Five-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia after initial colonoscopy according to the baseline risk stratification: a prospective study in 2452 asymptomatic Koreans

ObjectivePostpolypectomy surveillance guidelines for colorectal cancer introduced the concept of ‘risk stratification’; however, few studies have been conducted for validation of its usefulness. The aim of this study was to assess the 5-year incidence of advanced neoplasia recurrence based on the ri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGut Vol. 60; no. 11; pp. 1537 - 1543
Main Authors Chung, Su Jin, Kim, Young Sun, Yang, Sun Young, Song, Ji Hyun, Kim, Donghee, Park, Min Jung, Kim, Sang Gyun, Song, In Sung, Kim, Joo Sung
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology 01.11.2011
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0017-5749
1468-3288
1468-3288
DOI10.1136/gut.2010.232876

Cover

More Information
Summary:ObjectivePostpolypectomy surveillance guidelines for colorectal cancer introduced the concept of ‘risk stratification’; however, few studies have been conducted for validation of its usefulness. The aim of this study was to assess the 5-year incidence of advanced neoplasia recurrence based on the risk stratification scheme of the guidelines and to identify its risk factors.MethodsA prospective study of surveillance colonoscopy after screening colonoscopy was carried out at the Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center. 3803 asymptomatic Koreans aged 50–69 were enrolled prospectively and 5-year cumulative adenoma rates were analysed according to three risk groups: normal (no baseline adenoma), low-risk (1–2 adenomas <10 mm) and high-risk (an advanced adenoma or ≥3 adenomas) groups. The RR was computed by HR using Cox proportional regression after multivariate adjustments. The primary outcome was the 5-year cumulative rate of recurrent advanced adenoma in each risk category and the secondary outcome was its predictive factors.ResultsAmong 3803 subjects enrolled between 2003 and 2005, 2452 were followed-up within 5 years: 1242, 671 and 539 in the normal, low-risk and high-risk groups, respectively. Compared with the normal group, the low-risk group had a sufficiently low 5-year incidence and did not show an increased risk for subsequent advanced adenoma (2.4% vs 2.0%, HR=1.14, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.17). Conversely, a significantly higher 5-year rate (12.2%) and early recurrence (4.6, 7.4 and 9.6% at 1, 2 and 3 years) of advanced adenoma were revealed in the high-risk group. Among various patients and adenoma characteristics, only high-risk adenoma (HR=5.95, 95% CI 3.66 to 9.68) along with a number of ≥3 (HR=3.06, 95% CI 1.51 to 6.57) and size ≥10 mm (HR=3.02, 95% CI 1.80 to 5.06) were independent predictors.ConclusionsThe surveillance interval for low-risk patients could be extended beyond 5 years. Colonoscopic surveillance should be targeted to high-risk patients, and 3-year follow-up after initial polypectomy may be appropriate.
Bibliography:local:gutjnl;60/11/1537
href:gutjnl-60-1537.pdf
ArticleID:gutjnl232876
ark:/67375/NVC-TB2247QV-Z
istex:6EC2E66E7776E6467CA3EB12FFE081981DD7753B
PMID:21427200
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0017-5749
1468-3288
1468-3288
DOI:10.1136/gut.2010.232876