Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement

• Published in: BMJ (Online) Vol. 356; p. i6795
• Main Authors: Pinnock, Hilary, Barwick, Melanie, Carpenter, Christopher R, Eldridge, Sandra, Grandes, Gonzalo, Griffiths, Chris J, Rycroft-Malone, Jo, Meissner, Paul, Murray, Elizabeth, Patel, Anita, Sheikh, Aziz, Taylor, Stephanie J C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England British Medical Journal Publishing Group 06.03.2017; BMJ Publishing Group LTD; BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
• Subjects: Biomedical Research - standards; Delphi Technique; Funding; Health Plan Implementation - standards; Humans; Intervention; Medical research; Pragmatism; Quality; Research methodology; Research Methods & Reporting; Researchers; Science; Studies; Working groups; United Kingdom > UK
• ISSN: 0959-8138; 1756-1833; 1756-1833
• DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i6795

Implementation studies are often poorly reported and indexed, reducing their potential to inform initiatives to improve healthcare services. The Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) initiative aimed to develop guidelines for transparent and accurate reporting of implementation studies. Informed by the findings of a systematic review and a consensus-building e-Delphi exercise, an international working group of implementation science experts discussed and agreed the StaRI Checklist comprising 27 items. It prompts researchers to describe both the implementation strategy (techniques used to promote implementation of an underused evidence-based intervention) and the effectiveness of the intervention that was being implemented. An accompanying Explanation and Elaboration document (published in BMJ Open, doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013318) details each of the items, explains the rationale, and provides examples of good reporting practice. Adoption of StaRI will improve the reporting of implementation studies, potentially facilitating translation of research into practice and improving the health of individuals and populations.