Does increasing the grades of the knee osteoarthritis line drawing atlas alter its clinimetric properties?

Objectives: To (a) develop further logically derived line drawing atlases (LDAs) for grading radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA); and (b) determine which is superior using metrological criteria. Methods: A series of LDAs (−3 to +3, −4 to +4, and −5 to +5) were produced by (a) incorporating additio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 64; no. 10; pp. 1467 - 1473
Main Authors Wilkinson, C E, Carr, A J, Doherty, M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism 01.10.2005
BMJ
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI10.1136/ard.2004.033282

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objectives: To (a) develop further logically derived line drawing atlases (LDAs) for grading radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA); and (b) determine which is superior using metrological criteria. Methods: A series of LDAs (−3 to +3, −4 to +4, and −5 to +5) were produced by (a) incorporating additional grades for osteophyte and joint space width (JSW) above the 0–3 pilot LDA, over an equivalent range of disease; and (b) adding negative grades for JSW. 121 sets of bilateral knee radiographs (standing, anteroposterior plus flexed skyline), plus serial views of 68 tibiofemoral joints (TFJs) and 36 patellofemoral joints were scored twice by one observer for each LDA. Minimum JSW of 50 radiograph sets was directly measured and awarded a categorical grade dependent upon the boundaries of each LDA grade. Time taken to grade 30 randomly selected knee radiograph sets was measured. Results: Intraobserver reproducibility was similar for all LDAs, (weighted κ: JSW = 0.85–0.87; osteophyte = 0.77–0.79), with no deterioration with increasing grades. Criterion validity favoured the −5 to +5 LDA, which was also quickest to use. All atlases showed similar responsiveness (standardised response mean: medial TFJ JSW = 0.78–0.83; medial femoral osteophyte = 0.61–0.73), with most sites compromised by small sample size, little change in score, and high variation between subjects. Conclusions: A set of LDAs was created illustrating the full range of normality/abnormality likely to be encountered in a community study of knee pain or OA. Despite superior validity and equivalent reproducibility, improved responsiveness of the −5 to +5 LDA was not confirmed.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/NVC-ZJS71DGW-S
local:0641467
istex:277D136E348066C43EB1E33E1CA2DA9F1E237EE0
href:annrheumdis-64-1467.pdf
PMID:15817656
Correspondence to:
 Professor M Doherty
 Academic Rheumatology, Nottingham City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK; Michael.Doherty@nottingham.ac.ck
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/ard.2004.033282