Therapeutic options for neurocardiogenic syncope: a meta-analysis of randomised trials with and without blinding

BackgroundNeurocardiogenic syncope is a common condition with significant associated psychological and physical morbidity. The effectiveness of therapeutic options for neurocardiogenic syncope beyond placebo remains uncertain.MethodsThe primary endpoint was the risk ratio (RR) of spontaneously recur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOpen heart Vol. 11; no. 1; p. e002669
Main Authors Kaza, Nandita, Sorbini, Michela, Liu, Zhuang, Johal, Monika, Porter, Bradley, Nowbar, Alexandra, Levy, Shuli, Dani, Melanie, Taraborelli, Patricia, Eardley, Philip, Zuhair, Mohamed, Arnold, Ahran, Howard, James, Whinnett, Zachary I, Francis, Darrel P, Shun-Shin, Matthew J, Lim, Phang Boon, Keene, Daniel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England British Cardiovascular Society 18.06.2024
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
SeriesSystematic review
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2053-3624
2398-595X
2053-3624
DOI10.1136/openhrt-2024-002669

Cover

More Information
Summary:BackgroundNeurocardiogenic syncope is a common condition with significant associated psychological and physical morbidity. The effectiveness of therapeutic options for neurocardiogenic syncope beyond placebo remains uncertain.MethodsThe primary endpoint was the risk ratio (RR) of spontaneously recurring syncope following any therapeutic intervention. We also examined the effect of blinding on treatment efficacy. We identified all randomised trials which evaluated the effect of any pharmacological, device-based or supportive intervention on patients with a history of syncope. A systematic search was conducted on Medline, Embase, PubMed databases and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials from 1950 to 25 April 2023. Event rates, their RRs and 95% CIs were calculated, and a random-effects meta-analysis was conducted for each intervention. Data analysis was performed in R using RStudio.ResultsWe identified 47 eligible trials randomising 3518 patients. Blinded trials assessing syncope recurrence were neutral for beta blockers, fludrocortisone and conventional dual-chamber pacing but were favourable for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.63, p<0.001), midodrine (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.94, p=0.016) and closed-loop stimulation (CLS) pacing (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.35, p<0.001). Unblinded trials reported significant benefits for all therapy categories other than beta blockers and consistently showed larger benefits than blinded trials.ConclusionsUnder blinded conditions, SSRIs, midodrine and CLS pacing significantly reduced syncope recurrence. Future trials for syncope should be blinded to avoid overestimating treatment effects.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022330148.
Bibliography:Systematic review
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
NK and MS are joint first authors.
ISSN:2053-3624
2398-595X
2053-3624
DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2024-002669