Diagnosing childhood-onset inborn errors of metabolism by next-generation sequencing

BackgroundInborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) underlie a substantial proportion of paediatric disease burden but their genetic diagnosis can be challenging using the traditional approaches.MethodsWe designed and validated a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel of 226 IEM genes, created six overlapp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of disease in childhood Vol. 102; no. 11; pp. 1019 - 1029
Main Authors Ghosh, Arunabha, Schlecht, Helene, Heptinstall, Lesley E, Bassett, John K, Cartwright, Eleanor, Bhaskar, Sanjeev S, Urquhart, Jill, Broomfield, Alexander, Morris, Andrew AM, Jameson, Elisabeth, Schwahn, Bernd C, Walter, John H, Douzgou, Sofia, Murphy, Helen, Hendriksz, Chris, Sharma, Reena, Wilcox, Gisela, Crushell, Ellen, Monavari, Ardeshir A, Martin, Richard, Doolan, Anne, Senniappan, Senthil, Ramsden, Simon C, Jones, Simon A, Banka, Siddharth
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health 01.11.2017
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0003-9888
1468-2044
1468-2044
DOI10.1136/archdischild-2017-312738

Cover

More Information
Summary:BackgroundInborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) underlie a substantial proportion of paediatric disease burden but their genetic diagnosis can be challenging using the traditional approaches.MethodsWe designed and validated a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel of 226 IEM genes, created six overlapping phenotype-based subpanels and tested 102 individuals, who presented clinically with suspected childhood-onset IEMs.ResultsIn 51/102 individuals, NGS fully or partially established the molecular cause or identified other actionable diagnoses. Causal mutations were identified significantly more frequently when the biochemical phenotype suggested a specific IEM or a group of IEMs (p<0.0001), demonstrating the pivotal role of prior biochemical testing in guiding NGS analysis. The NGS panel helped to avoid further invasive, hazardous, lengthy or expensive investigations in 69% individuals (p<0.0001). Additional functional testing due to novel or unexpected findings had to be undertaken in only 3% of subjects, demonstrating that the use of NGS does not significantly increase the burden of subsequent follow-up testing. Even where a molecular diagnosis could not be achieved, NGS-based approach assisted in the management and counselling by reducing the likelihood of a high-penetrant genetic cause.ConclusionNGS has significant clinical utility for the diagnosis of IEMs. Biochemical testing and NGS analysis play complementary roles in the diagnosis of IEMs. Incorporating NGS into the diagnostic algorithm of IEMs can improve the accuracy of diagnosis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-9888
1468-2044
1468-2044
DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2017-312738