The implantable loop recorder in children

Objective:To evaluate use of the implantable loop recorder in children.Setting:Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow, UK.Method:Retrospective study of children who had an implantable loop recorder between September 1998 and October 2005.Results:38 devices were implanted in 34 children. Median ag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeart (British Cardiac Society) Vol. 94; no. 7; pp. 888 - 891
Main Authors Yeung, B, McLeod, K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society 01.07.2008
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1355-6037
1468-201X
1468-201X
DOI10.1136/hrt.2007.121855

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objective:To evaluate use of the implantable loop recorder in children.Setting:Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow, UK.Method:Retrospective study of children who had an implantable loop recorder between September 1998 and October 2005.Results:38 devices were implanted in 34 children. Median age at implantation 11.3 years (range 1.8–17.6); median follow-up period 15 months (range 2–58). The main presenting complaint was syncope in 26 (76.5%), seizures in 6 (17.6%) and palpitations in 2 (5.9%). After implantation, 19 (55.9%) patients had symptom recurrence. Of these, 11 were shown to have sinus rhythm during symptoms and 8 had an abnormal ECG. Four patients had asystole >3 seconds and were diagnosed with reflex asystolic syncope; 2 had polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. One patient who already had a diagnosis of long QT syndrome was shown to have ventricular ectopy during symptoms and β-blockers were increased. One patient had transient complete heart block during symptoms but refused a pacemaker. In almost half the patients (44.1%), symptoms resolved after implantation. Complications requiring removal of the device occurred in 6 (15.8%) implants.Conclusions:In children with syncope and palpitations, the implantable loop recorder appears to be an excellent method of effecting a “cure” in almost 50% of subjects. For those who remain symptomatic, it is successful in determining cardiac rhythm during symptoms, but the complication rate in children may be higher than that of adults.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/NVC-K27XFXPG-X
ArticleID:ht121855
istex:194654E27DDBC5324F06D9A551CE79495905858F
href:heartjnl-94-888.pdf
local:heartjnl;94/7/888
PMID:17664191
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
ISSN:1355-6037
1468-201X
1468-201X
DOI:10.1136/hrt.2007.121855