Associations between immune checkpoint inhibitor response, immune-related adverse events, and steroid use in RADIOHEAD: a prospective pan-tumor cohort study

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have led to enduring responses in subsets of patients with cancer. However, these responses carry the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can diminish the overall benefit of ICI treatment. While associations between irAE development and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal for immunotherapy of cancer Vol. 13; no. 5; p. e011545
Main Authors Quandt, Zoe, Lucas, Anastasia, Liang, Samantha I, Yang, EnJun, Stone, Samantha, Fadlullah, Muhammad Zaki Hidayatullah, Bayless, Nicholas L, Marr, Sara Siebel, Thompson, Marshall A, Padron, Lacey J, Bucktrout, Samantha, Butterfield, Lisa H, Tan, Aik Choon, Herold, Kevan C, Bluestone, Jeffrey A, Anderson, Mark S, Spencer, Christine N, Young, Arabella, Connolly, John E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 12.05.2025
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2051-1426
2051-1426
DOI10.1136/jitc-2025-011545

Cover

More Information
Summary:BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have led to enduring responses in subsets of patients with cancer. However, these responses carry the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can diminish the overall benefit of ICI treatment. While associations between irAE development and overall survival have been increasingly documented, there is a need for further understanding of these connections in large prospective real-world cohorts.MethodsThe Resistance Drivers for Immuno-Oncology Patients Interrogated by Harmonized Molecular Datasets (RADIOHEAD) study, a pan-tumor, prospective cohort of 1,070 individuals undergoing standard of care first-line ICI treatment, aims to identify factors driving irAEs and clinical response. Clinical data and longitudinal blood samples were collected prospectively at multiple time points from 49 community-based oncology clinics across the USA. Structured, harmonized clinical data underwent unbiased statistical analysis to uncover predictors of real-world overall survival (rwOS) and risk factors for irAEs.ResultsAcross 1,070 participants’ treatment courses, RADIOHEAD accumulated over 4,500 clinical data points. Patients experiencing any irAE (25.4%, n=272) exhibited significantly improved rwOS in the pan-tumor cohort (n=1,028, HR=0.41, 95% CI=(0.31, 0.55)). This association persisted when adjusting for age and metastatic disease in multivariate time-dependent Cox proportional hazard analysis, and was consistent across major tumor subtypes, including lung cancer and melanoma. Skin and endocrine irAEs of any grade were strongly associated with improved rwOS (Cox proportional hazard analysis, skin, p=2.03e−05; endocrine, p=0.0006). In this real-world cohort, the irAE rate appeared lower than those reported in clinical trials. Patients receiving corticosteroids prior to initiation of ICI treatment had significantly worse survival outcomes than non-users (HR 1.37, p=0.0054), with a stronger association with systemic steroid use (HR 1.75, p=0.0022). The risk of irAE was increased by exposure to combination immunotherapy relative to monotherapy (OR 4.17, p=2.8e−7), zoster vaccine (OR 2.4, p=5.2e−05), and decreased by prior chemotherapy (OR 1.69, p=0.0005).ConclusionThe RADIOHEAD cohort is a well-powered, real-world cohort that clearly demonstrates the association between irAE development with improved response and baseline steroid use with worse response to ICI treatment after adjustment for survival bias.
Bibliography:Original research
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2051-1426
2051-1426
DOI:10.1136/jitc-2025-011545