Test–retest variability of intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude for dynamic contour tonometry: a multicentre study

AimsTo assess the test–retest variability of intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) measurements utilising dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and to evaluate possible influential factors.MethodsThe study included 350 consecutive subjects (175 glaucoma, 175 control; one eye per subj...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of ophthalmology Vol. 94; no. 4; pp. 419 - 423
Main Authors Fogagnolo, P, Figus, M, Frezzotti, P, Iester, M, Oddone, F, Zeppieri, M, Ferreras, A, Brusini, P, Rossetti, L, Orzalesi, N
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.04.2010
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0007-1161
1468-2079
1468-2079
DOI10.1136/bjo.2009.165142

Cover

More Information
Summary:AimsTo assess the test–retest variability of intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) measurements utilising dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and to evaluate possible influential factors.MethodsThe study included 350 consecutive subjects (175 glaucoma, 175 control; one eye per subject) from seven European centres. IOP was measured once with a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and twice by DCT (DCT1, DCT2) in a randomised sequence. OPA was also recorded for both DCT measurements. Differences (DCT1-DCT2; OPA1-OPA2; GAT-DCT1; GAT-DCT2) were assessed using the t test. The intraclass coefficient of correlation (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CoV) for DCT and OPA were calculated.ResultsDCT1 was 0.6±1.6 mm Hg higher than DCT2 (p<0.001); OPA1 was 0.1±0.7 mm Hg higher than OPA2 (p=0.02). Results were not influenced by randomisation test order. In both glaucoma and normal subjects, DCT and OPA showed ICC>0.90 and >0.76, and CoV=4.8–5.0% and 10.3–10.5%, respectively. DCT1 and 2 were 2.4±2.6 and 1.8±2.6 mm Hg higher respectively than GAT (p<0.001).DiscussionDCT test–retest variability was almost perfect for IOP and good for OPA. Tonometry measurements with DCT tended to be overestimated compared with GAT.
Bibliography:PMID:19833616
local:bjophthalmol;94/4/419
ark:/67375/NVC-GKT582DG-M
href:bjophthalmol-94-419.pdf
Preliminary results presented at ARVO, Fort Lauderdale, USA, 3–7 May 2009.
ArticleID:bjo165142
istex:F19A8F05B5EE7735F297454D31E35BCB230F74EF
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0007-1161
1468-2079
1468-2079
DOI:10.1136/bjo.2009.165142