Test–retest variability of intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude for dynamic contour tonometry: a multicentre study
AimsTo assess the test–retest variability of intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) measurements utilising dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and to evaluate possible influential factors.MethodsThe study included 350 consecutive subjects (175 glaucoma, 175 control; one eye per subj...
Saved in:
Published in | British journal of ophthalmology Vol. 94; no. 4; pp. 419 - 423 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
01.04.2010
BMJ Publishing Group BMJ Publishing Group LTD |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0007-1161 1468-2079 1468-2079 |
DOI | 10.1136/bjo.2009.165142 |
Cover
Summary: | AimsTo assess the test–retest variability of intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) measurements utilising dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and to evaluate possible influential factors.MethodsThe study included 350 consecutive subjects (175 glaucoma, 175 control; one eye per subject) from seven European centres. IOP was measured once with a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and twice by DCT (DCT1, DCT2) in a randomised sequence. OPA was also recorded for both DCT measurements. Differences (DCT1-DCT2; OPA1-OPA2; GAT-DCT1; GAT-DCT2) were assessed using the t test. The intraclass coefficient of correlation (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CoV) for DCT and OPA were calculated.ResultsDCT1 was 0.6±1.6 mm Hg higher than DCT2 (p<0.001); OPA1 was 0.1±0.7 mm Hg higher than OPA2 (p=0.02). Results were not influenced by randomisation test order. In both glaucoma and normal subjects, DCT and OPA showed ICC>0.90 and >0.76, and CoV=4.8–5.0% and 10.3–10.5%, respectively. DCT1 and 2 were 2.4±2.6 and 1.8±2.6 mm Hg higher respectively than GAT (p<0.001).DiscussionDCT test–retest variability was almost perfect for IOP and good for OPA. Tonometry measurements with DCT tended to be overestimated compared with GAT. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | PMID:19833616 local:bjophthalmol;94/4/419 ark:/67375/NVC-GKT582DG-M href:bjophthalmol-94-419.pdf Preliminary results presented at ARVO, Fort Lauderdale, USA, 3–7 May 2009. ArticleID:bjo165142 istex:F19A8F05B5EE7735F297454D31E35BCB230F74EF ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0007-1161 1468-2079 1468-2079 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bjo.2009.165142 |