Interleukin 1 alpha and beta production by cells isolated from membranes around aseptically loose total joint replacements
Aseptic loosening of joint prostheses is accompanied by local osteolysis. To determine whether local production of interleukin 1 might contribute to such lysis, the number of interleukin 1 secreting cells in the pseudosynovial membrane surrounding prostheses was measured. Interleukin 1 alpha and bet...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 51; no. 5; pp. 638 - 642 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism
01.05.1992
BMJ Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0003-4967 1468-2060 1468-2060 |
DOI | 10.1136/ard.51.5.638 |
Cover
Summary: | Aseptic loosening of joint prostheses is accompanied by local osteolysis. To determine whether local production of interleukin 1 might contribute to such lysis, the number of interleukin 1 secreting cells in the pseudosynovial membrane surrounding prostheses was measured. Interleukin 1 alpha and beta secreting cells were identified by ELISPOT, a sensitive cytokine secreting assay. The proportion of interleukin 1 beta secreting cells in pseudosynovial membrane was comparable with the proportion occurring in the synovium of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and higher than that in normal subjects and patients with osteoarthritis. The proportion of interleukin 1 alpha producing cells was higher in pseudosynovial membrane than in diseased synovium. Overall, higher numbers of interleukin 1 beta than interleukin 1 alpha secreting cells were detected. A correlation was observed between the number of cells in pseudosynovial membrane producing interleukin 1 beta and those producing interleukin 1 alpha. When divided into area of origin, tissue samples from the femoral area contained a higher proportion of interleukin 1 beta producing cells than tissue in the acetabular or capsular regions, though due to variance within each group this difference did not reach significance. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/NVC-V92WGXB5-V local:annrheumdis;51/5/638 istex:9D383CECA0A24E5EE07304BADAD99B28370E7E01 PMID:1616329 href:annrheumdis-51-638.pdf ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0003-4967 1468-2060 1468-2060 |
DOI: | 10.1136/ard.51.5.638 |