Performance and safety of the PRICO closed-loop oxygen saturation targeting system in neonates: pragmatic multicentre cross-over study (TarOx Study)
ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the performance of the fabian-Predictive-Intelligent-Control-of-Oxygenation (PRICO) system for automated control of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2).DesignMulticentre randomised cross-over study.SettingFive neonatal intensive care units experienced with aut...
Saved in:
Published in | BMJ paediatrics open Vol. 8; no. 1; p. e002583 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
16.07.2024
BMJ Publishing Group LTD BMJ Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2399-9772 2399-9772 |
DOI | 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002583 |
Cover
Summary: | ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the performance of the fabian-Predictive-Intelligent-Control-of-Oxygenation (PRICO) system for automated control of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2).DesignMulticentre randomised cross-over study.SettingFive neonatal intensive care units experienced with automated control of FiO2 and the fabian ventilator.Patients39 infants: median gestational age of 27 weeks (IQR: 26–30), postnatal age 7 days (IQR: 2–17), weight 1120 g (IQR: 915–1588), FiO2 0.32 (IQR: 0.22–0.43) receiving both non-invasive (27) and invasive (12) respiratory support.InterventionRandomised sequential 24-hour periods of automated and manual FiO2 control.Main outcome measuresProportion (%) of time in normoxaemia (90%–95% with FiO2>0.21 and 90%–100% when FiO2=0.21) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were severe hypoxaemia (<80%) and severe hyperoxaemia (>98% with FiO2>0.21) and prevalence of episodes ≥60 s at these two SpO2 extremes.ResultsDuring automated control, subjects spent more time in normoxaemia (74%±22% vs 51%±22%, p<0.001) with less time above and below (<90% (9%±8% vs 12%±11%, p<0.001) and >95% with FiO2>0.21 (16%±19% vs 35%±24%) p<0.001). They spent less time in severe hyperoxaemia (1% (0%–3.5%) vs 5% (1%–10%), p<0.001) but exposure to severe hypoxaemia was low in both arms and not different. The differences in prolonged episodes of SpO2 were consistent with the times at extremes.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the ability of the PRICO automated oxygen control algorithm to improve the maintenance of SpO2 in normoxaemia and to avoid hyperoxaemia without increasing hypoxaemia. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Original research ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 All the authors or their institutions received funding for this and additional projects from Vyaire Medical. Additional supplemental material is published online only. To view, please visit the journal online (https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002583). Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise. |
ISSN: | 2399-9772 2399-9772 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002583 |