A comparison of transoesophageal atrial pacing and direct current cardioversion for the termination of atrial flutter: a prospective, randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVE--To compare the safety and efficacy of transoesophageal atrial pacing (TAP) with an easily swallowed pill electrode and direct current cardioversion (DCC) in patients with atrial flutter that was refractory to appropriate medical treatment. DESIGN--Prospective, randomised clinical trial. S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish Heart Journal Vol. 69; no. 6; pp. 530 - 535
Main Authors Tucker, K J, Wilson, C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society 01.06.1993
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0007-0769
1468-201X
2053-5864
DOI10.1136/hrt.69.6.530

Cover

More Information
Summary:OBJECTIVE--To compare the safety and efficacy of transoesophageal atrial pacing (TAP) with an easily swallowed pill electrode and direct current cardioversion (DCC) in patients with atrial flutter that was refractory to appropriate medical treatment. DESIGN--Prospective, randomised clinical trial. SETTING--Community based United States naval hospital. SUBJECTS--Twenty one consecutive patients with refractory atrial flutter selected consecutively from the inpatient cardiology consultation service. All patients were haemodynamically stable and medical treatment with a class IA or IC antiarrhythmic agent had failed. Eleven patients were treated with TAP and 10 patients were treated with DCC. INTERVENTIONS--Digoxin was given to all patients to control the ventricular rate to < 100/minute. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Conversion to normal sinus rhythm and arrhythmias after cardioversion. RESULTS--Conversion to normal sinus rhythm was similar in both groups (TAP 8/11, DCC 9/10, p = 0.31). Arrhythmias after cardioversion including third degree heart block and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia were more frequent in the DCC group (TAP 0/11, DCC 6/10, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION--Transoesophageal atrial pacing with an easily swallowed pill electrode is safe, well tolerated, and is as efficacious as DCC for refractory atrial flutter.
Bibliography:local:heartjnl;69/6/530
istex:E0B8C2B9D7506A6657939C318D2A59A1914B9E10
href:heartjnl-69-530.pdf
ark:/67375/NVC-M6JD42P0-8
PMID:8343321
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0007-0769
1468-201X
2053-5864
DOI:10.1136/hrt.69.6.530