Methotrexate versus conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the treatment of non-anterior sarcoidosis-associated uveitis

AimsTo compare the safety and efficacy of methotrexate (MTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) in non-anterior sarcoidosis-associated uveitis.MethodsRetrospective study including non-anterior sarcoidosis-associated uveitis according to the revised International Workshop on Ocular S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of ophthalmology Vol. 109; no. 1; pp. 34 - 40
Main Authors Leclercq, Mathilde, Sève, Pascal, Biard, Lucie, Vautier, Mathieu, Maalouf, Georgina, Leroux, Gaëlle, Domont, Fanny, Toutée, Adélaïde, Fardeau, Christine, Sales de Gauzy, Thomas, Touhami, Sara, Kodjikian, Laurent, Cacoub, Patrice, Bodaghi, Bahram, Saadoun, David, Desbois, Anne-Claire
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.01.2025
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0007-1161
1468-2079
1468-2079
DOI10.1136/bjo-2024-325163

Cover

More Information
Summary:AimsTo compare the safety and efficacy of methotrexate (MTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) in non-anterior sarcoidosis-associated uveitis.MethodsRetrospective study including non-anterior sarcoidosis-associated uveitis according to the revised International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis criteria. The primary outcome was defined as the median time to relapse or occurrence of serious adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation.Results58 patients with non-anterior sarcoidosis-associated uveitis (MTX (n=33), MMF (n=16) and AZA (n=9)) were included. The time to treatment failure (ie, primary outcome) after adjustment for corticosteroids dose and the presence of vasculitis was significantly higher with MTX (median time of 34.5 months with MTX (IQR: 11.8 –not reached) vs 8.4 months (3.1–22.9) with MMF and 16.8 months (8.0–90.1) with AZA (p=0.020)). The risk of relapse at 12 months was more than twice lower in MTX as compared with MMF (p=0.046). Low visual acuity at the last visit was significantly lower with MTX (4% vs 9% in MMF vs 57% in AZA group (p=0.008)). Regarding all 75 lines of treatment (MTX (n=39), MMF (n=24) and AZA (n=12)), MTX was more effective than MMF and AZA to obtain treatment response at 3 months (OR 10.85; 95% CI 1.13 to 104.6; p=0.039). Significant corticosteroid-sparing effect at 12 months (p=0.035) was only observed under MTX. Serious adverse events were observed in 6/39 (15%), 5/24 (21%) and 2/12 (17%) with MTX, MMF and AZA, respectively.ConclusionIn non-anterior sarcoidosis-associated uveitis, MTX seems to be more efficient compared with AZA and MMF and with an acceptable safety profile.
Bibliography:Clinical science
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1161
1468-2079
1468-2079
DOI:10.1136/bjo-2024-325163