Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with rheumatic aortic stenosis

BackgroundRheumatic heart disease (RHD) accounts for the highest number of deaths from valvular heart disease globally. Yet, rheumatic aortic stenosis (AS) was excluded from landmark studies investigating the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We aimed to describe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeart (British Cardiac Society) Vol. 108; no. 15; pp. 1225 - 1233
Main Authors Okuno, Taishi, Tomii, Daijiro, Buffle, Eric, Lanz, Jonas, Ryffel, Christoph, Demirel, Caglayan, Hashemi, Suliman, Hagemeyer, Daniel, Papadis, Athanasios, Heg, Dik, Praz, Fabien, Stortecky, Stefan, Windecker, Stephan, Pilgrim, Thomas
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society 01.08.2022
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1355-6037
1468-201X
1468-201X
DOI10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320531

Cover

More Information
Summary:BackgroundRheumatic heart disease (RHD) accounts for the highest number of deaths from valvular heart disease globally. Yet, rheumatic aortic stenosis (AS) was excluded from landmark studies investigating the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We aimed to describe the clinical and anatomical characteristics of patients with rheumatic AS undergoing TAVI, and to compare procedural and clinical outcomes with patients undergoing TAVI for degenerative AS.MethodsIn a prospective TAVI registry, patients with rheumatic AS were identified based on International Classification of Diseases version 10 codes and/or a documented history of acute rheumatic fever and/or the World Heart Federation criteria for echocardiographic diagnosis of RHD, and were propensity score-matched in a 1:4 ratio to patients with degenerative AS.ResultsAmong 2329 patients undergoing TAVI, 105 (4.5%) had rheumatic AS. Compared with patients with degenerative AS, patients with rheumatic AS were more commonly female, older, had higher surgical risk and more commonly suffered from multivalvular heart disease. In the unmatched cohort, both technical success (85.7% vs 85.9%, p=0.887) and 1-year cardiovascular mortality (10.0% vs 8.6%; HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.18, p=0.656) were comparable between patients with rheumatic and degenerative AS. In contrast, patients with rheumatic AS had lower rates of 30-day and 1-year cardiovascular mortality compared with matched patients with degenerative AS (1.9% vs 8.9%, adjusted HR (HRadj) 0.18, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.80, p=0.024; and 10.0% vs 20.3%, HRadj 0.44, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.84, p=0.012, respectively).ConclusionTAVI may be a safe and effective treatment strategy for selected elderly patients with rheumatic AS.Trial registration number NCT01368250.
Bibliography:Original research
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1355-6037
1468-201X
1468-201X
DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320531