TMPRSS2-ERG confers resistance to antiandrogens: mechanism and therapeutic implications
Approximately 50% of prostate cancer (PCa) patients harbor fusions involving the and genes. Despite this, tailored therapies targeting the fused gene, , remain undeveloped. Our study analyzed biopsy samples from two clinical trials assessing the efficacies of androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibit...
Saved in:
Published in | bioRxiv |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article Paper |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
20.01.2025
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
Edition | 1.1 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2692-8205 2692-8205 |
DOI | 10.1101/2025.01.17.633582 |
Cover
Summary: | Approximately 50% of prostate cancer (PCa) patients harbor fusions involving the
and
genes. Despite this, tailored therapies targeting the fused gene,
, remain undeveloped. Our study analyzed biopsy samples from two clinical trials assessing the efficacies of androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitors (ARSIs). The results revealed that
promotes resistance to ARSIs and is associated with elevated levels of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Subsequent assays showed that GR directly interacts with tERG, alleviates allosteric autoinhibition and prevents chemotherapy-induced tERG degradation. In PCa models, either inhibiting GR or lowering cortisol levels suppressed tumor growth in tERG-positive models, but not in fusion-negative models. In addition, patient-derived fusion-positive xenografts displayed enhanced sensitivity to combined GR and AR inhibitors. Collectively, these findings highlight
as a new biomarker and propose that simultaneous inhibition of GR and AR may specifically benefit
-positine patients. However, GR stimulatory corticosteroid therapies may not be advisable for this patient subgroup. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Working Papers-1 ObjectType-Working Paper/Pre-Print-1 content type line 50 ObjectType-Working Paper/Pre-Print-3 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Competing Interest Statement: E.C. obtained funding from Genentech, Sanofi, AbbVie, Astra Zeneca, Foghorn Pharmaceuticals, Kronos Bio, MacroGenics, Janssen Research, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Forma Pharmaceuticals, Gilead and Zenith Epigenetics and is consultant of DotQuant. A.G.S. reports that the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) with Astellas. Resources are provided by this CRADA to the NCI. A.G.S. received no personal funding from this CRADA but is the primary investigator of the CRADA. W.V.W. obtained research funding from AstraZeneca, Bayer AG and Sanofi. H.H. and is an employee and shareholder of Corcept Therapeutics. A.E.G. is a shareholder of Corcept Therapeutics Inc. and Exelixis Inc. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the herein reported study. |
ISSN: | 2692-8205 2692-8205 |
DOI: | 10.1101/2025.01.17.633582 |