THU0124 Variability of Intended Copies for Etanercept in Five Countries

BackgroundThe term “intended copy” (IC) is used to describe biotherapeutic medicinal products that have not been approved via a regulatory pathway aligned with WHO's Similar Biotherapeutic Product (SBP) guidelines to ensure quality, safety and efficacy. In some countries, the WHO SBP guidelines...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 75; no. Suppl 2; pp. 224 - 225
Main Authors Scheinberg, M., Castaneda Hernandez, G., Li, M., Rao, U.R., Singh, E., Mahgoub, E., Coindreau, J., O'Brien, J., Vicik, S.M., Fitzpatrick, B., Hassett, B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Limited 01.06.2016
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.1449

Cover

More Information
Summary:BackgroundThe term “intended copy” (IC) is used to describe biotherapeutic medicinal products that have not been approved via a regulatory pathway aligned with WHO's Similar Biotherapeutic Product (SBP) guidelines to ensure quality, safety and efficacy. In some countries, the WHO SBP guidelines are not being consistently adopted or implemented and ICs of etanercept (ETN), originally developed by Pfizer (Wyeth), are being marketed as biosimilar versions, although rigorous regulatory criteria for analytical testing and clinical demonstration of biosimilarity may not have been fully assessed.ObjectivesPfizer conducted an analytical assessment of multiple lots of 4 ICs, and a single lot of 1 IC of ETN that have received marketing approval in various global markets. The results for critical quality attributes are compared with the licensed specifications of ETN.MethodsICs of ETN manufactured by Shanghai CP Guojian (China), Lafrancol (Colombia), Cipla (India), Probiomed (Mexico) and AryoGen (Iran) were assessed. Analyses included a subset of the release tests for ETN, together with evaluation by additional characterization methods to provide appropriate comparative detail on biochemical composition. Results for each product were evaluated against licensed specifications and historical ranges for ETN and ETN reference standard for the additional characterization test results.ResultsNone of the ICs met all of the individual product quality criteria that Pfizer apply for analytical comparability, although each product met some of the requirements. Principal differences were observed during assessments of identity (as measured by tryptic peptide map high-performance liquid chromatography [HPLC]), purity (as measured by hydrophobic interaction chromatography [HIC]), degree of aggregation (size exclusion [SE] HPLC), distribution of charged species (isoelectric focusing [IEF]/anion exchange [AEX] chromatography) and carbohydrate profile (N-linked oligosaccharide map). These are shown in the table.Key structural differences*IC ManufacturerShanghai CP GuojianLafrancolCiplaProbiomedAryoGenIdentity (tryptic peptide map HPLC): AtypicalYAggregation (SE HPLC): above specification limitYYYCharged species (IEF/AEX chromatography): Differences in distribution vs ETNYYYYPurity (HIC): Atypical profileYYYCarbohydrate profile (N-linked oligosaccharide map): Atypical (additional species not in ETN profile)YY*Relative to ETN release specifications and additional characterization historical data. Y, yes.ConclusionsWhile a degree of structural similarity with ETN was observed for each of the ICs analyzed, a number of significant structural and biochemical differences were noted. None of the products analyzed meet the combination of release specification and additional characterization criteria Pfizer typically apply to support a comparability assessment with ETN.Disclosure of InterestM. Scheinberg Consultant for: Pfizer Boehringer Mannenheim, Genzyme, Orygen, GSK, G. Castaneda Hernandez Consultant for: Abbvie, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli-Lilly, Laboratorios Liomont, Laboratorios Sophia, Medix, Merck-Serono, Merck, Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi, Speakers bureau: Amgen, Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca, Bayer, Eli-Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Laboratorios Liomont, Laboratorios Sophia, Medix, Merck-Serono, Merck, Sharp and Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and UC, M. Li: None declared, U. R. Rao Consultant for: Pfizer, Sanofi, E. Singh Shareholder of: Pfizer, Employee of: Pfizer, E. Mahgoub Shareholder of: Pfizer, Employee of: Pfizer, J. Coindreau Shareholder of: Pfizer, Employee of: Pfizer, J. O'Brien Shareholder of: Pfizer, Employee of: Pfizer, S. M. Vicik Shareholder of: Pfizer, Employee of: Pfizer, B. Fitzpatrick Shareholder of: Pfizer, Employee of: Pfizer, B. Hassett Shareholder of: Pfizer, Employee of: Pfizer
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.1449