Imaging in the Evaluation of Endoscopic or Surgical Treatment for Achalasia

• Published in: Gastroenterology research and practice Vol. 2016; no. 2016; pp. 1 - 4
• Main Authors: Giuseppe, Guglielmi, Scaglione, M., Rossi, C., Lassandro, Francesco, Roberto, Luca, D’Amora, Marilina, Mardighian, Andrea, Palladino, Diego, Gatta, Gianluca
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cairo, Egypt Hindawi Publishing Corporation 01.01.2016; John Wiley & Sons, Inc; Wiley
• Subjects: Achalasia; Barium; Care and treatment; Colleges & universities; Comparative analysis; Endoscopy; Gastroesophageal reflux; Myotomy; Radiology; Surgery
• ISSN: 1687-6121; 1687-630X
• DOI: 10.1155/2016/2657876

Purpose. Aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of the endoscopic (pneumatic dilation) versus surgical (Heller myotomy) treatment in patients affected by esophageal achalasia using barium X-ray examination of the digestive tract performed before and after the treatment. Materials and Methods. 19 patients (10 males and 9 females) were enrolled in this study; each patient underwent a barium X-ray examination to evaluate the esophageal diameter and the height of the barium column before and after endoscopic or surgical treatment. Results. The mean variation of oesophageal diameter before and after treatment is −2.1 mm for surgery and 1.74 mm for pneumatic dilation (OR 0.167, CI 95% 0.02–1.419, and P: 0.10). The variations of all variables, with the exception of the oesophageal diameter variation, are strongly related to the treatment performed. Conclusions. The barium X-ray study of the digestive tract, performed before and after different treatment approaches, demonstrates that the surgical treatment has to be considered as the treatment of choice of achalasia, reserving endoscopic treatment to patients with high operative risk and refusing surgery.