Robust Monotone Submodular Function Maximization

We consider a robust formulation, introduced by Krause et al. (2008), of the classical cardinality constrained monotone submodular function maximization problem, and give the first constant factor approximation results. The robustness considered is w.r.t. adversarial removal of up to \(\tau\) elemen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Orlin, James B, Schulz, Andreas S, Rajan Udwani
Format Paper Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 15.11.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2331-8422
DOI10.48550/arxiv.1507.06616

Cover

More Information
Summary:We consider a robust formulation, introduced by Krause et al. (2008), of the classical cardinality constrained monotone submodular function maximization problem, and give the first constant factor approximation results. The robustness considered is w.r.t. adversarial removal of up to \(\tau\) elements from the chosen set. For the fundamental case of \(\tau=1\), we give a deterministic \((1-1/e)-1/\Theta(m)\) approximation algorithm, where \(m\) is an input parameter and number of queries scale as \(O(n^{m+1})\). In the process, we develop a deterministic \((1-1/e)-1/\Theta(m)\) approximate greedy algorithm for bi-objective maximization of (two) monotone submodular functions. Generalizing the ideas and using a result from Chekuri et al. (2010), we show a randomized \((1-1/e)-\epsilon\) approximation for constant \(\tau\) and \(\epsilon\leq \frac{1}{\tilde{\Omega}(\tau)}\), making \(O(n^{1/\epsilon^3})\) queries. Further, for \(\tau\ll \sqrt{k}\), we give a fast and practical 0.387 algorithm. Finally, we also give a black box result result for the much more general setting of robust maximization subject to an Independence System.
Bibliography:SourceType-Working Papers-1
ObjectType-Working Paper/Pre-Print-1
content type line 50
ISSN:2331-8422
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.1507.06616