Risk and Safety Attitudes Among Conscripts During Compulsory Military Training
The purpose was to examine relationships between individual characteristics, leadership, group cohesion, and risk and safety attitudes among Swedish conscripts (N = 389). The longitudinal questionnaire study revealed positive associations between safety-specific leadership and safety attitudes, whil...
Saved in:
Published in | Military psychology Vol. 23; no. 6; pp. 659 - 684 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Washington
Taylor & Francis
01.11.2011
Taylor & Francis Group Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0899-5605 1532-7876 1532-7876 |
DOI | 10.1080/08995605.2011.616815 |
Cover
Summary: | The purpose was to examine relationships between individual characteristics, leadership, group cohesion, and risk and safety attitudes among Swedish conscripts (N = 389). The longitudinal questionnaire study revealed positive associations between safety-specific leadership and safety attitudes, while safety skepticism and leadership promoting risk taking were associated with stronger attitudes of necessary risk taking. Attitudes of unnecessary risk taking, on the other hand, were negatively related to safety-specific leadership and group cohesion, but positively associated with safety fatalism and leadership promoting risk taking. Decreases in safety attitudes were found between basic and unit training. The results highlight the importance of a balanced leadership. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0899-5605 1532-7876 1532-7876 |
DOI: | 10.1080/08995605.2011.616815 |