Risk and Safety Attitudes Among Conscripts During Compulsory Military Training

The purpose was to examine relationships between individual characteristics, leadership, group cohesion, and risk and safety attitudes among Swedish conscripts (N = 389). The longitudinal questionnaire study revealed positive associations between safety-specific leadership and safety attitudes, whil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMilitary psychology Vol. 23; no. 6; pp. 659 - 684
Main Authors Börjesson, M, Österberg, J, Enander, A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington Taylor & Francis 01.11.2011
Taylor & Francis Group
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0899-5605
1532-7876
1532-7876
DOI10.1080/08995605.2011.616815

Cover

More Information
Summary:The purpose was to examine relationships between individual characteristics, leadership, group cohesion, and risk and safety attitudes among Swedish conscripts (N = 389). The longitudinal questionnaire study revealed positive associations between safety-specific leadership and safety attitudes, while safety skepticism and leadership promoting risk taking were associated with stronger attitudes of necessary risk taking. Attitudes of unnecessary risk taking, on the other hand, were negatively related to safety-specific leadership and group cohesion, but positively associated with safety fatalism and leadership promoting risk taking. Decreases in safety attitudes were found between basic and unit training. The results highlight the importance of a balanced leadership.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0899-5605
1532-7876
1532-7876
DOI:10.1080/08995605.2011.616815