Effect of Availability of Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement on Clinical Practice
In Germany, the use of TAVR increased substantially between 2007 and 2013, whereas the use of surgical aortic-valve replacement decreased modestly. Patients undergoing TAVR were older and at higher operative risk. Mortality decreased over time in both groups. Surgical aortic-valve replacement was a...
Saved in:
Published in | The New England journal of medicine Vol. 373; no. 25; pp. 2438 - 2447 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Massachusetts Medical Society
17.12.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0028-4793 1533-4406 1533-4406 |
DOI | 10.1056/NEJMoa1500893 |
Cover
Summary: | In Germany, the use of TAVR increased substantially between 2007 and 2013, whereas the use of surgical aortic-valve replacement decreased modestly. Patients undergoing TAVR were older and at higher operative risk. Mortality decreased over time in both groups.
Surgical aortic-valve replacement was a major clinical advance in the 1960s
1
and offered a cure for aortic stenosis, a condition for which no disease-modifying pharmacologic therapy is available. Surgical replacement remained the only treatment option until 2007, when devices for transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) were approved.
2
Since then, TAVR has become established not only as an effective therapy for patients for whom surgery is not an option
3
but also as an alternative for high-risk patients.
4
The introduction of TAVR has led to questions about the effect of this relatively new approach on current clinical practice and its effect on surgical . . . |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMoa1500893 |