The treatment of flat areas and depressions in automated drainage analysis of raster digital elevation models

• Published in: Hydrological processes Vol. 12; no. 6; pp. 843 - 855
• Main Authors: Martz, Lawrence W., Garbrecht, Jurgen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: West Sussex John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.05.1998; Wiley
• Subjects: automated drainage analysis; closed depressions; digital elevation models; Earth sciences; Earth, ocean, space; Exact sciences and technology; flat areas; Hydrology; Hydrology. Hydrogeology; watershed; United States; Oklahoma; algorithms; drainage basins; models; depressions; hydrology; drainage; drainage patterns; digital simulation; automated analysis; North America; errors; direction
• ISSN: 0885-6087; 1099-1085
• DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199805)12:6<843::AID-HYP658>3.0.CO;2-R

Methods developed to process raster digital elevation models (DEM) automatically in order to delineate and measure the properties of drainage networks and drainage basins are being recognized as potentially valuable tools for the topographic parameterization of hydrological models. All of these methods ultimately rely on some form of overland flow simulation to define drainage courses and catchment areas and, therefore, have difficulty dealing with closed depressions and flat areas on digital land surface models. Some fundamental assumptions about the nature of these problem topographic features in DEM are implicit in the various techniques developed to deal with them in automated drainage analysis. The principal assumptions are: (1) that closed depressions and flat areas are spurious features that arise from data errors and limitations of DEM resolution; (2) that flow directions across flat areas are determined solely by adjacent cells of lower elevation; and (3) that closed depressions are caused exclusively by the underestimation of DEM elevations. It is argued that while the first of these assumptions is reasonable, given the quality of DEMs generally available for hydrological analysis, the others are not. Rather it seems more likely that depressions are caused by both under‐ and overestimation errors and that flow directions across flat areas are determined by the distribution of both higher and lower elevations surrounding flat areas. Two new algorithms are introduced that are based on more reasonable assumptions about the nature of flat areas and depressions, and produce more realistic results in application. These algorithms allow breaching of depression outlets and consider the distribution of both higher and lower elevations in assigning flow directions on flat areas. The results of applying these algorithms to some real and hypothetical landscapes are presented. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.