Conjunctive interpretation of core and log data through association of the effective and total porosity models

Traditionally, the deterministic open-hole petrophysical evaluation of non-Archie primary reservoirs has been undertaken exclusively within one or other of two intergranular systems, those of effective and total porosity. Yet, these interpretative models can be considered conjunctively with the obje...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCore-Log Integration Vol. 136; no. 1; pp. 213 - 223
Main Author Worthington, P. F.
Format Book Chapter Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published The Geological Society of London 1998
The Geological Society, London
Geological Society of London (GSL)
SeriesGeological Society, London, Special Publications
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISBN1862390169
9781862390164
ISSN0305-8719
2041-4927
DOI10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.136.01.18

Cover

More Information
Summary:Traditionally, the deterministic open-hole petrophysical evaluation of non-Archie primary reservoirs has been undertaken exclusively within one or other of two intergranular systems, those of effective and total porosity. Yet, these interpretative models can be considered conjunctively with the object of inter-model validation of petrophysical interpretation. These considerations reveal ways of demonstrating the numerical compatibility of the two approaches. The compatibility is expressed in terms of equalities that contain core-calibrated, log-derived parameters and that are founded on the underlying petrophysics. The equalities must be satisfied if the petrophysical procedures are to be applied consistently and correctly. These inter-model algorithms constitute a basis for a proposed quality assurance scheme in well-log interpretation that goes beyond tying log data back to core. They suggest quality control points at which core-calibrated log data can be examined to assess the meaningfulness and performance of interpretation procedures at different stages of the petrophysical evaluation process. These assessments form a basis for the development of measures of confidence in the practice of open-hole well-log interpretation for porosity and hydrocarbon saturation, regardless of whether the interpretation is ultimately set in the context of the effective or the total porosity model. More generally, the subject matter forms part of a broader thrust to introduce a systematic quality assurance culture into open-hole petrophysical interpretation.
Bibliography:istex:EA757218080D37E69659B69C1D3E4E1864CED74A
ark:/67375/996-BRTQ1P0M-7
ISBN:1862390169
9781862390164
ISSN:0305-8719
2041-4927
DOI:10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.136.01.18