Defective Recognition of One's Own Actions in Patients With Schizophrenia

• Published in: The American journal of psychiatry Vol. 158; no. 3; pp. 454 - 459
• Main Authors: Franck, Nicolas, Farrer, Chlöé, Georgieff, Nicolas, Marie-Cardine, Michel, Daléry, Jean, d'Amato, Thierry, Jeannerod, Marc
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Washington, DC American Psychiatric Publishing 01.03.2001; American Psychiatric Association
• Subjects: Adult; Adult and adolescent clinical studies; Awareness; Biological and medical sciences; Body Image; Delusions; Delusions - diagnosis; Delusions - psychology; Discrimination (Psychology); Female; Hand - physiology; Humans; Male; Medical sciences; Motion Perception; Movement - physiology; Neurology; Other psychotic disorders; Patients; Psychiatry; Psychology; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychopathology. Psychiatry; Psychoses; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenia - diagnosis; Schizophrenic Psychology; Social influence; Software; Visual Perception; Psychosis; Human; Symptomatology; Body movement; Delusion; Schizophrenia; Cognition; Influence syndrome; Experimental study; Attribution; Proper motion; Recognition
• ISSN: 0002-953X; 1535-7228
• DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.454

OBJECTIVE: The possibility that delusions of influence could be related to abnormal recognition of one's own actions was investigated in persons with schizophrenia. METHOD: Schizophrenic patients with (N=6) and without (N=18) delusions of influence were compared with normal subjects (N=29) on an action recognition task. The image of a virtual right hand holding a joystick was presented to the subjects through a mirror so that the image was superimposed on their real hand holding a real joystick. Subjects executed discrete movements in different directions. Angular biases and temporal delays were randomly introduced in some trials, such that the movement of the virtual hand departed from the movement executed by the subjects. After each trial, subjects were asked whether the movement they saw was their own. RESULTS: Compared with normal subjects, both patient groups made significantly more recognition errors in trials with temporal delays. In trials with angular biases, the error rate of patients with delusions of influence significantly differed from that of comparison subjects and from that of patients without delusions of influence. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the hypothesis that delusions of influence are associated with a quantifiable difficulty in correct self-attribution of actions. This difficulty may be related to a specific impairment of a neural action attribution system.