Interindividual differences influence multisensory processing during spatial navigation

When moving through space, we encode multiple sensory cues that guide our orientation through the environment. The integration between visual and self-motion cues is known to improve navigation. However, spatial navigation may also benefit from multisensory external signals. The present study aimed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance Vol. 48; no. 2; p. 174
Main Authors Zanchi, Silvia, Cuturi, Luigi F, Sandini, Giulio, Gori, Monica
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.02.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0096-1523
1939-1277
1939-1277
DOI10.1037/xhp0000973

Cover

More Information
Summary:When moving through space, we encode multiple sensory cues that guide our orientation through the environment. The integration between visual and self-motion cues is known to improve navigation. However, spatial navigation may also benefit from multisensory external signals. The present study aimed to investigate whether humans combine auditory and visual landmarks with improving their navigation abilities. Two experiments with different cue reliability were conducted. In both, participants' task was to return an object to its original location by using landmarks, which could be visual-only, auditory-only, or audiovisual. We took error and variability of object relocation distance as measures of accuracy and precision. To quantify interference between cues and assess their weights, we ran a conflict condition with a spatial discrepancy between visual and auditory landmarks. Results showed comparable accuracy and precision when navigating with visual-only and audiovisual landmarks but greater error and variability with auditory-only landmarks. Splitting participants into two groups based on given unimodal weights revealed that only subjects who associated similar weights to auditory and visual cues showed precision benefit in audiovisual conditions. These findings suggest that multisensory integration occurs depending on idiosyncratic cue weighting. Future multisensory procedures to aid mobility must consider individual differences in encoding landmarks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
ISSN:0096-1523
1939-1277
1939-1277
DOI:10.1037/xhp0000973