Variability of the topographic core-mantle torque calculated from core surface flow models

• Published in: Physics of the earth and planetary interiors Vol. 154; no. 1; pp. 85 - 111
• Main Authors: Asari, S., Shimizu, H., Utada, H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 16.01.2006
• Subjects: Core dynamics; Core flow; Core-mantle coupling; Geomagnetic secular variation; Core flow; Core dynamics; Geomagnetic secular variation; Core-mantle coupling
• ISSN: 0031-9201; 1872-7395
• DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2005.09.002

With the prospect of studying the relevance of the topographic core-mantle coupling to the variations of the Earth’s rotation and also its applicability to constraining the core surface flow, we investigate the variability of the topographic torque estimated by using core surface flow models accompanied by (a) uncertainty due to the non-uniqueness problem in the flow inversion, and (b) variance originating in that of geomagnetic secular variation models employed in the inversion. Various flow models and their variances are estimated by inverting prescribed geomagnetic models at the epoch 1980. The subsequent topographic torque is then calculated by using a core-mantle boundary topography model obtained by seismic tomography. The calculated axial and equatorial torques are found subject to the variability of order 1 0 19 and 1 0 20  Nm, respectively, on which (b) is more effective than (a). The variability of the torque is attributed even to (a) and (b) of the large-scale flows (degrees 2 and 3). Yet, it still seems unlikely for the decadal polar motion with the observed amplitude to be excited exclusively by the equatorial topographic torque associated with any of reasonable core surface flow models. It is also confirmed that, with the topography model adopted here, the axial topographic torque on a rigid annulus in the core (coaxial with the Earth’s rotation axis) associated with any of reasonable flow models is larger by two orders of magnitude than the plausible inertial torque on such cylinders. This implies that any core surface flow model consistent with the topographic coupling does not exist, unless the topography model is appropriately modified. Nevertheless, the topographic coupling might provide not only a weak constraint for explaining the decadal LOD variations, but also the possibility to probe the core surface flow and the core dynamics.