With practice, keyboard shortcuts become faster than menu selection: A crossover interaction

It is widely believed that a graphical user interface (GUI) is superior to a command line interface (CLI) for novice users, but less efficient than the CLI after practice. However, there appears to be no detailed study of the crossover interaction that this implies. The rate of learning may shed lig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of experimental psychology. Applied Vol. 22; no. 1; p. 95
Main Authors Remington, Roger W, Yuen, Ho Wang Holman, Pashler, Harold
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.03.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1939-2192
1076-898X
1939-2192
DOI10.1037/xap0000069

Cover

More Information
Summary:It is widely believed that a graphical user interface (GUI) is superior to a command line interface (CLI) for novice users, but less efficient than the CLI after practice. However, there appears to be no detailed study of the crossover interaction that this implies. The rate of learning may shed light on the reluctance of experienced users to adopt keyboard shortcuts, even though, when mastered, shortcut use would reduce task completion times. We report 2 experiments examining changes in the efficiency of and preference for keyboard input versus GUI with practice. Experiment 1 had separate groups of subjects make speeded choice responses to words on a 20-item list either by clicking on a tab in a dropdown menu (GUI version) or by entering a preassigned keystroke combination (CLI version). The predicted crossover was observed after approximately 200 responses. Experiment 2 showed that following training all but 1 subject in the CLI-trained group chose to continue using shortcuts. These results suggest that frequency of shortcut use is a function of ease of retrieval, which develops over the course of multiple repetitions of the command. We discuss possible methods for promoting shortcut learning and the practical implications of our results.
ISSN:1939-2192
1076-898X
1939-2192
DOI:10.1037/xap0000069