Benchmarking Experimental and Computational Thermochemical Data: A Case Study of the Butane Conformers

Due to its crucial importance, numerous studies have been conducted to determine the enthalpy difference between the conformers of butane. However, it is shown here that the most reliable experimental values are biased due to the statistical model utilized during the evaluation of the raw experiment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of chemical theory and computation Vol. 8; no. 2; pp. 479 - 486
Main Authors Barna, Dóra, Nagy, Balázs, Csontos, József, Császár, Attila G, Tasi, Gyula
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Chemical Society 14.02.2012
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1549-9618
1549-9626
DOI10.1021/ct2007956

Cover

More Information
Summary:Due to its crucial importance, numerous studies have been conducted to determine the enthalpy difference between the conformers of butane. However, it is shown here that the most reliable experimental values are biased due to the statistical model utilized during the evaluation of the raw experimental data. In this study, using the appropriate statistical model, both the experimental expectation values and the associated uncertainties are revised. For the 133–196 and 223–297 K temperature ranges, 668 ± 20 and 653 ± 125 cal mol–1, respectively, are recommended as reference values. Furthermore, to show that present-day quantum chemistry is a favorable alternative to experimental techniques in the determination of enthalpy differences of conformers, a focal-point analysis, based on coupled-cluster electronic structure computations, has been performed that included contributions of up to perturbative quadruple excitations as well as small correction terms beyond the Born–Oppenheimer and nonrelativistic approximations. For the 133–196 and 223–297 K temperature ranges, in exceptional agreement with the corresponding revised experimental data, our computations yielded 668 ± 3 and 650 ± 6 cal mol–1, respectively. The most reliable enthalpy difference values for 0 and 298.15 K are also provided by the computational approach, 680.9 ± 2.5 and 647.4 ± 7.0 cal mol–1, respectively.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1549-9618
1549-9626
DOI:10.1021/ct2007956