There is no random sampling in software engineering research
Representative sampling is considered crucial for predominately quantitative, positivist research. Researchers typically argue that a sample is representative when items are selected randomly from a population. However, random sampling is rare in empirical software engineering research because there...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceeedings pp. 344 - 345 | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , | 
| Format | Conference Proceeding | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
        New York, NY, USA
          ACM
    
        27.05.2018
     | 
| Series | ACM Conferences | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISBN | 145035663X 9781450356633  | 
| DOI | 10.1145/3183440.3195001 | 
Cover
| Summary: | Representative sampling is considered crucial for predominately quantitative, positivist research. Researchers typically argue that a sample is representative when items are selected randomly from a population. However, random sampling is rare in empirical software engineering research because there are no credible sampling frames (population lists) for the units of analysis software engineering researchers study (e.g. software projects, code libraries, developers, projects). This means that most software engineering research does not support statistical generalization, but rejecting any particular study for lack of random sampling is capricious. | 
|---|---|
| ISBN: | 145035663X 9781450356633  | 
| DOI: | 10.1145/3183440.3195001 |