Adaptability of model comparison tools

Modern model-based development methodologies require a large number of efficient, high-quality model comparison tools. They must be carefully adapted to the specific model type, user preferences and application context. Implementing a large number of dedicated, monolithic tools is infeasible, the on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in27th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) : proceedings, September 3-7, 2012, Essen, Germany pp. 306 - 309
Main Authors Kehrer, Timo, Kelter, Udo, Pietsch, Pit, Schmidt, Maik
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY, USA ACM 03.09.2012
SeriesACM Conferences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISBN1450312047
9781450312042
DOI10.1145/2351676.2351731

Cover

More Information
Summary:Modern model-based development methodologies require a large number of efficient, high-quality model comparison tools. They must be carefully adapted to the specific model type, user preferences and application context. Implementing a large number of dedicated, monolithic tools is infeasible, the only viable approach are generic, adaptable tools. Generic tools currently available provide only partial or low-quality solutions to this challenge; their results are not satisfactory for model types such as state machines or block diagrams. This paper presents the SiDiff approach to model comparison which includes a set of highly configurable incremental matchers and a specification language to control their application.
ISBN:1450312047
9781450312042
DOI:10.1145/2351676.2351731