Adaptability of model comparison tools
Modern model-based development methodologies require a large number of efficient, high-quality model comparison tools. They must be carefully adapted to the specific model type, user preferences and application context. Implementing a large number of dedicated, monolithic tools is infeasible, the on...
Saved in:
Published in | 27th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) : proceedings, September 3-7, 2012, Essen, Germany pp. 306 - 309 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY, USA
ACM
03.09.2012
|
Series | ACM Conferences |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISBN | 1450312047 9781450312042 |
DOI | 10.1145/2351676.2351731 |
Cover
Summary: | Modern model-based development methodologies require a large number of efficient, high-quality model comparison tools. They must be carefully adapted to the specific model type, user preferences and application context. Implementing a large number of dedicated, monolithic tools is infeasible, the only viable approach are generic, adaptable tools. Generic tools currently available provide only partial or low-quality solutions to this challenge; their results are not satisfactory for model types such as state machines or block diagrams. This paper presents the SiDiff approach to model comparison which includes a set of highly configurable incremental matchers and a specification language to control their application. |
---|---|
ISBN: | 1450312047 9781450312042 |
DOI: | 10.1145/2351676.2351731 |