When Are Power Shifts Dangerous? : Military Strategy and Preventive War
This article explains why shifts in the balance of power lead to war in some cases, but not in others. I argue that the declining state’s military strategy is the key determinant of whether power shifts will result in war or pass peacefully. If the decliner has a maneuver strategy, then war is likel...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of international and area studies pp. 53 - 71 |
|---|---|
| Main Author | |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | Korean |
| Published |
국제학연구소
01.12.2006
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1226-8550 2765-1800 |
| DOI | 10.23071/jias.2006.13.2.53 |
Cover
| Summary: | This article explains why shifts in the balance of power lead to war in some cases, but not in others. I argue that the declining state’s military strategy is the key determinant of whether power shifts will result in war or pass peacefully. If the decliner has a maneuver strategy, then war is likely; if it has an attrition strategy, the power shift will pass peacefully. I test the plausibility of my theory and three prominent alternatives by taking a sample of twelve power shifts among great powers over the period 1860-1945 and establishing correlations between the indicators used by all four theories and the incidence in each case of war or peace. This article finds that for the large majority of the examined cases, the decliner’s military strategy correctly predicts the power shift’s political outcome. KCI Citation Count: 0 |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | G704-000686.2006.13.2.004 |
| ISSN: | 1226-8550 2765-1800 |
| DOI: | 10.23071/jias.2006.13.2.53 |