Antifungal prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients: a randomized placebo-controlled study
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two antifungal prophylaxis regimens in liver transplant recipients. One hundred and twenty-nine consecutive recipients were randomized to receive sequential treatment with intravenous liposomal amphotericin B + oral itraconazole, intravenous fluc...
Saved in:
Published in | Transplant international Vol. 15; no. 7; p. 341 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Groningen
Frontiers Media SA
01.07.2002
|
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0934-0874 1432-2277 |
DOI | 10.1007/s00147-002-0431-z |
Cover
Summary: | The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two antifungal prophylaxis regimens in liver transplant recipients. One hundred and twenty-nine consecutive recipients were randomized to receive sequential treatment with intravenous liposomal amphotericin B + oral itraconazole, intravenous fluconazole + oral itraconazole, or intravenous and oral placebo. Frequency and incidence of mycotic colonization, local and systemic infection of mycotic origin, causes of death, and possible risk factors for mycotic infection were evaluated. The incidence of mycotic colonization was higher in the placebo group (P<0.01), but there was no significant difference in the incidence of infection between the three groups. Pre-transplant colonization, severity of liver disease, and graft rejection were all risk factors for the development of fungal infection. The routine use of antifungal prophylaxis for all liver transplant recipients does not seem to be justified. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0934-0874 1432-2277 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00147-002-0431-z |