Matching Task Difficulty to Patient Ability During Task Practice Improves Upper Extremity Motor Skill After Stroke: A Proof-of-Concept Study
To test the feasibility of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity "keyform," derived from Rasch analysis, as a method for systematically planning and progressing rehabilitation. Feasibility study, single group design. University rehabilitation research laboratory. Participants (N...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Vol. 97; no. 11; pp. 1863 - 1871 | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , | 
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
        United States
        
        01.11.2016
     | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISSN | 1532-821X 0003-9993 1532-821X  | 
| DOI | 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.022 | 
Cover
| Abstract | To test the feasibility of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity "keyform," derived from Rasch analysis, as a method for systematically planning and progressing rehabilitation.
Feasibility study, single group design.
University rehabilitation research laboratory.
Participants (N=10; mean age, 59.70±9.96y; 24.1±30.54mo poststroke) with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke >3 months prior, voluntarily shoulder flexion ≥30°, and simultaneous elbow extension ≥20°.
The keyform method defined initial rehabilitation targets (goals) and progressed the rehabilitation program after every third session. Targets were repetitively practiced within the context of client-selected functional tasks not in isolation.
Feasibility was defined by subject's pain or fatigue, upper extremity motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test), and movement patterns (kinematics). Assessments were administered pre- and posttreatment and compared using paired t tests. Task-difficulty and patient-ability measures were calculated using Rasch analysis and compared using paired t tests (P<.05).
Ten participants completed 9 sessions, 200 movement repetitions per session in <2 hours without pain or fatigue. Participants gained upper extremity motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test: pretreatment, 22.23±24.26s; posttreatment, 15.46±22.12s; P=.01), improved shoulder-elbow coordination (index of curvature: pretreatment, 1.30±0.15; posttreatment, 1.21±0.11; P=.01), and exhibited reduced trunk compensatory movement (trunk displacement: pretreatment, 133.97±74.15mm; posttreatment, 108.08±64.73mm; P=.02). Task-difficulty and patient-ability measures were not statistically different throughout the program (person-ability measures of 1.01±0.05, 1.64±0.45, and 2.22±0.65 logits and item-difficulty measures of 0.93±0.37, 1.70±0.20, and 2.06±0.24 logits at the 3 testing time points, respectively; P>.05).
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity keyform is a feasible method to ensure that the difficulty of tasks practiced were well matched to initial and evolving levels of upper extremity motor ability. | 
    
|---|---|
| AbstractList | To test the feasibility of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity "keyform," derived from Rasch analysis, as a method for systematically planning and progressing rehabilitation.OBJECTIVETo test the feasibility of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity "keyform," derived from Rasch analysis, as a method for systematically planning and progressing rehabilitation.Feasibility study, single group design.DESIGNFeasibility study, single group design.University rehabilitation research laboratory.SETTINGUniversity rehabilitation research laboratory.Participants (N=10; mean age, 59.70±9.96y; 24.1±30.54mo poststroke) with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke >3 months prior, voluntarily shoulder flexion ≥30°, and simultaneous elbow extension ≥20°.PARTICIPANTSParticipants (N=10; mean age, 59.70±9.96y; 24.1±30.54mo poststroke) with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke >3 months prior, voluntarily shoulder flexion ≥30°, and simultaneous elbow extension ≥20°.The keyform method defined initial rehabilitation targets (goals) and progressed the rehabilitation program after every third session. Targets were repetitively practiced within the context of client-selected functional tasks not in isolation.INTERVENTIONSThe keyform method defined initial rehabilitation targets (goals) and progressed the rehabilitation program after every third session. Targets were repetitively practiced within the context of client-selected functional tasks not in isolation.Feasibility was defined by subject's pain or fatigue, upper extremity motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test), and movement patterns (kinematics). Assessments were administered pre- and posttreatment and compared using paired t tests. Task-difficulty and patient-ability measures were calculated using Rasch analysis and compared using paired t tests (P<.05).MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESFeasibility was defined by subject's pain or fatigue, upper extremity motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test), and movement patterns (kinematics). Assessments were administered pre- and posttreatment and compared using paired t tests. Task-difficulty and patient-ability measures were calculated using Rasch analysis and compared using paired t tests (P<.05).Ten participants completed 9 sessions, 200 movement repetitions per session in <2 hours without pain or fatigue. Participants gained upper extremity motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test: pretreatment, 22.23±24.26s; posttreatment, 15.46±22.12s; P=.01), improved shoulder-elbow coordination (index of curvature: pretreatment, 1.30±0.15; posttreatment, 1.21±0.11; P=.01), and exhibited reduced trunk compensatory movement (trunk displacement: pretreatment, 133.97±74.15mm; posttreatment, 108.08±64.73mm; P=.02). Task-difficulty and patient-ability measures were not statistically different throughout the program (person-ability measures of 1.01±0.05, 1.64±0.45, and 2.22±0.65 logits and item-difficulty measures of 0.93±0.37, 1.70±0.20, and 2.06±0.24 logits at the 3 testing time points, respectively; P>.05).RESULTSTen participants completed 9 sessions, 200 movement repetitions per session in <2 hours without pain or fatigue. Participants gained upper extremity motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test: pretreatment, 22.23±24.26s; posttreatment, 15.46±22.12s; P=.01), improved shoulder-elbow coordination (index of curvature: pretreatment, 1.30±0.15; posttreatment, 1.21±0.11; P=.01), and exhibited reduced trunk compensatory movement (trunk displacement: pretreatment, 133.97±74.15mm; posttreatment, 108.08±64.73mm; P=.02). Task-difficulty and patient-ability measures were not statistically different throughout the program (person-ability measures of 1.01±0.05, 1.64±0.45, and 2.22±0.65 logits and item-difficulty measures of 0.93±0.37, 1.70±0.20, and 2.06±0.24 logits at the 3 testing time points, respectively; P>.05).The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity keyform is a feasible method to ensure that the difficulty of tasks practiced were well matched to initial and evolving levels of upper extremity motor ability.CONCLUSIONSThe Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity keyform is a feasible method to ensure that the difficulty of tasks practiced were well matched to initial and evolving levels of upper extremity motor ability. To test the feasibility of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity "keyform," derived from Rasch analysis, as a method for systematically planning and progressing rehabilitation. Feasibility study, single group design. University rehabilitation research laboratory. Participants (N=10; mean age, 59.70±9.96y; 24.1±30.54mo poststroke) with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke >3 months prior, voluntarily shoulder flexion ≥30°, and simultaneous elbow extension ≥20°. The keyform method defined initial rehabilitation targets (goals) and progressed the rehabilitation program after every third session. Targets were repetitively practiced within the context of client-selected functional tasks not in isolation. Feasibility was defined by subject's pain or fatigue, upper extremity motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test), and movement patterns (kinematics). Assessments were administered pre- and posttreatment and compared using paired t tests. Task-difficulty and patient-ability measures were calculated using Rasch analysis and compared using paired t tests (P<.05). Ten participants completed 9 sessions, 200 movement repetitions per session in <2 hours without pain or fatigue. Participants gained upper extremity motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test: pretreatment, 22.23±24.26s; posttreatment, 15.46±22.12s; P=.01), improved shoulder-elbow coordination (index of curvature: pretreatment, 1.30±0.15; posttreatment, 1.21±0.11; P=.01), and exhibited reduced trunk compensatory movement (trunk displacement: pretreatment, 133.97±74.15mm; posttreatment, 108.08±64.73mm; P=.02). Task-difficulty and patient-ability measures were not statistically different throughout the program (person-ability measures of 1.01±0.05, 1.64±0.45, and 2.22±0.65 logits and item-difficulty measures of 0.93±0.37, 1.70±0.20, and 2.06±0.24 logits at the 3 testing time points, respectively; P>.05). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity keyform is a feasible method to ensure that the difficulty of tasks practiced were well matched to initial and evolving levels of upper extremity motor ability.  | 
    
| Author | Finetto, Christian Woodbury, Michelle L Grattan, Emily Dellenbach, Blair Anderson, Kelly Fortune, Andrew Hutchison, Scott  | 
    
| AuthorAffiliation | 2 Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Health Science and Research 1 Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center 3 Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Health Professions, Division of Occupational Therapy  | 
    
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 3 Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Health Professions, Division of Occupational Therapy – name: 1 Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center – name: 2 Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Health Science and Research  | 
    
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Michelle L surname: Woodbury fullname: Woodbury, Michelle L email: WoodbuML@musc.edu organization: Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC; Department of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. Electronic address: WoodbuML@musc.edu – sequence: 2 givenname: Kelly surname: Anderson fullname: Anderson, Kelly organization: Department of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC – sequence: 3 givenname: Christian surname: Finetto fullname: Finetto, Christian organization: Department of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC – sequence: 4 givenname: Andrew surname: Fortune fullname: Fortune, Andrew organization: Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC; Department of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC – sequence: 5 givenname: Blair surname: Dellenbach fullname: Dellenbach, Blair organization: Department of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC – sequence: 6 givenname: Emily surname: Grattan fullname: Grattan, Emily organization: Department of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC – sequence: 7 givenname: Scott surname: Hutchison fullname: Hutchison, Scott organization: Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC; Department of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC  | 
    
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27117385$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed | 
    
| BookMark | eNqFUU1r3DAQFSUhX80f6KHo2IsdfViy3ENh2aRNICGB7EJvRiuPEmVty5Hl0P0P_dFV6TZsToGBecx783jDHKO93veA0CdKckqoPHvK9dCFnCWcE54Txj6gIyo4yxSjP_d28CE6HscnQogUnB6gQ1ZSWnIljtDvGx3No-sf8EKPa3zurHVmauMGR4_vdHTQRzxbudal0fkUXpV3QZvoDOCrbgj-BUa8HAYI-OJXDND9Vd_46AO-X7u2xTMbE3cfg1_DVzxL297bLNXc9waGmKip2XxE-1a3I5xu-wlafr9YzC-z69sfV_PZdTawqoqZlCBkwWVRrCppipIKzRWTFgpmVoQYkEVVKW5MZYRtGqXBcg4NIZYlimp-gr798x2mVQeNSTcG3dZDcJ0Om9prV79levdYP_iXWrBSlVImgy9bg-CfJxhj3bnRQNvqHvw01uklTCnJJH9XSlNyWQolVJJ-3o31muf_t_gf8zOcXw | 
    
| ContentType | Journal Article | 
    
| Copyright | Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | 
    
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | 
    
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM  | 
    
| DOI | 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.022 | 
    
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)  | 
    
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic  | 
    
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE  | 
    
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database  | 
    
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc | 
    
| Discipline | Medicine Physical Therapy  | 
    
| EISSN | 1532-821X | 
    
| EndPage | 1871 | 
    
| ExternalDocumentID | PMC5278766 27117385  | 
    
| Genre | Journal Article | 
    
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NCATS NIH HHS grantid: TL1 TR001451 – fundername: RRD VA grantid: I01 RX000799  | 
    
| GroupedDBID | --- --K -~X .1- .55 .FO .GJ 07C 0R~ 1B1 1CY 1P~ 1~5 23N 3O- 4.4 41~ 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 7-5 AAEDT AAEDW AALRI AAQFI AAQOH AAQQT AAQXK AAWTL AAXUO ABDQB ABFRF ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABOCM ABWVN ACBNA ACGFO ACGUR ACRPL ADBBV ADMUD ADNMO ADRMJ AEFWE AENEX AEVXI AFCTW AFFNX AFJKZ AFRHN AFTJW AGNAY AI. AITUG AJUYK AKRWK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BELOY BR6 C5W CAG CGR COF CS3 CUY CVF E3Z EBS ECM EFJIC EIF EJD F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID G-Q GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W J5H K-O KOM KOO L7B M41 MO0 N4W NEJ NPM NQ- O-3 O9- OH. OHT OK1 OT. P2P QTD QZG R2- RIG ROL RPZ SEL SES SJN SKT SSZ TWZ UDS UGJ UHB UHS UPT UQV UV1 VH1 WH7 WHG X7M XH2 XOL YQJ YRY YZZ Z5R ZGI ZXP ~S- 7X8 AAYWO AIGII EFKBS 5PM  | 
    
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-p299t-66e5643644b96c4715a3826fe42cb00ce649983cc9c5fdd8aef33ed00f2e641a3 | 
    
| ISSN | 1532-821X 0003-9993  | 
    
| IngestDate | Tue Sep 30 16:45:06 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 27 23:19:02 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 27 18:11:50 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:05:37 EDT 2025  | 
    
| IsPeerReviewed | true | 
    
| IsScholarly | true | 
    
| Issue | 11 | 
    
| Keywords | Occupational therapy Stroke Rehabilitation  | 
    
| Language | English | 
    
| License | Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | 
    
| LinkModel | OpenURL | 
    
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p299t-66e5643644b96c4715a3826fe42cb00ce649983cc9c5fdd8aef33ed00f2e641a3 | 
    
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1  | 
    
| PMID | 27117385 | 
    
| PQID | 1826675858 | 
    
| PQPubID | 23479 | 
    
| PageCount | 9 | 
    
| ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5278766 proquest_miscellaneous_2012886263 proquest_miscellaneous_1826675858 pubmed_primary_27117385  | 
    
| PublicationCentury | 2000 | 
    
| PublicationDate | 2016-11-01 | 
    
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-11-01 | 
    
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2016 text: 2016-11-01 day: 01  | 
    
| PublicationDecade | 2010 | 
    
| PublicationPlace | United States | 
    
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States | 
    
| PublicationTitle | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation | 
    
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Arch Phys Med Rehabil | 
    
| PublicationYear | 2016 | 
    
| References | 16796767 - J Neurol Phys Ther. 2006 Jun;30(2):46-57; discussion 58-9 22234665 - J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(10 ):1211-22 20424192 - Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Sep;24(7):620-35 25005508 - Am J Occup Ther. 2014 Jul-Aug;68(4):444-53 9862925 - J Neurophysiol. 1998 Dec;80(6):3321-5 10873519 - Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000 Jul;74(1):27-55 19651514 - Gait Posture. 2009 Nov;30(4):469-76 18155782 - Behav Brain Res. 2008 Apr 9;188(2):281-90 8551360 - J Neurosci. 1996 Jan 15;16(2):785-807 15130871 - J Mot Behav. 2004 Jun;36(2):212-24 16415682 - Curr Opin Neurol. 2006 Feb;19(1):84-90 16014786 - J Neurophysiol. 2005 Nov;94(5):2999-3008 11486120 - Stroke. 2001 Aug;32(8):1875-83 23396369 - Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2013;31(3):299-309 15609840 - Clin Rehabil. 2004 Dec;18(8):833-62 16959909 - J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Dec;101(6):1776-82 15265326 - Neural Comput. 2004 Sep;16(9):1873-86 18674991 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Aug;89(8):1563-9 10479785 - Phys Ther. 1999 Sep;79(9):847-53 18984831 - Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Mar-Apr;23 (3):295-304 17532892 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jun;88(6):715-23 10775539 - Brain. 2000 May;123 ( Pt 5):940-53 1135616 - Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31  | 
    
| References_xml | – reference: 9862925 - J Neurophysiol. 1998 Dec;80(6):3321-5 – reference: 25005508 - Am J Occup Ther. 2014 Jul-Aug;68(4):444-53 – reference: 15265326 - Neural Comput. 2004 Sep;16(9):1873-86 – reference: 10873519 - Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000 Jul;74(1):27-55 – reference: 11486120 - Stroke. 2001 Aug;32(8):1875-83 – reference: 17532892 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jun;88(6):715-23 – reference: 22234665 - J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(10 ):1211-22 – reference: 20424192 - Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Sep;24(7):620-35 – reference: 15130871 - J Mot Behav. 2004 Jun;36(2):212-24 – reference: 18674991 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Aug;89(8):1563-9 – reference: 10775539 - Brain. 2000 May;123 ( Pt 5):940-53 – reference: 16796767 - J Neurol Phys Ther. 2006 Jun;30(2):46-57; discussion 58-9 – reference: 18155782 - Behav Brain Res. 2008 Apr 9;188(2):281-90 – reference: 16959909 - J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Dec;101(6):1776-82 – reference: 8551360 - J Neurosci. 1996 Jan 15;16(2):785-807 – reference: 10479785 - Phys Ther. 1999 Sep;79(9):847-53 – reference: 18984831 - Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Mar-Apr;23 (3):295-304 – reference: 15609840 - Clin Rehabil. 2004 Dec;18(8):833-62 – reference: 16415682 - Curr Opin Neurol. 2006 Feb;19(1):84-90 – reference: 23396369 - Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2013;31(3):299-309 – reference: 1135616 - Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31 – reference: 19651514 - Gait Posture. 2009 Nov;30(4):469-76 – reference: 16014786 - J Neurophysiol. 2005 Nov;94(5):2999-3008  | 
    
| SSID | ssj0006531 | 
    
| Score | 2.371082 | 
    
| Snippet | To test the feasibility of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity "keyform," derived from Rasch analysis, as a method for systematically planning and... | 
    
| SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed  | 
    
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database  | 
    
| StartPage | 1863 | 
    
| SubjectTerms | Activities of Daily Living Adult Aged Biomechanical Phenomena Disability Evaluation Fatigue - physiopathology Female Humans Male Middle Aged Motor Skills Pain - physiopathology Range of Motion, Articular Stroke Rehabilitation - methods Upper Extremity - physiopathology  | 
    
| Title | Matching Task Difficulty to Patient Ability During Task Practice Improves Upper Extremity Motor Skill After Stroke: A Proof-of-Concept Study | 
    
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27117385 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1826675858 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2012886263 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5278766  | 
    
| Volume | 97 | 
    
| hasFullText | 1 | 
    
| inHoldings | 1 | 
    
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: Baden-Württemberg Complete Freedom Collection (Elsevier) customDbUrl: eissn: 1532-821X dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0006531 issn: 1532-821X databaseCode: GBLVA dateStart: 20110101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier – providerCode: PRVLSH databaseName: Elsevier Journals customDbUrl: mediaType: online eissn: 1532-821X dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0006531 issn: 1532-821X databaseCode: AKRWK dateStart: 19930501 isFulltext: true providerName: Library Specific Holdings  | 
    
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Za9tAEF5cB0pfeqSXe7GFvhkZr4613LcQakJTl1Acmjezu1qRNLYkZOkh-Q39lf0lnb0k2XWhDRghSyv5mE-zM7Mz3yD0ARwcQqZJ4sVhQL0w5rAXU-FxJjiNGJcTrrN8v9KT8_DzRXTR6_3qZC3VFR-J2711JXeRKhwDuaoq2f-QbHNTOAD7IF_YgoRh-08ynoMe1RGkim2uPdXrRDNpaIPSEqZ6hof7xtUjqpFNaZSqkSxzxTtbF4Ush6CoS7lWo0GAeTncXF-tVraN-KYqFTmnro2Gi8DG1AnpuuixQ1K7h9C2cFBw6_gmp32LIryZG_K8Wdp3WarDL6M2WJFoD8FUFK3aVNQZ3Laq8pYuoYP6GXgYtQ3ctumbNtJBqC3562rvwAOD1ihE6RQ2aHRft91pNLrJ-HXIJR39TGKrTqV9a_q__DGPmJDGjxEr1oo0llDNhGsqqDvAKtYaWf6EEMUK1M6pTabj2fw48kEpUnoPHfgw84z76ODo9Nv308ZeoFHQ9HVUv86WdpksxN0voMir7aft84l2U3s7ttLiMXponRx8ZBD7BPVkdojuz634D9GjMwsJvDCkFk_RT4dlvINlXOV4B8vYYFmPxA7L2GEZayzjBstYYxlrLGONZWyw_BEzrJGM4WWRjDWSn6Hz2afF8YlnO4V4BZhTlUepjMC0BtueT6kAeytiAfjNqQx9AfOKkBQc-zgQYiqiNEliJtMgkMl4nPpwirDgOepneSZfIswIE4ySZOonacjiCZsmwk_FWIArykOfD9B7968vQROr5TWWybzeLJWnrt3v-O9jfGUPqiBCMEAvjKSWhaGVWTq5DtBkS4bNAMUEv30mu7rUjPAWYq_ufOVr9KB94t6gflXW8i1Y2xV_Z-H6G6R64ug | 
    
| linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings | 
    
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Matching+task-difficulty+to+patient-ability+during+task+practice+improves+upper+extremity+motor+skill+after+stroke%3A+a+proof+of+concept+study&rft.jtitle=Archives+of+physical+medicine+and+rehabilitation&rft.au=Woodbury%2C+Michelle+L.&rft.au=Anderson%2C+Kelly&rft.au=Finetto%2C+Christian&rft.au=Fortune%2C+Andrew&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1863&rft.epage=1871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.apmr.2016.03.022&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F27117385&rft.externalDocID=PMC5278766 | 
    
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1532-821X&client=summon | 
    
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1532-821X&client=summon | 
    
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1532-821X&client=summon |