Matching Task Difficulty to Patient Ability During Task Practice Improves Upper Extremity Motor Skill After Stroke: A Proof-of-Concept Study

To test the feasibility of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity "keyform," derived from Rasch analysis, as a method for systematically planning and progressing rehabilitation. Feasibility study, single group design. University rehabilitation research laboratory. Participants (N...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Vol. 97; no. 11; pp. 1863 - 1871
Main Authors Woodbury, Michelle L, Anderson, Kelly, Finetto, Christian, Fortune, Andrew, Dellenbach, Blair, Grattan, Emily, Hutchison, Scott
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.11.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1532-821X
0003-9993
1532-821X
DOI10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.022

Cover

Abstract To test the feasibility of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity "keyform," derived from Rasch analysis, as a method for systematically planning and progressing rehabilitation. Feasibility study, single group design. University rehabilitation research laboratory. Participants (N=10; mean age, 59.70±9.96y; 24.1±30.54mo poststroke) with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke >3 months prior, voluntarily shoulder flexion ≥30°, and simultaneous elbow extension ≥20°. The keyform method defined initial rehabilitation targets (goals) and progressed the rehabilitation program after every third session. Targets were repetitively practiced within the context of client-selected functional tasks not in isolation. Feasibility was defined by subject's pain or fatigue, upper extremity motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test), and movement patterns (kinematics). Assessments were administered pre- and posttreatment and compared using paired t tests. Task-difficulty and patient-ability measures were calculated using Rasch analysis and compared using paired t tests (P<.05). Ten participants completed 9 sessions, 200 movement repetitions per session in <2 hours without pain or fatigue. Participants gained upper extremity motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test: pretreatment, 22.23±24.26s; posttreatment, 15.46±22.12s; P=.01), improved shoulder-elbow coordination (index of curvature: pretreatment, 1.30±0.15; posttreatment, 1.21±0.11; P=.01), and exhibited reduced trunk compensatory movement (trunk displacement: pretreatment, 133.97±74.15mm; posttreatment, 108.08±64.73mm; P=.02). Task-difficulty and patient-ability measures were not statistically different throughout the program (person-ability measures of 1.01±0.05, 1.64±0.45, and 2.22±0.65 logits and item-difficulty measures of 0.93±0.37, 1.70±0.20, and 2.06±0.24 logits at the 3 testing time points, respectively; P>.05). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity keyform is a feasible method to ensure that the difficulty of tasks practiced were well matched to initial and evolving levels of upper extremity motor ability.
AbstractList To test the feasibility of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity "keyform," derived from Rasch analysis, as a method for systematically planning and progressing rehabilitation.OBJECTIVETo test the feasibility of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity "keyform," derived from Rasch analysis, as a method for systematically planning and progressing rehabilitation.Feasibility study, single group design.DESIGNFeasibility study, single group design.University rehabilitation research laboratory.SETTINGUniversity rehabilitation research laboratory.Participants (N=10; mean age, 59.70±9.96y; 24.1±30.54mo poststroke) with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke >3 months prior, voluntarily shoulder flexion ≥30°, and simultaneous elbow extension ≥20°.PARTICIPANTSParticipants (N=10; mean age, 59.70±9.96y; 24.1±30.54mo poststroke) with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke >3 months prior, voluntarily shoulder flexion ≥30°, and simultaneous elbow extension ≥20°.The keyform method defined initial rehabilitation targets (goals) and progressed the rehabilitation program after every third session. Targets were repetitively practiced within the context of client-selected functional tasks not in isolation.INTERVENTIONSThe keyform method defined initial rehabilitation targets (goals) and progressed the rehabilitation program after every third session. Targets were repetitively practiced within the context of client-selected functional tasks not in isolation.Feasibility was defined by subject's pain or fatigue, upper extremity motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test), and movement patterns (kinematics). Assessments were administered pre- and posttreatment and compared using paired t tests. Task-difficulty and patient-ability measures were calculated using Rasch analysis and compared using paired t tests (P<.05).MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESFeasibility was defined by subject's pain or fatigue, upper extremity motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test), and movement patterns (kinematics). Assessments were administered pre- and posttreatment and compared using paired t tests. Task-difficulty and patient-ability measures were calculated using Rasch analysis and compared using paired t tests (P<.05).Ten participants completed 9 sessions, 200 movement repetitions per session in <2 hours without pain or fatigue. Participants gained upper extremity motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test: pretreatment, 22.23±24.26s; posttreatment, 15.46±22.12s; P=.01), improved shoulder-elbow coordination (index of curvature: pretreatment, 1.30±0.15; posttreatment, 1.21±0.11; P=.01), and exhibited reduced trunk compensatory movement (trunk displacement: pretreatment, 133.97±74.15mm; posttreatment, 108.08±64.73mm; P=.02). Task-difficulty and patient-ability measures were not statistically different throughout the program (person-ability measures of 1.01±0.05, 1.64±0.45, and 2.22±0.65 logits and item-difficulty measures of 0.93±0.37, 1.70±0.20, and 2.06±0.24 logits at the 3 testing time points, respectively; P>.05).RESULTSTen participants completed 9 sessions, 200 movement repetitions per session in <2 hours without pain or fatigue. Participants gained upper extremity motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test: pretreatment, 22.23±24.26s; posttreatment, 15.46±22.12s; P=.01), improved shoulder-elbow coordination (index of curvature: pretreatment, 1.30±0.15; posttreatment, 1.21±0.11; P=.01), and exhibited reduced trunk compensatory movement (trunk displacement: pretreatment, 133.97±74.15mm; posttreatment, 108.08±64.73mm; P=.02). Task-difficulty and patient-ability measures were not statistically different throughout the program (person-ability measures of 1.01±0.05, 1.64±0.45, and 2.22±0.65 logits and item-difficulty measures of 0.93±0.37, 1.70±0.20, and 2.06±0.24 logits at the 3 testing time points, respectively; P>.05).The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity keyform is a feasible method to ensure that the difficulty of tasks practiced were well matched to initial and evolving levels of upper extremity motor ability.CONCLUSIONSThe Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity keyform is a feasible method to ensure that the difficulty of tasks practiced were well matched to initial and evolving levels of upper extremity motor ability.
To test the feasibility of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity "keyform," derived from Rasch analysis, as a method for systematically planning and progressing rehabilitation. Feasibility study, single group design. University rehabilitation research laboratory. Participants (N=10; mean age, 59.70±9.96y; 24.1±30.54mo poststroke) with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke >3 months prior, voluntarily shoulder flexion ≥30°, and simultaneous elbow extension ≥20°. The keyform method defined initial rehabilitation targets (goals) and progressed the rehabilitation program after every third session. Targets were repetitively practiced within the context of client-selected functional tasks not in isolation. Feasibility was defined by subject's pain or fatigue, upper extremity motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test), and movement patterns (kinematics). Assessments were administered pre- and posttreatment and compared using paired t tests. Task-difficulty and patient-ability measures were calculated using Rasch analysis and compared using paired t tests (P<.05). Ten participants completed 9 sessions, 200 movement repetitions per session in <2 hours without pain or fatigue. Participants gained upper extremity motor function (Wolf Motor Function Test: pretreatment, 22.23±24.26s; posttreatment, 15.46±22.12s; P=.01), improved shoulder-elbow coordination (index of curvature: pretreatment, 1.30±0.15; posttreatment, 1.21±0.11; P=.01), and exhibited reduced trunk compensatory movement (trunk displacement: pretreatment, 133.97±74.15mm; posttreatment, 108.08±64.73mm; P=.02). Task-difficulty and patient-ability measures were not statistically different throughout the program (person-ability measures of 1.01±0.05, 1.64±0.45, and 2.22±0.65 logits and item-difficulty measures of 0.93±0.37, 1.70±0.20, and 2.06±0.24 logits at the 3 testing time points, respectively; P>.05). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity keyform is a feasible method to ensure that the difficulty of tasks practiced were well matched to initial and evolving levels of upper extremity motor ability.
Author Finetto, Christian
Woodbury, Michelle L
Grattan, Emily
Dellenbach, Blair
Anderson, Kelly
Fortune, Andrew
Hutchison, Scott
AuthorAffiliation 2 Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Health Science and Research
1 Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center
3 Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Health Professions, Division of Occupational Therapy
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 3 Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Health Professions, Division of Occupational Therapy
– name: 1 Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center
– name: 2 Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Health Science and Research
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Michelle L
  surname: Woodbury
  fullname: Woodbury, Michelle L
  email: WoodbuML@musc.edu
  organization: Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC; Department of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. Electronic address: WoodbuML@musc.edu
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Kelly
  surname: Anderson
  fullname: Anderson, Kelly
  organization: Department of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Christian
  surname: Finetto
  fullname: Finetto, Christian
  organization: Department of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Andrew
  surname: Fortune
  fullname: Fortune, Andrew
  organization: Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC; Department of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Blair
  surname: Dellenbach
  fullname: Dellenbach, Blair
  organization: Department of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Emily
  surname: Grattan
  fullname: Grattan, Emily
  organization: Department of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Scott
  surname: Hutchison
  fullname: Hutchison, Scott
  organization: Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC; Department of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27117385$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFUU1r3DAQFSUhX80f6KHo2IsdfViy3ENh2aRNICGB7EJvRiuPEmVty5Hl0P0P_dFV6TZsToGBecx783jDHKO93veA0CdKckqoPHvK9dCFnCWcE54Txj6gIyo4yxSjP_d28CE6HscnQogUnB6gQ1ZSWnIljtDvGx3No-sf8EKPa3zurHVmauMGR4_vdHTQRzxbudal0fkUXpV3QZvoDOCrbgj-BUa8HAYI-OJXDND9Vd_46AO-X7u2xTMbE3cfg1_DVzxL297bLNXc9waGmKip2XxE-1a3I5xu-wlafr9YzC-z69sfV_PZdTawqoqZlCBkwWVRrCppipIKzRWTFgpmVoQYkEVVKW5MZYRtGqXBcg4NIZYlimp-gr798x2mVQeNSTcG3dZDcJ0Om9prV79levdYP_iXWrBSlVImgy9bg-CfJxhj3bnRQNvqHvw01uklTCnJJH9XSlNyWQolVJJ-3o31muf_t_gf8zOcXw
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.022
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Physical Therapy
EISSN 1532-821X
EndPage 1871
ExternalDocumentID PMC5278766
27117385
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NCATS NIH HHS
  grantid: TL1 TR001451
– fundername: RRD VA
  grantid: I01 RX000799
GroupedDBID ---
--K
-~X
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
07C
0R~
1B1
1CY
1P~
1~5
23N
3O-
4.4
41~
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6J9
7-5
AAEDT
AAEDW
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQOH
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAWTL
AAXUO
ABDQB
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABOCM
ABWVN
ACBNA
ACGFO
ACGUR
ACRPL
ADBBV
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADRMJ
AEFWE
AENEX
AEVXI
AFCTW
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGNAY
AI.
AITUG
AJUYK
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BELOY
BR6
C5W
CAG
CGR
COF
CS3
CUY
CVF
E3Z
EBS
ECM
EFJIC
EIF
EJD
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
G-Q
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
J5H
K-O
KOM
KOO
L7B
M41
MO0
N4W
NEJ
NPM
NQ-
O-3
O9-
OH.
OHT
OK1
OT.
P2P
QTD
QZG
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SEL
SES
SJN
SKT
SSZ
TWZ
UDS
UGJ
UHB
UHS
UPT
UQV
UV1
VH1
WH7
WHG
X7M
XH2
XOL
YQJ
YRY
YZZ
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
~S-
7X8
AAYWO
AIGII
EFKBS
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-p299t-66e5643644b96c4715a3826fe42cb00ce649983cc9c5fdd8aef33ed00f2e641a3
ISSN 1532-821X
0003-9993
IngestDate Tue Sep 30 16:45:06 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 27 23:19:02 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 27 18:11:50 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:05:37 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Keywords Occupational therapy
Stroke
Rehabilitation
Language English
License Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p299t-66e5643644b96c4715a3826fe42cb00ce649983cc9c5fdd8aef33ed00f2e641a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
PMID 27117385
PQID 1826675858
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5278766
proquest_miscellaneous_2012886263
proquest_miscellaneous_1826675858
pubmed_primary_27117385
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-11-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-11-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
PublicationTitleAlternate Arch Phys Med Rehabil
PublicationYear 2016
References 16796767 - J Neurol Phys Ther. 2006 Jun;30(2):46-57; discussion 58-9
22234665 - J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(10 ):1211-22
20424192 - Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Sep;24(7):620-35
25005508 - Am J Occup Ther. 2014 Jul-Aug;68(4):444-53
9862925 - J Neurophysiol. 1998 Dec;80(6):3321-5
10873519 - Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000 Jul;74(1):27-55
19651514 - Gait Posture. 2009 Nov;30(4):469-76
18155782 - Behav Brain Res. 2008 Apr 9;188(2):281-90
8551360 - J Neurosci. 1996 Jan 15;16(2):785-807
15130871 - J Mot Behav. 2004 Jun;36(2):212-24
16415682 - Curr Opin Neurol. 2006 Feb;19(1):84-90
16014786 - J Neurophysiol. 2005 Nov;94(5):2999-3008
11486120 - Stroke. 2001 Aug;32(8):1875-83
23396369 - Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2013;31(3):299-309
15609840 - Clin Rehabil. 2004 Dec;18(8):833-62
16959909 - J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Dec;101(6):1776-82
15265326 - Neural Comput. 2004 Sep;16(9):1873-86
18674991 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Aug;89(8):1563-9
10479785 - Phys Ther. 1999 Sep;79(9):847-53
18984831 - Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Mar-Apr;23 (3):295-304
17532892 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jun;88(6):715-23
10775539 - Brain. 2000 May;123 ( Pt 5):940-53
1135616 - Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31
References_xml – reference: 9862925 - J Neurophysiol. 1998 Dec;80(6):3321-5
– reference: 25005508 - Am J Occup Ther. 2014 Jul-Aug;68(4):444-53
– reference: 15265326 - Neural Comput. 2004 Sep;16(9):1873-86
– reference: 10873519 - Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000 Jul;74(1):27-55
– reference: 11486120 - Stroke. 2001 Aug;32(8):1875-83
– reference: 17532892 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jun;88(6):715-23
– reference: 22234665 - J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(10 ):1211-22
– reference: 20424192 - Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Sep;24(7):620-35
– reference: 15130871 - J Mot Behav. 2004 Jun;36(2):212-24
– reference: 18674991 - Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Aug;89(8):1563-9
– reference: 10775539 - Brain. 2000 May;123 ( Pt 5):940-53
– reference: 16796767 - J Neurol Phys Ther. 2006 Jun;30(2):46-57; discussion 58-9
– reference: 18155782 - Behav Brain Res. 2008 Apr 9;188(2):281-90
– reference: 16959909 - J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Dec;101(6):1776-82
– reference: 8551360 - J Neurosci. 1996 Jan 15;16(2):785-807
– reference: 10479785 - Phys Ther. 1999 Sep;79(9):847-53
– reference: 18984831 - Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Mar-Apr;23 (3):295-304
– reference: 15609840 - Clin Rehabil. 2004 Dec;18(8):833-62
– reference: 16415682 - Curr Opin Neurol. 2006 Feb;19(1):84-90
– reference: 23396369 - Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2013;31(3):299-309
– reference: 1135616 - Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31
– reference: 19651514 - Gait Posture. 2009 Nov;30(4):469-76
– reference: 16014786 - J Neurophysiol. 2005 Nov;94(5):2999-3008
SSID ssj0006531
Score 2.371082
Snippet To test the feasibility of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity "keyform," derived from Rasch analysis, as a method for systematically planning and...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1863
SubjectTerms Activities of Daily Living
Adult
Aged
Biomechanical Phenomena
Disability Evaluation
Fatigue - physiopathology
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Motor Skills
Pain - physiopathology
Range of Motion, Articular
Stroke Rehabilitation - methods
Upper Extremity - physiopathology
Title Matching Task Difficulty to Patient Ability During Task Practice Improves Upper Extremity Motor Skill After Stroke: A Proof-of-Concept Study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27117385
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1826675858
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2012886263
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5278766
Volume 97
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Baden-Württemberg Complete Freedom Collection (Elsevier)
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1532-821X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0006531
  issn: 1532-821X
  databaseCode: GBLVA
  dateStart: 20110101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
– providerCode: PRVLSH
  databaseName: Elsevier Journals
  customDbUrl:
  mediaType: online
  eissn: 1532-821X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0006531
  issn: 1532-821X
  databaseCode: AKRWK
  dateStart: 19930501
  isFulltext: true
  providerName: Library Specific Holdings
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Za9tAEF5cB0pfeqSXe7GFvhkZr4613LcQakJTl1Acmjezu1qRNLYkZOkh-Q39lf0lnb0k2XWhDRghSyv5mE-zM7Mz3yD0ARwcQqZJ4sVhQL0w5rAXU-FxJjiNGJcTrrN8v9KT8_DzRXTR6_3qZC3VFR-J2711JXeRKhwDuaoq2f-QbHNTOAD7IF_YgoRh-08ynoMe1RGkim2uPdXrRDNpaIPSEqZ6hof7xtUjqpFNaZSqkSxzxTtbF4Ush6CoS7lWo0GAeTncXF-tVraN-KYqFTmnro2Gi8DG1AnpuuixQ1K7h9C2cFBw6_gmp32LIryZG_K8Wdp3WarDL6M2WJFoD8FUFK3aVNQZ3Laq8pYuoYP6GXgYtQ3ctumbNtJBqC3562rvwAOD1ihE6RQ2aHRft91pNLrJ-HXIJR39TGKrTqV9a_q__DGPmJDGjxEr1oo0llDNhGsqqDvAKtYaWf6EEMUK1M6pTabj2fw48kEpUnoPHfgw84z76ODo9Nv308ZeoFHQ9HVUv86WdpksxN0voMir7aft84l2U3s7ttLiMXponRx8ZBD7BPVkdojuz634D9GjMwsJvDCkFk_RT4dlvINlXOV4B8vYYFmPxA7L2GEZayzjBstYYxlrLGONZWyw_BEzrJGM4WWRjDWSn6Hz2afF8YlnO4V4BZhTlUepjMC0BtueT6kAeytiAfjNqQx9AfOKkBQc-zgQYiqiNEliJtMgkMl4nPpwirDgOepneSZfIswIE4ySZOonacjiCZsmwk_FWIArykOfD9B7968vQROr5TWWybzeLJWnrt3v-O9jfGUPqiBCMEAvjKSWhaGVWTq5DtBkS4bNAMUEv30mu7rUjPAWYq_ufOVr9KB94t6gflXW8i1Y2xV_Z-H6G6R64ug
linkProvider Library Specific Holdings
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Matching+task-difficulty+to+patient-ability+during+task+practice+improves+upper+extremity+motor+skill+after+stroke%3A+a+proof+of+concept+study&rft.jtitle=Archives+of+physical+medicine+and+rehabilitation&rft.au=Woodbury%2C+Michelle+L.&rft.au=Anderson%2C+Kelly&rft.au=Finetto%2C+Christian&rft.au=Fortune%2C+Andrew&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1863&rft.epage=1871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.apmr.2016.03.022&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F27117385&rft.externalDocID=PMC5278766
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1532-821X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1532-821X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1532-821X&client=summon