A template-matching algorithm for laminar identification of cortical recording sites from evoked response potentials
In recent years, the advent of the so-called silicon probes has made it possible to homogeneously sample spikes and local field potentials (LFPs) from a regular grid of cortical recording sites. In principle, this allows inferring the laminar location of the sites based on the spatiotemporal pattern...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of neurophysiology |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
01.07.2020
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1522-1598 1522-1598 |
| DOI | 10.1152/jn.00033.2020 |
Cover
| Abstract | In recent years, the advent of the so-called silicon probes has made it possible to homogeneously sample spikes and local field potentials (LFPs) from a regular grid of cortical recording sites. In principle, this allows inferring the laminar location of the sites based on the spatiotemporal pattern of LFPs recorded along the probe, as in the well-known current source-density (CSD) analysis. This approach, however, has several limitations, since it relies on visual identification of landmark features (i.e., current sinks and sources) by human operators - features that can be absent from the CSD pattern if the probe does not span the whole cortical thickness, thus making manual labelling harder. Furthermore, as any manual annotation procedure, the typical CSD-based workflow for laminar identification of recording sites is affected by subjective judgment undermining the consistency and reproducibility of results. To overcome these limitations, we developed an alternative approach, based on finding the optimal match between the LFPs recorded along a probe in a given experiment and a template LFP profile that was computed using 18 recording sessions, in which the depth of the recording sites had been recovered through histology. We show that this method can achieve an accuracy of 79 µm in recovering the cortical depth of recording sites and a 76% accuracy in inferring their laminar location. As such, our approach provides an alternative to CSD that, being fully automated, is less prone to the idiosyncrasies of subjective judgment and works reliably also for recordings spanning a limited cortical stretch. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | In recent years, the advent of the so-called silicon probes has made it possible to homogeneously sample spikes and local field potentials (LFPs) from a regular grid of cortical recording sites. In principle, this allows inferring the laminar location of the sites based on the spatiotemporal pattern of LFPs recorded along the probe, as in the well-known current source-density (CSD) analysis. This approach, however, has several limitations, since it relies on visual identification of landmark features (i.e., current sinks and sources) by human operators - features that can be absent from the CSD pattern if the probe does not span the whole cortical thickness, thus making manual labelling harder. Furthermore, as any manual annotation procedure, the typical CSD-based workflow for laminar identification of recording sites is affected by subjective judgment undermining the consistency and reproducibility of results. To overcome these limitations, we developed an alternative approach, based on finding the optimal match between the LFPs recorded along a probe in a given experiment and a template LFP profile that was computed using 18 recording sessions, in which the depth of the recording sites had been recovered through histology. We show that this method can achieve an accuracy of 79 µm in recovering the cortical depth of recording sites and a 76% accuracy in inferring their laminar location. As such, our approach provides an alternative to CSD that, being fully automated, is less prone to the idiosyncrasies of subjective judgment and works reliably also for recordings spanning a limited cortical stretch. In recent years, the advent of the so-called silicon probes has made it possible to homogeneously sample spikes and local field potentials (LFPs) from a regular grid of cortical recording sites. In principle, this allows inferring the laminar location of the sites based on the spatiotemporal pattern of LFPs recorded along the probe, as in the well-known current source-density (CSD) analysis. This approach, however, has several limitations, since it relies on visual identification of landmark features (i.e., current sinks and sources) by human operators - features that can be absent from the CSD pattern if the probe does not span the whole cortical thickness, thus making manual labelling harder. Furthermore, as any manual annotation procedure, the typical CSD-based workflow for laminar identification of recording sites is affected by subjective judgment undermining the consistency and reproducibility of results. To overcome these limitations, we developed an alternative approach, based on finding the optimal match between the LFPs recorded along a probe in a given experiment and a template LFP profile that was computed using 18 recording sessions, in which the depth of the recording sites had been recovered through histology. We show that this method can achieve an accuracy of 79 µm in recovering the cortical depth of recording sites and a 76% accuracy in inferring their laminar location. As such, our approach provides an alternative to CSD that, being fully automated, is less prone to the idiosyncrasies of subjective judgment and works reliably also for recordings spanning a limited cortical stretch.In recent years, the advent of the so-called silicon probes has made it possible to homogeneously sample spikes and local field potentials (LFPs) from a regular grid of cortical recording sites. In principle, this allows inferring the laminar location of the sites based on the spatiotemporal pattern of LFPs recorded along the probe, as in the well-known current source-density (CSD) analysis. This approach, however, has several limitations, since it relies on visual identification of landmark features (i.e., current sinks and sources) by human operators - features that can be absent from the CSD pattern if the probe does not span the whole cortical thickness, thus making manual labelling harder. Furthermore, as any manual annotation procedure, the typical CSD-based workflow for laminar identification of recording sites is affected by subjective judgment undermining the consistency and reproducibility of results. To overcome these limitations, we developed an alternative approach, based on finding the optimal match between the LFPs recorded along a probe in a given experiment and a template LFP profile that was computed using 18 recording sessions, in which the depth of the recording sites had been recovered through histology. We show that this method can achieve an accuracy of 79 µm in recovering the cortical depth of recording sites and a 76% accuracy in inferring their laminar location. As such, our approach provides an alternative to CSD that, being fully automated, is less prone to the idiosyncrasies of subjective judgment and works reliably also for recordings spanning a limited cortical stretch. |
| Author | Zoccolan, Davide Matteucci, Giulio Riggi, Margherita |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Giulio surname: Matteucci fullname: Matteucci, Giulio organization: Neuroscience, SISSA, Italy – sequence: 2 givenname: Margherita surname: Riggi fullname: Riggi, Margherita organization: Neuroscience, SISSA, Italy – sequence: 3 givenname: Davide surname: Zoccolan fullname: Zoccolan, Davide organization: Neuroscience, SISSA, Italy |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32490704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpNkL1PwzAQxS1URGlhZEUeWVL8lToZq4ovqRILzJHjnFuX2A62i8R_TyqKxPTevfvdG26GJj54QOiGkgWlJbvf-wUhhPMFI4ycocsxYwUt62ryz0_RLKX9yMmSsAs05UzURBJxifIKZ3BDrzIUTmW9s36LVb8N0eadwyZE3CtnvYrYduCzNVarbIPHwWAdYh7HHkcYbXc8TTZDwiYGh-ErfEA37tIQfAI8hHwsUH26QudmFLg-6Ry9Pz68rZ-LzevTy3q1KQZGaS6okF1btUIZoahhS6ilIktuOGO1IRq05LxaKt0RqVsDrdBSs7qUomo17RTlc3T32zvE8HmAlBtnk4a-Vx7CITVMkJrWvKLliN6e0EProGuGaJ2K383fp_gPoRpvPg |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1152/jn.00033.2020 |
| DatabaseName | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology |
| EISSN | 1522-1598 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 32490704 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: EC | European Research Council (ERC) grantid: 616803-LEARN2SEE |
| GroupedDBID | --- -DZ -~X .55 18M 29L 2WC 39C 4.4 53G 5GY 5VS ABCQX ABHWK ABIVO ABJNI ABKWE ACGFO ACGFS ACNCT ADBBV ADFNX ADIYS AENEX AFFNX AFOSN AIZAD ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL BKKCC BTFSW CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EMOBN F5P FRP GX1 H13 H~9 ITBOX KQ8 L7B NPM OK1 P2P RAP RHF RHI RPL RPRKH SJN TR2 UHB UPT VXZ W8F WH7 WOQ WOW X7M XSW YBH YQT YSK 7X8 ADHGD AETEA |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-147db8b4af4a1f26e97a063f3229f0cec73386acd07cbfeb4c7c295748bc1da13 |
| ISSN | 1522-1598 |
| IngestDate | Thu Sep 04 20:18:45 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:09:40 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Keywords | cortical layers visual cortex visually evoked potentials silicon probes |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p211t-147db8b4af4a1f26e97a063f3229f0cec73386acd07cbfeb4c7c295748bc1da13 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 32490704 |
| PQID | 2409193815 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2409193815 pubmed_primary_32490704 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2020-07-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-07-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2020 text: 2020-07-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of neurophysiology |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Neurophysiol |
| PublicationYear | 2020 |
| SSID | ssj0007502 |
| Score | 2.3359873 |
| Snippet | In recent years, the advent of the so-called silicon probes has made it possible to homogeneously sample spikes and local field potentials (LFPs) from a... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| Title | A template-matching algorithm for laminar identification of cortical recording sites from evoked response potentials |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32490704 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2409193815 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1522-1598 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0007502 issn: 1522-1598 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries – providerCode: PRVBFR databaseName: Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1522-1598 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0007502 issn: 1522-1598 databaseCode: DIK dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com providerName: Flying Publisher |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Ra9RAEF5sC9IX0dZqq5YRxJcj9ZJsssnjIdqiKAotlL4cu5vNNXqXHG1O0F_vzG4219MeaF_CkeQ2MN-X3W8mM7OMvRIJpwJHFeS54gGXIb1zYRJoXBpS9-2PQgOfPqcnZ_zDeXLut7jvqktadaR_3VpXchdU8RziSlWy_4FsPyiewN-ILx4RYTz-E8ajAXWWmqJcDFB4uqxIOZ006PBfzmwCIeJNBbeDquiygnqFiF6nC2O7MI0NK1QUhLUFJ-ZH891QYYvNoDWDedPSAHJ6vUbN2r6YNkyyEqen7cTNQmubM3BcLaYu7cu1zZ5Mqq5ciHJNqrZfIS4ajfx0oVmbdG9uBifQE_WJrLi2dBMqOrsombLbp-uE2r9-q6mLZBwf0Qg370Nrz2cWO5R96MW7jYr_6I_tL22wrQhndtq-4-PXZcd4VESR762aRG9WnrXN7vt_r3cwrNA4fcgedDaFkYP7Ebtn6h22O6pl28x-wmv40ht5l7Uj-IsB0DMAkAHQMQBWGQBNCZ4B0DMALAOAGACOAeAZAEsGPGZn79-dvj0Jun00gjm6920QclGoTHFZ4rtYRqnJhURlWuJcnpdDbbSI4yyVuhgKrUqjuBY6yhPBM6XDQobxHtusm9o8ZZBmkVDUYg7v5EkhVKHzocyljkwmIjPcZy-9Gcc4T9HHJ1mbZnE9RuWYo7OQhck-e-LsO567hipjD8LB2ivP2PaSXs_ZZnu1MC9QDbbq0ML9G13pZfw |
| linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+template-matching+algorithm+for+laminar+identification+of+cortical+recording+sites+from+evoked+response+potentials&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neurophysiology&rft.au=Matteucci%2C+Giulio&rft.au=Riggi%2C+Margherita&rft.au=Zoccolan%2C+Davide&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjn.00033.2020&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F32490704&rft.externalDocID=32490704 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1522-1598&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1522-1598&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1522-1598&client=summon |