A template-matching algorithm for laminar identification of cortical recording sites from evoked response potentials

In recent years, the advent of the so-called silicon probes has made it possible to homogeneously sample spikes and local field potentials (LFPs) from a regular grid of cortical recording sites. In principle, this allows inferring the laminar location of the sites based on the spatiotemporal pattern...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurophysiology
Main Authors Matteucci, Giulio, Riggi, Margherita, Zoccolan, Davide
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.07.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1522-1598
1522-1598
DOI10.1152/jn.00033.2020

Cover

Abstract In recent years, the advent of the so-called silicon probes has made it possible to homogeneously sample spikes and local field potentials (LFPs) from a regular grid of cortical recording sites. In principle, this allows inferring the laminar location of the sites based on the spatiotemporal pattern of LFPs recorded along the probe, as in the well-known current source-density (CSD) analysis. This approach, however, has several limitations, since it relies on visual identification of landmark features (i.e., current sinks and sources) by human operators - features that can be absent from the CSD pattern if the probe does not span the whole cortical thickness, thus making manual labelling harder. Furthermore, as any manual annotation procedure, the typical CSD-based workflow for laminar identification of recording sites is affected by subjective judgment undermining the consistency and reproducibility of results. To overcome these limitations, we developed an alternative approach, based on finding the optimal match between the LFPs recorded along a probe in a given experiment and a template LFP profile that was computed using 18 recording sessions, in which the depth of the recording sites had been recovered through histology. We show that this method can achieve an accuracy of 79 µm in recovering the cortical depth of recording sites and a 76% accuracy in inferring their laminar location. As such, our approach provides an alternative to CSD that, being fully automated, is less prone to the idiosyncrasies of subjective judgment and works reliably also for recordings spanning a limited cortical stretch.
AbstractList In recent years, the advent of the so-called silicon probes has made it possible to homogeneously sample spikes and local field potentials (LFPs) from a regular grid of cortical recording sites. In principle, this allows inferring the laminar location of the sites based on the spatiotemporal pattern of LFPs recorded along the probe, as in the well-known current source-density (CSD) analysis. This approach, however, has several limitations, since it relies on visual identification of landmark features (i.e., current sinks and sources) by human operators - features that can be absent from the CSD pattern if the probe does not span the whole cortical thickness, thus making manual labelling harder. Furthermore, as any manual annotation procedure, the typical CSD-based workflow for laminar identification of recording sites is affected by subjective judgment undermining the consistency and reproducibility of results. To overcome these limitations, we developed an alternative approach, based on finding the optimal match between the LFPs recorded along a probe in a given experiment and a template LFP profile that was computed using 18 recording sessions, in which the depth of the recording sites had been recovered through histology. We show that this method can achieve an accuracy of 79 µm in recovering the cortical depth of recording sites and a 76% accuracy in inferring their laminar location. As such, our approach provides an alternative to CSD that, being fully automated, is less prone to the idiosyncrasies of subjective judgment and works reliably also for recordings spanning a limited cortical stretch.
In recent years, the advent of the so-called silicon probes has made it possible to homogeneously sample spikes and local field potentials (LFPs) from a regular grid of cortical recording sites. In principle, this allows inferring the laminar location of the sites based on the spatiotemporal pattern of LFPs recorded along the probe, as in the well-known current source-density (CSD) analysis. This approach, however, has several limitations, since it relies on visual identification of landmark features (i.e., current sinks and sources) by human operators - features that can be absent from the CSD pattern if the probe does not span the whole cortical thickness, thus making manual labelling harder. Furthermore, as any manual annotation procedure, the typical CSD-based workflow for laminar identification of recording sites is affected by subjective judgment undermining the consistency and reproducibility of results. To overcome these limitations, we developed an alternative approach, based on finding the optimal match between the LFPs recorded along a probe in a given experiment and a template LFP profile that was computed using 18 recording sessions, in which the depth of the recording sites had been recovered through histology. We show that this method can achieve an accuracy of 79 µm in recovering the cortical depth of recording sites and a 76% accuracy in inferring their laminar location. As such, our approach provides an alternative to CSD that, being fully automated, is less prone to the idiosyncrasies of subjective judgment and works reliably also for recordings spanning a limited cortical stretch.In recent years, the advent of the so-called silicon probes has made it possible to homogeneously sample spikes and local field potentials (LFPs) from a regular grid of cortical recording sites. In principle, this allows inferring the laminar location of the sites based on the spatiotemporal pattern of LFPs recorded along the probe, as in the well-known current source-density (CSD) analysis. This approach, however, has several limitations, since it relies on visual identification of landmark features (i.e., current sinks and sources) by human operators - features that can be absent from the CSD pattern if the probe does not span the whole cortical thickness, thus making manual labelling harder. Furthermore, as any manual annotation procedure, the typical CSD-based workflow for laminar identification of recording sites is affected by subjective judgment undermining the consistency and reproducibility of results. To overcome these limitations, we developed an alternative approach, based on finding the optimal match between the LFPs recorded along a probe in a given experiment and a template LFP profile that was computed using 18 recording sessions, in which the depth of the recording sites had been recovered through histology. We show that this method can achieve an accuracy of 79 µm in recovering the cortical depth of recording sites and a 76% accuracy in inferring their laminar location. As such, our approach provides an alternative to CSD that, being fully automated, is less prone to the idiosyncrasies of subjective judgment and works reliably also for recordings spanning a limited cortical stretch.
Author Zoccolan, Davide
Matteucci, Giulio
Riggi, Margherita
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Giulio
  surname: Matteucci
  fullname: Matteucci, Giulio
  organization: Neuroscience, SISSA, Italy
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Margherita
  surname: Riggi
  fullname: Riggi, Margherita
  organization: Neuroscience, SISSA, Italy
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Davide
  surname: Zoccolan
  fullname: Zoccolan, Davide
  organization: Neuroscience, SISSA, Italy
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32490704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkL1PwzAQxS1URGlhZEUeWVL8lToZq4ovqRILzJHjnFuX2A62i8R_TyqKxPTevfvdG26GJj54QOiGkgWlJbvf-wUhhPMFI4ycocsxYwUt62ryz0_RLKX9yMmSsAs05UzURBJxifIKZ3BDrzIUTmW9s36LVb8N0eadwyZE3CtnvYrYduCzNVarbIPHwWAdYh7HHkcYbXc8TTZDwiYGh-ErfEA37tIQfAI8hHwsUH26QudmFLg-6Ry9Pz68rZ-LzevTy3q1KQZGaS6okF1btUIZoahhS6ilIktuOGO1IRq05LxaKt0RqVsDrdBSs7qUomo17RTlc3T32zvE8HmAlBtnk4a-Vx7CITVMkJrWvKLliN6e0EProGuGaJ2K383fp_gPoRpvPg
ContentType Journal Article
DBID NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1152/jn.00033.2020
DatabaseName PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
EISSN 1522-1598
ExternalDocumentID 32490704
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: EC | European Research Council (ERC)
  grantid: 616803-LEARN2SEE
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
-~X
.55
18M
29L
2WC
39C
4.4
53G
5GY
5VS
ABCQX
ABHWK
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABKWE
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACNCT
ADBBV
ADFNX
ADIYS
AENEX
AFFNX
AFOSN
AIZAD
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BKKCC
BTFSW
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EMOBN
F5P
FRP
GX1
H13
H~9
ITBOX
KQ8
L7B
NPM
OK1
P2P
RAP
RHF
RHI
RPL
RPRKH
SJN
TR2
UHB
UPT
VXZ
W8F
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X7M
XSW
YBH
YQT
YSK
7X8
ADHGD
AETEA
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-147db8b4af4a1f26e97a063f3229f0cec73386acd07cbfeb4c7c295748bc1da13
ISSN 1522-1598
IngestDate Thu Sep 04 20:18:45 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:09:40 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords cortical layers
visual cortex
visually evoked potentials
silicon probes
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p211t-147db8b4af4a1f26e97a063f3229f0cec73386acd07cbfeb4c7c295748bc1da13
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 32490704
PQID 2409193815
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2409193815
pubmed_primary_32490704
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-07-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-07-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of neurophysiology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Neurophysiol
PublicationYear 2020
SSID ssj0007502
Score 2.3359873
Snippet In recent years, the advent of the so-called silicon probes has made it possible to homogeneously sample spikes and local field potentials (LFPs) from a...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Title A template-matching algorithm for laminar identification of cortical recording sites from evoked response potentials
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32490704
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2409193815
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAFT
  databaseName: Open Access Digital Library
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1522-1598
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0007502
  issn: 1522-1598
  databaseCode: KQ8
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html
  providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
– providerCode: PRVBFR
  databaseName: Free Medical Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1522-1598
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0007502
  issn: 1522-1598
  databaseCode: DIK
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com
  providerName: Flying Publisher
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Ra9RAEF5sC9IX0dZqq5YRxJcj9ZJsssnjIdqiKAotlL4cu5vNNXqXHG1O0F_vzG4219MeaF_CkeQ2MN-X3W8mM7OMvRIJpwJHFeS54gGXIb1zYRJoXBpS9-2PQgOfPqcnZ_zDeXLut7jvqktadaR_3VpXchdU8RziSlWy_4FsPyiewN-ILx4RYTz-E8ajAXWWmqJcDFB4uqxIOZ006PBfzmwCIeJNBbeDquiygnqFiF6nC2O7MI0NK1QUhLUFJ-ZH891QYYvNoDWDedPSAHJ6vUbN2r6YNkyyEqen7cTNQmubM3BcLaYu7cu1zZ5Mqq5ciHJNqrZfIS4ajfx0oVmbdG9uBifQE_WJrLi2dBMqOrsombLbp-uE2r9-q6mLZBwf0Qg370Nrz2cWO5R96MW7jYr_6I_tL22wrQhndtq-4-PXZcd4VESR762aRG9WnrXN7vt_r3cwrNA4fcgedDaFkYP7Ebtn6h22O6pl28x-wmv40ht5l7Uj-IsB0DMAkAHQMQBWGQBNCZ4B0DMALAOAGACOAeAZAEsGPGZn79-dvj0Jun00gjm6920QclGoTHFZ4rtYRqnJhURlWuJcnpdDbbSI4yyVuhgKrUqjuBY6yhPBM6XDQobxHtusm9o8ZZBmkVDUYg7v5EkhVKHzocyljkwmIjPcZy-9Gcc4T9HHJ1mbZnE9RuWYo7OQhck-e-LsO567hipjD8LB2ivP2PaSXs_ZZnu1MC9QDbbq0ML9G13pZfw
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+template-matching+algorithm+for+laminar+identification+of+cortical+recording+sites+from+evoked+response+potentials&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neurophysiology&rft.au=Matteucci%2C+Giulio&rft.au=Riggi%2C+Margherita&rft.au=Zoccolan%2C+Davide&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjn.00033.2020&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F32490704&rft.externalDocID=32490704
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1522-1598&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1522-1598&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1522-1598&client=summon