Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review
To evaluate systematically the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang Data, China Biomedical Literature Service System, and China Clinical Trial Registry were searched for randomized controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccines publishe...
Saved in:
Published in | Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi Vol. 23; no. 3; pp. 221 - 228 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
China
中国当代儿科杂志编辑部
15.03.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1008-8830 |
DOI | 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2101133 |
Cover
Abstract | To evaluate systematically the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang Data, China Biomedical Literature Service System, and China Clinical Trial Registry were searched for randomized controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccines published up to December 31, 2020. The Cochrane bias risk assessment tool was used to assess the quality of studies. A qualitative analysis was performed on the results of clinical trials.
Thirteen randomized, blinded, controlled trials, which involved the safety and efficacy of 11 COVID-19 vaccines, were included. In 10 studies, the 28-day seroconversion rate of subjects exceeded 80%. In two 10 000-scale clinical trials, the vaccines were effective in 95% and 70.4% of the subjects, respectively. The seroconversion rate was lower than 60% in only one study. In six studies, the proportion of subjects who had an adverse reaction within 28 days after vaccination was lower than 30%. This proportion was 30%-50% in two studies and > 50% in the other two studies. Most of the adverse reactions were mild to moderate and resolved within 24 hours after vaccination. The most common local adverse reaction was pain or tenderness at the injection site, and the most common systemic adverse reaction was fatigue, fever, or bodily pain. The immune response and incidence of adverse reactions to the vaccines were positively correlated with the dose given to the subjects. The immune response to the vaccines was worse in the elderly than in the younger population. In 6 studies that compared single-dose and double-dose vaccination, 4 studies showed that double-dose vaccination produced a stronger immune response than single-dose vaccination.
Most of the COVID-19 vaccines appear to be effective and safe. Double-dose vaccination is recommended. However, more research is needed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of the vaccines and the influence of dose, age, and production process on the protective efficacy. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To evaluate systematically the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.OBJECTIVETo evaluate systematically the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang Data, China Biomedical Literature Service System, and China Clinical Trial Registry were searched for randomized controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccines published up to December 31, 2020. The Cochrane bias risk assessment tool was used to assess the quality of studies. A qualitative analysis was performed on the results of clinical trials.METHODSPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang Data, China Biomedical Literature Service System, and China Clinical Trial Registry were searched for randomized controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccines published up to December 31, 2020. The Cochrane bias risk assessment tool was used to assess the quality of studies. A qualitative analysis was performed on the results of clinical trials.Thirteen randomized, blinded, controlled trials, which involved the safety and efficacy of 11 COVID-19 vaccines, were included. In 10 studies, the 28-day seroconversion rate of subjects exceeded 80%. In two 10 000-scale clinical trials, the vaccines were effective in 95% and 70.4% of the subjects, respectively. The seroconversion rate was lower than 60% in only one study. In six studies, the proportion of subjects who had an adverse reaction within 28 days after vaccination was lower than 30%. This proportion was 30%-50% in two studies and > 50% in the other two studies. Most of the adverse reactions were mild to moderate and resolved within 24 hours after vaccination. The most common local adverse reaction was pain or tenderness at the injection site, and the most common systemic adverse reaction was fatigue, fever, or bodily pain. The immune response and incidence of adverse reactions to the vaccines were positively correlated with the dose given to the subjects. The immune response to the vaccines was worse in the elderly than in the younger population. In 6 studies that compared single-dose and double-dose vaccination, 4 studies showed that double-dose vaccination produced a stronger immune response than single-dose vaccination.RESULTSThirteen randomized, blinded, controlled trials, which involved the safety and efficacy of 11 COVID-19 vaccines, were included. In 10 studies, the 28-day seroconversion rate of subjects exceeded 80%. In two 10 000-scale clinical trials, the vaccines were effective in 95% and 70.4% of the subjects, respectively. The seroconversion rate was lower than 60% in only one study. In six studies, the proportion of subjects who had an adverse reaction within 28 days after vaccination was lower than 30%. This proportion was 30%-50% in two studies and > 50% in the other two studies. Most of the adverse reactions were mild to moderate and resolved within 24 hours after vaccination. The most common local adverse reaction was pain or tenderness at the injection site, and the most common systemic adverse reaction was fatigue, fever, or bodily pain. The immune response and incidence of adverse reactions to the vaccines were positively correlated with the dose given to the subjects. The immune response to the vaccines was worse in the elderly than in the younger population. In 6 studies that compared single-dose and double-dose vaccination, 4 studies showed that double-dose vaccination produced a stronger immune response than single-dose vaccination.Most of the COVID-19 vaccines appear to be effective and safe. Double-dose vaccination is recommended. However, more research is needed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of the vaccines and the influence of dose, age, and production process on the protective efficacy.CONCLUSIONSMost of the COVID-19 vaccines appear to be effective and safe. Double-dose vaccination is recommended. However, more research is needed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of the vaccines and the influence of dose, age, and production process on the protective efficacy. To evaluate systematically the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang Data, China Biomedical Literature Service System, and China Clinical Trial Registry were searched for randomized controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccines published up to December 31, 2020. The Cochrane bias risk assessment tool was used to assess the quality of studies. A qualitative analysis was performed on the results of clinical trials. Thirteen randomized, blinded, controlled trials, which involved the safety and efficacy of 11 COVID-19 vaccines, were included. In 10 studies, the 28-day seroconversion rate of subjects exceeded 80%. In two 10 000-scale clinical trials, the vaccines were effective in 95% and 70.4% of the subjects, respectively. The seroconversion rate was lower than 60% in only one study. In six studies, the proportion of subjects who had an adverse reaction within 28 days after vaccination was lower than 30%. This proportion was 30%-50% in two studies and > 50% in the other two studies. Most of the adverse reactions were mild to moderate and resolved within 24 hours after vaccination. The most common local adverse reaction was pain or tenderness at the injection site, and the most common systemic adverse reaction was fatigue, fever, or bodily pain. The immune response and incidence of adverse reactions to the vaccines were positively correlated with the dose given to the subjects. The immune response to the vaccines was worse in the elderly than in the younger population. In 6 studies that compared single-dose and double-dose vaccination, 4 studies showed that double-dose vaccination produced a stronger immune response than single-dose vaccination. Most of the COVID-19 vaccines appear to be effective and safe. Double-dose vaccination is recommended. However, more research is needed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of the vaccines and the influence of dose, age, and production process on the protective efficacy. |
Author | Liu, Miao Jiang, Li-Guo Tu, Xiao-Yan Chen, Jiang-Nan Xing, Kai Li, Jiao-Jiao Jiang, Yi Liang, Zhang-Wu Xing, Fu-Qiang |
AuthorAffiliation | Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China 武汉大学人民医院儿科, 湖北武汉 430060 |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China 武汉大学人民医院儿科, 湖北武汉 430060 |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Kai surname: Xing fullname: Xing, Kai organization: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China – sequence: 2 givenname: Xiao-Yan surname: Tu fullname: Tu, Xiao-Yan organization: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China – sequence: 3 givenname: Miao surname: Liu fullname: Liu, Miao organization: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China – sequence: 4 givenname: Zhang-Wu surname: Liang fullname: Liang, Zhang-Wu organization: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China – sequence: 5 givenname: Jiang-Nan surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Jiang-Nan organization: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China – sequence: 6 givenname: Jiao-Jiao surname: Li fullname: Li, Jiao-Jiao organization: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China – sequence: 7 givenname: Li-Guo surname: Jiang fullname: Jiang, Li-Guo organization: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China – sequence: 8 givenname: Fu-Qiang surname: Xing fullname: Xing, Fu-Qiang organization: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China – sequence: 9 givenname: Yi surname: Jiang fullname: Jiang, Yi organization: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33691913$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpVkEtLAzEUhbOo2If-BcnSzdR7k-lMIihIrVoodKNuh0x6oynzqJNpZf69FWvR1YVz4Ps4d8h6VV0RYxxhnMZaX63HPoRqjAAqUkrCWCAgStljg2PWZ8MQ1gATFWt5yvpSJho1ygG7mTnnrbEdN9WKB-Oo7Xjt-HT5Or-PUPOdsdZXFK654aELLZWm9ZY3tPP0ecZOnCkCnR_uiL08zJ6nT9Fi-Tif3i2iDSpsIydsKnPUq1yAsSImpQn2fmsFQCwVJblFiQ5IpC6VCFoJkonThBLQJHLEbn-4m21e0spS1TamyDaNL03TZbXx2f-m8u_ZW73LUr0fqtI94PIAaOqPLYU2K32wVBSmonobMjEBkKnW-O26-Os6Sn5_Jr8A2BVvZw |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 版权所有©《中国当代儿科杂志》编辑部2021 Copyright ©2021 Contemporary Chinese journal pediatrics. All rights reserved. 2021 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 版权所有©《中国当代儿科杂志》编辑部2021 Copyright ©2021 Contemporary Chinese journal pediatrics. All rights reserved. 2021 |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2101133 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EndPage | 228 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC7969187 33691913 |
Genre | Systematic Review Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | China |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目 grantid: 2042020kf1011 – fundername: Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities grantid: 2042020kf1011 |
GroupedDBID | --- -05 92F 92I ABJNI ACGFS ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CCEZO CGR CIEJG CUY CVF CW9 ECM EIF EMOBN F5P NPM RPM TCJ TGQ U1G U5O 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-p181t-f2c73b19db20ac24e89e0191cc200438e6bc131f0e27f7310982e36f9e1301a63 |
ISSN | 1008-8830 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 14:13:43 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 05:51:20 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:07:37 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p181t-f2c73b19db20ac24e89e0191cc200438e6bc131f0e27f7310982e36f9e1301a63 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
PMID | 33691913 |
PQID | 2500379916 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7969187 proquest_miscellaneous_2500379916 pubmed_primary_33691913 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-03-15 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-03-15 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2021 text: 2021-03-15 day: 15 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | China |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: China – name: 中国长沙 |
PublicationTitle | Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | 中国当代儿科杂志编辑部 |
Publisher_xml | – name: 中国当代儿科杂志编辑部 |
SSID | ssj0058493 |
Score | 2.4881694 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | To evaluate systematically the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang Data, China... To evaluate systematically the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.OBJECTIVETo evaluate systematically the efficacy and safety of COVID-19... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 221 |
SubjectTerms | Aged China Clinical Research COVID-19 COVID-19 Vaccines Humans SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines 论著·临床研究 |
Title | Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33691913 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2500379916 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7969187 |
Volume | 23 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAQN databaseName: PubMed Central issn: 1008-8830 databaseCode: RPM dateStart: 20160101 customDbUrl: isFulltext: true dateEnd: 99991231 titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0058493 providerName: National Library of Medicine |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELZgkdBeEIhXeSlI-BSlxHbqB7emTbUgLXDYRSsuVZw4bYVIq90WpP56xnbSZqtFgr1Ylu3Wkb_JeMaeb4LQO5LouFQyiVQZWwdFqEjCNhcJnldFUiW6NJYofPqZn5wnny4GF_vQIccuWet-sb2RV3IbVKENcLUs2f9Adven0AB1wBdKQBjKf8I4s_kf7Pfa3el3XpkmvOLLt4_jiKjwV17Ye_Mrz2g-TNr8u2uYfp8v69lsswzLvJ5BsQjNZfjDhNs83M4X3bMB6oKjPDvSoYmzBKcSD8c4G2CV4tRVoFTMdaV4yGyLhPoEZwIPBVYEZxyrMZbUDZ5gJWxXOsKK40ziNHNjFJYMD7uq0wZSSNncsjS61XOJGxliXUXpedHNnks9QfxQnQtwx5w6txP0dxP0wU0lxOfP6KC8-ulgZowrcELZfoPbhR1-PR0JBb1S3EX3qOCctsc7fusGY0x5RkYzkw_9so_x_m8PcYzutzPe5KQcxtp2jJezh-hB43UEQy9Cj9AdUz9GO_EJQHwCLz7Bsgpa8Qla8fkQ5MFeeAIvPE_Q-SQ7G51Ezdc0ohVYceuoooVgmqhS0zgvaGKkMmDfk6Kg7jrYcF0QRqrYUFEJmzBWUsN4pQyYOSTn7Ck6qpe1eY4CloMTqio9SGic8EEpNSwIYVqrsgALnffQ23YhpqCt7BVUXpvl5moKBnfMhPVJeuiZX5jpyqdVmbbL2EPi2pLtBthM6Nd76sXcZURvUH1x61--RMf79-cVOlpfbsxrsDbX-o2TkD8wmm9o |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy+and+safety+of+COVID-19+vaccines%3A+a+systematic+review&rft.jtitle=Zhongguo+dang+dai+er+ke+za+zhi&rft.date=2021-03-15&rft.pub=%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E5%84%BF%E7%A7%91%E6%9D%82%E5%BF%97%E7%BC%96%E8%BE%91%E9%83%A8&rft.issn=1008-8830&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=228&rft_id=info:doi/10.7499%2Fj.issn.1008-8830.2101133&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F33691913&rft.externalDocID=PMC7969187 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1008-8830&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1008-8830&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1008-8830&client=summon |