Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review

To evaluate systematically the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang Data, China Biomedical Literature Service System, and China Clinical Trial Registry were searched for randomized controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccines publishe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi Vol. 23; no. 3; pp. 221 - 228
Main Authors Xing, Kai, Tu, Xiao-Yan, Liu, Miao, Liang, Zhang-Wu, Chen, Jiang-Nan, Li, Jiao-Jiao, Jiang, Li-Guo, Xing, Fu-Qiang, Jiang, Yi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published China 中国当代儿科杂志编辑部 15.03.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1008-8830
DOI10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2101133

Cover

Abstract To evaluate systematically the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang Data, China Biomedical Literature Service System, and China Clinical Trial Registry were searched for randomized controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccines published up to December 31, 2020. The Cochrane bias risk assessment tool was used to assess the quality of studies. A qualitative analysis was performed on the results of clinical trials. Thirteen randomized, blinded, controlled trials, which involved the safety and efficacy of 11 COVID-19 vaccines, were included. In 10 studies, the 28-day seroconversion rate of subjects exceeded 80%. In two 10 000-scale clinical trials, the vaccines were effective in 95% and 70.4% of the subjects, respectively. The seroconversion rate was lower than 60% in only one study. In six studies, the proportion of subjects who had an adverse reaction within 28 days after vaccination was lower than 30%. This proportion was 30%-50% in two studies and > 50% in the other two studies. Most of the adverse reactions were mild to moderate and resolved within 24 hours after vaccination. The most common local adverse reaction was pain or tenderness at the injection site, and the most common systemic adverse reaction was fatigue, fever, or bodily pain. The immune response and incidence of adverse reactions to the vaccines were positively correlated with the dose given to the subjects. The immune response to the vaccines was worse in the elderly than in the younger population. In 6 studies that compared single-dose and double-dose vaccination, 4 studies showed that double-dose vaccination produced a stronger immune response than single-dose vaccination. Most of the COVID-19 vaccines appear to be effective and safe. Double-dose vaccination is recommended. However, more research is needed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of the vaccines and the influence of dose, age, and production process on the protective efficacy.
AbstractList To evaluate systematically the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.OBJECTIVETo evaluate systematically the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang Data, China Biomedical Literature Service System, and China Clinical Trial Registry were searched for randomized controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccines published up to December 31, 2020. The Cochrane bias risk assessment tool was used to assess the quality of studies. A qualitative analysis was performed on the results of clinical trials.METHODSPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang Data, China Biomedical Literature Service System, and China Clinical Trial Registry were searched for randomized controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccines published up to December 31, 2020. The Cochrane bias risk assessment tool was used to assess the quality of studies. A qualitative analysis was performed on the results of clinical trials.Thirteen randomized, blinded, controlled trials, which involved the safety and efficacy of 11 COVID-19 vaccines, were included. In 10 studies, the 28-day seroconversion rate of subjects exceeded 80%. In two 10 000-scale clinical trials, the vaccines were effective in 95% and 70.4% of the subjects, respectively. The seroconversion rate was lower than 60% in only one study. In six studies, the proportion of subjects who had an adverse reaction within 28 days after vaccination was lower than 30%. This proportion was 30%-50% in two studies and > 50% in the other two studies. Most of the adverse reactions were mild to moderate and resolved within 24 hours after vaccination. The most common local adverse reaction was pain or tenderness at the injection site, and the most common systemic adverse reaction was fatigue, fever, or bodily pain. The immune response and incidence of adverse reactions to the vaccines were positively correlated with the dose given to the subjects. The immune response to the vaccines was worse in the elderly than in the younger population. In 6 studies that compared single-dose and double-dose vaccination, 4 studies showed that double-dose vaccination produced a stronger immune response than single-dose vaccination.RESULTSThirteen randomized, blinded, controlled trials, which involved the safety and efficacy of 11 COVID-19 vaccines, were included. In 10 studies, the 28-day seroconversion rate of subjects exceeded 80%. In two 10 000-scale clinical trials, the vaccines were effective in 95% and 70.4% of the subjects, respectively. The seroconversion rate was lower than 60% in only one study. In six studies, the proportion of subjects who had an adverse reaction within 28 days after vaccination was lower than 30%. This proportion was 30%-50% in two studies and > 50% in the other two studies. Most of the adverse reactions were mild to moderate and resolved within 24 hours after vaccination. The most common local adverse reaction was pain or tenderness at the injection site, and the most common systemic adverse reaction was fatigue, fever, or bodily pain. The immune response and incidence of adverse reactions to the vaccines were positively correlated with the dose given to the subjects. The immune response to the vaccines was worse in the elderly than in the younger population. In 6 studies that compared single-dose and double-dose vaccination, 4 studies showed that double-dose vaccination produced a stronger immune response than single-dose vaccination.Most of the COVID-19 vaccines appear to be effective and safe. Double-dose vaccination is recommended. However, more research is needed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of the vaccines and the influence of dose, age, and production process on the protective efficacy.CONCLUSIONSMost of the COVID-19 vaccines appear to be effective and safe. Double-dose vaccination is recommended. However, more research is needed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of the vaccines and the influence of dose, age, and production process on the protective efficacy.
To evaluate systematically the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang Data, China Biomedical Literature Service System, and China Clinical Trial Registry were searched for randomized controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccines published up to December 31, 2020. The Cochrane bias risk assessment tool was used to assess the quality of studies. A qualitative analysis was performed on the results of clinical trials. Thirteen randomized, blinded, controlled trials, which involved the safety and efficacy of 11 COVID-19 vaccines, were included. In 10 studies, the 28-day seroconversion rate of subjects exceeded 80%. In two 10 000-scale clinical trials, the vaccines were effective in 95% and 70.4% of the subjects, respectively. The seroconversion rate was lower than 60% in only one study. In six studies, the proportion of subjects who had an adverse reaction within 28 days after vaccination was lower than 30%. This proportion was 30%-50% in two studies and > 50% in the other two studies. Most of the adverse reactions were mild to moderate and resolved within 24 hours after vaccination. The most common local adverse reaction was pain or tenderness at the injection site, and the most common systemic adverse reaction was fatigue, fever, or bodily pain. The immune response and incidence of adverse reactions to the vaccines were positively correlated with the dose given to the subjects. The immune response to the vaccines was worse in the elderly than in the younger population. In 6 studies that compared single-dose and double-dose vaccination, 4 studies showed that double-dose vaccination produced a stronger immune response than single-dose vaccination. Most of the COVID-19 vaccines appear to be effective and safe. Double-dose vaccination is recommended. However, more research is needed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of the vaccines and the influence of dose, age, and production process on the protective efficacy.
Author Liu, Miao
Jiang, Li-Guo
Tu, Xiao-Yan
Chen, Jiang-Nan
Xing, Kai
Li, Jiao-Jiao
Jiang, Yi
Liang, Zhang-Wu
Xing, Fu-Qiang
AuthorAffiliation Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China 武汉大学人民医院儿科, 湖北武汉 430060
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China 武汉大学人民医院儿科, 湖北武汉 430060
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Kai
  surname: Xing
  fullname: Xing, Kai
  organization: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Xiao-Yan
  surname: Tu
  fullname: Tu, Xiao-Yan
  organization: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Miao
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Miao
  organization: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Zhang-Wu
  surname: Liang
  fullname: Liang, Zhang-Wu
  organization: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Jiang-Nan
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Jiang-Nan
  organization: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Jiao-Jiao
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Jiao-Jiao
  organization: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Li-Guo
  surname: Jiang
  fullname: Jiang, Li-Guo
  organization: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Fu-Qiang
  surname: Xing
  fullname: Xing, Fu-Qiang
  organization: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Yi
  surname: Jiang
  fullname: Jiang, Yi
  organization: Department of Pediatrics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33691913$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpVkEtLAzEUhbOo2If-BcnSzdR7k-lMIihIrVoodKNuh0x6oynzqJNpZf69FWvR1YVz4Ps4d8h6VV0RYxxhnMZaX63HPoRqjAAqUkrCWCAgStljg2PWZ8MQ1gATFWt5yvpSJho1ygG7mTnnrbEdN9WKB-Oo7Xjt-HT5Or-PUPOdsdZXFK654aELLZWm9ZY3tPP0ecZOnCkCnR_uiL08zJ6nT9Fi-Tif3i2iDSpsIydsKnPUq1yAsSImpQn2fmsFQCwVJblFiQ5IpC6VCFoJkonThBLQJHLEbn-4m21e0spS1TamyDaNL03TZbXx2f-m8u_ZW73LUr0fqtI94PIAaOqPLYU2K32wVBSmonobMjEBkKnW-O26-Os6Sn5_Jr8A2BVvZw
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 版权所有©《中国当代儿科杂志》编辑部2021 Copyright ©2021 Contemporary Chinese journal pediatrics. All rights reserved. 2021
Copyright_xml – notice: 版权所有©《中国当代儿科杂志》编辑部2021 Copyright ©2021 Contemporary Chinese journal pediatrics. All rights reserved. 2021
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2101133
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EndPage 228
ExternalDocumentID PMC7969187
33691913
Genre Systematic Review
Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目
  grantid: 2042020kf1011
– fundername: Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  grantid: 2042020kf1011
GroupedDBID ---
-05
92F
92I
ABJNI
ACGFS
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CCEZO
CGR
CIEJG
CUY
CVF
CW9
ECM
EIF
EMOBN
F5P
NPM
RPM
TCJ
TGQ
U1G
U5O
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-p181t-f2c73b19db20ac24e89e0191cc200438e6bc131f0e27f7310982e36f9e1301a63
ISSN 1008-8830
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 14:13:43 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 05:51:20 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:07:37 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p181t-f2c73b19db20ac24e89e0191cc200438e6bc131f0e27f7310982e36f9e1301a63
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMID 33691913
PQID 2500379916
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7969187
proquest_miscellaneous_2500379916
pubmed_primary_33691913
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-03-15
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-03-15
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-03-15
  day: 15
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace China
PublicationPlace_xml – name: China
– name: 中国长沙
PublicationTitle Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi
PublicationTitleAlternate Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher 中国当代儿科杂志编辑部
Publisher_xml – name: 中国当代儿科杂志编辑部
SSID ssj0058493
Score 2.4881694
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet To evaluate systematically the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang Data, China...
To evaluate systematically the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.OBJECTIVETo evaluate systematically the efficacy and safety of COVID-19...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 221
SubjectTerms Aged
China
Clinical Research
COVID-19
COVID-19 Vaccines
Humans
SARS-CoV-2
Vaccines
论著·临床研究
Title Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33691913
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2500379916
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7969187
Volume 23
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAQN
  databaseName: PubMed Central
  issn: 1008-8830
  databaseCode: RPM
  dateStart: 20160101
  customDbUrl:
  isFulltext: true
  dateEnd: 99991231
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0058493
  providerName: National Library of Medicine
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELZgkdBeEIhXeSlI-BSlxHbqB7emTbUgLXDYRSsuVZw4bYVIq90WpP56xnbSZqtFgr1Ylu3Wkb_JeMaeb4LQO5LouFQyiVQZWwdFqEjCNhcJnldFUiW6NJYofPqZn5wnny4GF_vQIccuWet-sb2RV3IbVKENcLUs2f9Adven0AB1wBdKQBjKf8I4s_kf7Pfa3el3XpkmvOLLt4_jiKjwV17Ye_Mrz2g-TNr8u2uYfp8v69lsswzLvJ5BsQjNZfjDhNs83M4X3bMB6oKjPDvSoYmzBKcSD8c4G2CV4tRVoFTMdaV4yGyLhPoEZwIPBVYEZxyrMZbUDZ5gJWxXOsKK40ziNHNjFJYMD7uq0wZSSNncsjS61XOJGxliXUXpedHNnks9QfxQnQtwx5w6txP0dxP0wU0lxOfP6KC8-ulgZowrcELZfoPbhR1-PR0JBb1S3EX3qOCctsc7fusGY0x5RkYzkw_9so_x_m8PcYzutzPe5KQcxtp2jJezh-hB43UEQy9Cj9AdUz9GO_EJQHwCLz7Bsgpa8Qla8fkQ5MFeeAIvPE_Q-SQ7G51Ezdc0ohVYceuoooVgmqhS0zgvaGKkMmDfk6Kg7jrYcF0QRqrYUFEJmzBWUsN4pQyYOSTn7Ck6qpe1eY4CloMTqio9SGic8EEpNSwIYVqrsgALnffQ23YhpqCt7BVUXpvl5moKBnfMhPVJeuiZX5jpyqdVmbbL2EPi2pLtBthM6Nd76sXcZURvUH1x61--RMf79-cVOlpfbsxrsDbX-o2TkD8wmm9o
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy+and+safety+of+COVID-19+vaccines%3A+a+systematic+review&rft.jtitle=Zhongguo+dang+dai+er+ke+za+zhi&rft.date=2021-03-15&rft.pub=%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E5%84%BF%E7%A7%91%E6%9D%82%E5%BF%97%E7%BC%96%E8%BE%91%E9%83%A8&rft.issn=1008-8830&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=228&rft_id=info:doi/10.7499%2Fj.issn.1008-8830.2101133&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F33691913&rft.externalDocID=PMC7969187
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1008-8830&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1008-8830&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1008-8830&client=summon