Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part II. Dual-energy imaging
Purpose: Dual-energy (DE) contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) uses an iodinated contrast agent in combination with digital mammography (DM) to evaluate lesions on the basis of tumor angiogenesis. In DE imaging, low-energy (LE) and high-energy (HE) images are acquired after contrast administ...
Saved in:
| Published in | Medical physics (Lancaster) Vol. 40; no. 8; pp. 081907 - n/a |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
American Association of Physicists in Medicine
01.08.2013
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0094-2405 2473-4209 2473-4209 |
| DOI | 10.1118/1.4812681 |
Cover
| Abstract | Purpose:
Dual-energy (DE) contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) uses an iodinated contrast agent in combination with digital mammography (DM) to evaluate lesions on the basis of tumor angiogenesis. In DE imaging, low-energy (LE) and high-energy (HE) images are acquired after contrast administration and their logarithms are subtracted to cancel the appearance of normal breast tissue. Often there is incomplete signal cancellation in the subtracted images, creating a background “clutter” that can impair lesion detection. This is the second component of a two-part report on anatomical noise in CEDM. In Part I the authors characterized the anatomical noise for single-energy (SE) temporal subtraction CEDM by a power law, with model parametersα and β. In this work the authors quantify the anatomical noise in DE CEDM clinical images and compare this with the noise in SE CEDM. The influence on the anatomical noise of the presence of iodine in the breast, the timing of imaging postcontrast administration, and the x-ray energy used for acquisition are each evaluated.
Methods:
The power law parameters,α and β, were measured from unprocessed LE and HE images and from DE subtracted images to quantify the anatomical noise. A total of 98 DE CEDM cases acquired in a previous clinical pilot study were assessed. Conventional DM images from 75 of the women were evaluated for comparison with DE CEDM. The influence of the imaging technique on anatomical noise was determined from an analysis of differences between the power law parameters as measured in DM, LE, HE, and DE subtracted images for each subject.
Results:
In DE CEDM, weighted image subtraction lowers β to about 1.1 from 3.2 and 3.1 in LE and HE unprocessed images, respectively. The presence of iodine has a small but significant effect in LE images, reducing β by about 0.07 compared to DM, with α unchanged. Increasing the x-ray energy, from that typical in DM to a HE beam, significantly decreases α by about 2 × 10−5 mm2, and lowers β by about 0.14 compared to LE images. A comparison of SE and DE CEDM at 4 min postcontrast shows equivalent power law parameters in unprocessed images, and lower α and β by about 3 × 10−5 mm2 and 0.50, respectively, in DE versus SE subtracted images.
Conclusions:
Image subtraction in both SE and DE CEDM reduces β by over a factor of 2, while maintaining α below that in DM. Given the equivalent α between SE and DE unprocessed CEDM images, and the smaller anatomical noise in the DE subtracted images, the DE approach may have an advantage over SE CEDM. It will be necessary to test this potential advantage in future lesion detectability experiments, which account for realistic lesion signals. The authors' results suggest that LE images could be used in place of DM images in CEDM exam interpretation. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Purpose:
Dual-energy (DE) contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) uses an iodinated contrast agent in combination with digital mammography (DM) to evaluate lesions on the basis of tumor angiogenesis. In DE imaging, low-energy (LE) and high-energy (HE) images are acquired after contrast administration and their logarithms are subtracted to cancel the appearance of normal breast tissue. Often there is incomplete signal cancellation in the subtracted images, creating a background “clutter” that can impair lesion detection. This is the second component of a two-part report on anatomical noise in CEDM. In Part I the authors characterized the anatomical noise for single-energy (SE) temporal subtraction CEDM by a power law, with model parametersα and β. In this work the authors quantify the anatomical noise in DE CEDM clinical images and compare this with the noise in SE CEDM. The influence on the anatomical noise of the presence of iodine in the breast, the timing of imaging postcontrast administration, and the x-ray energy used for acquisition are each evaluated.
Methods:
The power law parameters,α and β, were measured from unprocessed LE and HE images and from DE subtracted images to quantify the anatomical noise. A total of 98 DE CEDM cases acquired in a previous clinical pilot study were assessed. Conventional DM images from 75 of the women were evaluated for comparison with DE CEDM. The influence of the imaging technique on anatomical noise was determined from an analysis of differences between the power law parameters as measured in DM, LE, HE, and DE subtracted images for each subject.
Results:
In DE CEDM, weighted image subtraction lowers β to about 1.1 from 3.2 and 3.1 in LE and HE unprocessed images, respectively. The presence of iodine has a small but significant effect in LE images, reducing β by about 0.07 compared to DM, with α unchanged. Increasing the x-ray energy, from that typical in DM to a HE beam, significantly decreases α by about 2 × 10−5 mm2, and lowers β by about 0.14 compared to LE images. A comparison of SE and DE CEDM at 4 min postcontrast shows equivalent power law parameters in unprocessed images, and lower α and β by about 3 × 10−5 mm2 and 0.50, respectively, in DE versus SE subtracted images.
Conclusions:
Image subtraction in both SE and DE CEDM reduces β by over a factor of 2, while maintaining α below that in DM. Given the equivalent α between SE and DE unprocessed CEDM images, and the smaller anatomical noise in the DE subtracted images, the DE approach may have an advantage over SE CEDM. It will be necessary to test this potential advantage in future lesion detectability experiments, which account for realistic lesion signals. The authors' results suggest that LE images could be used in place of DM images in CEDM exam interpretation. Dual-energy (DE) contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) uses an iodinated contrast agent in combination with digital mammography (DM) to evaluate lesions on the basis of tumor angiogenesis. In DE imaging, low-energy (LE) and high-energy (HE) images are acquired after contrast administration and their logarithms are subtracted to cancel the appearance of normal breast tissue. Often there is incomplete signal cancellation in the subtracted images, creating a background "clutter" that can impair lesion detection. This is the second component of a two-part report on anatomical noise in CEDM. In Part I the authors characterized the anatomical noise for single-energy (SE) temporal subtraction CEDM by a power law, with model parameters α and β. In this work the authors quantify the anatomical noise in DE CEDM clinical images and compare this with the noise in SE CEDM. The influence on the anatomical noise of the presence of iodine in the breast, the timing of imaging postcontrast administration, and the x-ray energy used for acquisition are each evaluated.PURPOSEDual-energy (DE) contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) uses an iodinated contrast agent in combination with digital mammography (DM) to evaluate lesions on the basis of tumor angiogenesis. In DE imaging, low-energy (LE) and high-energy (HE) images are acquired after contrast administration and their logarithms are subtracted to cancel the appearance of normal breast tissue. Often there is incomplete signal cancellation in the subtracted images, creating a background "clutter" that can impair lesion detection. This is the second component of a two-part report on anatomical noise in CEDM. In Part I the authors characterized the anatomical noise for single-energy (SE) temporal subtraction CEDM by a power law, with model parameters α and β. In this work the authors quantify the anatomical noise in DE CEDM clinical images and compare this with the noise in SE CEDM. The influence on the anatomical noise of the presence of iodine in the breast, the timing of imaging postcontrast administration, and the x-ray energy used for acquisition are each evaluated.The power law parameters, α and β, were measured from unprocessed LE and HE images and from DE subtracted images to quantify the anatomical noise. A total of 98 DE CEDM cases acquired in a previous clinical pilot study were assessed. Conventional DM images from 75 of the women were evaluated for comparison with DE CEDM. The influence of the imaging technique on anatomical noise was determined from an analysis of differences between the power law parameters as measured in DM, LE, HE, and DE subtracted images for each subject.METHODSThe power law parameters, α and β, were measured from unprocessed LE and HE images and from DE subtracted images to quantify the anatomical noise. A total of 98 DE CEDM cases acquired in a previous clinical pilot study were assessed. Conventional DM images from 75 of the women were evaluated for comparison with DE CEDM. The influence of the imaging technique on anatomical noise was determined from an analysis of differences between the power law parameters as measured in DM, LE, HE, and DE subtracted images for each subject.In DE CEDM, weighted image subtraction lowers β to about 1.1 from 3.2 and 3.1 in LE and HE unprocessed images, respectively. The presence of iodine has a small but significant effect in LE images, reducing β by about 0.07 compared to DM, with α unchanged. Increasing the x-ray energy, from that typical in DM to a HE beam, significantly decreases α by about 2×10(-5) mm2, and lowers β by about 0.14 compared to LE images. A comparison of SE and DE CEDM at 4 min postcontrast shows equivalent power law parameters in unprocessed images, and lower α and β by about 3×10(-5) mm2 and 0.50, respectively, in DE versus SE subtracted images.RESULTSIn DE CEDM, weighted image subtraction lowers β to about 1.1 from 3.2 and 3.1 in LE and HE unprocessed images, respectively. The presence of iodine has a small but significant effect in LE images, reducing β by about 0.07 compared to DM, with α unchanged. Increasing the x-ray energy, from that typical in DM to a HE beam, significantly decreases α by about 2×10(-5) mm2, and lowers β by about 0.14 compared to LE images. A comparison of SE and DE CEDM at 4 min postcontrast shows equivalent power law parameters in unprocessed images, and lower α and β by about 3×10(-5) mm2 and 0.50, respectively, in DE versus SE subtracted images.Image subtraction in both SE and DE CEDM reduces β by over a factor of 2, while maintaining α below that in DM. Given the equivalent α between SE and DE unprocessed CEDM images, and the smaller anatomical noise in the DE subtracted images, the DE approach may have an advantage over SE CEDM. It will be necessary to test this potential advantage in future lesion detectability experiments, which account for realistic lesion signals. The authors' results suggest that LE images could be used in place of DM images in CEDM exam interpretation.CONCLUSIONSImage subtraction in both SE and DE CEDM reduces β by over a factor of 2, while maintaining α below that in DM. Given the equivalent α between SE and DE unprocessed CEDM images, and the smaller anatomical noise in the DE subtracted images, the DE approach may have an advantage over SE CEDM. It will be necessary to test this potential advantage in future lesion detectability experiments, which account for realistic lesion signals. The authors' results suggest that LE images could be used in place of DM images in CEDM exam interpretation. Dual-energy (DE) contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) uses an iodinated contrast agent in combination with digital mammography (DM) to evaluate lesions on the basis of tumor angiogenesis. In DE imaging, low-energy (LE) and high-energy (HE) images are acquired after contrast administration and their logarithms are subtracted to cancel the appearance of normal breast tissue. Often there is incomplete signal cancellation in the subtracted images, creating a background "clutter" that can impair lesion detection. This is the second component of a two-part report on anatomical noise in CEDM. In Part I the authors characterized the anatomical noise for single-energy (SE) temporal subtraction CEDM by a power law, with model parameters α and β. In this work the authors quantify the anatomical noise in DE CEDM clinical images and compare this with the noise in SE CEDM. The influence on the anatomical noise of the presence of iodine in the breast, the timing of imaging postcontrast administration, and the x-ray energy used for acquisition are each evaluated. The power law parameters, α and β, were measured from unprocessed LE and HE images and from DE subtracted images to quantify the anatomical noise. A total of 98 DE CEDM cases acquired in a previous clinical pilot study were assessed. Conventional DM images from 75 of the women were evaluated for comparison with DE CEDM. The influence of the imaging technique on anatomical noise was determined from an analysis of differences between the power law parameters as measured in DM, LE, HE, and DE subtracted images for each subject. In DE CEDM, weighted image subtraction lowers β to about 1.1 from 3.2 and 3.1 in LE and HE unprocessed images, respectively. The presence of iodine has a small but significant effect in LE images, reducing β by about 0.07 compared to DM, with α unchanged. Increasing the x-ray energy, from that typical in DM to a HE beam, significantly decreases α by about 2×10(-5) mm2, and lowers β by about 0.14 compared to LE images. A comparison of SE and DE CEDM at 4 min postcontrast shows equivalent power law parameters in unprocessed images, and lower α and β by about 3×10(-5) mm2 and 0.50, respectively, in DE versus SE subtracted images. Image subtraction in both SE and DE CEDM reduces β by over a factor of 2, while maintaining α below that in DM. Given the equivalent α between SE and DE unprocessed CEDM images, and the smaller anatomical noise in the DE subtracted images, the DE approach may have an advantage over SE CEDM. It will be necessary to test this potential advantage in future lesion detectability experiments, which account for realistic lesion signals. The authors' results suggest that LE images could be used in place of DM images in CEDM exam interpretation. Purpose: Dual-energy (DE) contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) uses an iodinated contrast agent in combination with digital mammography (DM) to evaluate lesions on the basis of tumor angiogenesis. In DE imaging, low-energy (LE) and high-energy (HE) images are acquired after contrast administration and their logarithms are subtracted to cancel the appearance of normal breast tissue. Often there is incomplete signal cancellation in the subtracted images, creating a background “clutter” that can impair lesion detection. This is the second component of a two-part report on anatomical noise in CEDM. In Part I the authors characterized the anatomical noise for single-energy (SE) temporal subtraction CEDM by a power law, with model parameters α and β. In this work the authors quantify the anatomical noise in DE CEDM clinical images and compare this with the noise in SE CEDM. The influence on the anatomical noise of the presence of iodine in the breast, the timing of imaging postcontrast administration, and the x-ray energy used for acquisition are each evaluated.Methods: The power law parameters, α and β, were measured from unprocessed LE and HE images and from DE subtracted images to quantify the anatomical noise. A total of 98 DE CEDM cases acquired in a previous clinical pilot study were assessed. Conventional DM images from 75 of the women were evaluated for comparison with DE CEDM. The influence of the imaging technique on anatomical noise was determined from an analysis of differences between the power law parameters as measured in DM, LE, HE, and DE subtracted images for each subject.Results: In DE CEDM, weighted image subtraction lowers β to about 1.1 from 3.2 and 3.1 in LE and HE unprocessed images, respectively. The presence of iodine has a small but significant effect in LE images, reducing β by about 0.07 compared to DM, with α unchanged. Increasing the x-ray energy, from that typical in DM to a HE beam, significantly decreases α by about 2 × 10{sup −5} mm{sup 2}, and lowers β by about 0.14 compared to LE images. A comparison of SE and DE CEDM at 4 min postcontrast shows equivalent power law parameters in unprocessed images, and lower α and β by about 3 × 10{sup −5} mm{sup 2} and 0.50, respectively, in DE versus SE subtracted images.Conclusions: Image subtraction in both SE and DE CEDM reduces β by over a factor of 2, while maintaining α below that in DM. Given the equivalent α between SE and DE unprocessed CEDM images, and the smaller anatomical noise in the DE subtracted images, the DE approach may have an advantage over SE CEDM. It will be necessary to test this potential advantage in future lesion detectability experiments, which account for realistic lesion signals. The authors' results suggest that LE images could be used in place of DM images in CEDM exam interpretation. |
| Author | Muller, Serge Yaffe, Martin J. Iordache, Răzvan Jong, Roberta A. Saab-Puong, Sylvie Dromain, Clarisse Hill, Melissa L. Mainprize, James G. Carton, Ann-Katherine |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Melissa L. surname: Hill fullname: Hill, Melissa L. email: melissa.hill@sri.utoronto.ca organization: Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada and Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada – sequence: 2 givenname: James G. surname: Mainprize fullname: Mainprize, James G. organization: Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada – sequence: 3 givenname: Ann-Katherine surname: Carton fullname: Carton, Ann-Katherine organization: GE Healthcare, 283 rue de la Minière, Buc 78530, France – sequence: 4 givenname: Sylvie surname: Saab-Puong fullname: Saab-Puong, Sylvie organization: GE Healthcare, 283 rue de la Minière, Buc 78530, France – sequence: 5 givenname: Răzvan surname: Iordache fullname: Iordache, Răzvan organization: GE Healthcare, 283 rue de la Minière, Buc 78530, France – sequence: 6 givenname: Serge surname: Muller fullname: Muller, Serge organization: GE Healthcare, 283 rue de la Minière, Buc 78530, France – sequence: 7 givenname: Roberta A. surname: Jong fullname: Jong, Roberta A. organization: Breast Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada – sequence: 8 givenname: Clarisse surname: Dromain fullname: Dromain, Clarisse organization: Department of Radiology, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulin, Villejuif 94805, France – sequence: 9 givenname: Martin J. surname: Yaffe fullname: Yaffe, Martin J. organization: Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada and Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23927321$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22220516$$D View this record in Osti.gov |
| BookMark | eNp90c1u1DAQAGALtaLbwoEXQJG4IKQsHtuJk2PV8rNSq_YA4mhNnNmsUWIvsRe0b49XuyAudC5zmM-j8cwlO_PBE2OvgC8BoHkPS9WAqBt4xhZCaVkqwdsztuC8VaVQvLpglzF-55zXsuLP2YWQrdBSwIJ9u_aYwuQsjoUPLlLhfGGDTzPGVJLfoLfUF70bXMpkwmkKw4zbzX5ZPOKcitVqWdzucMyW5mFfuAkH54cX7HyNY6SXp3zFvn788OXmc3n38Gl1c31XBqk0lHXTKE4gmlZSR6jUusW67zSuNSI0wKGTnCOqru4qrrGh2iqNrRI1KBRWXrE3x74hJmeidYnsJs_vySYjcvAK6qzeHtV2Dj92FJOZXLQ0jugp7KIBJXWl27yWTF-f6K6bqDfbOf9o3ps_K8ugPIJfbqT93zpwc7iFAXO6hbl_PKTs3x39YThMLvj_v3kK_wzzP823_Vr-Bmmjllo |
| CODEN | MPHYA6 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: American Association of Physicists in Medicine – notice: 2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 OTOTI |
| DOI | 10.1118/1.4812681 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic OSTI.GOV |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Physics |
| EISSN | 2473-4209 |
| EndPage | n/a |
| ExternalDocumentID | 22220516 23927321 MP2681 |
| Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- --Z -DZ .GJ 0R~ 1OB 1OC 29M 2WC 33P 36B 3O- 4.4 476 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS AAHHS AANLZ AAQQT AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCUV ABEFU ABFTF ABJNI ABLJU ABQWH ABTAH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBEA ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACPOU ACSMX ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADKYN ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AENEX AEQDE AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AHBTC AIACR AIAGR AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMYDB ASPBG BFHJK C45 CS3 DCZOG DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBD EBS EJD EMB EMOBN F5P G8K HDBZQ HGLYW I-F KBYEO LATKE LEEKS LOXES LUTES LYRES MEWTI O9- OVD P2P P2W PALCI PHY RJQFR RNS ROL SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TN5 TWZ USG WOHZO WXSBR XJT ZGI ZVN ZXP ZY4 ZZTAW AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AAYCA ABDPE AFWVQ AITYG ALVPJ AAMMB ADMLS AEFGJ AEYWJ AGHNM AGXDD AGYGG AIDQK AIDYY CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 LH4 AAJUZ AAPBV ABCVL ABPTK ADDAD AEUQT OTOTI |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-o3471-68840e12893ebea44f9a6db7af7aa18101b300aa4b6b507a8e6c47a942614a2c3 |
| ISSN | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
| IngestDate | Fri May 19 00:38:37 EDT 2023 Fri Sep 05 09:07:44 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:49:51 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:27:44 EST 2025 Sun Jul 14 10:05:21 EDT 2019 Fri Jun 21 00:28:34 EDT 2024 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 8 |
| Keywords | contrast-enhanced dual-energy power-law mammography beta anatomical noise |
| Language | English |
| License | 0094-2405/2013/40(8)/081907/15/$30.00 |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-o3471-68840e12893ebea44f9a6db7af7aa18101b300aa4b6b507a8e6c47a942614a2c3 |
| Notes | melissa.hill@sri.utoronto.ca Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 23927321 |
| PQID | 1437579239 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 15 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1437579239 scitation_primary_10_1118_1_4812681 pubmed_primary_23927321 wiley_primary_10_1118_1_4812681_MP2681 osti_scitechconnect_22220516 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | August 2013 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-08-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2013 text: August 2013 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Med Phys |
| PublicationYear | 2013 |
| Publisher | American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
| Publisher_xml | – name: American Association of Physicists in Medicine |
| References | Metheany, Abbey, Packard, Boone (c37) 2008; 35 Diekmann, Diekmann, Jeunehomme, Muller, Hamm, Bick (c14) 2005; 40 Dromain (c10) 2011; 21 Thibault, Balleyguier, Tardivon, Dromain (c51) 2012; 81 Alonzo-Proulx (c26) 2010; 55 Burgess (c24) 1999; 3661 Boone, Lindfors, Cooper, Seibert (c34) 2000; 27 Samei, Saunders (c22) 2011; 56 Diekmann (c46) 2011; 78 Fredenberg, Hemmendorff, Cederström, Åslund, Danielsson (c53) 2010; 37 Legmann, Vignaux, Bahurel, Coste, Oudjit (c28) 2001; 11 Fischbach, Freund, Röttgen, Engert, Felix, Ricke (c7) 2003; 181 Puong, Bouchevreau, Patoureaux, Iordache (c11) 2007; 6510 Lewin, Isaacs, Vance, Larke (c9) 2003; 229 Gavenonis, Lau, Karunamuni, Zhang (c52) 2012; 7361 Richard, Siewerdsen (c21) 2008; 35 Dromain (c47) 2012; 14 Rowlands, Ji, Zhao (c19) 2001; 4320 Jong, Yaffe, Skarpathiotakis, Shumak, Danjoux, Gunesekara (c12) 2003; 228 Kappadath, Shaw (c18) 2005; 32 Hu, Zhao (c32) 2011; 7961 Hill, Liu, Mainprize, Levitin, Shojaii, Yaffe (c45) 2012; 7361 Carp (c15) 2008; 16 Johns, Yaffe (c4) 1985; 12 Allec, Abbaszadeh, Scott, Lewin, Karim (c25) 2012; 57 Mainprize, Tyson, Yaffe (c29) 2012; 39 Brody, Butt, Hall, Macovski (c2) 1981; 8 Richard, Siewerdsen (c48) 2008; 35 Alonzo-Proulx (c30) 2010; 6136 Alvarez, Macovski (c1) 1976; 21 Burgess, Judy (c43) 2007; 24 Ducote, Xu, Molloi (c8) 2006; 33 Burgess, Jacobson, Judy (c36) 2001; 28 Lemacks, Kappadath, Shaw, Liu, Whitman (c6) 2002; 29 Chen, Abbey, Nosrateih, Lindfors, Boone (c33) 2012; 39 Hill (c20) 2013; 40 Richard, Siewerdsen, Jaffray, Moseley, Bakhtiar (c23) 2005; 32 Kuhl (c49) 1999; 211 Gang, Tward, Lee, Siewerdsen (c44) 2010; 37 Kontos, Ikejimba, Troxel, Conant, Maidment (c50) 2011; 261 Vedantham, Shi, Glick, Karellas (c31) 2013; 40 Reiser, Lee, Nishikawa (c39) 2011; 38 Hill (c42) 2012; 8313 Boone, Shaber, Tecotzky (c5) 1990; 17 Johns, Yaffe (c40) 1987; 32 Boone, Fewell, Jennings (c41) 1997; 24 Yaffe (c27) 2009; 36 Samei, Flynn, Reimann (c35) 1998; 25 Allec, Abbaszadeh, Karim (c54) 2011; 56 Dromain (c13) 2006; 187 Engstrom, Reiser, Nishikawa (c38) 2009; 36 Arvanitis, Speller (c17) 2009; 54 Lehmann, Alvarez, Macovski, Brody (c3) 1981; 8 1976; 21 2010; 55 2012; 81 1987; 32 2010; 37 2000; 27 2012; 8313 1990; 17 2006; 33 2013; 40 2007; 6510 2008; 16 1997; 24 2005; 40 2009 1999; 3661 1981; 8 2008; 35 2011; 56 2012; 39 2011; 78 2001; 28 2012; 14 2012; 57 2011; 38 1998; 25 2009; 36 2011; 7961 2003; 229 2003; 228 2002; 29 2009; 54 2006; 187 2003; 181 2011; 21 2005; 32 2012; 7361 1999; 211 2001; 11 1985; 12 2011; 261 2010; 6136 2007; 24 2001; 4320 |
| References_xml | – volume: 228 start-page: 842 year: 2003 ident: c12 article-title: Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Initial clinical experience publication-title: Radiology – volume: 32 start-page: 675 year: 1987 ident: c40 article-title: X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 181 start-page: 1519 year: 2003 ident: c7 article-title: Dual-energy chest radiography with a flat-panel digital detector: Revealing calcified chest abnormalities publication-title: Am. J. Roentgenol. – volume: 55 start-page: 3027 year: 2010 ident: c26 article-title: Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 21 start-page: 733 year: 1976 ident: c1 article-title: Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerised tomography publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 7361 start-page: 32 year: 2012 ident: c52 article-title: Initial experience with dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis in the characterization publication-title: Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. – volume: 78 start-page: 112 year: 2011 ident: c46 article-title: Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography publication-title: Eur. J. Radiol. – volume: 35 start-page: 5043 year: 2008 ident: c48 article-title: Comparison of model and human observer performance for detection and discrimination tasks using dual-energy x-ray images publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 261 start-page: 80 year: 2011 ident: c50 article-title: Analysis of parenchymal texture with digital breast tomosynthesis: Comparison with digital mammography and implications for cancer risk publication-title: Radiology – volume: 3661 start-page: 642 year: 1999 ident: c24 article-title: Mammographic structure: Data preparation and spatial statistics analysis publication-title: Proc. SPIE – volume: 7361 start-page: 1 year: 2012 ident: c45 article-title: Pre-clinical evaluation of tumour angiogenesis with contrast-enhanced breast tomosynthesis publication-title: Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. – volume: 29 start-page: 1739 year: 2002 ident: c6 article-title: A dual-energy subtraction technique for microcalcification imaging in digital mammography—A signal-to-noise analysis publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 38 start-page: 5303 year: 2011 ident: c39 article-title: On the orientation of mammographic structure publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 8 start-page: 659 year: 1981 ident: c3 article-title: Generalized image combinations in dual KVP digital radiography publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 6510 start-page: 65102H year: 2007 ident: c11 article-title: Dual-energy contrast enhanced digital mammography using a new approach for breast tissue canceling publication-title: Proc. SPIE – volume: 40 start-page: 051910 year: 2013 ident: c20 article-title: Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part I. Single-energy imaging publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 35 start-page: 4685 year: 2008 ident: c37 article-title: Characterizing anatomical variability in breast CT images publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 16 start-page: 16064 year: 2008 ident: c15 article-title: Dynamic functional and mechanical response of breast tissue to compression publication-title: Opt. Express – volume: 40 start-page: 011901 year: 2013 ident: c31 article-title: Scaling-law for the energy dependence of anatomic power spectrum in dedicated breast CT publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 229 start-page: 261 year: 2003 ident: c9 article-title: Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: Feasibility publication-title: Radiology – volume: 36 start-page: 1753 year: 2009 ident: c38 article-title: Comparison of power spectra for tomosynthesis projections and reconstructed images publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 21 start-page: 565 year: 2011 ident: c10 article-title: Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Initial clinical results publication-title: Eur. Radiol. – volume: 39 start-page: 1435 year: 2012 ident: c33 article-title: Anatomical complexity in breast parenchyma and its implications for optimal breast imaging strategies publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 187 start-page: W528 year: 2006 ident: c13 article-title: Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography publication-title: Am. J. Roentgenol. – volume: 24 start-page: B52 year: 2007 ident: c43 article-title: Signal detection in power-law noise: Effect of spectrum exponents publication-title: J. Opt. Soc. Am. A – volume: 11 start-page: 2220 year: 2001 ident: c28 article-title: Hepatic and vascular enhancement at dual-phase helical CT: Comparison of Iobitridol 300 and Iohexol 300 in a prospective randomized study publication-title: Eur. Radiol. – volume: 39 start-page: 4660 year: 2012 ident: c29 article-title: The relationship between anatomic noise and volumetric breast density for digital mammography publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 28 start-page: 419 year: 2001 ident: c36 article-title: Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 12 start-page: 289 year: 1985 ident: c4 article-title: Theoretical optimization of dual-energy x-ray imaging with application to mammography publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 37 start-page: 2017 year: 2010 ident: c53 article-title: Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography with a photon-counting detector publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 81 start-page: S162 year: 2012 ident: c51 article-title: Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: Better than MRI? publication-title: Eur. J. Radiol. – volume: 6136 start-page: 467 year: 2010 ident: c30 article-title: Development of a peripheral thickness estimation method for volumetric breast density measurements in mammography using a 3D finite element breast model publication-title: Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. – volume: 57 start-page: 8405 year: 2012 ident: c25 article-title: Including the effect of motion artifacts in noise and performance analysis of dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 33 start-page: 1562 year: 2006 ident: c8 article-title: Optimization of a flat-panel based real time dual-energy system for cardiac imaging publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 7961 start-page: 79611C year: 2011 ident: c32 article-title: A 3D linear system model for the optimization of dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis publication-title: Proc. SPIE – volume: 27 start-page: 2408 year: 2000 ident: c34 article-title: Scatter/primary in mammography: Comprehensive results publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 8313 start-page: 831308 year: 2012 ident: c42 article-title: Impact of image acquisition timing on image quality for dual energy contrast-enhanced breast tomosynthesis publication-title: Proc. SPIE – volume: 14 start-page: R94 year: 2012 ident: c47 article-title: Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study publication-title: Breast Cancer Res. – volume: 24 start-page: 1863 year: 1997 ident: c41 article-title: Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 56 start-page: 5903 year: 2011 ident: c54 article-title: Single-layer and dual-layer contrast-enhanced mammography using amorphous selenium flat panel detectors publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 37 start-page: 1948 year: 2010 ident: c44 article-title: Anatomical background and generalized detectability in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 36 start-page: 5437 year: 2009 ident: c27 article-title: The myth of the 50–50 breast publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 54 start-page: 6041 year: 2009 ident: c17 article-title: Quantitative contrast-enhanced mammography for contrast medium kinetics studies publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 211 start-page: 101 year: 1999 ident: c49 article-title: Dynamic breast MR imaging: Are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? publication-title: Radiology – volume: 32 start-page: 3395 year: 2005 ident: c18 article-title: Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: Scatter and nonuniformity corrections publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 17 start-page: 665 year: 1990 ident: c5 article-title: Dual-energy mammography: A detector analysis publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 4320 start-page: 257 year: 2001 ident: c19 article-title: Effect of depth dependent modulation transfer function and K- fluorescence reabsorption on the detective quantum efficiency of indirect conversion flat panel x-ray imaging systems using CsI publication-title: Proc. SPIE – volume: 35 start-page: 586 year: 2008 ident: c21 article-title: Cascaded systems analysis of noise reduction algorithms in dual-energy imaging publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 32 start-page: 1397 year: 2005 ident: c23 article-title: Generalized DQE analysis of radiographic and dual-energy imaging using flat-panel detectors publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 25 start-page: 102 year: 1998 ident: c35 article-title: A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 8 start-page: 353 year: 1981 ident: c2 article-title: A method for selective tissue and bone visualization using dual energy scanned projection radiography publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 56 start-page: 6359 year: 2011 ident: c22 article-title: Dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast tomosynthesis: Optimization of beam quality for dose and image quality publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 40 start-page: 397 year: 2005 ident: c14 article-title: Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: Initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement publication-title: Invest. Radiol. – volume: 21 start-page: 565 issue: 3 year: 2011 end-page: 574 article-title: Dual‐energy contrast‐enhanced digital mammography: Initial clinical results publication-title: Eur. Radiol. – volume: 37 start-page: 2017 issue: 5 year: 2010 end-page: 2029 article-title: Contrast‐enhanced spectral mammography with a photon‐counting detector publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 16 start-page: 16064 issue: 20 year: 2008 end-page: 16078 article-title: Dynamic functional and mechanical response of breast tissue to compression publication-title: Opt. Express – volume: 56 start-page: 5903 issue: 18 year: 2011 end-page: 5923 article-title: Single‐layer and dual‐layer contrast‐enhanced mammography using amorphous selenium flat panel detectors publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 228 start-page: 842 year: 2003 end-page: 850 article-title: Contrast‐enhanced digital mammography: Initial clinical experience publication-title: Radiology – volume: 57 start-page: 8405 issue: 24 year: 2012 end-page: 8425 article-title: Including the effect of motion artifacts in noise and performance analysis of dual‐energy contrast‐enhanced mammography publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 35 start-page: 586 issue: 2 year: 2008 end-page: 601 article-title: Cascaded systems analysis of noise reduction algorithms in dual‐energy imaging publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 181 start-page: 1519 year: 2003 end-page: 1524 article-title: Dual‐energy chest radiography with a flat‐panel digital detector: Revealing calcified chest abnormalities publication-title: Am. J. Roentgenol. – volume: 4320 start-page: 257 year: 2001 end-page: 267 article-title: Effect of depth dependent modulation transfer function and K‐ fluorescence reabsorption on the detective quantum efficiency of indirect conversion flat panel x‐ray imaging systems using CsI publication-title: Proc. SPIE – volume: 3661 start-page: 642 year: 1999 end-page: 653 article-title: Mammographic structure: Data preparation and spatial statistics analysis publication-title: Proc. SPIE – volume: 229 start-page: 261 issue: 1 year: 2003 end-page: 268 article-title: Dual‐energy contrast‐enhanced digital subtraction mammography: Feasibility publication-title: Radiology – volume: 24 start-page: 1863 issue: 12 year: 1997 end-page: 1874 article-title: Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 187 start-page: W528 issue: 5 year: 2006 end-page: W537 article-title: Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast‐enhanced digital mammography publication-title: Am. J. Roentgenol. – volume: 21 start-page: 733 issue: 5 year: 1976 end-page: 744 article-title: Energy‐selective reconstructions in X‐ray computerised tomography publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 40 start-page: 051910 issue: 5 year: 2013 article-title: Anatomical noise in contrast‐enhanced digital mammography. Part I. Single‐energy imaging publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 81 start-page: S162 year: 2012 end-page: S164 article-title: Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: Better than MRI? publication-title: Eur. J. Radiol. – volume: 24 start-page: B52 issue: 12 year: 2007 end-page: B60 article-title: Signal detection in power‐law noise: Effect of spectrum exponents publication-title: J. Opt. Soc. Am. A – volume: 17 start-page: 665 issue: 4 year: 1990 end-page: 675 article-title: Dual‐energy mammography: A detector analysis publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 7961 start-page: 79611C year: 2011 article-title: A 3D linear system model for the optimization of dual‐energy contrast‐enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis publication-title: Proc. SPIE – volume: 8 start-page: 659 issue: 5 year: 1981 end-page: 667 article-title: Generalized image combinations in dual KVP digital radiography publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 29 start-page: 1739 issue: 8 year: 2002 end-page: 1751 article-title: A dual‐energy subtraction technique for microcalcification imaging in digital mammography—A signal‐to‐noise analysis publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 56 start-page: 6359 issue: 19 year: 2011 end-page: 6378 article-title: Dual‐energy contrast‐enhanced breast tomosynthesis: Optimization of beam quality for dose and image quality publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 39 start-page: 4660 issue: 8 year: 2012 end-page: 4668 article-title: The relationship between anatomic noise and volumetric breast density for digital mammography publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 27 start-page: 2408 issue: 10 year: 2000 end-page: 2416 article-title: Scatter/primary in mammography: Comprehensive results publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 25 start-page: 102 issue: 1 year: 1998 end-page: 113 article-title: A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 12 start-page: 289 issue: 3 year: 1985 end-page: 296 article-title: Theoretical optimization of dual‐energy x‐ray imaging with application to mammography publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 6510 start-page: 65102H year: 2007 article-title: Dual‐energy contrast enhanced digital mammography using a new approach for breast tissue canceling publication-title: Proc. SPIE – volume: 39 start-page: 1435 issue: 3 year: 2012 end-page: 1441 article-title: Anatomical complexity in breast parenchyma and its implications for optimal breast imaging strategies publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 38 start-page: 5303 issue: 10 year: 2011 end-page: 5306 article-title: On the orientation of mammographic structure publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 211 start-page: 101 issue: 1 year: 1999 end-page: 110 article-title: Dynamic breast MR imaging: Are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? publication-title: Radiology – volume: 28 start-page: 419 issue: 4 year: 2001 end-page: 437 article-title: Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power‐law noise publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 40 start-page: 397 issue: 7 year: 2005 end-page: 404 article-title: Digital mammography using iodine‐based contrast media: Initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement publication-title: Invest. Radiol. – volume: 33 start-page: 1562 issue: 6 year: 2006 end-page: 1568 article-title: Optimization of a flat‐panel based real time dual‐energy system for cardiac imaging publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 40 start-page: 011901 issue: 1 year: 2013 article-title: Scaling‐law for the energy dependence of anatomic power spectrum in dedicated breast CT publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 35 start-page: 4685 issue: 10 year: 2008 end-page: 4694 article-title: Characterizing anatomical variability in breast CT images publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 54 start-page: 6041 issue: 20 year: 2009 end-page: 6064 article-title: Quantitative contrast‐enhanced mammography for contrast medium kinetics studies publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 6136 start-page: 467 year: 2010 end-page: 473 article-title: Development of a peripheral thickness estimation method for volumetric breast density measurements in mammography using a 3D finite element breast model publication-title: Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. – volume: 8313 start-page: 831308 year: 2012 end-page: 1 article-title: Impact of image acquisition timing on image quality for dual energy contrast‐enhanced breast tomosynthesis publication-title: Proc. SPIE – volume: 7361 start-page: 1 year: 2012 end-page: 8 article-title: Pre‐clinical evaluation of tumour angiogenesis with contrast‐enhanced breast tomosynthesis publication-title: Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. – volume: 36 start-page: 1753 issue: 5 year: 2009 end-page: 1758 article-title: Comparison of power spectra for tomosynthesis projections and reconstructed images publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 35 start-page: 5043 issue: 11 year: 2008 end-page: 5053 article-title: Comparison of model and human observer performance for detection and discrimination tasks using dual‐energy x‐ray images publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 261 start-page: 80 issue: 1 year: 2011 end-page: 91 article-title: Analysis of parenchymal texture with digital breast tomosynthesis: Comparison with digital mammography and implications for cancer risk publication-title: Radiology – start-page: 216 year: 2009 article-title: Contrast‐enhanced digital mammography – volume: 36 start-page: 5437 issue: 12 year: 2009 end-page: 5443 article-title: The myth of the 50–50 breast publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 32 start-page: 675 issue: 6 year: 1987 end-page: 695 article-title: X‐ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 37 start-page: 1948 issue: 5 year: 2010 end-page: 1965 article-title: Anatomical background and generalized detectability in tomosynthesis and cone‐beam CT publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 32 start-page: 1397 issue: 5 year: 2005 end-page: 1413 article-title: Generalized DQE analysis of radiographic and dual‐energy imaging using flat‐panel detectors publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 14 start-page: R94 issue: 3 year: 2012 article-title: Dual‐energy contrast‐enhanced digital mammography: Initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study publication-title: Breast Cancer Res. – volume: 55 start-page: 3027 issue: 11 year: 2010 end-page: 3044 article-title: Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 11 start-page: 2220 issue: 11 year: 2001 end-page: 2227 article-title: Hepatic and vascular enhancement at dual‐phase helical CT: Comparison of Iobitridol 300 and Iohexol 300 in a prospective randomized study publication-title: Eur. Radiol. – volume: 7361 start-page: 32 year: 2012 end-page: 39 article-title: Initial experience with dual‐energy contrast‐enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis in the characterization publication-title: Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. – volume: 8 start-page: 353 issue: 3 year: 1981 end-page: 357 article-title: A method for selective tissue and bone visualization using dual energy scanned projection radiography publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 78 start-page: 112 issue: 1 year: 2011 end-page: 121 article-title: Evaluation of contrast‐enhanced digital mammography publication-title: Eur. J. Radiol. – volume: 32 start-page: 3395 issue: 11 year: 2005 end-page: 3408 article-title: Dual‐energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: Scatter and nonuniformity corrections publication-title: Med. Phys. |
| SSID | ssj0006350 |
| Score | 2.204375 |
| Snippet | Purpose:
Dual-energy (DE) contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) uses an iodinated contrast agent in combination with digital mammography (DM) to... Purpose: Dual‐energy (DE) contrast‐enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) uses an iodinated contrast agent in combination with digital mammography (DM) to... Dual-energy (DE) contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) uses an iodinated contrast agent in combination with digital mammography (DM) to evaluate lesions... Purpose: Dual-energy (DE) contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) uses an iodinated contrast agent in combination with digital mammography (DM) to... |
| SourceID | osti proquest pubmed wiley scitation |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | 081907 |
| SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over anatomical noise ANIMAL TISSUES beta BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY Cancer CONTRAST MEDIA contrast‐enhanced DATA ACQUISITION Data acquisition and logging diagnostic radiography Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications Digital mammography Digital radiography dual‐energy Edge enhancement Female Humans Image data processing or generation, in general image denoising image enhancement Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit‐mapped to bit‐mapped creating a similar image IMAGE PROCESSING IODINE MAMMARY GLANDS mammography Mammography - methods Medical image artifacts Medical image contrast Medical image noise medical image processing Medical imaging Medical X‐ray imaging Middle Aged Modulation transfer functions NEOPLASMS Noise power‐law Quantum noise Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE Signal-To-Noise Ratio tumours X‐ray imaging X‐ray spectra |
| Title | Anatomical noise in contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Part II. Dual-energy imaging |
| URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4812681 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1118%2F1.4812681 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23927321 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1437579239 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22220516 |
| Volume | 40 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVEBS databaseName: Inspec with Full Text customDbUrl: eissn: 2473-4209 dateEnd: 20241105 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0006350 issn: 0094-2405 databaseCode: ADMLS dateStart: 20070101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.ebsco.com/products/research-databases/inspec-full-text providerName: EBSCOhost |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLagEzAeEIwBhYGMQLxUKU3iOs1jtYE6IKjSNrG36CR1WKTWqdp00vbrOb7kgmgl4CWpktSx_J3Y3zk-F0LeC-CKt3L80lLfYbiIOAkI7ni-H6QuBzfTBrfoO59csC-Xw8vGmKOjS8qkn95ujSv5H1TxGuKqomT_Adm6UbyAvxFfPCLCePwrjMcSVWYT7y-LfK3zf2jfc1iXjpBXZnd_lv9UlUF6C8CemQTVfWSOq7J3etrvnWxg7ggbAbjQNYvahLXayDEWEG2iVWHTYAp61FaEic2KHYk5Igm92qQcQS6Xq_xW1C65TTWvY-yDLWktpfO1ikWsjT4AiTPdWJ_hs5v5dS7aRgpVMGJUGSmEnsw8FihRGITtmdckarISNmpNo5qnBDtmeBW14PYZMhNuqr20kF4uNNQesr7A99xmkatdD6tbd8mehwvBoEP2xifRt7N6-UYGNrApqPBdH-s3qbTR9r-4fBc4AW9TSh6SB0hdjBfF7_qOJiznj8kjq2nQsRGbJ-SOkAfkfmR9KQ7IvamB9Cn50cgR1XJEc0n_kCNq5Yi25YgqOaIoR7QlR9TK0SG5-Pzp_Hji2IIbTuEjSXH4CNV9gYwl9PHbBsayEPgsCSALAFyVCi7xBwMAlvAE9QgYCZ6yAEKlhjPwUv8Z6chCiheEpkORcOEKJhhj2AYkvsjcYYbNhyJwWZccqSGM1WCJ9CpVXl1pGSNb9XCZ4F3ythraGOc7tYkFUhSbNaqqfjBUSS_DLnluxjxemsQscYVPl7yrQahvGm13FLuxBXTrU9fFqnkiXs6yLvmgQdzdThxN1enlzu68IvvNN3FEOuVqI14jlS2TN1b4fgFqF5qG |
| linkProvider | EBSCOhost |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anatomical+noise+in+contrast-enhanced+digital+mammography.+Part+II.+Dual-energy+imaging&rft.jtitle=Medical+physics+%28Lancaster%29&rft.au=Hill%2C+Melissa+L&rft.au=Mainprize%2C+James+G&rft.au=Carton%2C+Ann-Katherine&rft.au=Saab-Puong%2C+Sylvie&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=081907&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118%2F1.4812681&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F23927321&rft.externalDocID=23927321 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon |