위점막하종양의 복강경 위쐐기절제술과 개복 위쐐기절제술의 비교

Purpose: Laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR) is replacing open wedge resection (OWR) as the standard surgical treatment for gastric submucosal tumors. However, few scientific comparisons exist as to whether LWR or OWR is better in terms of postoperative outcomes. This study was performed to compare t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of surgical treatment and research Vol. 72; no. 1; pp. 27 - 31
Main Authors 김재근(Jae Keun Kim), 김성수(Sung Soo Kim), 최원혁(Won Hyuk Choi), 정재호(Jae Ho Jung), 형우진(Woo Jin Hyung), 최승호(Seung Ho Choi), 노성훈(Sung Hoon Noh), 김충배(Choong Bai Kim)
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 대한외과학회 2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2288-6575
2288-6796

Cover

Abstract Purpose: Laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR) is replacing open wedge resection (OWR) as the standard surgical treatment for gastric submucosal tumors. However, few scientific comparisons exist as to whether LWR or OWR is better in terms of postoperative outcomes. This study was performed to compare these two treatment modalities for the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors by evaluating the postoperative outcomes. Methods: Between 1993 and 2004, 112 patients with a gastric submucosal tumor had undergone either LWR (n=42) or OWR (n=70). Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed with regard to tumor size, operative time, time to first flatus, postoperative hospital stay and analgesics use. Results: The demographics and tumor characteristics of the patients were similar in both groups. Four (9%) cases in the LWR group were converted to an open procedure. The mean operation time was longer in the LWR than the OWR group (100.6 vs. 84.3 min)(P=0.015). The time to first flatus (1.8±0.1 vs. 3.3±0.1 days, respectively, P<0.0001) and soft diet intake (3.5±0.3 vs. 6.0±0.2 days, respectively, P<0.0001) were shorter in the LWR compared to the OWR group. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LWR than in the OWR group (5.3±0.6 vs. 8.5±0.2 days) (P<0.0001). The number of analgesics uses (2.7±0.4 times) in the LWR was less than that in the OWR group (2.7±0.4 vs. 4.1±0.5 times)(P=0.0056). Conclusion: Laparoscopic wedge resection of a gastric submucosal tumor was superior to open wedge resection in terms of the postoperative outcomes. Laparoscopic wedge resection could be considered the first-line treatment for gastric submucosal tumors. (J Korean Surg Soc 2007;72: 27-31) KCI Citation Count: 3
AbstractList Purpose: Laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR) is replacing open wedge resection (OWR) as the standard surgical treatment for gastric submucosal tumors. However, few scientific comparisons exist as to whether LWR or OWR is better in terms of postoperative outcomes. This study was performed to compare these two treatment modalities for the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors by evaluating the postoperative outcomes. Methods: Between 1993 and 2004, 112 patients with a gastric submucosal tumor had undergone either LWR (n=42) or OWR (n=70). Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed with regard to tumor size, operative time, time to first flatus, postoperative hospital stay and analgesics use. Results: The demographics and tumor characteristics of the patients were similar in both groups. Four (9%) cases in the LWR group were converted to an open procedure. The mean operation time was longer in the LWR than the OWR group (100.6 vs. 84.3 min)(P=0.015). The time to first flatus (1.8±0.1 vs. 3.3±0.1 days, respectively, P<0.0001) and soft diet intake (3.5±0.3 vs. 6.0±0.2 days, respectively, P<0.0001) were shorter in the LWR compared to the OWR group. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LWR than in the OWR group (5.3±0.6 vs. 8.5±0.2 days) (P<0.0001). The number of analgesics uses (2.7±0.4 times) in the LWR was less than that in the OWR group (2.7±0.4 vs. 4.1±0.5 times)(P=0.0056). Conclusion: Laparoscopic wedge resection of a gastric submucosal tumor was superior to open wedge resection in terms of the postoperative outcomes. Laparoscopic wedge resection could be considered the first-line treatment for gastric submucosal tumors. (J Korean Surg Soc 2007;72: 27-31) KCI Citation Count: 3
Author 김충배(Choong Bai Kim)
최원혁(Won Hyuk Choi)
최승호(Seung Ho Choi)
형우진(Woo Jin Hyung)
노성훈(Sung Hoon Noh)
김성수(Sung Soo Kim)
김재근(Jae Keun Kim)
정재호(Jae Ho Jung)
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: 김재근(Jae Keun Kim)
– sequence: 2
  fullname: 김성수(Sung Soo Kim)
– sequence: 3
  fullname: 최원혁(Won Hyuk Choi)
– sequence: 4
  fullname: 정재호(Jae Ho Jung)
– sequence: 5
  fullname: 형우진(Woo Jin Hyung)
– sequence: 6
  fullname: 최승호(Seung Ho Choi)
– sequence: 7
  fullname: 노성훈(Sung Hoon Noh)
– sequence: 8
  fullname: 김충배(Choong Bai Kim)
BackLink https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001040566$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNptjDFLw0AAhQ-pYK39D1nEKZDc5S53Y6lVC8WCZHE6LrmLhGoiCQ7uFeoWh0qHCMHFtVgKCvqH0vM_GGvdnN4H73tvFzTiJFZboAkhpSZxGWn8MXbxDmhnWeRbjuNCRi2nCc51MdZlvnq5_5rO9POdfnzQTzNjtVhW82n1-mn89Hlevc11OdFloSdltfgwqnlRK_-U6_H7uFrme2A7FJeZam-yBbyjntc9MQfD4363MzBjApmpoECIUIwphMIKpcCSuQETRAlCpR3IwJdICSigo1jo1kx96iviWLZUCIeoBQ5-b-M05KMg4omI1nmR8FHKO2den1PHttza3N-YN2l0pWQk-HUNIr3lp8PDnmVThhFl6BvJbHyY
ContentType Journal Article
DBID DBRKI
TDB
ACYCR
DatabaseName DBPIA - 디비피아
Korean Database (DBpia)
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitleList
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
DocumentTitleAlternate Wedge Resection of the Stomach for Gastric Submucosal Tumors: Laparoscopic vs. Open
DocumentTitle_FL Wedge Resection of the Stomach for Gastric Submucosal Tumors: Laparoscopic vs. Open
EISSN 2288-6796
EndPage 31
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_84107
NODE01895389
GroupedDBID 5-W
53G
8JR
8XY
9ZL
AAYYP
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
DBRKI
DIK
EF.
GW5
GX1
HYE
KQ8
M48
PGMZT
RPM
TDB
ACYCR
M~E
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-n629-e2a336855822a0fda5d97c9a6ea68d1cdcbd3ea2a24e9f7d3e8b8be6401de35f3
ISSN 2288-6575
IngestDate Tue Nov 21 21:35:05 EST 2023
Thu Mar 13 19:39:18 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Laparosopic wedge resection
위점막하 종양,복강경 위쐐기절제술
Gastric submucosal tumor
Wedge resection
위쐐기절제술
Language Korean
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-n629-e2a336855822a0fda5d97c9a6ea68d1cdcbd3ea2a24e9f7d3e8b8be6401de35f3
Notes G704-000991.2007.72.1.002
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_84107
nurimedia_primary_NODE01895389
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2007
2007-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2007-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2007
  text: 2007
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationTitle Annals of surgical treatment and research
PublicationYear 2007
Publisher 대한외과학회
Publisher_xml – name: 대한외과학회
SSID ssib044729804
ssj0001125833
Score 1.6612235
Snippet Purpose: Laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR) is replacing open wedge resection (OWR) as the standard surgical treatment for gastric submucosal tumors. However,...
SourceID nrf
nurimedia
SourceType Open Website
Publisher
StartPage 27
SubjectTerms 일반외과학
Title 위점막하종양의 복강경 위쐐기절제술과 개복 위쐐기절제술의 비교
URI https://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE01895389
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001040566
Volume 72
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research, 2007, 72(1), , pp.27-31
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVFQY
  databaseName: GFMER Free Medical Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2288-6796
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0001125833
  issn: 2288-6575
  databaseCode: GX1
  dateStart: 0
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.gfmer.ch/Medical_journals/Free_medical.php
  providerName: Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR1Nb9MwNBq7wAWBADE-ph7wKerUfNvHJC0qQ4wDQ5RT5HzBVClBpTnAeUjjVg5DOxSp4sJ1YpoEEvyhLvwH3rPT0G6VgF1S1-_Dz36x37Nj-ynKPdri1EgTqxnhJXcmhS7FI542zSilcRhZpsbxgPOjLbv71NzsWb2VC5O5XUvFMNyI3i49V3IerUIe6BVPyf6HZmumkAFp0C88QcPw_Ccdk45PmE-oiQkXtyyQjkdch1BGOm3CLMKoAOmEWgLZJkwTCYBSFbE9g3gAc4nXQgJM6MRrqwu8meQNMIp4sjRKZ8X6mIC_rsQBjr46Y-nXhZyb5YK4TNC7KLSMALpx5iro18VAjuendtEncyt38I4JLgy3emAJHeL6IscB6cHt3uSJ-jApMlXEm2ZLiUAST6sEhZbW6ZMC7zfP8zNEvpBXVIp5ouJYI3DjgegZdMDum6Kv-i_znVNUrlRKLZ-g8mglXzdXN8VgzRYWb5y6o2GLUV9IK18HKQFDFjNNzUDylXEB_49x0HXoC_jRTNrxuTxHRgieWTdHP9OLK1PlzDk9lSVevHl863G709IoA5uIJ2TBlRWxUXq1QTBNmJrRaj4vFjXBXaYG7uqo5QOfLRuAq3cxKzBeBQx6c_7b9hXlcjXxariyF11VVvr5NeV5Od4tJ6OTL-9_7R-Un9-VHz-Unw4aJ0fH08P96defDYSPRtNvh-Vkr5yMy73J9OhHY3o4BpQlQEH8fXd6PLqubN_vbPvdZhVspJnZOmsmOjcwFoMFDjNvpTG3YuZEjNsJt2msRXEUxkbCda6bCUsdSNOQholttrQ4MazUuKGsZnmW3FQaGMBHD22d25FthloMDnkKw18amVyLrThaUxrQIkE_2gnwbnf8fZEH_UEAM9gHATW1lrOmrNfNFbyS184E8-q49TeE28ol-RUCFwvvKKvDQZHcBfd5GK4LFf4Gwbyumw
linkProvider Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%EC%9C%84%EC%A0%90%EB%A7%89%ED%95%98%EC%A2%85%EC%96%91%EC%9D%98+%EB%B3%B5%EA%B0%95%EA%B2%BD+%EC%9C%84%EC%90%90%EA%B8%B0%EC%A0%88%EC%A0%9C%EC%88%A0%EA%B3%BC+%EA%B0%9C%EB%B3%B5+%EC%9C%84%EC%90%90%EA%B8%B0%EC%A0%88%EC%A0%9C%EC%88%A0%EC%9D%98+%EB%B9%84%EA%B5%90&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+surgical+treatment+and+research&rft.au=%EA%B9%80%EC%9E%AC%EA%B7%BC%28Jae+Keun+Kim%29&rft.au=%EA%B9%80%EC%84%B1%EC%88%98%28Sung+Soo+Kim%29&rft.au=%EC%B5%9C%EC%9B%90%ED%98%81%28Won+Hyuk+Choi%29&rft.au=%EC%A0%95%EC%9E%AC%ED%98%B8%28Jae+Ho+Jung%29&rft.date=2007&rft.pub=%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EC%99%B8%EA%B3%BC%ED%95%99%ED%9A%8C&rft.issn=2288-6575&rft.eissn=2288-6796&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=31&rft.externalDocID=NODE01895389
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2288-6575&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2288-6575&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2288-6575&client=summon