메타분석을 이용한 호르몬 수용체 양성/인체 상피세포 성장 인자 수용체 음성 진행성 유방암에서 사이클린 의존성 인산화효소 4/6 억제제와 방향화효소 억제제 병용요법과 방향화효소 억제제 단독요법의 임상적 유효성 및 안전성 비교 연구

Objective: The aim of the study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to compare the clinical efficacy and safety between combination of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and AIs alone in patients with hormone receptor+/human epiderma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in한국임상약학회지 Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 1 - 10
Main Authors 김민지, 김경, 조문경, 손기호, 백인환, Kim, Min Ji, Kim, Kyung, Cho, MoonKyoung, Sohn, KieHo, Baek, In-hwan
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 한국임상약학회 01.03.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1226-6051
2508-786X
DOI10.24304/kjcp.2020.30.1.1

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objective: The aim of the study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to compare the clinical efficacy and safety between combination of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and AIs alone in patients with hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor type2-(HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer. Methods: Published clinical studies were identified through electronic database searches until February 2019. Literature qualities were assessed by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Checklist. Key endpoints of efficacy were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit (CB). Endpoints of safety were adverse events (AEs) (neutropenia, leukopenia, any grade 3/4 AEs, and serious AEs) and on-treatment death. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software. Results: The selected five studies were evaluated as "good" in quality assessment. Compared to AIs alone, the combination therapy significantly improved PFS (pooled hazard ratio=0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.62), ORR (odds ratio=1.78; 95% CI=1.49-2.13), and CB (odds ratio=1.86; 95% CI=1.51-2.28). The prevalence of AEs was significantly higher in the combination group than in the AIs alone group. On-treatment death was greater in the combination group than in the AIs alone group, although insignificant. Conclusion: The combination therapy of CDK4/6 inhibitors with AIs was more effective for the treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer, but less safe than AIs alone. The combination therapy should be effectively managed through patient monitoring, and further studies are needed to reduce AEs in the combination therapy of CDK4/6 inhibitors with AIs.
Bibliography:KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO202009863559509
http://www.ekjcp.org
ISSN:1226-6051
2508-786X
DOI:10.24304/kjcp.2020.30.1.1