제왕절개술에서 전신마취시와 lidocaine 또는 lidocaine-fentanyl 을 이용한 경막외마취시의 술후 통증 비교

Background : A recent report suggested that intrathecal local anesthetic pretreatment alone might not be beneficial for the prevention of postoperative pain possibly due to a increase in spinal excitability. We tested that the effect of centrineuraxis block would be more effective on postoperative p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKorean journal of anesthesiology Vol. 33; no. 4; pp. 697 - 703
Main Authors 지대림, Dae Lim Jee, 신건, Keon Shin, 한석주, Seok Ju Han, 김세연, Se Yeon Kim, 박노천, No Cheon Park, 박대팔, Dae Pal Park, 김흥대, Heung Dae Kim
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 대한마취통증의학회 30.10.1997
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2005-6419

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background : A recent report suggested that intrathecal local anesthetic pretreatment alone might not be beneficial for the prevention of postoperative pain possibly due to a increase in spinal excitability. We tested that the effect of centrineuraxis block would be more effective on postoperative pain than general anesthesia and lidocaine-fentanyl epidural block would reduce pain more effectively than lidocaine epidural. Methods : Parturient patients scheduled for cesarean section were randomly assigned to receive single epidural block using lidocaine alone(Group LE, n = 15), or with fentanyl(Group LFE, n = 15) to T4 or more sensory level, and enflurane anesthesia(Group G, n = 15). To relieve postoperative pain, all patients received intravenous bolus morphine on pain, followed by the intravenous patient-controlled analgesia(IV-PCA). Visual analogue scores(VAS) and cumulative morphine consumptions were measured at time intervals. Comparisons were made within and between groups. Results : VAS and morphine consumption for first 24 hours were less in Group LE and LFE than in Group G over the time interval without difference between Group LE and LFE(P<0.05). The morphine consumptions in Group LE(1.07±0.80 mg) and LFE(1.00±0.93 mg) were lower than in Group G(2.40±0.83 mg) at 24 hour(P<0.05). There were no differences between 3 groups in 24 hours' morphine consumption during the second day. Conclusions : Epidural block is more effective than general anesthesia on pain relief. Lidocaine- fentanyl epidurals are not more effective than lidocaine alone on postoperative pain relief, suggesting no significant effect on spinal sensitization of fentanyl. IV-PCA in patients with epidural block can be stopped earlier than with general anesthesia postoperatively. (Korean J Anesthesiol 1997; 33: 697∼703)
Bibliography:The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
ISSN:2005-6419