Relationship between Recognition of “the Poor” and Criminal Law Reform in Benthamite Utilitarianism: Focusing on the Criticism of Natural Rights Theory

This paper analyzes the purpose and legitimacy of relief support for “the poor” under positive law in Benthamite utilitarianism. First, the author compares the recognition of “the poor” in Jeremy Bentham’s theory of utility with their recognition in John Locke’s theory of natural rights. Second, the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEibeibunka: Studies in English Language, Literature and Culture Vol. 54; pp. 61 - 80
Main Author TOMIKAWA, Takako
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published The Society of English Studies 31.03.2024
英米文化学会
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0917-3536
2424-2381
DOI10.20802/eibeibunka.54.0_61

Cover

Abstract This paper analyzes the purpose and legitimacy of relief support for “the poor” under positive law in Benthamite utilitarianism. First, the author compares the recognition of “the poor” in Jeremy Bentham’s theory of utility with their recognition in John Locke’s theory of natural rights. Second, the author considers it in conjunction with the purpose of criminal law reform. Locke’s ideas included no assumption of the rights of “the poor” as citizens. On the other hand, Bentham’s theory of utility argued that to enhance utility for society, it was necessary to alleviate the suffering of the “the poor.” Bentham justified bringing “the poor” under the control of the law in support of positive legalism associated with utilitarianism. This coincided with the desire of industrial capitalists to control property infringements by the “the poor” more effectively through positive law and promoted the criminal law reform movement.
AbstractList This paper analyzes the purpose and legitimacy of relief support for “the poor” under positive law in Benthamite utilitarianism. First, the author compares the recognition of “the poor” in Jeremy Bentham’s theory of utility with their recognition in John Locke’s theory of natural rights. Second, the author considers it in conjunction with the purpose of criminal law reform. Locke’s ideas included no assumption of the rights of “the poor” as citizens. On the other hand, Bentham’s theory of utility argued that to enhance utility for society, it was necessary to alleviate the suffering of the “the poor.” Bentham justified bringing “the poor” under the control of the law in support of positive legalism associated with utilitarianism. This coincided with the desire of industrial capitalists to control property infringements by the “the poor” more effectively through positive law and promoted the criminal law reform movement.
Author TOMIKAWA, Takako
Author_FL 冨川 多佳子
Author_FL_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: 冨川 多佳子
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: TOMIKAWA, Takako
BackLink https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1390299937187333760$$DView record in CiNii
BookMark eNpFkc9u1EAMxkeoSCylT8BlDlyzzJ9kkuEGK1oqrQCtlnPkTJyNS3ammsyq6q3vUXi5PgkTFYFk2ZK_Tz_L9mt25oNHxt5KsVaiEeo9Upfj5H_CuirXojXyBVupUpWF0o08YythZV3oSptX7GKeqRNCKVUZa1bscYcTJAp-HumWd5juED3foQsHT0ufh4E_PfxKI_LvIcSnh98cfM83kY7kYeJbuMv2IcQjJ88_oU8jHCkh_5FoogSRwNN8_MAvgzvN5A88MxdaJiRyWVomfIV0ipm2o8OYZr4fMcT7N-zlANOMF3_rOdtfft5vvhTbb1fXm4_b4qaxosCmr52Rzg1y6Ibe1L2WJWBVV31nyrIqocuKMLJXqIXRiHpwwuKQdWs06HP27hnriVpHS5baCmWt1bVsaq11bUS2bZ5tN3OCA7a3-QIQ71uIeY0J2_9faKuyFUsy8p_qRogtev0HTomLlw
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024 The Society of English Studies
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024 The Society of English Studies
DBID RYH
DOI 10.20802/eibeibunka.54.0_61
DatabaseName CiNii Complete
DatabaseTitleList

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
DocumentTitleAlternate ベンサム功利主義における「貧民」認識と刑法改革の関係―自然権論批判に注目して
DocumentTitle_FL ベンサム功利主義における「貧民」認識と刑法改革の関係―自然権論批判に注目して
EISSN 2424-2381
EndPage 80
ExternalDocumentID article_eibeibunka_54_0_54_61_article_char_en
GroupedDBID ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
JSF
RJT
RYH
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-j890-e8d7c61ccf1fbfd67d314ae575db64454abf1f061d2e3063ee3fc09ef5db963a3
ISSN 0917-3536
IngestDate Thu Jun 26 22:41:58 EDT 2025
Wed Sep 03 06:31:13 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Language Japanese
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-j890-e8d7c61ccf1fbfd67d314ae575db64454abf1f061d2e3063ee3fc09ef5db963a3
OpenAccessLink https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/eibeibunka/54/0/54_61/_article/-char/en
PageCount 20
ParticipantIDs nii_cinii_1390299937187333760
jstage_primary_article_eibeibunka_54_0_54_61_article_char_en
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024/03/31
2024-03-31
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-03-31
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2024
  text: 2024/03/31
  day: 31
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Eibeibunka: Studies in English Language, Literature and Culture
PublicationTitleAlternate Eibeibunka: Studies in English Language, Literature and Culture
PublicationTitle_FL Eibeibunka: Studies in English Language, Literature and Culture
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher The Society of English Studies
英米文化学会
Publisher_xml – name: The Society of English Studies
– name: 英米文化学会
References Thompson, E. P., Whig and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act, London: Allen Lane, 1975.
フーコー,ミシェル,田村俶訳,『監獄の誕生―監視と処罰』,新潮社,2020年。原著:Surveiller Et Punir: Naissance de Prison, Paris: Éditions Gallimard, 1975.
Campos-Boralevi, Lea, Bentham and the Oppressed, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co., 1984.
坂井広明,「ベンサムにおける快楽主義の位相とマイノリティーの問題【『男色論』に注目して】」,『社会思想史研究』,vol. 26,藤原書店,2002年,62–74頁
深田三徳,「自然権論と功利主義」,長尾龍一ほか編,『法思想』(現代法哲学2),東京大学出版会,1983年,65–94頁。――,『法実証主義と功利主義―ベンサムとその周辺―』,木鐸社,1984年
Bentham, Jeremy, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, edited by J. H. Burns and H. L. Hart, London: The Athlone Press, 17891, 1970. 邦訳:中山元,『道徳および立法の諸原理序説』(上・下),筑摩書房,2022年。――, Principles of Legislation, Principles of the Civil Code, translated and edited from the French of Étienne Dumont by Charles Milner Atkinson, vol. 1, London: Humphrey Milford, 1914.
トレヴェリアン,G. M.,大野真弓監訳,『イギリス史1』,みすず書房,1973年。――,『イギリス史2』,みすず書房,1974年。原著:History of England, London: Longmans, 1929.
Locke, John, Two Treatises of Government, a critical edition with an introduction and apparatus criticus by Peter Laslett, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 16901, 1960.邦訳:加藤節,『完訳 統治二論』,岩波書店,2010年
冨川多佳子,「『ジプシー』関連法からみる産業革命期イングランドの刑法改革―功利性追求と『マイノリティ』―」,『ヨーロッパ研究』,vol. 17,東北大学大学院国際文化研究科ヨーロッパ文化論講座,2023年,27–50頁
伊原吉之助,『ベンサムの功利主義体系』,龍谷大学龍谷学会,1960年
マクファースン,C. B.,藤野渉ほか訳,『所有的個人主義の政治理論』,合同出版,1980年。原著:The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962.
安彦一恵,「ベンサムの(もう一つの)科学主義」,『実践哲学研究』,vol. 20,京都倫理学会,1997年,1–18頁
田代不二男,『英国の救貧制度』,有斐閣,1958年
Pennock, J. R., “Rights, Natural Rights, and Human Rights: A General View”, Human Rights, vol. 23, American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, 1981, pp. 1–28.
大沢真里,『イギリス社会政策史』,東京大学出版会,1986年
柳本正春,『イギリスにおける罪と罰』(成文堂選書7),成文堂,1989年
川北稔ほか編,『イギリス史新版世界各国史11』,山川出版社,1998年
References_xml – reference: トレヴェリアン,G. M.,大野真弓監訳,『イギリス史1』,みすず書房,1973年。――,『イギリス史2』,みすず書房,1974年。原著:History of England, London: Longmans, 1929.
– reference: Locke, John, Two Treatises of Government, a critical edition with an introduction and apparatus criticus by Peter Laslett, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 16901, 1960.邦訳:加藤節,『完訳 統治二論』,岩波書店,2010年。
– reference: 川北稔ほか編,『イギリス史新版世界各国史11』,山川出版社,1998年。
– reference: マクファースン,C. B.,藤野渉ほか訳,『所有的個人主義の政治理論』,合同出版,1980年。原著:The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962.
– reference: 柳本正春,『イギリスにおける罪と罰』(成文堂選書7),成文堂,1989年。
– reference: Bentham, Jeremy, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, edited by J. H. Burns and H. L. Hart, London: The Athlone Press, 17891, 1970. 邦訳:中山元,『道徳および立法の諸原理序説』(上・下),筑摩書房,2022年。――, Principles of Legislation, Principles of the Civil Code, translated and edited from the French of Étienne Dumont by Charles Milner Atkinson, vol. 1, London: Humphrey Milford, 1914.
– reference: 伊原吉之助,『ベンサムの功利主義体系』,龍谷大学龍谷学会,1960年。
– reference: Thompson, E. P., Whig and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act, London: Allen Lane, 1975.
– reference: Campos-Boralevi, Lea, Bentham and the Oppressed, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co., 1984.
– reference: 大沢真里,『イギリス社会政策史』,東京大学出版会,1986年。
– reference: 冨川多佳子,「『ジプシー』関連法からみる産業革命期イングランドの刑法改革―功利性追求と『マイノリティ』―」,『ヨーロッパ研究』,vol. 17,東北大学大学院国際文化研究科ヨーロッパ文化論講座,2023年,27–50頁。
– reference: Pennock, J. R., “Rights, Natural Rights, and Human Rights: A General View”, Human Rights, vol. 23, American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, 1981, pp. 1–28.
– reference: 深田三徳,「自然権論と功利主義」,長尾龍一ほか編,『法思想』(現代法哲学2),東京大学出版会,1983年,65–94頁。――,『法実証主義と功利主義―ベンサムとその周辺―』,木鐸社,1984年。
– reference: 安彦一恵,「ベンサムの(もう一つの)科学主義」,『実践哲学研究』,vol. 20,京都倫理学会,1997年,1–18頁。
– reference: フーコー,ミシェル,田村俶訳,『監獄の誕生―監視と処罰』,新潮社,2020年。原著:Surveiller Et Punir: Naissance de Prison, Paris: Éditions Gallimard, 1975.
– reference: 田代不二男,『英国の救貧制度』,有斐閣,1958年。
– reference: 坂井広明,「ベンサムにおける快楽主義の位相とマイノリティーの問題【『男色論』に注目して】」,『社会思想史研究』,vol. 26,藤原書店,2002年,62–74頁。
SSID ssib002225696
ssj0003315193
ssib044735396
ssib000937653
Score 1.9749292
Snippet This paper analyzes the purpose and legitimacy of relief support for “the poor” under positive law in Benthamite utilitarianism. First, the author compares the...
SourceID nii
jstage
SourceType Publisher
StartPage 61
Title Relationship between Recognition of “the Poor” and Criminal Law Reform in Benthamite Utilitarianism: Focusing on the Criticism of Natural Rights Theory
URI https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/eibeibunka/54/0/54_61/_article/-char/en
https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1390299937187333760
Volume 54
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Eibeibunka: Studies in English Language, Literature and Culture, 2024/03/31, Vol.54, pp.61-80
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2424-2381
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssib044735396
  issn: 0917-3536
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 19910101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Pb9MwFLe6ceGChgAxYMgHblNKWjt_iriUsWmACmjqxG6R7dhaWilBrL1wQPsewAfjuk_Ce7aTuGIHBherdVrHyfvFfu_lvd8j5FnGWMYyeNJUysqIJzqLpBEyAntI6FyA-cYwUXj2Pj0-5W_PkrPB4FcQtbReyaH6em1eyb9IFfpArpglewPJdoNCB3wG-UILEob2r2TcRbKFEVcnbUiQ0wTbaIYD1DA_NmCd-47X9r1BV9bLvShAFRZdIK9gLzoXmPu0f7qyRN5wObWP0jhq1Nq6GNyLhn1XLgGrbaD7QTgmjxO0-i_63P_e_19JjWwlS1sVyMcx4jl9RjHMxLlQncugZX12s7U8IR0W5x9mb95NP00t6MRSLJvQiTHmbVafhx0-Em2UKgZU-vOFoZTeaQl7KkuYJ8-2fZjfEqHiEa7pCQ8WZcf23m7v8XUbxxhTjhFD3S0YJnwYF-1fNxi5vbyL_sdFwosYm3RUtEcxaw5AukVujbM0xeIas2-HoSMp22C2g3U17ZkPOVaEZv47KhWMjVDXtsyR_h44Di078-d_zhs0qgXYF0gcsVVXVaA0zXfIHW_t0Kmb7F0yWIh75HsIW-phSwPY0sbQq8sfAC2KgL26_ElB-LSFKgWoUgdVWtW0hyrdhOoL2gKVwpg4WgdUPIMHKnVApQ6o98n86HB-cBz5GiHRIp_Ekc7LTKUjpczISFOmWclGXGiwQUoJmn7ChYQjoLOWYw3GMdOaGRVPtIHjsPUI9oBs102tHxJqmFBsIuREx5qrOJc8MWDNSJno2ORM7ZKX7oYWnx0PTHEjHOySPRBDoSpsweyKQQ9ELsocVksMTHv0f8M_Jrf75-oJ2V59Wes9UJdX8qkF3m-wA8pP
linkProvider ISSN International Centre
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationship+between+Recognition+of+%E2%80%9Cthe+Poor%E2%80%9D+and+Criminal+Law+Reform+in+Benthamite+Utilitarianism%3A+Focusing+on+the+Criticism+of+Natural+Rights+Theory&rft.jtitle=Eibeibunka%3A+Studies+in+English+Language%2C+Literature+and+Culture&rft.au=TOMIKAWA%2C+Takako&rft.date=2024-03-31&rft.pub=The+Society+of+English+Studies&rft.issn=0917-3536&rft.eissn=2424-2381&rft.volume=54&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=80&rft_id=info:doi/10.20802%2Feibeibunka.54.0_61&rft.externalDocID=article_eibeibunka_54_0_54_61_article_char_en
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0917-3536&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0917-3536&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0917-3536&client=summon