Comparative study of irrigation efficiency during HoLEP and morcellation

  We investigated the safety of and effective irrigation methods for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and tissue morcellation with and without using a lure lock cock with three companies’ endoscopes. Furthermore, the flow rates of the three companies’ irrigation tubes were compared....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJapanese Journal of Endourology Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. 350 - 355
Main Authors Ohno, Yoshio, Hashimoto, Takeshi, Hayashi, Kenjiro, Ishida, Takuya, Shishido, Toshihide, Namiki, Kazunori, Aizawa, Taku, Satake, Naoya
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Japanese Society of Endourology 2021
日本泌尿器内視鏡学会
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2186-1889
2187-4700
DOI10.11302/jsejje.34.350

Cover

More Information
Summary:  We investigated the safety of and effective irrigation methods for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and tissue morcellation with and without using a lure lock cock with three companies’ endoscopes. Furthermore, the flow rates of the three companies’ irrigation tubes were compared. The flow rate exceeded 500 mL per minute for all manufacturers on performing HoLEP. In the morcellation setting, the presence of a lure lock cock did not affect the flow rate. The inflow rate of the irrigation port of the nephroscope in single route was lower than that of the outer sheath. The irrigation tube with the highest flow rate was had a large inside diameter and four connecting tubes.  It is important to consider the difference in flow rates due to the difference in connection routes of an endoscope and choose an efficient irrigation route using a lure lock cock.
ISSN:2186-1889
2187-4700
DOI:10.11302/jsejje.34.350