(2013). Criminal Procedure — Fourth Amendment — Sixth Circuit Holds that "Pinging" a Target's Cell Phone to Obtain GPS Data Is Not a Search Subject to the Warrant Requirement. — United States v. Skinner, 690 F.3d 772 (6th Cir. 2012), reh'g and reh'g en banc denied, No. 09-6497 (6th Cir. Sept. 26, 2012). Harvard law review, 126(3), 802-809.
Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation"Criminal Procedure — Fourth Amendment — Sixth Circuit Holds That "Pinging" a Target's Cell Phone to Obtain GPS Data Is Not a Search Subject to the Warrant Requirement. — United States V. Skinner, 690 F.3d 772 (6th Cir. 2012), Reh'g and Reh'g En Banc Denied, No. 09-6497 (6th Cir. Sept. 26, 2012)." Harvard Law Review 126, no. 3 (2013): 802-809.
MLA (9th ed.) Citation"Criminal Procedure — Fourth Amendment — Sixth Circuit Holds That "Pinging" a Target's Cell Phone to Obtain GPS Data Is Not a Search Subject to the Warrant Requirement. — United States V. Skinner, 690 F.3d 772 (6th Cir. 2012), Reh'g and Reh'g En Banc Denied, No. 09-6497 (6th Cir. Sept. 26, 2012)." Harvard Law Review, vol. 126, no. 3, 2013, pp. 802-809.