偏重MPG三軸同時印加DWIの特性とADC値
Saved in:
Published in | 日本放射線技術学会雑誌 Vol. 71; no. 7; pp. 595 - 604 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Japanese |
Published |
公益社団法人 日本放射線技術学会
2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0369-4305 1881-4883 |
DOI | 10.6009/jjrt.2015_JSRT_71.7.595 |
Cover
Author | 長壁, 航己 山口, 奈津美 小倉, 明夫 林, 則夫 秦野, 勇 小山, 大輔 |
---|---|
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: 林, 則夫 organization: 群馬県立県民健康科学大学診療放射線学部 – sequence: 1 fullname: 山口, 奈津美 organization: 東京都立多摩総合医療センター診療放射線科 – sequence: 1 fullname: 小倉, 明夫 organization: 群馬県立県民健康科学大学診療放射線学部 – sequence: 1 fullname: 秦野, 勇 organization: 自治医科大学付属病院放射線科 – sequence: 1 fullname: 小山, 大輔 organization: 国立病院機構まつもと医療センター中信松本病院放射線科 – sequence: 1 fullname: 長壁, 航己 organization: 済生会前橋病院放射線科 |
BookMark | eNrjYmDJy89LZWCQNzTQMzMwsNTPyioq0TMyMDSN9woOCok3N9Qz1zO1NGVi4DS0sDDUNbGwMGZh4DQwNrPUNTE2MOVg4C0uzkwyAGoFChmYcDIYPG3sf9ne6xvg_mRH54vdO55O6Hk2s-lp74anXQtcwj0fN6573rnzWcPyx40rHF2cnzYs4WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDKFuriHOHro-_u6ezo4-ullG5sbGukaJRoZJxkArLUzSTAzMUtPSDM2AnCQDoLiloVGyYZJRmkVyqomJpUWqYVJqItAxRibJyYkmJsapKUB5Y24GO4i5WcUliemp8QVFmbmJRZXxiUUlmck5qfEgnwP9G28OIoBehkskZyQWxWclGgMAMHlg0w |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2015 公益社団法人 日本放射線技術学会 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 公益社団法人 日本放射線技術学会 |
DOI | 10.6009/jjrt.2015_JSRT_71.7.595 |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1881-4883 |
EndPage | 604 |
ExternalDocumentID | article_jjrt_71_7_71_595_article_char_ja |
GroupedDBID | .LE 2WC ABJNI ACGFS ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS KQ8 OK1 RJT |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-j2733-2a21b330584f406eff16058b0a21912c1b2f8ce4498e1bea90424cca443ed12c3 |
ISSN | 0369-4305 |
IngestDate | Wed Sep 03 06:30:05 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 7 |
Language | Japanese |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-j2733-2a21b330584f406eff16058b0a21912c1b2f8ce4498e1bea90424cca443ed12c3 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjrt/71/7/71_595/_article/-char/ja |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | jstage_primary_article_jjrt_71_7_71_595_article_char_ja |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20150000 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – year: 2015 text: 20150000 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationTitle | 日本放射線技術学会雑誌 |
PublicationTitleAlternate | 日放技学誌 |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | 公益社団法人 日本放射線技術学会 |
Publisher_xml | – name: 公益社団法人 日本放射線技術学会 |
References | 9) Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16(2): 172-178. 14) Yankeelov TE, Lepage M, Chakravarthy A, et al. Integration of quantitativeDCE-MRI and ADC mapping to monitor treatment response in human breast cancer: initial results. Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25(1): 1-13. 16) Mardor Y, Pfeffer R, Spiegelmann R, et al. Early detection of response to radiation therapy in patients with brain malignancies using conventional and high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21(6): 10941100. 6) desouza NM, Reinsberg SA, Scurr ED, et al. Magnetic resonanceimaging in prostatecancer: thevalueof apparent diffusion coefficients for identifying malignant nodules. Br J Radiol 2007; 80(950): 90-95. 10) Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, et al. In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. JMRA 2002; 15: 693-704. 24) National Electrical Manufacturers Association: NEMA Standards Publication MS 2-2008: Determination of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) in Diagnostic Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 30) Ueguchi T, Yamada S, Mihara N, et al. Breast diffusion-weighted MRI: comparison of tetrahedral versus orthogonal diffusion sensitization for detection and localization of mass lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33(6): 1375-1381. 13) Pickles MD, Gibbs P, Lowry M, et al. Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24(7): 843-847. 25) National Electrical Manufacturers Association: NEMA Standards Publication MS 2-2008: Determination of Two-Dimensional Geometric Distortion in Diagnostic Resonance Images 8) Nakayama T, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, et al. Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and ADC mapping in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cystic masses: usefulness of detecting keratinoid substances in mature cystic teratomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 22(2): 271-278. 15) Theilmann RJ, Borders R, Trouard TP, et al. Changes in water mobility measured by diffusion MRI predict response of metastatic breast cancer to chemotherapy. Neoplasia 2004; 6(6): 831-837. 22) Conturo TE, McKinstry RC, Akbudak E, et al.: Encoding of anisotropic diffusion with tetrahedral gradients: a general mathematical diffusion formalism and experimental results. Magn Reson Med 1996; 35(3): 399-412. 29) Ogura A, Hayakawa K, Miyati T, et al. Imaging parameter effects in apparent diffusion coefficient determination of magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 2011; 77(1): 185-188. 23) Javier Sanchez-Gonzalez: How to Identify and Avoid; Artifacts on DWI. Diffusion MRI OutsidetheBrain, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2012: 17-31. 27) Yeom KW, Holdsworth SJ, Van AT, et al. Comparison of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (EPI) and single-shot EPI in clinical application of diffusion-weighted imaging of thepediatric brain. AJR 2013; 200(5): 437-443. 12) Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Iwabuchi K, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29(5): 644-649. 7) Eida S, Sumi M, Sakihama N, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping of salivary gland tumors: prediction of the benignancy and malignancy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28(1): 116-121. 21) 高橋光幸,小倉明夫,尾崎正則,他.拡散強調画像における歪みの検討.日放技学誌 2009; 65(11): 1494-1501. 20) Sandrasegaran K, Patel AA, Ramaswamy R, et al. Characterization of adrenal masses with diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197(1): 132-138. 26) Rasband, W.S., ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, 19972014. 2) Muti M, AprileI, Principi M, et al. Study on thevariations of the apparent diffusion coefficient in areas of solid tumor in high gradegliomas. Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 20(9): 53-60. 19) Khalid L, CaroneM, Dumrongpisutikul N, et al. Imaging characteristics of oligodendrogliomas that predict grade. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33(5): 852-857. 5) Matsushima N, Maeda M, Takamura M, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficients of benign and malignant salivary gland tumors; comparison to histopathological findings. Neuroradiol 2007; 34(3): 183-189. 17) Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, et al. Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196(1): 210-217. 3) Park MJ, Cha ES, Kang BJ, et al. Theroleof diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors. Korean J Radiol 2007; 8(5): 390-396. 11) Taouli B, Vilgrain V, Dumont E, et al. Evaluation of liver diffusion isotropy and characterization of focal hepatic lesions with two single-shot echo-planar MR imaging sequences: prospective study in 66 patients. Radiology 2003; 226(1): 71-78. 18) Rechichi G, Galimberti S, Signorelli M, et al. Endometrial cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with tumor grade, depth of myometrial invasion, and presence of lymph node metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197(1): 256-262. 28) Yamada K, Kizu O, Mori S, et al. Brain fiber tracking with clinically feasible diffusion-tensor MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2003; 227(1): 295-301. 4) Yerli H, Agildere AM, Aydin E, at al. Value of apparent diffusion coefficient calculation in the differential diagnosis of parotid gland tumors. Acta Radiol 1987; 48(9): 980-987. 1) Bulakbasi N, Guvenc I, Onguru O, et al. The added value of the apparent diffusion coefficient calculation to magnetic resonanceimaging in thedifferentiation and grading of malignant brain tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28(6): 735-746. |
References_xml | – reference: 4) Yerli H, Agildere AM, Aydin E, at al. Value of apparent diffusion coefficient calculation in the differential diagnosis of parotid gland tumors. Acta Radiol 1987; 48(9): 980-987. – reference: 18) Rechichi G, Galimberti S, Signorelli M, et al. Endometrial cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with tumor grade, depth of myometrial invasion, and presence of lymph node metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197(1): 256-262. – reference: 3) Park MJ, Cha ES, Kang BJ, et al. Theroleof diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors. Korean J Radiol 2007; 8(5): 390-396. – reference: 13) Pickles MD, Gibbs P, Lowry M, et al. Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24(7): 843-847. – reference: 27) Yeom KW, Holdsworth SJ, Van AT, et al. Comparison of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (EPI) and single-shot EPI in clinical application of diffusion-weighted imaging of thepediatric brain. AJR 2013; 200(5): 437-443. – reference: 5) Matsushima N, Maeda M, Takamura M, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficients of benign and malignant salivary gland tumors; comparison to histopathological findings. Neuroradiol 2007; 34(3): 183-189. – reference: 11) Taouli B, Vilgrain V, Dumont E, et al. Evaluation of liver diffusion isotropy and characterization of focal hepatic lesions with two single-shot echo-planar MR imaging sequences: prospective study in 66 patients. Radiology 2003; 226(1): 71-78. – reference: 14) Yankeelov TE, Lepage M, Chakravarthy A, et al. Integration of quantitativeDCE-MRI and ADC mapping to monitor treatment response in human breast cancer: initial results. Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25(1): 1-13. – reference: 12) Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Iwabuchi K, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29(5): 644-649. – reference: 15) Theilmann RJ, Borders R, Trouard TP, et al. Changes in water mobility measured by diffusion MRI predict response of metastatic breast cancer to chemotherapy. Neoplasia 2004; 6(6): 831-837. – reference: 26) Rasband, W.S., ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, 19972014. – reference: 6) desouza NM, Reinsberg SA, Scurr ED, et al. Magnetic resonanceimaging in prostatecancer: thevalueof apparent diffusion coefficients for identifying malignant nodules. Br J Radiol 2007; 80(950): 90-95. – reference: 25) National Electrical Manufacturers Association: NEMA Standards Publication MS 2-2008: Determination of Two-Dimensional Geometric Distortion in Diagnostic Resonance Images – reference: 9) Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16(2): 172-178. – reference: 29) Ogura A, Hayakawa K, Miyati T, et al. Imaging parameter effects in apparent diffusion coefficient determination of magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 2011; 77(1): 185-188. – reference: 30) Ueguchi T, Yamada S, Mihara N, et al. Breast diffusion-weighted MRI: comparison of tetrahedral versus orthogonal diffusion sensitization for detection and localization of mass lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33(6): 1375-1381. – reference: 23) Javier Sanchez-Gonzalez: How to Identify and Avoid; Artifacts on DWI. Diffusion MRI OutsidetheBrain, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2012: 17-31. – reference: 19) Khalid L, CaroneM, Dumrongpisutikul N, et al. Imaging characteristics of oligodendrogliomas that predict grade. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33(5): 852-857. – reference: 28) Yamada K, Kizu O, Mori S, et al. Brain fiber tracking with clinically feasible diffusion-tensor MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2003; 227(1): 295-301. – reference: 21) 高橋光幸,小倉明夫,尾崎正則,他.拡散強調画像における歪みの検討.日放技学誌 2009; 65(11): 1494-1501. – reference: 22) Conturo TE, McKinstry RC, Akbudak E, et al.: Encoding of anisotropic diffusion with tetrahedral gradients: a general mathematical diffusion formalism and experimental results. Magn Reson Med 1996; 35(3): 399-412. – reference: 8) Nakayama T, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, et al. Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and ADC mapping in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cystic masses: usefulness of detecting keratinoid substances in mature cystic teratomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 22(2): 271-278. – reference: 17) Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, et al. Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196(1): 210-217. – reference: 1) Bulakbasi N, Guvenc I, Onguru O, et al. The added value of the apparent diffusion coefficient calculation to magnetic resonanceimaging in thedifferentiation and grading of malignant brain tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28(6): 735-746. – reference: 24) National Electrical Manufacturers Association: NEMA Standards Publication MS 2-2008: Determination of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) in Diagnostic Magnetic Resonance Imaging. – reference: 20) Sandrasegaran K, Patel AA, Ramaswamy R, et al. Characterization of adrenal masses with diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197(1): 132-138. – reference: 10) Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, et al. In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. JMRA 2002; 15: 693-704. – reference: 16) Mardor Y, Pfeffer R, Spiegelmann R, et al. Early detection of response to radiation therapy in patients with brain malignancies using conventional and high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21(6): 10941100. – reference: 2) Muti M, AprileI, Principi M, et al. Study on thevariations of the apparent diffusion coefficient in areas of solid tumor in high gradegliomas. Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 20(9): 53-60. – reference: 7) Eida S, Sumi M, Sakihama N, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping of salivary gland tumors: prediction of the benignancy and malignancy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28(1): 116-121. |
SSID | ssib000936904 ssib002223925 ssj0055458 ssib005879721 ssib031740840 ssib000959831 ssib000753122 ssib008799587 ssib002484555 ssib023160873 |
Score | 2.0365658 |
SourceID | jstage |
SourceType | Publisher |
StartPage | 595 |
SubjectTerms | apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) diffusion weighted images (DWIs) geometric distortion gradient overplus signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) |
Title | 偏重MPG三軸同時印加DWIの特性とADC値 |
URI | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjrt/71/7/71_595/_article/-char/ja |
Volume | 71 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | 日本放射線技術学会雑誌, 2015, Vol.71(7), pp.595-604 |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1881-4883 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0055458 issn: 0369-4305 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 20060101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEI5KkRAXxFO81QNzQil5OGv76Oy6lEpFPFrRW7TZZg97KKhqL5xaLqiICq7cOCDBCXEs4q9wK1vgX_CNnd2mqEhQIUVRZI_H4xk7M5OMx0FwY1mXXUwcEUo-w11UKg67OlFh2YV67lX8o403OM_fbc0uirmlbGni2NdG1NL6Wjnde3rovpKjSBVlkCvvkv0HyY6RogDPkC_ukDDufyVjshksQVIzZDXBq1ed-Xu3yQrKFSlNVlGe8zPAdESqTbZFGpCJa9ihPHIPhkzUeXSHbMrYjCUruXmuGV5FZOSoSplO2zVBoWjatQ6zJJO5hzYZ3xcosQyPjpRgtLkkbRxaw0hAoYlJpwxjOmRajvi2g9Gkc9KxgwHw-GuuQ2y5N8wOR4wbO2MQZPJ9MHQb88UgM2TSETyIVIqx5MIRLJlIZQ80jBxT3UCB3jVEr-CqPaQjyRxi2r0Q7JiwnGo1X39W8VtK3RJw9Znjk-SBgh-MZ8QwlIBgpjElnTmuGFw3_zufG4ogbemQU7N5ne0VlcKqwss3bWoyf5hNvWJlQy1lOmtYOC1_4PPvyhOmL-eeHQxWOcY4zoq5hw8WChlPy-lx-wOZyet5X3ALwBWSbwAtRhW8cbAYwHs5nkjYgRwycV81jdU0biaP5LMlm5mCdKZV4x81W7I6OZCMT2TNXdVK6mayP8W5DvedDzgyLZSNtREMZxG5TEfebsv4F7KPbPDc9tGgzJVbf-AJrNYBfLhR_KczSRdOB6dqX3LKeD6cCSYG3bPBifk6WuZcEA03X_18vo13wredrR9fdoavX-69eTbc_jR88RbrfXfz4_etz3sb73c3P2BdDzfenQ8WZ-xCezasT0gJB3A70jDpJnGZglYl-rDMq34_5jCHMkK5jpNeXCZ91auE0KqKy6qrOdAB72wh0moZ9emFYHLl8Up1MZiK-7D8OXtiL9KiTGUZ9VRVRssaKGHGJ5cC6cdaPPFpcIq_Ff_lI7e8EpxkpvsvnleDybXV9eoafIC18rqbSr8AzHzCSQ |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E5%81%8F%E9%87%8DMPG%E4%B8%89%E8%BB%B8%E5%90%8C%E6%99%82%E5%8D%B0%E5%8A%A0DWI%E3%81%AE%E7%89%B9%E6%80%A7%E3%81%A8ADC%E5%80%A4&rft.jtitle=%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E6%94%BE%E5%B0%84%E7%B7%9A%E6%8A%80%E8%A1%93%E5%AD%A6%E4%BC%9A%E9%9B%91%E8%AA%8C&rft.au=%E6%9E%97%2C+%E5%89%87%E5%A4%AB&rft.au=%E5%B1%B1%E5%8F%A3%2C+%E5%A5%88%E6%B4%A5%E7%BE%8E&rft.au=%E5%B0%8F%E5%80%89%2C+%E6%98%8E%E5%A4%AB&rft.au=%E7%A7%A6%E9%87%8E%2C+%E5%8B%87&rft.date=2015&rft.pub=%E5%85%AC%E7%9B%8A%E7%A4%BE%E5%9B%A3%E6%B3%95%E4%BA%BA+%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E6%94%BE%E5%B0%84%E7%B7%9A%E6%8A%80%E8%A1%93%E5%AD%A6%E4%BC%9A&rft.issn=0369-4305&rft.eissn=1881-4883&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=595&rft.epage=604&rft_id=info:doi/10.6009%2Fjjrt.2015_JSRT_71.7.595&rft.externalDocID=article_jjrt_71_7_71_595_article_char_ja |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0369-4305&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0369-4305&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0369-4305&client=summon |