偏重MPG三軸同時印加DWIの特性とADC値

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in日本放射線技術学会雑誌 Vol. 71; no. 7; pp. 595 - 604
Main Authors 林, 則夫, 山口, 奈津美, 小倉, 明夫, 秦野, 勇, 小山, 大輔, 長壁, 航己
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published 公益社団法人 日本放射線技術学会 2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0369-4305
1881-4883
DOI10.6009/jjrt.2015_JSRT_71.7.595

Cover

Author 長壁, 航己
山口, 奈津美
小倉, 明夫
林, 則夫
秦野, 勇
小山, 大輔
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: 林, 則夫
  organization: 群馬県立県民健康科学大学診療放射線学部
– sequence: 1
  fullname: 山口, 奈津美
  organization: 東京都立多摩総合医療センター診療放射線科
– sequence: 1
  fullname: 小倉, 明夫
  organization: 群馬県立県民健康科学大学診療放射線学部
– sequence: 1
  fullname: 秦野, 勇
  organization: 自治医科大学付属病院放射線科
– sequence: 1
  fullname: 小山, 大輔
  organization: 国立病院機構まつもと医療センター中信松本病院放射線科
– sequence: 1
  fullname: 長壁, 航己
  organization: 済生会前橋病院放射線科
BookMark eNrjYmDJy89LZWCQNzTQMzMwsNTPyioq0TMyMDSN9woOCok3N9Qz1zO1NGVi4DS0sDDUNbGwMGZh4DQwNrPUNTE2MOVg4C0uzkwyAGoFChmYcDIYPG3sf9ne6xvg_mRH54vdO55O6Hk2s-lp74anXQtcwj0fN6573rnzWcPyx40rHF2cnzYs4WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDKFuriHOHro-_u6ezo4-ullG5sbGukaJRoZJxkArLUzSTAzMUtPSDM2AnCQDoLiloVGyYZJRmkVyqomJpUWqYVJqItAxRibJyYkmJsapKUB5Y24GO4i5WcUliemp8QVFmbmJRZXxiUUlmck5qfEgnwP9G28OIoBehkskZyQWxWclGgMAMHlg0w
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 公益社団法人 日本放射線技術学会
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 公益社団法人 日本放射線技術学会
DOI 10.6009/jjrt.2015_JSRT_71.7.595
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1881-4883
EndPage 604
ExternalDocumentID article_jjrt_71_7_71_595_article_char_ja
GroupedDBID .LE
2WC
ABJNI
ACGFS
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
KQ8
OK1
RJT
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-j2733-2a21b330584f406eff16058b0a21912c1b2f8ce4498e1bea90424cca443ed12c3
ISSN 0369-4305
IngestDate Wed Sep 03 06:30:05 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 7
Language Japanese
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-j2733-2a21b330584f406eff16058b0a21912c1b2f8ce4498e1bea90424cca443ed12c3
OpenAccessLink https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjrt/71/7/71_595/_article/-char/ja
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs jstage_primary_article_jjrt_71_7_71_595_article_char_ja
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20150000
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2015
  text: 20150000
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle 日本放射線技術学会雑誌
PublicationTitleAlternate 日放技学誌
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher 公益社団法人 日本放射線技術学会
Publisher_xml – name: 公益社団法人 日本放射線技術学会
References 9) Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16(2): 172-178.
14) Yankeelov TE, Lepage M, Chakravarthy A, et al. Integration of quantitativeDCE-MRI and ADC mapping to monitor treatment response in human breast cancer: initial results. Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25(1): 1-13.
16) Mardor Y, Pfeffer R, Spiegelmann R, et al. Early detection of response to radiation therapy in patients with brain malignancies using conventional and high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21(6): 10941100.
6) desouza NM, Reinsberg SA, Scurr ED, et al. Magnetic resonanceimaging in prostatecancer: thevalueof apparent diffusion coefficients for identifying malignant nodules. Br J Radiol 2007; 80(950): 90-95.
10) Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, et al. In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. JMRA 2002; 15: 693-704.
24) National Electrical Manufacturers Association: NEMA Standards Publication MS 2-2008: Determination of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) in Diagnostic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
30) Ueguchi T, Yamada S, Mihara N, et al. Breast diffusion-weighted MRI: comparison of tetrahedral versus orthogonal diffusion sensitization for detection and localization of mass lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33(6): 1375-1381.
13) Pickles MD, Gibbs P, Lowry M, et al. Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24(7): 843-847.
25) National Electrical Manufacturers Association: NEMA Standards Publication MS 2-2008: Determination of Two-Dimensional Geometric Distortion in Diagnostic Resonance Images
8) Nakayama T, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, et al. Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and ADC mapping in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cystic masses: usefulness of detecting keratinoid substances in mature cystic teratomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 22(2): 271-278.
15) Theilmann RJ, Borders R, Trouard TP, et al. Changes in water mobility measured by diffusion MRI predict response of metastatic breast cancer to chemotherapy. Neoplasia 2004; 6(6): 831-837.
22) Conturo TE, McKinstry RC, Akbudak E, et al.: Encoding of anisotropic diffusion with tetrahedral gradients: a general mathematical diffusion formalism and experimental results. Magn Reson Med 1996; 35(3): 399-412.
29) Ogura A, Hayakawa K, Miyati T, et al. Imaging parameter effects in apparent diffusion coefficient determination of magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 2011; 77(1): 185-188.
23) Javier Sanchez-Gonzalez: How to Identify and Avoid; Artifacts on DWI. Diffusion MRI OutsidetheBrain, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2012: 17-31.
27) Yeom KW, Holdsworth SJ, Van AT, et al. Comparison of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (EPI) and single-shot EPI in clinical application of diffusion-weighted imaging of thepediatric brain. AJR 2013; 200(5): 437-443.
12) Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Iwabuchi K, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29(5): 644-649.
7) Eida S, Sumi M, Sakihama N, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping of salivary gland tumors: prediction of the benignancy and malignancy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28(1): 116-121.
21) 高橋光幸,小倉明夫,尾崎正則,他.拡散強調画像における歪みの検討.日放技学誌 2009; 65(11): 1494-1501.
20) Sandrasegaran K, Patel AA, Ramaswamy R, et al. Characterization of adrenal masses with diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197(1): 132-138.
26) Rasband, W.S., ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, 19972014.
2) Muti M, AprileI, Principi M, et al. Study on thevariations of the apparent diffusion coefficient in areas of solid tumor in high gradegliomas. Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 20(9): 53-60.
19) Khalid L, CaroneM, Dumrongpisutikul N, et al. Imaging characteristics of oligodendrogliomas that predict grade. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33(5): 852-857.
5) Matsushima N, Maeda M, Takamura M, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficients of benign and malignant salivary gland tumors; comparison to histopathological findings. Neuroradiol 2007; 34(3): 183-189.
17) Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, et al. Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196(1): 210-217.
3) Park MJ, Cha ES, Kang BJ, et al. Theroleof diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors. Korean J Radiol 2007; 8(5): 390-396.
11) Taouli B, Vilgrain V, Dumont E, et al. Evaluation of liver diffusion isotropy and characterization of focal hepatic lesions with two single-shot echo-planar MR imaging sequences: prospective study in 66 patients. Radiology 2003; 226(1): 71-78.
18) Rechichi G, Galimberti S, Signorelli M, et al. Endometrial cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with tumor grade, depth of myometrial invasion, and presence of lymph node metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197(1): 256-262.
28) Yamada K, Kizu O, Mori S, et al. Brain fiber tracking with clinically feasible diffusion-tensor MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2003; 227(1): 295-301.
4) Yerli H, Agildere AM, Aydin E, at al. Value of apparent diffusion coefficient calculation in the differential diagnosis of parotid gland tumors. Acta Radiol 1987; 48(9): 980-987.
1) Bulakbasi N, Guvenc I, Onguru O, et al. The added value of the apparent diffusion coefficient calculation to magnetic resonanceimaging in thedifferentiation and grading of malignant brain tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28(6): 735-746.
References_xml – reference: 4) Yerli H, Agildere AM, Aydin E, at al. Value of apparent diffusion coefficient calculation in the differential diagnosis of parotid gland tumors. Acta Radiol 1987; 48(9): 980-987.
– reference: 18) Rechichi G, Galimberti S, Signorelli M, et al. Endometrial cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with tumor grade, depth of myometrial invasion, and presence of lymph node metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197(1): 256-262.
– reference: 3) Park MJ, Cha ES, Kang BJ, et al. Theroleof diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors. Korean J Radiol 2007; 8(5): 390-396.
– reference: 13) Pickles MD, Gibbs P, Lowry M, et al. Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24(7): 843-847.
– reference: 27) Yeom KW, Holdsworth SJ, Van AT, et al. Comparison of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (EPI) and single-shot EPI in clinical application of diffusion-weighted imaging of thepediatric brain. AJR 2013; 200(5): 437-443.
– reference: 5) Matsushima N, Maeda M, Takamura M, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficients of benign and malignant salivary gland tumors; comparison to histopathological findings. Neuroradiol 2007; 34(3): 183-189.
– reference: 11) Taouli B, Vilgrain V, Dumont E, et al. Evaluation of liver diffusion isotropy and characterization of focal hepatic lesions with two single-shot echo-planar MR imaging sequences: prospective study in 66 patients. Radiology 2003; 226(1): 71-78.
– reference: 14) Yankeelov TE, Lepage M, Chakravarthy A, et al. Integration of quantitativeDCE-MRI and ADC mapping to monitor treatment response in human breast cancer: initial results. Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25(1): 1-13.
– reference: 12) Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Iwabuchi K, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29(5): 644-649.
– reference: 15) Theilmann RJ, Borders R, Trouard TP, et al. Changes in water mobility measured by diffusion MRI predict response of metastatic breast cancer to chemotherapy. Neoplasia 2004; 6(6): 831-837.
– reference: 26) Rasband, W.S., ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, 19972014.
– reference: 6) desouza NM, Reinsberg SA, Scurr ED, et al. Magnetic resonanceimaging in prostatecancer: thevalueof apparent diffusion coefficients for identifying malignant nodules. Br J Radiol 2007; 80(950): 90-95.
– reference: 25) National Electrical Manufacturers Association: NEMA Standards Publication MS 2-2008: Determination of Two-Dimensional Geometric Distortion in Diagnostic Resonance Images
– reference: 9) Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16(2): 172-178.
– reference: 29) Ogura A, Hayakawa K, Miyati T, et al. Imaging parameter effects in apparent diffusion coefficient determination of magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 2011; 77(1): 185-188.
– reference: 30) Ueguchi T, Yamada S, Mihara N, et al. Breast diffusion-weighted MRI: comparison of tetrahedral versus orthogonal diffusion sensitization for detection and localization of mass lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33(6): 1375-1381.
– reference: 23) Javier Sanchez-Gonzalez: How to Identify and Avoid; Artifacts on DWI. Diffusion MRI OutsidetheBrain, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2012: 17-31.
– reference: 19) Khalid L, CaroneM, Dumrongpisutikul N, et al. Imaging characteristics of oligodendrogliomas that predict grade. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33(5): 852-857.
– reference: 28) Yamada K, Kizu O, Mori S, et al. Brain fiber tracking with clinically feasible diffusion-tensor MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2003; 227(1): 295-301.
– reference: 21) 高橋光幸,小倉明夫,尾崎正則,他.拡散強調画像における歪みの検討.日放技学誌 2009; 65(11): 1494-1501.
– reference: 22) Conturo TE, McKinstry RC, Akbudak E, et al.: Encoding of anisotropic diffusion with tetrahedral gradients: a general mathematical diffusion formalism and experimental results. Magn Reson Med 1996; 35(3): 399-412.
– reference: 8) Nakayama T, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, et al. Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and ADC mapping in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cystic masses: usefulness of detecting keratinoid substances in mature cystic teratomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 22(2): 271-278.
– reference: 17) Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E, et al. Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196(1): 210-217.
– reference: 1) Bulakbasi N, Guvenc I, Onguru O, et al. The added value of the apparent diffusion coefficient calculation to magnetic resonanceimaging in thedifferentiation and grading of malignant brain tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28(6): 735-746.
– reference: 24) National Electrical Manufacturers Association: NEMA Standards Publication MS 2-2008: Determination of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) in Diagnostic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
– reference: 20) Sandrasegaran K, Patel AA, Ramaswamy R, et al. Characterization of adrenal masses with diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197(1): 132-138.
– reference: 10) Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, et al. In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. JMRA 2002; 15: 693-704.
– reference: 16) Mardor Y, Pfeffer R, Spiegelmann R, et al. Early detection of response to radiation therapy in patients with brain malignancies using conventional and high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21(6): 10941100.
– reference: 2) Muti M, AprileI, Principi M, et al. Study on thevariations of the apparent diffusion coefficient in areas of solid tumor in high gradegliomas. Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 20(9): 53-60.
– reference: 7) Eida S, Sumi M, Sakihama N, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping of salivary gland tumors: prediction of the benignancy and malignancy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28(1): 116-121.
SSID ssib000936904
ssib002223925
ssj0055458
ssib005879721
ssib031740840
ssib000959831
ssib000753122
ssib008799587
ssib002484555
ssib023160873
Score 2.0365658
SourceID jstage
SourceType Publisher
StartPage 595
SubjectTerms apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)
diffusion weighted images (DWIs)
geometric distortion
gradient overplus
signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)
Title 偏重MPG三軸同時印加DWIの特性とADC値
URI https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjrt/71/7/71_595/_article/-char/ja
Volume 71
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX 日本放射線技術学会雑誌, 2015, Vol.71(7), pp.595-604
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAFT
  databaseName: Open Access Digital Library
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1881-4883
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0055458
  issn: 0369-4305
  databaseCode: KQ8
  dateStart: 20060101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html
  providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEI5KkRAXxFO81QNzQil5OGv76Oy6lEpFPFrRW7TZZg97KKhqL5xaLqiICq7cOCDBCXEs4q9wK1vgX_CNnd2mqEhQIUVRZI_H4xk7M5OMx0FwY1mXXUwcEUo-w11UKg67OlFh2YV67lX8o403OM_fbc0uirmlbGni2NdG1NL6Wjnde3rovpKjSBVlkCvvkv0HyY6RogDPkC_ukDDufyVjshksQVIzZDXBq1ed-Xu3yQrKFSlNVlGe8zPAdESqTbZFGpCJa9ihPHIPhkzUeXSHbMrYjCUruXmuGV5FZOSoSplO2zVBoWjatQ6zJJO5hzYZ3xcosQyPjpRgtLkkbRxaw0hAoYlJpwxjOmRajvi2g9Gkc9KxgwHw-GuuQ2y5N8wOR4wbO2MQZPJ9MHQb88UgM2TSETyIVIqx5MIRLJlIZQ80jBxT3UCB3jVEr-CqPaQjyRxi2r0Q7JiwnGo1X39W8VtK3RJw9Znjk-SBgh-MZ8QwlIBgpjElnTmuGFw3_zufG4ogbemQU7N5ne0VlcKqwss3bWoyf5hNvWJlQy1lOmtYOC1_4PPvyhOmL-eeHQxWOcY4zoq5hw8WChlPy-lx-wOZyet5X3ALwBWSbwAtRhW8cbAYwHs5nkjYgRwycV81jdU0biaP5LMlm5mCdKZV4x81W7I6OZCMT2TNXdVK6mayP8W5DvedDzgyLZSNtREMZxG5TEfebsv4F7KPbPDc9tGgzJVbf-AJrNYBfLhR_KczSRdOB6dqX3LKeD6cCSYG3bPBifk6WuZcEA03X_18vo13wredrR9fdoavX-69eTbc_jR88RbrfXfz4_etz3sb73c3P2BdDzfenQ8WZ-xCezasT0gJB3A70jDpJnGZglYl-rDMq34_5jCHMkK5jpNeXCZ91auE0KqKy6qrOdAB72wh0moZ9emFYHLl8Up1MZiK-7D8OXtiL9KiTGUZ9VRVRssaKGHGJ5cC6cdaPPFpcIq_Ff_lI7e8EpxkpvsvnleDybXV9eoafIC18rqbSr8AzHzCSQ
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E5%81%8F%E9%87%8DMPG%E4%B8%89%E8%BB%B8%E5%90%8C%E6%99%82%E5%8D%B0%E5%8A%A0DWI%E3%81%AE%E7%89%B9%E6%80%A7%E3%81%A8ADC%E5%80%A4&rft.jtitle=%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E6%94%BE%E5%B0%84%E7%B7%9A%E6%8A%80%E8%A1%93%E5%AD%A6%E4%BC%9A%E9%9B%91%E8%AA%8C&rft.au=%E6%9E%97%2C+%E5%89%87%E5%A4%AB&rft.au=%E5%B1%B1%E5%8F%A3%2C+%E5%A5%88%E6%B4%A5%E7%BE%8E&rft.au=%E5%B0%8F%E5%80%89%2C+%E6%98%8E%E5%A4%AB&rft.au=%E7%A7%A6%E9%87%8E%2C+%E5%8B%87&rft.date=2015&rft.pub=%E5%85%AC%E7%9B%8A%E7%A4%BE%E5%9B%A3%E6%B3%95%E4%BA%BA+%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E6%94%BE%E5%B0%84%E7%B7%9A%E6%8A%80%E8%A1%93%E5%AD%A6%E4%BC%9A&rft.issn=0369-4305&rft.eissn=1881-4883&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=595&rft.epage=604&rft_id=info:doi/10.6009%2Fjjrt.2015_JSRT_71.7.595&rft.externalDocID=article_jjrt_71_7_71_595_article_char_ja
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0369-4305&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0369-4305&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0369-4305&client=summon