対称性バイアス研究におけるアブダクションとインダクションとのベスト・バランスとは何か:文脈的行動科学からのコメント
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | 認知科学 Vol. 15; no. 3; pp. 482 - 495 | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , | 
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | Japanese | 
| Published | 
            日本認知科学会
    
        2008
     | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISSN | 1341-7924 1881-5995  | 
| DOI | 10.11225/jcss.15.482 | 
Cover
| Author | ヘイズ, スティーブン C. 武藤, 崇  | 
    
|---|---|
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: ヘイズ, スティーブン C. organization: ネバダ大学リノ校 – sequence: 1 fullname: 武藤, 崇 organization: 立命館大学  | 
    
| BookMark | eNplkMtKw2AQhX-kgrW68zVS899y2SnFGxTc6DqkTaINtUrSjbsmKVitCwu2YFdWxFqKVhAU8fIyY5vufAUTK27czAznzHwDZxYlSvslE6EFLKYxJoQv2nnXTWOeZgqZQkmsKFjgqsoT0UwZFmSVsBk067q2KHIuYZpE_eHgI-w-jCpdCM7Avwb_CvyX8PI87D2B1wfvBLwG-PVYD1oQVMAfgP8MQbT_CN5tfBIN_3XvHoKLCAVBDYLXGB70YitSYnfw-d4Er_711h61jsbVWtiujjunw3oz7DaGdzeRBf5xDPEjeOfnRW0OTVt60TXnf3sKba-ubGXWhezm2kZmOSvYhKlYyIki0ZlMJMoUXbJkmrOwaEkmES1MFNOkTGKipcoGw4phcIlQyTBzhFKFMU5VQlNoacK13bK-Y2oHTmFPdw413SkX8kVTi1PWMNfopERh_1n5Xd3RbJ1-A53ItMk | 
    
| ContentType | Journal Article | 
    
| Copyright | 2008 日本認知科学会 | 
    
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2008 日本認知科学会 | 
    
| DOI | 10.11225/jcss.15.482 | 
    
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc | 
    
| Discipline | Psychology | 
    
| EISSN | 1881-5995 | 
    
| EndPage | 495 | 
    
| ExternalDocumentID | article_jcss_15_3_15_3_482_article_char_ja | 
    
| GroupedDBID | 2WC AAFWJ ABIVO ABJNI ACGFS ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS JSF KQ8 OK1 RJT  | 
    
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-j2491-b002a4726348a6f73bf10f6e20f128ee34640f97d418dd56236deb23384453923 | 
    
| ISSN | 1341-7924 | 
    
| IngestDate | Wed Sep 03 06:07:20 EDT 2025 | 
    
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true | 
    
| IsOpenAccess | true | 
    
| IsPeerReviewed | false | 
    
| IsScholarly | true | 
    
| Issue | 3 | 
    
| Language | Japanese | 
    
| LinkModel | OpenURL | 
    
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-j2491-b002a4726348a6f73bf10f6e20f128ee34640f97d418dd56236deb23384453923 | 
    
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jcss/15/3/15_3_482/_article/-char/ja | 
    
| PageCount | 14 | 
    
| ParticipantIDs | jstage_primary_article_jcss_15_3_15_3_482_article_char_ja | 
    
| PublicationCentury | 2000 | 
    
| PublicationDate | 20080000 | 
    
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2008-01-01 | 
    
| PublicationDate_xml | – year: 2008 text: 20080000  | 
    
| PublicationDecade | 2000 | 
    
| PublicationTitle | 認知科学 | 
    
| PublicationTitleAlternate | 認知科学 | 
    
| PublicationYear | 2008 | 
    
| Publisher | 日本認知科学会 | 
    
| Publisher_xml | – name: 日本認知科学会 | 
    
| References | Garcia, A., & Benjumea, S. (2006). The emergence of symmetry in a conditional discrimination task using different response as propioceptive samples in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 65-80. Lowe, C. F., Horne, P. J., & Hughes, J. C. (2005). Naming and categorization in young children: III. Vocal tact training and transfer of function. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 83, 47-65. Saunders, R. R., Wechter, J., & Spradlin, J. E. (1988). Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 95-115. Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127-146. Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A. J., Devany, J. M., Kohlenberg, B. S., & Shelby, J. (1987). Stimulus equivalence and the symbolic control of behavior. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 13, 361-374. Pilgrim, C., & Galizio, M. (1990). Relations between baseline contingencies and equivalence probe performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 213-224. Roche, B., Barnes, D., & Smeets, P. (1997). Incongruous stimulus pairing and conditional discrimination training: Effect of relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 143-160. Hayes, S. C. (1998). Understanding and treating the theoretical emaciation of behavior therapy. The Behavior Therapist, 21, 67-68. Hayes, S. C., Levin, M., Plumb, J., Boulanger, J., & Pistorello, J. (in press). Acceptance and commitment therapy and contextual behavioral science: Examining the progress of distinctive model of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy. Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative. Hayes, S. C., & Smith, S. (2005). Get out of your mind & into your life: The new acceptance and commitment therapy. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc. (武藤, 崇・原井 宏明・吉岡 昌子・岡嶋 美代 訳 (2008). 『<あなた>の人生をはじめるためのワークブック:「こころ」との新しいつきあい方 アクセプタンス & コミットメント』. 東京:ブレーン出版.) Ogawa, A., Yamazaki, Y., Ueno, K., Cheng, K., & Iriki, A. (2007). Intraparietal and prefrontal cortices are involved in the illogical inference specific to humans. Paper presented of the 37th Annual Meeting of Society for Neuroscience. San Diego, CA. Urcuioli, P. J., Zentall, T. R., & DeMarse, T. (1995). Transfer of derived sample-comparison relations by pigeons following many-to-one versus one-to-many matching with identical training relations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 48B, 158-178. Hall, G., Ray, E., & Bonardi, C. (1993). Acquired equivalence between cues trained with a common antecedent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 391-399. Wagner, D., & Zanakos, S. I. (1994). Chronic thought suppression. Journal of Personality, 62, 615-640. 佐藤 方哉 (1996). 認知科学と行動分析学との<対話>は可能か? 『哲學』, 100, 275-299. 的場 隆一・中村 誠・東条 敏 (2008). 構文獲得における対称性バイアスの有効性. 『認知科学』, 15, 457-469. Rehfeldt, R. A., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (in press). Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic ⁄ Plenum Publishers. 川合 伸幸・久保(川合) 南海子 (2008). ヒトと動物の回顧的推論について. 『認知科学』, 15, 378-391. Tomonaga, M., Matsuzawa, T., Fujita, K., & Yamamoto, J. (1991). Emergence of symmetry in a visual conditional discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Psychological Reports, 68, 51-60. Hove, O. (2003). Differential probability of equivalence class formation following a one-to-many versus a many-to-one training structure. The Psychological Record, 53, 617-634. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford. Hayes, S. C. (1989). Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. New York: Plenum. 山崎 由美子・小川 昭利・入來 篤史 (2008). 対称性に関わる生物学的要因の解明に向けて. 『認知科学』, 15, 366-377. Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185-241. Smeets, P. M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Akpinar, D., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2003). Reversal of equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 53, 91-119. 佐藤 隆弘 (2008). 刺激等価性の機能的分析:行動随伴性,関係枠,ネーミング. 『認知科学』, 15, 333-346. Hayes, S. C., Follette, V. M., & Linehan, M. M. (2004). Mindfulness and acceptance: Expanding the cognitive-behavior tradition. New York: Guilford Press. (春木 豊 監修,武藤, 崇・伊藤 義徳・杉浦 義典 監訳 (2005). 『マインドフルネス & アクセプタンス:認知行動療法の新次元』. 東京:ブレーン出版.) Luciano, C., Becerra, I. G., & Valverde, M. R. (2007). The role of multiple-exemplar training and naming in establishing derived equivalence in an infant. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 349-365. Muto, T. (2008, May). The “turtle” OS: ACT as an another clinical-psychological operating system. Paper presented of the ACT Summer Institute 4th (in the Association for Cognitive Behavioral Science). Chicago, IL. Saunders, K. J., Saunders, R. R., Williams, D. C., & Spradlin, J. E. (1993). An interaction of instructions and training design on stimulus class formation: Extending the analysis of equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 725-744. Hayes, S. C., & Plumb, J. C. (2007). Mindfulness from the bottom up: Providing an inductive framework for understanding mindfulness processes and their application to human suffering. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 242-248. 武藤, 崇 (2001). 自閉性障害における異同概念の検討:「関係の概念」に対する分析パラダイムとその援助. 『特殊教育学研究』, 39, 1-15. Bearns, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124. Hayes, S. C., Barlow, D. H., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (1999). The scientist practitioner: Research and accountability in the age of managed care. (2nd Ed.) Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. 中野 昌宏・篠原 修二 (2008). 対称性バイアスの必然性と可能性: 無意識の思考をどうモデル化するか. 『認知科学』, 15, 428-441. Saunders, R. R., Saunders, K. J., Kirby, K. C., & Spradlin, J. E. (1988). The merger and development of equivalence classes by unreinforced conditional selection of comparison stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 145-1162. Palmer, D. C. (2004). Data in search of a principle: A review of relational frame theory: A post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81, 189-204. Jones, K. M., & Friman, P. C. (1999). A case study of behavioral assessment and treatment of insect phobia. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 95-98. Öst, L. (2008). Efficacy of the third wave of behavioral therapies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 296-321. Hayes, S. C. (1992). Verbal relations, time and suicide. S.C. Hayes & L.J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations, 109-118. Reno, NV: Context Press. 友永 雅己 (2008). チンパンジーにおける対称性の(不)成立. 『認知科学』, 15, 347-357. Hayes, S. C., & Berens, N. M. (2004). Why Relational Frame Theory alters the relationship between basic and applied behavioral psychology. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Psychotherapy, 4, 341-353. Malenfant, L., Wells, J. K., Van Houten, R., & Williams, A. F. (1996). The use of feedback signs to increase observed daytime seat belt use in two cities in North Carolina. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 28, 771-777. Horne, P. J., Hughes, C., & Lowe, C. F. (2006). Naming and categorization in young children: IV. Listener behavior training and transfer of function. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85, 247-273. 武藤, 崇 (編) (2006). 『アクセプタンス & コミットメント・セラピーの文脈:臨床行動分析におけるマインドフルな展開』. 東京:ブレーン出版. Skinner, B. F. (1966). An operant analysis of problem solving. B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Problem solving, 225-257. New York: Wiley. 出口 光 (1987). 行動修正のコンテクスト. 『行動分析学研究』, 2, 48-59. Lowe, C. F., Horne, P. J., Harris, F. D. A., & Randle, V. R. L. (2002). Naming and categorization in young children: Vocal tact training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 527-549. Spradlin, J. E., & Saunders, R. R. (1986). The development of stimulus classes using match-to-sample procedure: Sample classification versus comparison classification. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 41-58. King, N. J. (1993). Simple and social phobias. T.H. Ollendick & R.J. Prinz (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (Vol.15), 305-340. New York: Plenum. Hayes, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. L.J. Hayes & P.N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior, 19-40. Reno, NV: Context Press. 武藤, 崇 (2007). 子どもの応用行動分析. 大河内 浩人・武藤, 崇(編) 『心理療法プリマーズ 行動分析』, 59-68.京都:ミネルヴァ書房. Sidman, M. (2008). Symmetry and equivalence relations in behavior. 『認知科学』, 15, 322-332. 望月 昭・山本 淳一 (1989). 言語. 冨安 芳和・山口 薫(編) 『講座 発達障害 行動』, 145-171. 東京: 日本文化科学社 Schusterman, R. J., & Kastak, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823-839. Arntzen, E., & Holth, P. (1997). Probability of stimulus equivalence as a function of training design. The Psychological Record, 47, 309-320. Hayes, S. C. (1993). Analytic goals and the varieties of scientific contextualism. S.C. Hayes, L.J. Hayes, H.W. Reese, T.R. Sarbin (Eds.), Varieties of scientific contextualism, 11-27. Reno, NV: Context Press. Pilgrim, C., Chambers, L., & Galizio, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: II. Children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 239-254. Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349-367. Arntzen, E., & Holth, P. (2000). Equivalence outcome in single subjects as a function of training structure. The Psychological Reco  | 
    
| References_xml | – reference: Dougher, M. J., Auguston, E. M., Markman, M. R., Greenway, D. E., & Wulfert, E. (1994). The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 331-351. – reference: 望月 昭・山本 淳一 (1989). 言語. 冨安 芳和・山口 薫(編) 『講座 発達障害 行動』, 145-171. 東京: 日本文化科学社. – reference: Hayes, S. C. (1993). Analytic goals and the varieties of scientific contextualism. S.C. Hayes, L.J. Hayes, H.W. Reese, T.R. Sarbin (Eds.), Varieties of scientific contextualism, 11-27. Reno, NV: Context Press. – reference: Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A. J., Devany, J. M., Kohlenberg, B. S., & Shelby, J. (1987). Stimulus equivalence and the symbolic control of behavior. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 13, 361-374. – reference: Luciano, C., Becerra, I. G., & Valverde, M. R. (2007). The role of multiple-exemplar training and naming in establishing derived equivalence in an infant. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 349-365. – reference: Schusterman, R. J., & Kastak, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823-839. – reference: Rehfeldt, R. A., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (in press). Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc. – reference: 的場 隆一・中村 誠・東条 敏 (2008). 構文獲得における対称性バイアスの有効性. 『認知科学』, 15, 457-469. – reference: Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349-367. – reference: 武藤, 崇 (2001). 自閉性障害における異同概念の検討:「関係の概念」に対する分析パラダイムとその援助. 『特殊教育学研究』, 39, 1-15. – reference: Smeets, P. M., & Barnes-Homes, D. (2005). Establishing equivalence classes in preschool children with one-to-many and many-to-one training protocols. Behavioural Processes, 69, 281-293. – reference: Saunders, R. R., Saunders, K. J., Kirby, K. C., & Spradlin, J. E. (1988). The merger and development of equivalence classes by unreinforced conditional selection of comparison stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 145-1162. – reference: Pilgrim, C., Chambers, L., & Galizio, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: II. Children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 239-254. – reference: 山崎 由美子・小川 昭利・入來 篤史 (2008). 対称性に関わる生物学的要因の解明に向けて. 『認知科学』, 15, 366-377. – reference: Pilgrim, C., & Galizio, M. (1990). Relations between baseline contingencies and equivalence probe performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 213-224. – reference: 増田 暁彦・武藤, 崇・S. C. ヘイズ・J. リリス (印刷中). アクセプタンス & コミットメント・セラピー:日本人クライエントへの適用. 『行動療法研究』. – reference: Lowe, C. F., Horne, P. J., & Hughes, J. C. (2005). Naming and categorization in young children: III. Vocal tact training and transfer of function. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 83, 47-65. – reference: Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative. – reference: 望月 昭 (1995). 「正の強化」を手段から目的へ. 『行動分析学研究』, 8, 4-11. – reference: Lowe, C. F., Horne, P. J., Harris, F. D. A., & Randle, V. R. L. (2002). Naming and categorization in young children: Vocal tact training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 527-549. – reference: Öst, L. (2008). Efficacy of the third wave of behavioral therapies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 296-321. – reference: Hall, G., Ray, E., & Bonardi, C. (1993). Acquired equivalence between cues trained with a common antecedent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 391-399. – reference: Hayes, S. C. (2001). The greatest dangers facing behavior analysis today. Behavior Analysis Today, 2, 61-63. – reference: 佐藤 方哉 (1985). 行動心理学は徹底的行動主義に徹底している. 『理想』, 625, 124-135. – reference: Bearns, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124. – reference: 佐藤 隆弘 (2008). 刺激等価性の機能的分析:行動随伴性,関係枠,ネーミング. 『認知科学』, 15, 333-346. – reference: Hayes, S. C. (1987). A contextual approach to therapeutic change. N. Jacobson (Ed.), Psychotherapists in clinical practice: Cognitive and behavioral perspectives, 327-387. New York: Guilford Press. – reference: Hove, O. (2003). Differential probability of equivalence class formation following a one-to-many versus a many-to-one training structure. The Psychological Record, 53, 617-634. – reference: 友永 雅己 (2008). チンパンジーにおける対称性の(不)成立. 『認知科学』, 15, 347-357. – reference: Hayes, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. L.J. Hayes & P.N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior, 19-40. Reno, NV: Context Press. – reference: 川合 伸幸・久保(川合) 南海子 (2008). ヒトと動物の回顧的推論について. 『認知科学』, 15, 378-391. – reference: Hayes, S. C., & Smith, S. (2005). Get out of your mind & into your life: The new acceptance and commitment therapy. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc. (武藤, 崇・原井 宏明・吉岡 昌子・岡嶋 美代 訳 (2008). 『<あなた>の人生をはじめるためのワークブック:「こころ」との新しいつきあい方 アクセプタンス & コミットメント』. 東京:ブレーン出版.) – reference: Oaksford, M. (2008). Stimulus equivalence and the origins of reasoning, language, and working memory. 『認知科学』, 15, 392-407. – reference: Hayes, S. C., & Berens, N. M. (2004). Why Relational Frame Theory alters the relationship between basic and applied behavioral psychology. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Psychotherapy, 4, 341-353. – reference: Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127-146. – reference: Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185-241. – reference: Arntzen, E., & Holth, P. (2000). Equivalence outcome in single subjects as a function of training structure. The Psychological Record, 50, 603-628. – reference: Hayes, S. C, Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, process, and outcome. Behavior Research and Therapy, 44, 1-25. – reference: Hayes, S. C., Barlow, D. H., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (1999). The scientist practitioner: Research and accountability in the age of managed care. (2nd Ed.) Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. – reference: Spradlin, J. E., Cotter, V. W., & Baxley, N. (1973). Establishing a conditional discrimination without direct training: a study of transfer with retarded adolescents. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 556-566. – reference: Ogawa, A., Yamazaki, Y., Ueno, K., Cheng, K., & Iriki, A. (2007). Intraparietal and prefrontal cortices are involved in the illogical inference specific to humans. Paper presented of the 37th Annual Meeting of Society for Neuroscience. San Diego, CA. – reference: Palmer, D. C. (2004). Data in search of a principle: A review of relational frame theory: A post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81, 189-204. – reference: Roche, B., Barnes, D., & Smeets, P. (1997). Incongruous stimulus pairing and conditional discrimination training: Effect of relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 143-160. – reference: Skinner, B. F. (1966). An operant analysis of problem solving. B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Problem solving, 225-257. New York: Wiley. – reference: 服部 雅史 (2008). 推論と判断の等確率性仮説:思考の対称性とその適応的意味. 『認知科学』, 15, 408-427. – reference: Hayes, S. C., Levin, M., Plumb, J., Boulanger, J., & Pistorello, J. (in press). Acceptance and commitment therapy and contextual behavioral science: Examining the progress of distinctive model of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy. – reference: Wagner, D., & Zanakos, S. I. (1994). Chronic thought suppression. Journal of Personality, 62, 615-640. – reference: Muto, T. (2008, May). The “turtle” OS: ACT as an another clinical-psychological operating system. Paper presented of the ACT Summer Institute 4th (in the Association for Cognitive Behavioral Science). Chicago, IL. – reference: Smeets, P. M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Akpinar, D., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2003). Reversal of equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 53, 91-119. – reference: Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic ⁄ Plenum Publishers. – reference: Horne, P. J., Hughes, C., & Lowe, C. F. (2006). Naming and categorization in young children: IV. Listener behavior training and transfer of function. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85, 247-273. – reference: Saunders, K. J., Saunders, R. R., Williams, D. C., & Spradlin, J. E. (1993). An interaction of instructions and training design on stimulus class formation: Extending the analysis of equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 725-744. – reference: 出口 光 (1987). 行動修正のコンテクスト. 『行動分析学研究』, 2, 48-59. – reference: Ramnerö, J. R., & Törneke, N. (2008). The ABCs of human behavior: Behavioral principles for the practicing clinician. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc. (松見 淳子 監修,武藤, 崇・米山直樹 監訳 (2009: 公刊予定). 『臨床行動分析のABC:新世代の認知⁄行動療法入門』. 東京:日本評論社.) – reference: Pilgrim, C., & Galizio, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: I. Adults. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 225-238. – reference: Sidman, M. (2008). Symmetry and equivalence relations in behavior. 『認知科学』, 15, 322-332. – reference: Urcuioli, P. J., Zentall, T. R., & DeMarse, T. (1995). Transfer of derived sample-comparison relations by pigeons following many-to-one versus one-to-many matching with identical training relations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 48B, 158-178. – reference: 武藤, 崇 (編) (2006). 『アクセプタンス & コミットメント・セラピーの文脈:臨床行動分析におけるマインドフルな展開』. 東京:ブレーン出版. – reference: Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford. – reference: King, N. J. (1993). Simple and social phobias. T.H. Ollendick & R.J. Prinz (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (Vol.15), 305-340. New York: Plenum. – reference: Malenfant, L., Wells, J. K., Van Houten, R., & Williams, A. F. (1996). The use of feedback signs to increase observed daytime seat belt use in two cities in North Carolina. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 28, 771-777. – reference: 中野 昌宏・篠原 修二 (2008). 対称性バイアスの必然性と可能性: 無意識の思考をどうモデル化するか. 『認知科学』, 15, 428-441. – reference: Jones, K. M., & Friman, P. C. (1999). A case study of behavioral assessment and treatment of insect phobia. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 95-98. – reference: Spradlin, J. E., & Saunders, R. R. (1986). The development of stimulus classes using match-to-sample procedure: Sample classification versus comparison classification. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 41-58. – reference: Garcia, A., & Benjumea, S. (2006). The emergence of symmetry in a conditional discrimination task using different response as propioceptive samples in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 65-80. – reference: Arntzen, E., & Holth, P. (1997). Probability of stimulus equivalence as a function of training design. The Psychological Record, 47, 309-320. – reference: Hayes, S. C., Follette, V. M., & Linehan, M. M. (2004). Mindfulness and acceptance: Expanding the cognitive-behavior tradition. New York: Guilford Press. (春木 豊 監修,武藤, 崇・伊藤 義徳・杉浦 義典 監訳 (2005). 『マインドフルネス & アクセプタンス:認知行動療法の新次元』. 東京:ブレーン出版.) – reference: 佐藤 方哉 (1996). 認知科学と行動分析学との<対話>は可能か? 『哲學』, 100, 275-299. – reference: Hayes, S. C. (1998). Understanding and treating the theoretical emaciation of behavior therapy. The Behavior Therapist, 21, 67-68. – reference: Saunders, R. R., Wechter, J., & Spradlin, J. E. (1988). Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 95-115. – reference: Skinner, B. F. (1979). The non-punitive society (罰なき社会). 『行動分析学研究』, 5, 87-106. – reference: 村山 司・藤井 有希・勝俣 浩・荒井 一利・祖一 誠 (2008). シロイルカにおける対称性の成立について. 『認知科学』, 15, 358-365. – reference: 郡司 ペギオ-幸夫・澤 宏司 (2008). 認知的誤謬の起源:アドホック論理と対称性バイアス. 『認知科学』, 15, 442-456. – reference: Tomonaga, M., Matsuzawa, T., Fujita, K., & Yamamoto, J. (1991). Emergence of symmetry in a visual conditional discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Psychological Reports, 68, 51-60. – reference: Hayes, S. C. (1989). Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. New York: Plenum. – reference: Hayes, S. C., & Plumb, J. C. (2007). Mindfulness from the bottom up: Providing an inductive framework for understanding mindfulness processes and their application to human suffering. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 242-248. – reference: 武藤, 崇 (2007). 子どもの応用行動分析. 大河内 浩人・武藤, 崇(編) 『心理療法プリマーズ 行動分析』, 59-68.京都:ミネルヴァ書房. – reference: Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91-98. – reference: Hayes, S. C. (1992). Verbal relations, time and suicide. S.C. Hayes & L.J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations, 109-118. Reno, NV: Context Press. – reference: Horne, P. J., Lowe, C. F., & Randle, V. R. L. (2004). Naming and categorization in young children: II. Listener behavior training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81, 267-288.  | 
    
| SSID | ssj0055613 ssib001106414 ssib002484563  | 
    
| Score | 1.7423859 | 
    
| SourceID | jstage | 
    
| SourceType | Publisher | 
    
| StartPage | 482 | 
    
| SubjectTerms | アクセプタンス & コミットメント・セラピー アブダクション インダクション; 帰納 対称性 文脈的行動科学 機能的文脈主義 関係フレーム理論  | 
    
| Title | 対称性バイアス研究におけるアブダクションとインダクションとのベスト・バランスとは何か:文脈的行動科学からのコメント | 
    
| URI | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jcss/15/3/15_3_482/_article/-char/ja | 
    
| Volume | 15 | 
    
| hasFullText | 1 | 
    
| inHoldings | 1 | 
    
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| ispartofPNX | 認知科学, 2008, Vol.15(3), pp.482-495 | 
    
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1881-5995 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0055613 issn: 1341-7924 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 19940101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries  | 
    
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3Na9VAEA-lXnoRP_GbHtyT5JlkN8nuMXnNo3gQhBZ6C0lf3uEdqtj2oKe-pGC1HizYgj2IFbGWohUERfz4Z9b29ea_4OwmmyZ9Hmq9hGF25zezM_mYSXazmnadMht3jKitMzuOddKhsU5tB-sJje3IwnHs5BNkbzvjk-TWlD01NPyyMmtpfi5uTD_867qS40QVeBBXsUr2HyJbggIDaIgvHCHCcDxSjFFgI6-F_AAFLvJc5BsocMTcBaADjChGzJCEhTyiCKsgfCalDMSIJBjyHdlkIs8vCOoVBDMLKerXcUCFUxC01NVSKpQZpT0-Vipo3bCy6Xg4QATKHlYZYA5IlZRfd4uYI1AHLKWqyGAGQf4YYrZyC-CA25uIecLh4AEKhlFEidTlCj7QwPGgc1OECUSEuAyTcCYEbgx5TgUwdy-rD8c6cItnDjiKVksLqQ70jkkDWsj7izp1eSk3HAoCaPPENTfgQEf1U6ph7Iei7-MbzcYBvqPGRxFzBb6EtZEPLnJrr5poeVuQvnSl4UA0kdc8yphkcEQoKs9XSJp0l-XL5htJzqPU1MV_72oPZbty88GVJyzJ96oqkjWSSw3mAZbc1as7PTvbMO1GKVT7s3px3YaiV2jaIc4P0DlUTWLpY9iF-uuEJd73iUkfdypfmU1I6CuzECxCoR4pM0Gx86xc4KMGrRbegHE3K6ZB8tuFUlBNI5WZ7cQp7WRRko56uTGntaFudEYbKTOjB2e17d2dn_3Nj3sLmzx7xtM3PH3N06_9V8_7W595b5v3nvDeCk-XBT9b49kCT3d4-oVn0P8T770TIkAM8nsfePYCoHi2xLNvAjzbEk3AEa07v36s8t7y7-_re2uP9heX-uuL-xtPd5dX-5sru-_fQhNPHwuQFMA3pIqlc9pkK5hojuvFLi961yLMFDuAWRFxLQcTGjkdF8cd0-g4iWV0IHdOEkwcYnSY2yYmbbdFuea0k9jCmBJiQ3WHz2vDM3dnkgvaqDsdu8wGpmG1SYTbNDKhY5SInUctG0cXNZY7OryX_8onPPopcOk_ZC9rI_k0M_Hm9oo2PHd_PrkKtcxcfE2eUH8Ao-ohew | 
    
| linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries | 
    
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E5%AF%BE%E7%A7%B0%E6%80%A7%E3%83%90%E3%82%A4%E3%82%A2%E3%82%B9%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E3%81%AB%E3%81%8A%E3%81%91%E3%82%8B%E3%82%A2%E3%83%96%E3%83%80%E3%82%AF%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A7%E3%83%B3%E3%81%A8%E3%82%A4%E3%83%B3%E3%83%80%E3%82%AF%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A7%E3%83%B3%E3%81%A8%E3%81%AE%E3%83%99%E3%82%B9%E3%83%88%E3%83%BB%E3%83%90%E3%83%A9%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B9%E3%81%A8%E3%81%AF%E4%BD%95%E3%81%8B%EF%BC%9A%E6%96%87%E8%84%88%E7%9A%84%E8%A1%8C%E5%8B%95%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E3%81%8B%E3%82%89%E3%81%AE%E3%82%B3%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88&rft.jtitle=%E8%AA%8D%E7%9F%A5%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6&rft.au=%E3%83%98%E3%82%A4%E3%82%BA%2C+%E3%82%B9%E3%83%86%E3%82%A3%E3%83%BC%E3%83%96%E3%83%B3+C.&rft.au=%E6%AD%A6%E8%97%A4%2C+%E5%B4%87&rft.date=2008&rft.pub=%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E8%AA%8D%E7%9F%A5%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6%E4%BC%9A&rft.issn=1341-7924&rft.eissn=1881-5995&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=482&rft.epage=495&rft_id=info:doi/10.11225%2Fjcss.15.482&rft.externalDocID=article_jcss_15_3_15_3_482_article_char_ja | 
    
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1341-7924&client=summon | 
    
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1341-7924&client=summon | 
    
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1341-7924&client=summon |