アセスメント係数を用いる方法と種の感受性分布方法から導出され る予測無影響濃度(PNEC)の比較

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in環境毒性学会誌 Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 47 - 58
Main Authors Masashi, KAMO, 岩崎, 雄一
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published 日本環境毒性学会 30.06.2016
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1344-0667
1882-5958
DOI10.11403/jset.19.47

Cover

Author Masashi, KAMO
岩崎, 雄一
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Masashi, KAMO
  organization: 産業技術総合研究所
– sequence: 1
  fullname: 岩崎, 雄一
  organization: 東洋大学
BookMark eNo9UMtOwkAA3BhMROTkD_gDxW53y24PHgzBR0LUg56bZdsqBNFQLt6kJQjBaGJAjwQPysEghgsgho9ZWvTELwjxcZmZzGTmMMsgkD3LmgCsQjkCIZbReto28xGoRTBZAEFIqSKpmkoDM40wluRolCyBsG2nkrKsKESDlARBSTiPwnkXTl-4TeF2hVsejxy_3hHO3aTWEoWicKr-fd_v1kWhNWm1RaHtFxve7YN_-eyVS17P_Uurwql4nRvvaiAKdeFcr82a40HZ771Mik3v4-2rMfJHrjd4mg7LB3vx2HRYmY-91j6H7gpYtFjGNsO_HAJHW_HD2I6U2N_ejW0mpDQkhElGUsGYE8ohhBbFzICWNvOISmWTEVVBSOMIM8x4UoUG5lyzDI6iiKgQUaJQFAIbP7tpO8-OTf08lzpluQud5fIpnjH1-YU61HQ4B0z-fX7CcnqaoW-S5Jvp
ContentType Journal Article
DOI 10.11403/jset.19.47
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Oceanography
EISSN 1882-5958
EndPage 58
ExternalDocumentID article_jset_19_1_19_47_article_char_ja
GroupedDBID ABJNI
ACGFS
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
JSF
KQ8
OK1
RJT
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-j177a-db244c78c111f84ad1f9db27580ea752339c34a4acb51d4cc9fdc363751387283
ISSN 1344-0667
IngestDate Wed Sep 03 06:11:12 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Issue 1
Language Japanese
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-j177a-db244c78c111f84ad1f9db27580ea752339c34a4acb51d4cc9fdc363751387283
OpenAccessLink https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jset/19/1/19_47/_article/-char/ja
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs jstage_primary_article_jset_19_1_19_47_article_char_ja
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016/06/30
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-06-30
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2016
  text: 2016/06/30
  day: 30
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle 環境毒性学会誌
PublicationTitleAlternate 環境毒性学会誌
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher 日本環境毒性学会
Publisher_xml – name: 日本環境毒性学会
References 3) Chapman, P.M., Fairbrother, A. and Brown, D. (1998) A critical evaluation of safety (uncertainty) factors for ecological risk assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17:99–108.
7) Aldenberg, T. and Jaworska, J.S. (2000) Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 46:1–18.
6) Newman, M., Ownby, D.R., Mézin, L.C.A., et al. (2000) Applying species-sensitivity distributions in risk assessment: Assumptions of distribution type and sufficient numbers of species. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19:508–515.
8) Nagai, T. (2016) Ecological effect assessment by species sensitivity distribution for 68 pesticides used in Japanese paddy fields. J. Pestic. Sci. 41(1):6–14.
4) European Commission, (2011) Technical guidance for deriving environmental quality standards. Common implementation strategy for the Water ramework Directive (2000/60EC). Guidance Document No. 27. Prepared by EU, Member States and stakeholders/ Technical Report 2011-055.
9) Hahn, T., Diamond, J., Dobson, S., et al. (2014) Predicted no effect concentration derivation as a significant source of variability in environmental hazard assessments of chemicals in aquatic systems: An international analysis. Integr. Environ. Assess Manag. 10:30–36.
1) Cairns, J., Jr. (1986) The myth of the most sensitive species. Bioscience 36:670–672.
10) Nagai, T., Taya, K. and Yoda, I. (2016) Comparative toxicity of 20 herbicides to 5 periphytic algae and the relationship with mode of action. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 35(2):368–375.
11) Fox, D.R. (2015) Selection bias correction for species sensitivity distribution modeling and hazardous concentration estimation. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 34(11):2555–2563.
5) Posthuma, L., Suter, G., II and Traas, T.P., eds. (2002) Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
2) Forbes, V., Calow, P. and Sibly, R. (2008) The extrapolation problem and how population modeling can help. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27:1987–1994.
12) Versteeg, D.J., Belanger, S.E. and Carr, G.J. (1999) Understanding single-species and model ecosystem sensitivity: Data-based comparison. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18:1329–1346.
References_xml – reference: 3) Chapman, P.M., Fairbrother, A. and Brown, D. (1998) A critical evaluation of safety (uncertainty) factors for ecological risk assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17:99–108.
– reference: 6) Newman, M., Ownby, D.R., Mézin, L.C.A., et al. (2000) Applying species-sensitivity distributions in risk assessment: Assumptions of distribution type and sufficient numbers of species. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19:508–515.
– reference: 7) Aldenberg, T. and Jaworska, J.S. (2000) Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 46:1–18.
– reference: 5) Posthuma, L., Suter, G., II and Traas, T.P., eds. (2002) Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
– reference: 12) Versteeg, D.J., Belanger, S.E. and Carr, G.J. (1999) Understanding single-species and model ecosystem sensitivity: Data-based comparison. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18:1329–1346.
– reference: 4) European Commission, (2011) Technical guidance for deriving environmental quality standards. Common implementation strategy for the Water ramework Directive (2000/60EC). Guidance Document No. 27. Prepared by EU, Member States and stakeholders/ Technical Report 2011-055.
– reference: 9) Hahn, T., Diamond, J., Dobson, S., et al. (2014) Predicted no effect concentration derivation as a significant source of variability in environmental hazard assessments of chemicals in aquatic systems: An international analysis. Integr. Environ. Assess Manag. 10:30–36.
– reference: 2) Forbes, V., Calow, P. and Sibly, R. (2008) The extrapolation problem and how population modeling can help. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27:1987–1994.
– reference: 10) Nagai, T., Taya, K. and Yoda, I. (2016) Comparative toxicity of 20 herbicides to 5 periphytic algae and the relationship with mode of action. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 35(2):368–375.
– reference: 8) Nagai, T. (2016) Ecological effect assessment by species sensitivity distribution for 68 pesticides used in Japanese paddy fields. J. Pestic. Sci. 41(1):6–14.
– reference: 1) Cairns, J., Jr. (1986) The myth of the most sensitive species. Bioscience 36:670–672.
– reference: 11) Fox, D.R. (2015) Selection bias correction for species sensitivity distribution modeling and hazardous concentration estimation. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 34(11):2555–2563.
SSID ssib002279187
ssib002483746
ssib002484638
ssj0069031
Score 1.6870204
SourceID jstage
SourceType Publisher
StartPage 47
Title アセスメント係数を用いる方法と種の感受性分布方法から導出され る予測無影響濃度(PNEC)の比較
URI https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jset/19/1/19_47/_article/-char/ja
Volume 19
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX 環境毒性学会誌, 2016/06/30, Vol.19(1), pp.47-58
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAFT
  databaseName: Open Access Digital Library
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1882-5958
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0069031
  issn: 1344-0667
  databaseCode: KQ8
  dateStart: 19980101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html
  providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR1NT9RAtCF40JgYP-N3ODgns9h2pp2ZY7t0QzSAJpBw27Td3cMe0Mhy8eR2CS7BaGJAjwQPysEghgsghh9TdtETf8H3pu1SgibAZfL2zXuvb97rzLw3OzPVtAcVCyY5y6gU7MD0C6xSCwq-r9cKthWaoTREIEK1QXbUHp5gjyetyb7-87ldSzONYDB89c9zJWfxKuDAr3hK9hSe7QkFBMDgXyjBw1CeyMfEo0SYxDFTwHUzQCqAEsdIAZemgBDEY8QtIZlnE2kRV0-5JGA4kYw4QmEMIlhaJVxFbCvJNkoDxoQGiTmWjpdhPKQBXlkinkVEiUiuMDpxuMIIImwEXIEq_U-yyJojpCLWifAUOyeuk9KkxEBTfJjTlSEFNtXGZzhFVBEUQnOAoCHiAiBRPzAE0pSUHhZyOaAZ4IvA_nTUK2Y_5JHGOSW0kydUFc1H-MqEpjKqhZ5J2of05hEbOEPqSQwlSAdFOaBxb816xJ_Gz1ypcdgZGcvQSkfweGIQhgYxseHQFld5iymb6vnFHMPOdh6m3U8ZHFxmKaCYmuf0SucmNMoY3jKRBDXVBIdZlSWTK_N7s6A81tuTKY3xXHCU8ByfdpmO93_Up6uNQUMOZixH7jFPe0kZicqGLBtYMF7O8HjKsFyHVOecCRM0foXlybNcJmxyGDnyKwuC8vzNeAwCadr7A9GWOk3WWtLmp0dzUdFHh2pC2FmHJCzbwKliyvHL2qU0GRxwEt2uaH11_6p2cSys-lPpTfLXtLk4-hxHP-NoK26txK2NuNXe2426S-tx9GF_cTVuzsbRQvfjVndjKW6u7q-uxc217uxy5_2n7uuvnfZcZ7OV1S7E0Xxn_V3nzXbcXIqjtwPAubfd7m5-259d6fz68Wd5t7vb6mx_Odhp46t_sDOPwr4v_t5pXdcmSt54cbiQfjylUDc49wuVAAL3kIsQgpmaYH7FqEnAcUvoVZ9bJqUypMxnfhjAUM3CUNYqIbUpDNxUcEg6bmj9U8-nqje1ARoIoxZCJihDn9nCDMDURlizOK4eBzK4pdmJFcsvkhtyyif09e2zMt7RLhz2nrtaf-PlTPUeJAeN4L56bf4CvHHwWA
linkProvider Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E3%82%A2%E3%82%BB%E3%82%B9%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88%E4%BF%82%E6%95%B0%E3%82%92%E7%94%A8%E3%81%84%E3%82%8B%E6%96%B9%E6%B3%95%E3%81%A8%E7%A8%AE%E3%81%AE%E6%84%9F%E5%8F%97%E6%80%A7%E5%88%86%E5%B8%83%E6%96%B9%E6%B3%95%E3%81%8B%E3%82%89%E5%B0%8E%E5%87%BA%E3%81%95%E3%82%8C+%E3%82%8B%E4%BA%88%E6%B8%AC%E7%84%A1%E5%BD%B1%E9%9F%BF%E6%BF%83%E5%BA%A6%EF%BC%88PNEC%EF%BC%89%E3%81%AE%E6%AF%94%E8%BC%83&rft.jtitle=%E7%92%B0%E5%A2%83%E6%AF%92%E6%80%A7%E5%AD%A6%E4%BC%9A%E8%AA%8C&rft.au=Masashi%2C+KAMO&rft.au=%E5%B2%A9%E5%B4%8E%2C+%E9%9B%84%E4%B8%80&rft.date=2016-06-30&rft.pub=%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E7%92%B0%E5%A2%83%E6%AF%92%E6%80%A7%E5%AD%A6%E4%BC%9A&rft.issn=1344-0667&rft.eissn=1882-5958&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=58&rft_id=info:doi/10.11403%2Fjset.19.47&rft.externalDocID=article_jset_19_1_19_47_article_char_ja
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1344-0667&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1344-0667&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1344-0667&client=summon