Comparision of Primary Treatments for TMJ Closed Lock without Osteoarthritis ITT Analysis

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate primary treatment in the patients with disk displacement without reduction and no osseous changes. Subjects and Methods: The improvement proportion during three months after onset of treatment was compared in the four groups, 1st group, intraoral a dmin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the Japanese Society for the Temporomandibular Joint Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. 343 - 355
Main Authors OGI, Nobumi, MAKI, Izumi, KURITA, Kenichi, YUASA, Hidemichi, ITO, Yutaka, ARIJI, Eiichiro, TOYAMA, Masahiko
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published The Japanese Society for Temporomandibular Joint 20.09.1997
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0915-3004
1884-4308
DOI10.11246/gakukansetsu1989.9.343

Cover

More Information
Summary:Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate primary treatment in the patients with disk displacement without reduction and no osseous changes. Subjects and Methods: The improvement proportion during three months after onset of treatment was compared in the four groups, 1st group, intraoral a dministration of non steroidal anti inflammatory drug (NSAIDs): 2nd group, NSAIDs and mounth opening exercise: 3rd group, arthrocente sis: 4th group, a combination of arthrocentesis and a single injection of steroid. The subjects analyzed totaled 99 patients consiting of 25 in 1st group, 23 in 2nd group, 28 in 3rd group, and 23 in 4th group. Result: The improvement rate was 40% in 1st group, 44% in 2nd group, 36% in 3rd grop, and 30% in 4th group. Conlusion: In terms of improvement rate, no significance was found among 4 groups. However, a combination of intraoral administration of NSAIDs and mouth opening exercise could be most appropriate when primary treatment for TMJ closed lock without OA is evaluated.
ISSN:0915-3004
1884-4308
DOI:10.11246/gakukansetsu1989.9.343