Evaluating Performance Of Identifying At - Risk Students And Learning Achievement Model using Accuracy And F-measure by Comparing Logistic Regression, Generalized Linear Model And Gradient Boost Machine Algorithm

Aim: The objective of the study is to improve the Accuracy and F-Measure percentage of At - risk students Model on the basis of High withdrawal and Failure rate and learning Achievement Model based on low performance and less motivational status. Materials and Methods: Logistic Regression with sampl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in2022 International Conference for Advancement in Technology (ICONAT) pp. 1 - 7
Main Authors Harini, K., Rekha, K K. Sashi
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 21.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
DOI10.1109/ICONAT53423.2022.9725848

Cover

Abstract Aim: The objective of the study is to improve the Accuracy and F-Measure percentage of At - risk students Model on the basis of High withdrawal and Failure rate and learning Achievement Model based on low performance and less motivational status. Materials and Methods: Logistic Regression with sample size = 20, Generalised Linear Model (GLM) with sample size = 20 and Gradient Boost Machine algorithm (GBM) with sample size = 20 was executed a different number of times for predicting accuracy and F-Measure percentage of At - risk students Model and Learning Achievement Model. For improving the Accuracy and F-measure percentage the Novel sigmoid function was used in Logistic Regression which helps in mapping the prediction to probabilities. Results and Discussion: Logistic Regression achieved significantly better Accuracy (95.61%), F-Measure (93.65%) compared to GLM Accuracy (92.97%), F-Measure (89.45%) in At-Risk students Model and in Learning Achievement Model Logistic Regression has better accuracy (96.37%), F-Measure (95.59%) when compared to GBM accuracy (91.73%), F-Measure (90.85%). There was a statistical significance between Logistic regression, GLM and GBM (p = 0.000) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In this study it is found that the Logistic Regression algorithm performed better than the GLM algorithm and GBM Algorithm for predicting accuracy, F-Measure percentage of At - risk students Model and Learning Achievement Model using Novel Sigmoid function.
AbstractList Aim: The objective of the study is to improve the Accuracy and F-Measure percentage of At - risk students Model on the basis of High withdrawal and Failure rate and learning Achievement Model based on low performance and less motivational status. Materials and Methods: Logistic Regression with sample size = 20, Generalised Linear Model (GLM) with sample size = 20 and Gradient Boost Machine algorithm (GBM) with sample size = 20 was executed a different number of times for predicting accuracy and F-Measure percentage of At - risk students Model and Learning Achievement Model. For improving the Accuracy and F-measure percentage the Novel sigmoid function was used in Logistic Regression which helps in mapping the prediction to probabilities. Results and Discussion: Logistic Regression achieved significantly better Accuracy (95.61%), F-Measure (93.65%) compared to GLM Accuracy (92.97%), F-Measure (89.45%) in At-Risk students Model and in Learning Achievement Model Logistic Regression has better accuracy (96.37%), F-Measure (95.59%) when compared to GBM accuracy (91.73%), F-Measure (90.85%). There was a statistical significance between Logistic regression, GLM and GBM (p = 0.000) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In this study it is found that the Logistic Regression algorithm performed better than the GLM algorithm and GBM Algorithm for predicting accuracy, F-Measure percentage of At - risk students Model and Learning Achievement Model using Novel Sigmoid function.
Author Harini, K.
Rekha, K K. Sashi
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: K.
  surname: Harini
  fullname: Harini, K.
  email: harini.kamjula@gmail.com
  organization: Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences,Saveetha School of Engineering,Department of Computer Science and Engineering,Chennai,Tamilnadu,India
– sequence: 2
  givenname: K K. Sashi
  surname: Rekha
  fullname: Rekha, K K. Sashi
  email: sashirekhak.sse@saveetha.com
  organization: Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences,Saveetha School of Engineering,Department of Computer Science and Engineering,Chennai,Tamilnadu,India
BookMark eNotkEtuwjAURVOpHfTDCjrxAhoa23HsDNMIKBItFWWOTPIcrCY2shOkdJ1dUBNg9KR7r86R3kNwa6yBIEA4mmIcpa_LfP2ZbRmNCZ2SiJBpygkTsbgJJikXOElYTBjn9D74m51k3clWmwp9gVPWNdIUgNYKLUswrVb9WGUtCtFG-x_03XZj7lFmSrQC6cy5Lw4aTtAMDfqwJdSo85e86Jws-vN6HjYgfecA7XuU2-Yo3bhZ2Ur7VhdoA5UD77U1L2gBBpys9S8MFm0Gz5U7ghZOlnpUvVnrB6Ec7AZQVlfW6fbQPAV3StYeJtf7GGzns23-Hq7Wi2WerUIdCxzCvmBJRGUsIOYqlZHAJJVxuk8oT5jCKlKsZIRTBiIlXCUx5owXCXBeUkwFfQyeL1gNALuj0410_e76avoP1GJ8Gw
ContentType Conference Proceeding
DBID 6IE
6IL
CBEJK
RIE
RIL
DOI 10.1109/ICONAT53423.2022.9725848
DatabaseName IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
IEEE Xplore POP ALL
IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings
IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present
DatabaseTitleList
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: RIE
  name: IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Education
EISBN 9781665425773
1665425776
EndPage 7
ExternalDocumentID 9725848
Genre orig-research
GroupedDBID 6IE
6IL
CBEJK
RIE
RIL
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-i481-ebc5603a48e47f9a08129a49b63765f1f0f5d52735e8927f641757c6e77d31383
IEDL.DBID RIE
IngestDate Thu Jun 29 18:37:35 EDT 2023
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-i481-ebc5603a48e47f9a08129a49b63765f1f0f5d52735e8927f641757c6e77d31383
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs ieee_primary_9725848
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-Jan.-21
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-01-21
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-Jan.-21
  day: 21
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle 2022 International Conference for Advancement in Technology (ICONAT)
PublicationTitleAbbrev ICONAT
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher IEEE
Publisher_xml – name: IEEE
Score 1.7858684
Snippet Aim: The objective of the study is to improve the Accuracy and F-Measure percentage of At - risk students Model on the basis of High withdrawal and Failure...
SourceID ieee
SourceType Publisher
StartPage 1
SubjectTerms Accuracy
At-risk Students
Education
Effective teaching
F-Measure
GBM algorithm
GLM Algorithm
Learning Achievement
Logistics
Machine Learning
Novel Sigmoid Logistic Regression
Prediction
Prediction algorithms
Predictive models
Probability
Significantly
Statistical Probabilities
Title Evaluating Performance Of Identifying At - Risk Students And Learning Achievement Model using Accuracy And F-measure by Comparing Logistic Regression, Generalized Linear Model And Gradient Boost Machine Algorithm
URI https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9725848
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1NT9wwELWAU0-Fsqjlo5pDj3jZOPFHjsuKhVaFRXSRuKHYGS_RQoKy2QP8zv6g2k7YFVUPvUXOyBPJlmc8ee8NId-UybnWNqLGMk4TLRjVGi314t02izUXyhOcL6_ExW3y447fbZDjFRcGEQP4DPv-MfzLzyuz9KWyk1QyFy_VJtmUSrRcrTdwziA9-T6aXA2n3EvauXsfY_3O_F3flBA2xh_J5ZvDFi0y7y8b3Tevf2kx_u8XbZPemqAH16vQs0M2sPzkGzB3YI1d8vusU_EuZ3C95gbAxEJLzQ30Jhg2QOGmWMzhV6txuYBhmUMnuurem4cCg6J4A75r2iN4nLwfN8s6My_Bekyf2kIj6BcYtX0Nnc3PwC0qDNzgrAXblsfQqVwXr-i8uAQ3q7t5_UTndcCfNXBaVQvnMOA8EYaPs6oumoenHpmOz6ajC9o1cKBFoiKK2rh8Ks4ShYm0aeayD5ZmSaqFO9W4jezA8twLwHFUKZNWJC6XkUaglHkcuavzHtkqqxI_E8hywTB21tKYBGOlIxkZnsdS8nSQC_WF7PrFuX9uJTruu3XZ__fwAfngN4ivpLDokGw19RKPXG7R6K9hU_0BWQvTeQ
linkProvider IEEE
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1NT9wwELUoHNoT5UtAWzqHHvGycew4OS4rlqXdXRBdJG6r2BkvEZBU2ewBfic_qLYTQKAeeouciSeSrcx48t4bQn7EOhNKmYBqwwTlKmJUKTTUiXebNFQiih3BeTyJhlf857W4XiGHL1wYRPTgM-y4S_8vPyv10pXKjhLJbLyMP5A1wTkXDVvrGZ7TTY7O-ueT3lQ4UTt78mOs0z7wpnOKDxyDdTJ-dtngRW47y1p19OM7Ncb_fafPZPuVogcXL8Fng6xgselaMLdwjS3ydNLqeBdzuHhlB8C5gYac6wlO0KuBwmW-uIXfjcrlAnpFBq3sqr2vb3L0muI1uL5pd-CQ8m5cL6tUP3jrAb1vSo2gHqDfdDa0NiPPLso1XOK8gdsWh9DqXOePaL3YFDet2nndRKeVR6DVcFyWC-vQIz0Renfzssrrm_ttMh2cTPtD2rZwoDmPA4pK24wqTHmMXJoktfkHS1KeqMh-14QJTNeIzEnACYwTJk3EbTYjdYRSZmFgD887ZLUoC9wlkGYRw9BaS605hrEKZKBFFkopkm4WxXtkyy3O7E8j0jFr12X_38PfycfhdDyajc4mv76QT26zuLoKC76S1bpa4jebadTqwG-wv42e1sY
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Abook&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.title=2022+International+Conference+for+Advancement+in+Technology+%28ICONAT%29&rft.atitle=Evaluating+Performance+Of+Identifying+At+-+Risk+Students+And+Learning+Achievement+Model+using+Accuracy+And+F-measure+by+Comparing+Logistic+Regression%2C+Generalized+Linear+Model+And+Gradient+Boost+Machine+Algorithm&rft.au=Harini%2C+K.&rft.au=Rekha%2C+K+K.+Sashi&rft.date=2022-01-21&rft.pub=IEEE&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109%2FICONAT53423.2022.9725848&rft.externalDocID=9725848