A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Repetitive Transnasal Sphenopalatine Ganglion Blockade With Tx360® as Acute Treatment for Chronic Migraine

Objective To determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360® are superior in reducing pain associated with chronic migraine (CM) compared with saline. Background The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeadache Vol. 55; no. 1; pp. 101 - 116
Main Authors Cady, Roger, Saper, Joel, Dexter, Kent, Manley, Heather R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0017-8748
1526-4610
1526-4610
DOI10.1111/head.12458

Cover

Abstract Objective To determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360® are superior in reducing pain associated with chronic migraine (CM) compared with saline. Background The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. From an anatomical and physiological perspective, SPG blockade may be an effective acute and preventative treatment for CM. Method This was a double‐blind, parallel‐arm, placebo‐controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. Up to 41 subjects could be enrolled at 2 headache specialty clinics in the US. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by the second edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders appendix definition. They were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28‐day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer‐generated lists of 2:1 to receive 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively. The primary end‐point was to compare numeric rating scale scores at pretreatment baseline vs 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 24 hours postprocedure for all 12 treatments. SPG blockade was accomplished with the Tx360®, which allows a small flexible soft plastic tube that is advanced below the middle turbinate just past the pterygopalatine fossa into the intranasal space. A 0.3 cc of anesthetic or saline was injected into the mucosa covering the SPG. The procedure is performed similarly in each nostril. The active phase of the study consisted of a series of 12 SPG blocks with 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline provided 2 times per week for 6 weeks. Subjects were re‐evaluated at 1 and 6 months postfinal procedure. Results The final dataset included 38 subjects, 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. A repeated measures analysis of variance showed that subjects receiving treatment with bupivacaine experienced a significant reduction in the numeric rating scale scores compared with those receiving saline at baseline (M = 3.78 vs M = 3.18, P = .10), 15 minutes (M = 3.51 vs M = 2.53, P < .001), 30 minutes (M = 3.45 vs M = 2.41, P < .001), and 24 hours after treatment (M = 4.20 vs M = 2.85, P < .001), respectively. Headache Impact Test‐6 scores were statistically significantly decreased in subjects receiving treatments with bupivacaine from before treatment to the final treatment (Mdiff = −4.52, P = .005), whereas no significant change was seen in the saline group (Mdiff = −1.50, P = .13). Conclusion SPG blockade with bupivacaine delivered repetitively for 6 weeks with the Tx360® device demonstrates promise as an acute treatment of headache in some subjects with CM. Statistically significant headache relief is noted at 15 and 30 minutes and sustained at 24 hours for SPG blockade with bupivacaine vs saline. The Tx360® device was simple to use and not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on sphenopalatine ganglion blockade is warranted.
AbstractList Objective To determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360® are superior in reducing pain associated with chronic migraine (CM) compared with saline. Background The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. From an anatomical and physiological perspective, SPG blockade may be an effective acute and preventative treatment for CM. Method This was a double‐blind, parallel‐arm, placebo‐controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. Up to 41 subjects could be enrolled at 2 headache specialty clinics in the US. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by the second edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders appendix definition. They were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28‐day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer‐generated lists of 2:1 to receive 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively. The primary end‐point was to compare numeric rating scale scores at pretreatment baseline vs 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 24 hours postprocedure for all 12 treatments. SPG blockade was accomplished with the Tx360®, which allows a small flexible soft plastic tube that is advanced below the middle turbinate just past the pterygopalatine fossa into the intranasal space. A 0.3 cc of anesthetic or saline was injected into the mucosa covering the SPG. The procedure is performed similarly in each nostril. The active phase of the study consisted of a series of 12 SPG blocks with 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline provided 2 times per week for 6 weeks. Subjects were re‐evaluated at 1 and 6 months postfinal procedure. Results The final dataset included 38 subjects, 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. A repeated measures analysis of variance showed that subjects receiving treatment with bupivacaine experienced a significant reduction in the numeric rating scale scores compared with those receiving saline at baseline (M = 3.78 vs M = 3.18, P = .10), 15 minutes (M = 3.51 vs M = 2.53, P < .001), 30 minutes (M = 3.45 vs M = 2.41, P < .001), and 24 hours after treatment (M = 4.20 vs M = 2.85, P < .001), respectively. Headache Impact Test‐6 scores were statistically significantly decreased in subjects receiving treatments with bupivacaine from before treatment to the final treatment (Mdiff = −4.52, P = .005), whereas no significant change was seen in the saline group (Mdiff = −1.50, P = .13). Conclusion SPG blockade with bupivacaine delivered repetitively for 6 weeks with the Tx360® device demonstrates promise as an acute treatment of headache in some subjects with CM. Statistically significant headache relief is noted at 15 and 30 minutes and sustained at 24 hours for SPG blockade with bupivacaine vs saline. The Tx360® device was simple to use and not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on sphenopalatine ganglion blockade is warranted.
Objective To determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360 are superior in reducing pain associated with chronic migraine (CM) compared with saline. Background The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. From an anatomical and physiological perspective, SPG blockade may be an effective acute and preventative treatment for CM. Method This was a double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. Up to 41 subjects could be enrolled at 2 headache specialty clinics in the US. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by the second edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders appendix definition. They were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28-day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer-generated lists of 2:1 to receive 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively. The primary end-point was to compare numeric rating scale scores at pretreatment baseline vs 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 24 hours postprocedure for all 12 treatments. SPG blockade was accomplished with the Tx360, which allows a small flexible soft plastic tube that is advanced below the middle turbinate just past the pterygopalatine fossa into the intranasal space. A 0.3cc of anesthetic or saline was injected into the mucosa covering the SPG. The procedure is performed similarly in each nostril. The active phase of the study consisted of a series of 12 SPG blocks with 0.3cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline provided 2 times per week for 6 weeks. Subjects were re-evaluated at 1 and 6 months postfinal procedure. Results The final dataset included 38 subjects, 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. A repeated measures analysis of variance showed that subjects receiving treatment with bupivacaine experienced a significant reduction in the numeric rating scale scores compared with those receiving saline at baseline (M=3.78 vs M=3.18, P=.10), 15 minutes (M=3.51 vs M=2.53, P<.001), 30 minutes (M=3.45 vs M=2.41, P<.001), and 24 hours after treatment (M=4.20 vs M=2.85, P<.001), respectively. Headache Impact Test-6 scores were statistically significantly decreased in subjects receiving treatments with bupivacaine from before treatment to the final treatment (Mdiff=-4.52, P=.005), whereas no significant change was seen in the saline group (Mdiff=-1.50, P=.13). Conclusion SPG blockade with bupivacaine delivered repetitively for 6 weeks with the Tx360 device demonstrates promise as an acute treatment of headache in some subjects with CM. Statistically significant headache relief is noted at 15 and 30 minutes and sustained at 24 hours for SPG blockade with bupivacaine vs saline. The Tx360 device was simple to use and not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on sphenopalatine ganglion blockade is warranted.
To determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360(®) are superior in reducing pain associated with chronic migraine (CM) compared with saline. The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. From an anatomical and physiological perspective, SPG blockade may be an effective acute and preventative treatment for CM. This was a double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. Up to 41 subjects could be enrolled at 2 headache specialty clinics in the US. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by the second edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders appendix definition. They were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28-day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer-generated lists of 2:1 to receive 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively. The primary end-point was to compare numeric rating scale scores at pretreatment baseline vs 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 24 hours postprocedure for all 12 treatments. SPG blockade was accomplished with the Tx360(®) , which allows a small flexible soft plastic tube that is advanced below the middle turbinate just past the pterygopalatine fossa into the intranasal space. A 0.3 cc of anesthetic or saline was injected into the mucosa covering the SPG. The procedure is performed similarly in each nostril. The active phase of the study consisted of a series of 12 SPG blocks with 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline provided 2 times per week for 6 weeks. Subjects were re-evaluated at 1 and 6 months postfinal procedure. The final dataset included 38 subjects, 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. A repeated measures analysis of variance showed that subjects receiving treatment with bupivacaine experienced a significant reduction in the numeric rating scale scores compared with those receiving saline at baseline (M=3.78 vs M=3.18, P=.10), 15 minutes (M=3.51 vs M=2.53, P<.001), 30 minutes (M=3.45 vs M=2.41, P<.001), and 24 hours after treatment (M=4.20 vs M=2.85, P<.001), respectively. Headache Impact Test-6 scores were statistically significantly decreased in subjects receiving treatments with bupivacaine from before treatment to the final treatment (Mdiff  = -4.52, P=.005), whereas no significant change was seen in the saline group (Mdiff  = -1.50, P=.13). SPG blockade with bupivacaine delivered repetitively for 6 weeks with the Tx360(®) device demonstrates promise as an acute treatment of headache in some subjects with CM. Statistically significant headache relief is noted at 15 and 30 minutes and sustained at 24 hours for SPG blockade with bupivacaine vs saline. The Tx360(®) device was simple to use and not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on sphenopalatine ganglion blockade is warranted.
To determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360(®) are superior in reducing pain associated with chronic migraine (CM) compared with saline.OBJECTIVETo determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360(®) are superior in reducing pain associated with chronic migraine (CM) compared with saline.The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. From an anatomical and physiological perspective, SPG blockade may be an effective acute and preventative treatment for CM.BACKGROUNDThe SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. From an anatomical and physiological perspective, SPG blockade may be an effective acute and preventative treatment for CM.This was a double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. Up to 41 subjects could be enrolled at 2 headache specialty clinics in the US. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by the second edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders appendix definition. They were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28-day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer-generated lists of 2:1 to receive 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively. The primary end-point was to compare numeric rating scale scores at pretreatment baseline vs 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 24 hours postprocedure for all 12 treatments. SPG blockade was accomplished with the Tx360(®) , which allows a small flexible soft plastic tube that is advanced below the middle turbinate just past the pterygopalatine fossa into the intranasal space. A 0.3 cc of anesthetic or saline was injected into the mucosa covering the SPG. The procedure is performed similarly in each nostril. The active phase of the study consisted of a series of 12 SPG blocks with 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline provided 2 times per week for 6 weeks. Subjects were re-evaluated at 1 and 6 months postfinal procedure.METHODThis was a double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. Up to 41 subjects could be enrolled at 2 headache specialty clinics in the US. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by the second edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders appendix definition. They were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28-day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer-generated lists of 2:1 to receive 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively. The primary end-point was to compare numeric rating scale scores at pretreatment baseline vs 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 24 hours postprocedure for all 12 treatments. SPG blockade was accomplished with the Tx360(®) , which allows a small flexible soft plastic tube that is advanced below the middle turbinate just past the pterygopalatine fossa into the intranasal space. A 0.3 cc of anesthetic or saline was injected into the mucosa covering the SPG. The procedure is performed similarly in each nostril. The active phase of the study consisted of a series of 12 SPG blocks with 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline provided 2 times per week for 6 weeks. Subjects were re-evaluated at 1 and 6 months postfinal procedure.The final dataset included 38 subjects, 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. A repeated measures analysis of variance showed that subjects receiving treatment with bupivacaine experienced a significant reduction in the numeric rating scale scores compared with those receiving saline at baseline (M=3.78 vs M=3.18, P=.10), 15 minutes (M=3.51 vs M=2.53, P<.001), 30 minutes (M=3.45 vs M=2.41, P<.001), and 24 hours after treatment (M=4.20 vs M=2.85, P<.001), respectively. Headache Impact Test-6 scores were statistically significantly decreased in subjects receiving treatments with bupivacaine from before treatment to the final treatment (Mdiff  = -4.52, P=.005), whereas no significant change was seen in the saline group (Mdiff  = -1.50, P=.13).RESULTSThe final dataset included 38 subjects, 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. A repeated measures analysis of variance showed that subjects receiving treatment with bupivacaine experienced a significant reduction in the numeric rating scale scores compared with those receiving saline at baseline (M=3.78 vs M=3.18, P=.10), 15 minutes (M=3.51 vs M=2.53, P<.001), 30 minutes (M=3.45 vs M=2.41, P<.001), and 24 hours after treatment (M=4.20 vs M=2.85, P<.001), respectively. Headache Impact Test-6 scores were statistically significantly decreased in subjects receiving treatments with bupivacaine from before treatment to the final treatment (Mdiff  = -4.52, P=.005), whereas no significant change was seen in the saline group (Mdiff  = -1.50, P=.13).SPG blockade with bupivacaine delivered repetitively for 6 weeks with the Tx360(®) device demonstrates promise as an acute treatment of headache in some subjects with CM. Statistically significant headache relief is noted at 15 and 30 minutes and sustained at 24 hours for SPG blockade with bupivacaine vs saline. The Tx360(®) device was simple to use and not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on sphenopalatine ganglion blockade is warranted.CONCLUSIONSPG blockade with bupivacaine delivered repetitively for 6 weeks with the Tx360(®) device demonstrates promise as an acute treatment of headache in some subjects with CM. Statistically significant headache relief is noted at 15 and 30 minutes and sustained at 24 hours for SPG blockade with bupivacaine vs saline. The Tx360(®) device was simple to use and not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on sphenopalatine ganglion blockade is warranted.
Author Manley, Heather R.
Dexter, Kent
Cady, Roger
Saper, Joel
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Roger
  surname: Cady
  fullname: Cady, Roger
  email: rcady@headachecare.com
  organization: Headache Care Center, MO, Springfield, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Joel
  surname: Saper
  fullname: Saper, Joel
  organization: Michigan Head Pain and Neurological Institute, MI, Ann Arbor, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Kent
  surname: Dexter
  fullname: Dexter, Kent
  organization: Headache Care Center, MO, Springfield, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Heather R.
  surname: Manley
  fullname: Manley, Heather R.
  organization: Clinvest, MO, Springfield, USA
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25338927$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpdkt9O2zAUxq2JaRS2mz3AZGk3XCzMjv8kuZlUCpRJlKHRjUvLSU5ag2t3iQP0SXiLPcSebC5l1Tbf2NL5fd_5bJ89tOO8A4TeUnJI4_o4B10f0pSL_AUaUJHKhEtKdtCAEJolecbzXbTXdTeEEC4L-QrtpoKxvEizAXoc4mPflxaSI2tc_QFfWl1B6ZORd6H11kKNr0Jfr7Bv8FdYQjDB3AGettp1Tnfa4qvlHJxfaquDcYDH2s2s8Q4fWV_d6hrwtQlzPH1gkvz6iXWHh1Uf1g6gwwJcwI1v8WjeemcqPDGzVkeb1-hlo20Hb573ffTt9GQ6OkvOv4w_j4bnieGU5EmRNqXMgXEta5lSXdSFoExnpYAm53VNOaQUBKGFpqQBYKwgtJQ1Z1RQQSq2jz5tfJd9uYC6inlabdWyNQvdrpTXRv1bcWauZv5OcZaSTMhocPBs0PofPXRBLUxXgbXage87RaVIY9O84BF9_x964_vWxetFiksRH4iySL37O9E2yp8_iwDdAPfGwmpbp0Stp0Gtp0E9TYM6OxkeP52iJtloTBfgYavR7a2SGcuEur4YKza5-D45zS8VYb8BlNy6CQ
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2014 The Authors. Headache published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society.
Copyright © 2015 American Headache Society
2014 The Authors. Headache published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society. 2014
Copyright_xml – notice: 2014 The Authors. Headache published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society.
– notice: Copyright © 2015 American Headache Society
– notice: 2014 The Authors. Headache published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society. 2014
DBID BSCLL
24P
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7TK
7U7
C1K
K9.
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1111/head.12458
DatabaseName Istex
Wiley Online Library Open Access - NZ
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Neurosciences Abstracts
Toxicology Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Toxicology Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 24P
  name: Wiley Online Library Open Access
  url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1526-4610
EndPage 116
ExternalDocumentID PMC4320756
3562155331
25338927
HEAD12458
ark_67375_WNG_3MNVMF8P_0
Genre article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Tian Medical Inc.
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
29I
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5HH
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
6PF
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AAQQT
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AHBTC
AHMBA
AI.
AIACR
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
AITYG
AIURR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
ECV
EJD
EMOBN
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
FYBCS
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
L7B
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
VH1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WQ9
WQJ
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
YFH
YUY
ZGI
ZXP
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
24P
AAHHS
ACCFJ
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEQDE
AEUQT
AFPWT
AIWBW
AJBDE
ESX
WRC
YCJ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7TK
7U7
C1K
K9.
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-i4108-92fb68e34a6d621a9d9513a7b5ef84dd14e21e5019a10fee33901b6d4315150c3
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0017-8748
1526-4610
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:11:18 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 11:34:10 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 19:50:22 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:07:13 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:51:56 EST 2025
Sun Sep 21 06:19:17 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords sphenopalatine ganglion block
chronic migraine
preventive treatment
Tx360
acute treatment
Language English
License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
2014 The Authors. Headache published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-i4108-92fb68e34a6d621a9d9513a7b5ef84dd14e21e5019a10fee33901b6d4315150c3
Notes ArticleID:HEAD12458
Tian Medical Inc.
ark:/67375/WNG-3MNVMF8P-0
istex:4A8A8456D9E2EBF26DC61ECE617AE17C1979B748
ClinicalTrials.gov
(NCT01709708).
Dr. Kent Dexter and Heather Manley have nothing to disclose.
Trial Registration
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Roger Cady currently serves on several advisory boards: Allergan, Astellas, MAP Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co, Inc., Novartis, Ortho‐McNeil Neurologics, and Zogenix. He also receives research grants from Allergan, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck & Co, Inc., OptiNose, PuraMed Bioscience, Tian Medical, LLC, and Zogenix. Dr. Cady provided consulting services for Allergan, Astellas, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck & Co., Inc., and Ortho‐McNeil Neurologics.
Dr. Joel Saper receives research grants from Achelios, Alder, Allergan, Amgen, Astellas, Astrazeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Electrocore, Innovative Medical Concepts, Labrys Biologics, Neuraxon, Novartis, Optinose, Osmotica, Pfizer Inc., Tian Medical, and Vanda & Winston Laboratories.
Study approved by Sterling Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee.
Dr. Saper's consultant/honorarium is from Allergan, NuPathe, Johnson & Johnson (Ethicon), Purdue Pharma, Supernus, Medscape, Tian Medical, and Migraine Research Foundation.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Trial Registration: http//ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01709708).
Financial Support: This research study supported by a grant from Tian Medical Inc., Lombard, IL.
Conflict of Interest: Dr. Roger Cady currently serves on several advisory boards: Allergan, Astellas, MAP Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co, Inc., Novartis, Ortho-McNeil Neurologics, and Zogenix. He also receives research grants from Allergan, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck & Co, Inc., OptiNose, PuraMed Bioscience, Tian Medical, LLC, and Zogenix. Dr. Cady provided consulting services for Allergan, Astellas, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck & Co., Inc., and Ortho-McNeil Neurologics.
ORCID 0000-0003-4081-8395
OpenAccessLink https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fhead.12458
PMID 25338927
PQID 1646536013
PQPubID 24968
PageCount 16
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4320756
proquest_miscellaneous_1652390894
proquest_journals_1646536013
pubmed_primary_25338927
wiley_primary_10_1111_head_12458_HEAD12458
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_3MNVMF8P_0
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate January 2015
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2015
  text: January 2015
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Mt. Royal
– name: Oxford, UK
PublicationTitle Headache
PublicationTitleAlternate Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
– name: BlackWell Publishing Ltd
References Cady RK, Schreiber CP, Farmer KU. Understanding the patient with migraine: The evolution from episodic headache to chronic neurological disease. Headache. 2004;44:426-435.
Hazard E, Muakata J, Bigal ME, Rupnow MFT, Lipton RB. The burden of migraine in the United States: Current and emerging perspectives on disease management and economic analysis. Value Health. 2009;12:55-64.
Maizels M, Geiger AM. Intranasal lidocaine for migraine: A randomized trial and open-label followup. Headache. 1999;39:543-551.
Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Jensen R, et al. The global burden of headache: A documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia. 2007;27:193-210.
Paemeleire K, Goodman AM. Results of a patient survey for an implantable neurostimulator to treat migraine headaches. J Headache Pain. 2012;13:239-241.
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013;33:629-808.
Blanda M, Rench T, Gerson LW, Weigand JV. Intranasal lidocaine for the treatment of migraine headache: A randomized, controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:337-342.
Headache Classification Committee, Olesen J, Bousser MG, et al. New appendix criteria open for a broader concept of chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2006;26:742-746.
Katsarava Z, Schneeweiss S, Kurth T, et al. Incidence and predictors for chronicity of headache in patients with episodic migraine. Neurology. 2004;62:788-790.
Candido KD, Massey ST, Sauer R, Darabad RR, Knezevic NN. A novel revision to the classical transnasal topical sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of headache and facial pain. Pain Physician. 2013;16:E769-E778.
Ansarinia M, Rezai A, Tepper SJ, et al. Electrical stimulation of sphenopalatine ganglion for acute treatment of cluster headaches. Headache. 2010;50:1164-1174.
Piagkou M, Demesticha T, Troupis T, et al. The pterygopalatine ganglion and its role in various pain syndromes: From anatomy to clinical practice. Pain Pract. 2012;12:399-412.
Schoenen J, Jensen RH, Lantéri-Minet M, et al. Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for cluster headache treatment. Pathway CH-1: A randomized, sham-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2013;33:816-830.
Syed MI, Shaikh A. Radiology of Non-Spinal Pain Procedures: A Guide for the Interventionalist. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2011:5-6.
Kudrow L, Kudrow DB, Sandweiss JH. Rapid and sustained relief of migraine attacks with intranasal lidocaine: Preliminary findings. Headache. 1995;35:79-82.
Cady R, O'Carroll P, Dexter K, Freitag F, Shade C. SumaRT/Nap vs naproxen sodium in treatment and disease modification of migraine: A pilot study. Headache. 2013;54:67-79.
Yang I, Oraee S. A novel approach to transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion injection. Pain Physician. 2006;9:131-134.
Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, Ramadan N, International Headache Society Clinical Trials Subcommittee, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: Third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia. 2012;32:6-38.
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(Suppl. 1):1-160.
Lipton RB, Bigal ME. Ten lessons on the epidemiology of migraine. Headache. 2007;47(Suppl. 1):S2-S9.
Narouze S, Kapural L, Casanova J, Mekhail N. Sphenopalatine ganglion radiofrequency ablation for the management of chronic cluster headache. Headache. 2009;49:571-577.
Tepper SJ, Rezai A, Narouze S, Steiner C, Mohajer P, Ansarinia M. Acute treatment of intractable migraine with sphenopalatine ganglion electrical stimulation. Headache. 2009;49:983-989.
2009; 12
2004; 44
2004; 62
2013; 16
2013; 33
2011
2013; 54
1999; 39
1995; 35
2006; 9
2006; 26
2004; 24
2001; 8
2008
2012; 13
2012; 12
2009; 49
2012; 32
2007; 47
2010; 50
2007; 27
19486173 - Headache. 2009 Jul;49(7):983-9
23314784 - Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(10):816-30
11279969 - Headache. 1999 Sep;39(8):543-51
15007133 - Neurology. 2004 Mar 9;62(5):788-90
20438584 - Headache. 2010 Jul;50(7):1164-74
16703973 - Pain Physician. 2006 Apr;9(2):131-4
22384463 - Cephalalgia. 2012 Jan;32(1):6-38
14979299 - Cephalalgia. 2004;24 Suppl 1:9-160
18783451 - Headache. 2009 Apr;49(4):571-7
18671771 - Value Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):55-64
16686915 - Cephalalgia. 2006 Jun;26(6):742-6
17425705 - Headache. 2007 Apr;47 Suppl 1:S2-9
21956040 - Pain Pract. 2012 Jun;12(5):399-412
11282668 - Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Apr;8(4):337-42
17381554 - Cephalalgia. 2007 Mar;27(3):193-210
22395639 - J Headache Pain. 2012 Apr;13(3):239-41
7737865 - Headache. 1995 Feb;35(2):79-82
15147250 - Headache. 2004 May;44(5):426-35
24021029 - Headache. 2014 Jan;54(1):67-79
23771276 - Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808
24284858 - Pain Physician. 2013 Nov-Dec;16(6):E769-78
References_xml – reference: Headache Classification Committee, Olesen J, Bousser MG, et al. New appendix criteria open for a broader concept of chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2006;26:742-746.
– reference: Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Jensen R, et al. The global burden of headache: A documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia. 2007;27:193-210.
– reference: Schoenen J, Jensen RH, Lantéri-Minet M, et al. Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for cluster headache treatment. Pathway CH-1: A randomized, sham-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2013;33:816-830.
– reference: Yang I, Oraee S. A novel approach to transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion injection. Pain Physician. 2006;9:131-134.
– reference: Hazard E, Muakata J, Bigal ME, Rupnow MFT, Lipton RB. The burden of migraine in the United States: Current and emerging perspectives on disease management and economic analysis. Value Health. 2009;12:55-64.
– reference: Piagkou M, Demesticha T, Troupis T, et al. The pterygopalatine ganglion and its role in various pain syndromes: From anatomy to clinical practice. Pain Pract. 2012;12:399-412.
– reference: Lipton RB, Bigal ME. Ten lessons on the epidemiology of migraine. Headache. 2007;47(Suppl. 1):S2-S9.
– reference: Paemeleire K, Goodman AM. Results of a patient survey for an implantable neurostimulator to treat migraine headaches. J Headache Pain. 2012;13:239-241.
– reference: Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(Suppl. 1):1-160.
– reference: Katsarava Z, Schneeweiss S, Kurth T, et al. Incidence and predictors for chronicity of headache in patients with episodic migraine. Neurology. 2004;62:788-790.
– reference: Candido KD, Massey ST, Sauer R, Darabad RR, Knezevic NN. A novel revision to the classical transnasal topical sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of headache and facial pain. Pain Physician. 2013;16:E769-E778.
– reference: Tepper SJ, Rezai A, Narouze S, Steiner C, Mohajer P, Ansarinia M. Acute treatment of intractable migraine with sphenopalatine ganglion electrical stimulation. Headache. 2009;49:983-989.
– reference: Maizels M, Geiger AM. Intranasal lidocaine for migraine: A randomized trial and open-label followup. Headache. 1999;39:543-551.
– reference: Kudrow L, Kudrow DB, Sandweiss JH. Rapid and sustained relief of migraine attacks with intranasal lidocaine: Preliminary findings. Headache. 1995;35:79-82.
– reference: Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013;33:629-808.
– reference: Narouze S, Kapural L, Casanova J, Mekhail N. Sphenopalatine ganglion radiofrequency ablation for the management of chronic cluster headache. Headache. 2009;49:571-577.
– reference: Blanda M, Rench T, Gerson LW, Weigand JV. Intranasal lidocaine for the treatment of migraine headache: A randomized, controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:337-342.
– reference: Ansarinia M, Rezai A, Tepper SJ, et al. Electrical stimulation of sphenopalatine ganglion for acute treatment of cluster headaches. Headache. 2010;50:1164-1174.
– reference: Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, Ramadan N, International Headache Society Clinical Trials Subcommittee, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: Third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia. 2012;32:6-38.
– reference: Cady R, O'Carroll P, Dexter K, Freitag F, Shade C. SumaRT/Nap vs naproxen sodium in treatment and disease modification of migraine: A pilot study. Headache. 2013;54:67-79.
– reference: Cady RK, Schreiber CP, Farmer KU. Understanding the patient with migraine: The evolution from episodic headache to chronic neurological disease. Headache. 2004;44:426-435.
– reference: Syed MI, Shaikh A. Radiology of Non-Spinal Pain Procedures: A Guide for the Interventionalist. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2011:5-6.
– volume: 16
  start-page: E769
  year: 2013
  end-page: E778
  article-title: A novel revision to the classical transnasal topical sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of headache and facial pain
  publication-title: Pain Physician
– volume: 44
  start-page: 426
  year: 2004
  end-page: 435
  article-title: Understanding the patient with migraine: The evolution from episodic headache to chronic neurological disease
  publication-title: Headache
– volume: 62
  start-page: 788
  year: 2004
  end-page: 790
  article-title: Incidence and predictors for chronicity of headache in patients with episodic migraine
  publication-title: Neurology
– volume: 12
  start-page: 399
  year: 2012
  end-page: 412
  article-title: The pterygopalatine ganglion and its role in various pain syndromes: From anatomy to clinical practice
  publication-title: Pain Pract
– volume: 33
  start-page: 629
  year: 2013
  end-page: 808
  article-title: The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version)
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1
  issue: Suppl. 1
  year: 2004
  end-page: 160
  article-title: The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
– volume: 13
  start-page: 239
  year: 2012
  end-page: 241
  article-title: Results of a patient survey for an implantable neurostimulator to treat migraine headaches
  publication-title: J Headache Pain
– volume: 47
  start-page: S2
  issue: Suppl. 1
  year: 2007
  end-page: S9
  article-title: Ten lessons on the epidemiology of migraine
  publication-title: Headache
– volume: 49
  start-page: 983
  year: 2009
  end-page: 989
  article-title: Acute treatment of intractable migraine with sphenopalatine ganglion electrical stimulation
  publication-title: Headache
– volume: 35
  start-page: 79
  year: 1995
  end-page: 82
  article-title: Rapid and sustained relief of migraine attacks with intranasal lidocaine: Preliminary findings
  publication-title: Headache
– volume: 50
  start-page: 1164
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1174
  article-title: Electrical stimulation of sphenopalatine ganglion for acute treatment of cluster headaches
  publication-title: Headache
– volume: 39
  start-page: 543
  year: 1999
  end-page: 551
  article-title: Intranasal lidocaine for migraine: A randomized trial and open‐label followup
  publication-title: Headache
– volume: 9
  start-page: 131
  year: 2006
  end-page: 134
  article-title: A novel approach to transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion injection
  publication-title: Pain Physician
– volume: 54
  start-page: 67
  year: 2013
  end-page: 79
  article-title: SumaRT/Nap vs naproxen sodium in treatment and disease modification of migraine: A pilot study
  publication-title: Headache
– volume: 27
  start-page: 193
  year: 2007
  end-page: 210
  article-title: The global burden of headache: A documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
– volume: 33
  start-page: 816
  year: 2013
  end-page: 830
  article-title: Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for cluster headache treatment. Pathway CH‐1: A randomized, sham‐controlled study
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
– start-page: 5
  year: 2011
  end-page: 6
– volume: 12
  start-page: 55
  year: 2009
  end-page: 64
  article-title: The burden of migraine in the United States: Current and emerging perspectives on disease management and economic analysis
  publication-title: Value Health
– volume: 8
  start-page: 337
  year: 2001
  end-page: 342
  article-title: Intranasal lidocaine for the treatment of migraine headache: A randomized, controlled trial
  publication-title: Acad Emerg Med
– volume: 32
  start-page: 6
  year: 2012
  end-page: 38
  article-title: Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: Third edition. A guide for investigators
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
– start-page: 315
  year: 2008
  end-page: 377
– volume: 49
  start-page: 571
  year: 2009
  end-page: 577
  article-title: Sphenopalatine ganglion radiofrequency ablation for the management of chronic cluster headache
  publication-title: Headache
– volume: 26
  start-page: 742
  year: 2006
  end-page: 746
  article-title: New appendix criteria open for a broader concept of chronic migraine
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
– reference: 24284858 - Pain Physician. 2013 Nov-Dec;16(6):E769-78
– reference: 22384463 - Cephalalgia. 2012 Jan;32(1):6-38
– reference: 16703973 - Pain Physician. 2006 Apr;9(2):131-4
– reference: 19486173 - Headache. 2009 Jul;49(7):983-9
– reference: 22395639 - J Headache Pain. 2012 Apr;13(3):239-41
– reference: 11282668 - Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Apr;8(4):337-42
– reference: 17381554 - Cephalalgia. 2007 Mar;27(3):193-210
– reference: 21956040 - Pain Pract. 2012 Jun;12(5):399-412
– reference: 15147250 - Headache. 2004 May;44(5):426-35
– reference: 23314784 - Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(10):816-30
– reference: 18671771 - Value Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):55-64
– reference: 17425705 - Headache. 2007 Apr;47 Suppl 1:S2-9
– reference: 7737865 - Headache. 1995 Feb;35(2):79-82
– reference: 24021029 - Headache. 2014 Jan;54(1):67-79
– reference: 23771276 - Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808
– reference: 15007133 - Neurology. 2004 Mar 9;62(5):788-90
– reference: 16686915 - Cephalalgia. 2006 Jun;26(6):742-6
– reference: 18783451 - Headache. 2009 Apr;49(4):571-7
– reference: 14979299 - Cephalalgia. 2004;24 Suppl 1:9-160
– reference: 20438584 - Headache. 2010 Jul;50(7):1164-74
– reference: 11279969 - Headache. 1999 Sep;39(8):543-51
SSID ssj0004696
Score 2.400586
Snippet Objective To determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360® are superior in reducing pain...
To determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360(®) are superior in reducing pain associated...
Objective To determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360 are superior in reducing pain...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
wiley
istex
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 101
SubjectTerms acute treatment
Administration, Intranasal - methods
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Analysis of Variance
Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage
Bupivacaine - administration & dosage
Chronic Disease
chronic migraine
Double-Blind Method
Female
Headaches
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Migraine
Migraine Disorders - therapy
Pain Measurement
Pilot Projects
preventive treatment
Research Submissions
Severity of Illness Index
sphenopalatine ganglion block
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block - methods
Time Factors
Tx360
Young Adult
Title A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Repetitive Transnasal Sphenopalatine Ganglion Blockade With Tx360® as Acute Treatment for Chronic Migraine
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-3MNVMF8P-0/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fhead.12458
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25338927
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1646536013
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1652390894
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4320756
Volume 55
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket)
  issn: 0017-8748
  databaseCode: DR2
  dateStart: 19970101
  customDbUrl:
  isFulltext: true
  eissn: 1526-4610
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0004696
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LbtQwFLVKF4gNb2igVEZCLBAZxbGdh8RmWjodIWU0gpZ2gyI7duhoqgR1MlJhxSew5x_4CD6FL-FeJxOmwAZ2k4nzPtc-ts89JuSJAZiYKBR-mgjhC2aVn0Zl7DMtVKLDRBcuby2bROMj8epEnmyQF6tcmNYfoh9ww8hw9TUGuNKLtSDHNewH0DpJzPRlXLo52tfhWlKkW5yrrYZjkXTepCjj-XUoUFJ8mxd_45d_yiTX6atrf0Y3yLvVnbeyk_lg2ehB8ek3U8f_fbSb5HpHTOmwRdItsmGr2-Rq1k293yFfhxTItj6zPz5_2YVLmOd0ikPwuoY_9lrB-5k1FIWJH2ldUqD2mMEGtSl1DWKlFnD-N6gpg446SvAqSw8UphHXFd2FRnWujKXHs-aUHl7wKPj-jaoFHRbLBs_Q6eEpkGzaOfrSbPYeV7iwd8nRaP9wb-x3Kzv4M8ECqGHDUkeJ5UJFABSmUgNEj6tYS1smwhgmbMisBPqpWFBay3FkRkcG2A7wr6Dg98hmVVd2i1AmZMGFjmMdS8FKlSZaWMMVbKKPkfTIU_eF8w-te0euzucoZotlfjw5yHk2eZuNkmkeeGR7BYG8i-NFju5rEp6YcY887ndDBOK0iqpsvcQy0JnH6VPhkfstYvqLhcCmkzSMPRJfwlJfAN29L--pZqfO5VvwEOhc5JFnDir9EateG4IkdyDJx_vDl-7Xg38p_JBcA_Yn2_GkbbLZnC_tI2BYjd4hV0Ix3XHx9BOuHCW2
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3NbtQwELagSMAF8U-ggJEQB0RQHNuJc9yWbhdoViuxpb1Z9tqhq1YJ6u5K5cYjcOcdeAgehSdhxknDVnDhlsR2Imdm7M_jb8aEPHegJi5LRVwoIWLBvImLrMpjZoVRNlV2FuLWynE22hfvDuVhx83BWJg2P0TvcEPLCOM1Gjg6pNesHA-xfw3Tk1SXyRWRpQkqdSoma2GR4XiudiDOheqykyKR509bAKX4P8_-hTD_JkquA9gwAw1vkhsddKSDVta3yCVf3yZXy25z_A75PqAAh-2J__X12xb0z72iE3SS2wYebLeU9BPvKFIHv9CmogC-McYMxjsapqzaLOD9H5D1BUtpJMnVnu4aDPRtaroF096xcZ4ezJdHdHrGs-TnD2oWdDBbLfENHWOdAgymXc5dWs4_4RkU_i7ZH-5Mt0dxd_ZCPBcsgTEwrWymPBcmA1EyUziAYtzkVvpKCeeY8CnzEgCiYUnlPUffic0c4BFASMmM3yMbdVP7B4QyIWdc2Dy3uRSsMoWywjtu4BYzDcmIvAgS0J_b_BranB4j3SyX-mC8q3k5_lgO1UQnEdk8F5HuLG2hMT-ahB4zHpFnfTHYCG58mNo3K6wDy23c4BQRud9KtP9YCnhXFWkekfyCrPsKmH_7Ykk9Pwp5uAVPAXBlEXkZtKJvcb6uQiXTQcn0aGfwJlw9_J_KT8m10bTc03tvx-8fkeuA1WTr_dkkG8vTlX8MeGhpnwSt_w35Ogfv
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LbtQwFL0qRarY8H6kFDASYoHIKA_nJbGZPqbDI6MRtLQbFNmx046mSqpORiqs-AT2_AMfwafwJdzrZMIU2MBuMnHe59rH9rnHAE8UwkSFHreTmHObu1rYSVhEtiu5iKUXy9zkraWjcLjPXx0GhyvwYpEL0_hDdANuFBmmvqYAP1XFUpDTGvY9bJ2C-BJc5iF2r4gSvfWWsiLN6lxNPRzxuDUnJR3Pr2ORk9LrPP8bwfxTJ7nMX00DNLgGHxa33uhOpr15LXv5p99cHf_32a7D1ZaZsn4DpRuwosubsJa2c--34GufIduWJ_rH5y-beAn1nI1pDF5W-MdWo3g_0YqRMvEjqwqG3J5S2LA6ZaZFLMUMz_-ORGXYUycNXqnZrqA84qpkm9iqToXS7GBSH7O9cz90vn9jYsb6-bymM7SCeIYsm7WWviydHNESF_o27A929raGdru0gz3hroNVrFfIMNY-FyEixRWJQqbni0gGuoi5Ui7XnqsD5J_CdQqtfRqakaFCuoMEzMn9O7BaVqW-B8zlQe5zGUUyCrhbiCSWXCtf4CYZGQUWPDVfODtt7DsycTYlNVsUZAej3cxPR-_TQTzOHAs2FhDI2kCeZWS_FuATu74Fj7vdGII0ryJKXc2pDPbmaf6UW3C3QUx3MQ_pdJx4kQXRBSx1Bcje--KecnJsbL657yGfCy14ZqDSHbHothFIMgOSbLjT3za_1v-l8CNYG28PsjcvR6_vwxVkgkEztrQBq_XZXD9AtlXLhyaofgJqFieq
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Double-Blind%2C+Placebo-Controlled+Study+of+Repetitive+Transnasal+Sphenopalatine+Ganglion+Blockade+With+Tx360%C2%AE+as+Acute+Treatment+for+Chronic+Migraine&rft.jtitle=Headache&rft.au=Cady%2C+Roger&rft.au=Saper%2C+Joel&rft.au=Dexter%2C+Kent&rft.au=Manley%2C+Heather+R&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.pub=BlackWell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=0017-8748&rft.eissn=1526-4610&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=116&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fhead.12458&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F25338927&rft.externalDocID=PMC4320756
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0017-8748&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0017-8748&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0017-8748&client=summon