A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Repetitive Transnasal Sphenopalatine Ganglion Blockade With Tx360® as Acute Treatment for Chronic Migraine
Objective To determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360® are superior in reducing pain associated with chronic migraine (CM) compared with saline. Background The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides...
Saved in:
Published in | Headache Vol. 55; no. 1; pp. 101 - 116 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.01.2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0017-8748 1526-4610 1526-4610 |
DOI | 10.1111/head.12458 |
Cover
Abstract | Objective
To determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360® are superior in reducing pain associated with chronic migraine (CM) compared with saline.
Background
The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. From an anatomical and physiological perspective, SPG blockade may be an effective acute and preventative treatment for CM.
Method
This was a double‐blind, parallel‐arm, placebo‐controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. Up to 41 subjects could be enrolled at 2 headache specialty clinics in the US. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by the second edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders appendix definition. They were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28‐day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer‐generated lists of 2:1 to receive 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively. The primary end‐point was to compare numeric rating scale scores at pretreatment baseline vs 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 24 hours postprocedure for all 12 treatments.
SPG blockade was accomplished with the Tx360®, which allows a small flexible soft plastic tube that is advanced below the middle turbinate just past the pterygopalatine fossa into the intranasal space. A 0.3 cc of anesthetic or saline was injected into the mucosa covering the SPG. The procedure is performed similarly in each nostril. The active phase of the study consisted of a series of 12 SPG blocks with 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline provided 2 times per week for 6 weeks. Subjects were re‐evaluated at 1 and 6 months postfinal procedure.
Results
The final dataset included 38 subjects, 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. A repeated measures analysis of variance showed that subjects receiving treatment with bupivacaine experienced a significant reduction in the numeric rating scale scores compared with those receiving saline at baseline (M = 3.78 vs M = 3.18, P = .10), 15 minutes (M = 3.51 vs M = 2.53, P < .001), 30 minutes (M = 3.45 vs M = 2.41, P < .001), and 24 hours after treatment (M = 4.20 vs M = 2.85, P < .001), respectively. Headache Impact Test‐6 scores were statistically significantly decreased in subjects receiving treatments with bupivacaine from before treatment to the final treatment (Mdiff = −4.52, P = .005), whereas no significant change was seen in the saline group (Mdiff = −1.50, P = .13).
Conclusion
SPG blockade with bupivacaine delivered repetitively for 6 weeks with the Tx360® device demonstrates promise as an acute treatment of headache in some subjects with CM. Statistically significant headache relief is noted at 15 and 30 minutes and sustained at 24 hours for SPG blockade with bupivacaine vs saline. The Tx360® device was simple to use and not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on sphenopalatine ganglion blockade is warranted. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Objective
To determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360® are superior in reducing pain associated with chronic migraine (CM) compared with saline.
Background
The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. From an anatomical and physiological perspective, SPG blockade may be an effective acute and preventative treatment for CM.
Method
This was a double‐blind, parallel‐arm, placebo‐controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. Up to 41 subjects could be enrolled at 2 headache specialty clinics in the US. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by the second edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders appendix definition. They were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28‐day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer‐generated lists of 2:1 to receive 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively. The primary end‐point was to compare numeric rating scale scores at pretreatment baseline vs 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 24 hours postprocedure for all 12 treatments.
SPG blockade was accomplished with the Tx360®, which allows a small flexible soft plastic tube that is advanced below the middle turbinate just past the pterygopalatine fossa into the intranasal space. A 0.3 cc of anesthetic or saline was injected into the mucosa covering the SPG. The procedure is performed similarly in each nostril. The active phase of the study consisted of a series of 12 SPG blocks with 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline provided 2 times per week for 6 weeks. Subjects were re‐evaluated at 1 and 6 months postfinal procedure.
Results
The final dataset included 38 subjects, 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. A repeated measures analysis of variance showed that subjects receiving treatment with bupivacaine experienced a significant reduction in the numeric rating scale scores compared with those receiving saline at baseline (M = 3.78 vs M = 3.18, P = .10), 15 minutes (M = 3.51 vs M = 2.53, P < .001), 30 minutes (M = 3.45 vs M = 2.41, P < .001), and 24 hours after treatment (M = 4.20 vs M = 2.85, P < .001), respectively. Headache Impact Test‐6 scores were statistically significantly decreased in subjects receiving treatments with bupivacaine from before treatment to the final treatment (Mdiff = −4.52, P = .005), whereas no significant change was seen in the saline group (Mdiff = −1.50, P = .13).
Conclusion
SPG blockade with bupivacaine delivered repetitively for 6 weeks with the Tx360® device demonstrates promise as an acute treatment of headache in some subjects with CM. Statistically significant headache relief is noted at 15 and 30 minutes and sustained at 24 hours for SPG blockade with bupivacaine vs saline. The Tx360® device was simple to use and not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on sphenopalatine ganglion blockade is warranted. Objective To determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360 are superior in reducing pain associated with chronic migraine (CM) compared with saline. Background The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. From an anatomical and physiological perspective, SPG blockade may be an effective acute and preventative treatment for CM. Method This was a double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. Up to 41 subjects could be enrolled at 2 headache specialty clinics in the US. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by the second edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders appendix definition. They were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28-day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer-generated lists of 2:1 to receive 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively. The primary end-point was to compare numeric rating scale scores at pretreatment baseline vs 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 24 hours postprocedure for all 12 treatments. SPG blockade was accomplished with the Tx360, which allows a small flexible soft plastic tube that is advanced below the middle turbinate just past the pterygopalatine fossa into the intranasal space. A 0.3cc of anesthetic or saline was injected into the mucosa covering the SPG. The procedure is performed similarly in each nostril. The active phase of the study consisted of a series of 12 SPG blocks with 0.3cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline provided 2 times per week for 6 weeks. Subjects were re-evaluated at 1 and 6 months postfinal procedure. Results The final dataset included 38 subjects, 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. A repeated measures analysis of variance showed that subjects receiving treatment with bupivacaine experienced a significant reduction in the numeric rating scale scores compared with those receiving saline at baseline (M=3.78 vs M=3.18, P=.10), 15 minutes (M=3.51 vs M=2.53, P<.001), 30 minutes (M=3.45 vs M=2.41, P<.001), and 24 hours after treatment (M=4.20 vs M=2.85, P<.001), respectively. Headache Impact Test-6 scores were statistically significantly decreased in subjects receiving treatments with bupivacaine from before treatment to the final treatment (Mdiff=-4.52, P=.005), whereas no significant change was seen in the saline group (Mdiff=-1.50, P=.13). Conclusion SPG blockade with bupivacaine delivered repetitively for 6 weeks with the Tx360 device demonstrates promise as an acute treatment of headache in some subjects with CM. Statistically significant headache relief is noted at 15 and 30 minutes and sustained at 24 hours for SPG blockade with bupivacaine vs saline. The Tx360 device was simple to use and not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on sphenopalatine ganglion blockade is warranted. To determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360(®) are superior in reducing pain associated with chronic migraine (CM) compared with saline. The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. From an anatomical and physiological perspective, SPG blockade may be an effective acute and preventative treatment for CM. This was a double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. Up to 41 subjects could be enrolled at 2 headache specialty clinics in the US. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by the second edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders appendix definition. They were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28-day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer-generated lists of 2:1 to receive 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively. The primary end-point was to compare numeric rating scale scores at pretreatment baseline vs 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 24 hours postprocedure for all 12 treatments. SPG blockade was accomplished with the Tx360(®) , which allows a small flexible soft plastic tube that is advanced below the middle turbinate just past the pterygopalatine fossa into the intranasal space. A 0.3 cc of anesthetic or saline was injected into the mucosa covering the SPG. The procedure is performed similarly in each nostril. The active phase of the study consisted of a series of 12 SPG blocks with 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline provided 2 times per week for 6 weeks. Subjects were re-evaluated at 1 and 6 months postfinal procedure. The final dataset included 38 subjects, 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. A repeated measures analysis of variance showed that subjects receiving treatment with bupivacaine experienced a significant reduction in the numeric rating scale scores compared with those receiving saline at baseline (M=3.78 vs M=3.18, P=.10), 15 minutes (M=3.51 vs M=2.53, P<.001), 30 minutes (M=3.45 vs M=2.41, P<.001), and 24 hours after treatment (M=4.20 vs M=2.85, P<.001), respectively. Headache Impact Test-6 scores were statistically significantly decreased in subjects receiving treatments with bupivacaine from before treatment to the final treatment (Mdiff = -4.52, P=.005), whereas no significant change was seen in the saline group (Mdiff = -1.50, P=.13). SPG blockade with bupivacaine delivered repetitively for 6 weeks with the Tx360(®) device demonstrates promise as an acute treatment of headache in some subjects with CM. Statistically significant headache relief is noted at 15 and 30 minutes and sustained at 24 hours for SPG blockade with bupivacaine vs saline. The Tx360(®) device was simple to use and not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on sphenopalatine ganglion blockade is warranted. To determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360(®) are superior in reducing pain associated with chronic migraine (CM) compared with saline.OBJECTIVETo determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360(®) are superior in reducing pain associated with chronic migraine (CM) compared with saline.The SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. From an anatomical and physiological perspective, SPG blockade may be an effective acute and preventative treatment for CM.BACKGROUNDThe SPG is a small concentrated structure of neuronal tissue that resides within the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) in close proximity to the sphenopalatine foramen and is innervated by the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve. From an anatomical and physiological perspective, SPG blockade may be an effective acute and preventative treatment for CM.This was a double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. Up to 41 subjects could be enrolled at 2 headache specialty clinics in the US. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by the second edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders appendix definition. They were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28-day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer-generated lists of 2:1 to receive 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively. The primary end-point was to compare numeric rating scale scores at pretreatment baseline vs 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 24 hours postprocedure for all 12 treatments. SPG blockade was accomplished with the Tx360(®) , which allows a small flexible soft plastic tube that is advanced below the middle turbinate just past the pterygopalatine fossa into the intranasal space. A 0.3 cc of anesthetic or saline was injected into the mucosa covering the SPG. The procedure is performed similarly in each nostril. The active phase of the study consisted of a series of 12 SPG blocks with 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline provided 2 times per week for 6 weeks. Subjects were re-evaluated at 1 and 6 months postfinal procedure.METHODThis was a double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot study using a novel intervention for acute treatment in CM. Up to 41 subjects could be enrolled at 2 headache specialty clinics in the US. Eligible subjects were between 18 and 80 years of age and had a history of CM defined by the second edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders appendix definition. They were allowed a stable dose of migraine preventive medications that was maintained throughout the study. Following a 28-day baseline period, subjects were randomized by computer-generated lists of 2:1 to receive 0.5% bupivacaine or saline, respectively. The primary end-point was to compare numeric rating scale scores at pretreatment baseline vs 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 24 hours postprocedure for all 12 treatments. SPG blockade was accomplished with the Tx360(®) , which allows a small flexible soft plastic tube that is advanced below the middle turbinate just past the pterygopalatine fossa into the intranasal space. A 0.3 cc of anesthetic or saline was injected into the mucosa covering the SPG. The procedure is performed similarly in each nostril. The active phase of the study consisted of a series of 12 SPG blocks with 0.3 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine or saline provided 2 times per week for 6 weeks. Subjects were re-evaluated at 1 and 6 months postfinal procedure.The final dataset included 38 subjects, 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. A repeated measures analysis of variance showed that subjects receiving treatment with bupivacaine experienced a significant reduction in the numeric rating scale scores compared with those receiving saline at baseline (M=3.78 vs M=3.18, P=.10), 15 minutes (M=3.51 vs M=2.53, P<.001), 30 minutes (M=3.45 vs M=2.41, P<.001), and 24 hours after treatment (M=4.20 vs M=2.85, P<.001), respectively. Headache Impact Test-6 scores were statistically significantly decreased in subjects receiving treatments with bupivacaine from before treatment to the final treatment (Mdiff = -4.52, P=.005), whereas no significant change was seen in the saline group (Mdiff = -1.50, P=.13).RESULTSThe final dataset included 38 subjects, 26 in the bupivacaine group and 12 in the saline group. A repeated measures analysis of variance showed that subjects receiving treatment with bupivacaine experienced a significant reduction in the numeric rating scale scores compared with those receiving saline at baseline (M=3.78 vs M=3.18, P=.10), 15 minutes (M=3.51 vs M=2.53, P<.001), 30 minutes (M=3.45 vs M=2.41, P<.001), and 24 hours after treatment (M=4.20 vs M=2.85, P<.001), respectively. Headache Impact Test-6 scores were statistically significantly decreased in subjects receiving treatments with bupivacaine from before treatment to the final treatment (Mdiff = -4.52, P=.005), whereas no significant change was seen in the saline group (Mdiff = -1.50, P=.13).SPG blockade with bupivacaine delivered repetitively for 6 weeks with the Tx360(®) device demonstrates promise as an acute treatment of headache in some subjects with CM. Statistically significant headache relief is noted at 15 and 30 minutes and sustained at 24 hours for SPG blockade with bupivacaine vs saline. The Tx360(®) device was simple to use and not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on sphenopalatine ganglion blockade is warranted.CONCLUSIONSPG blockade with bupivacaine delivered repetitively for 6 weeks with the Tx360(®) device demonstrates promise as an acute treatment of headache in some subjects with CM. Statistically significant headache relief is noted at 15 and 30 minutes and sustained at 24 hours for SPG blockade with bupivacaine vs saline. The Tx360(®) device was simple to use and not associated with any significant or lasting adverse events. Further research on sphenopalatine ganglion blockade is warranted. |
Author | Manley, Heather R. Dexter, Kent Cady, Roger Saper, Joel |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Roger surname: Cady fullname: Cady, Roger email: rcady@headachecare.com organization: Headache Care Center, MO, Springfield, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Joel surname: Saper fullname: Saper, Joel organization: Michigan Head Pain and Neurological Institute, MI, Ann Arbor, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Kent surname: Dexter fullname: Dexter, Kent organization: Headache Care Center, MO, Springfield, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Heather R. surname: Manley fullname: Manley, Heather R. organization: Clinvest, MO, Springfield, USA |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25338927$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpdkt9O2zAUxq2JaRS2mz3AZGk3XCzMjv8kuZlUCpRJlKHRjUvLSU5ag2t3iQP0SXiLPcSebC5l1Tbf2NL5fd_5bJ89tOO8A4TeUnJI4_o4B10f0pSL_AUaUJHKhEtKdtCAEJolecbzXbTXdTeEEC4L-QrtpoKxvEizAXoc4mPflxaSI2tc_QFfWl1B6ZORd6H11kKNr0Jfr7Bv8FdYQjDB3AGettp1Tnfa4qvlHJxfaquDcYDH2s2s8Q4fWV_d6hrwtQlzPH1gkvz6iXWHh1Uf1g6gwwJcwI1v8WjeemcqPDGzVkeb1-hlo20Hb573ffTt9GQ6OkvOv4w_j4bnieGU5EmRNqXMgXEta5lSXdSFoExnpYAm53VNOaQUBKGFpqQBYKwgtJQ1Z1RQQSq2jz5tfJd9uYC6inlabdWyNQvdrpTXRv1bcWauZv5OcZaSTMhocPBs0PofPXRBLUxXgbXage87RaVIY9O84BF9_x964_vWxetFiksRH4iySL37O9E2yp8_iwDdAPfGwmpbp0Stp0Gtp0E9TYM6OxkeP52iJtloTBfgYavR7a2SGcuEur4YKza5-D45zS8VYb8BlNy6CQ |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2014 The Authors. Headache published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society. Copyright © 2015 American Headache Society 2014 The Authors. Headache published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society. 2014 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2014 The Authors. Headache published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society. – notice: Copyright © 2015 American Headache Society – notice: 2014 The Authors. Headache published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society. 2014 |
DBID | BSCLL 24P CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7TK 7U7 C1K K9. 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1111/head.12458 |
DatabaseName | Istex Wiley Online Library Open Access - NZ Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Neurosciences Abstracts Toxicology Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Toxicology Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Online Library Open Access url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1526-4610 |
EndPage | 116 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC4320756 3562155331 25338927 HEAD12458 ark_67375_WNG_3MNVMF8P_0 |
Genre | article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Tian Medical Inc. |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29I 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5HH 5LA 5RE 5VS 66C 6PF 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHQN AAIPD AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AAQQT AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIVO ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFEBI AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHMBA AI. AIACR AIDQK AIDYY AIQQE AITYG AIURR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CAG COF D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBS ECV EJD EMOBN EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC FYBCS G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO L7B LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TEORI UB1 VH1 W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOW WQ9 WQJ WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 YFH YUY ZGI ZXP ZZTAW ~IA ~WT 24P AAHHS ACCFJ ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AFPWT AIWBW AJBDE ESX WRC YCJ CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7TK 7U7 C1K K9. 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-i4108-92fb68e34a6d621a9d9513a7b5ef84dd14e21e5019a10fee33901b6d4315150c3 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0017-8748 1526-4610 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:11:18 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 11:34:10 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 19:50:22 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:07:13 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:51:56 EST 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:19:17 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | sphenopalatine ganglion block chronic migraine preventive treatment Tx360 acute treatment |
Language | English |
License | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2014 The Authors. Headache published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-i4108-92fb68e34a6d621a9d9513a7b5ef84dd14e21e5019a10fee33901b6d4315150c3 |
Notes | ArticleID:HEAD12458 Tian Medical Inc. ark:/67375/WNG-3MNVMF8P-0 istex:4A8A8456D9E2EBF26DC61ECE617AE17C1979B748 ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01709708). Dr. Kent Dexter and Heather Manley have nothing to disclose. Trial Registration Conflict of Interest Dr. Roger Cady currently serves on several advisory boards: Allergan, Astellas, MAP Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co, Inc., Novartis, Ortho‐McNeil Neurologics, and Zogenix. He also receives research grants from Allergan, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck & Co, Inc., OptiNose, PuraMed Bioscience, Tian Medical, LLC, and Zogenix. Dr. Cady provided consulting services for Allergan, Astellas, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck & Co., Inc., and Ortho‐McNeil Neurologics. Dr. Joel Saper receives research grants from Achelios, Alder, Allergan, Amgen, Astellas, Astrazeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Electrocore, Innovative Medical Concepts, Labrys Biologics, Neuraxon, Novartis, Optinose, Osmotica, Pfizer Inc., Tian Medical, and Vanda & Winston Laboratories. Study approved by Sterling Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee. Dr. Saper's consultant/honorarium is from Allergan, NuPathe, Johnson & Johnson (Ethicon), Purdue Pharma, Supernus, Medscape, Tian Medical, and Migraine Research Foundation. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 Trial Registration: http//ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01709708). Financial Support: This research study supported by a grant from Tian Medical Inc., Lombard, IL. Conflict of Interest: Dr. Roger Cady currently serves on several advisory boards: Allergan, Astellas, MAP Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co, Inc., Novartis, Ortho-McNeil Neurologics, and Zogenix. He also receives research grants from Allergan, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck & Co, Inc., OptiNose, PuraMed Bioscience, Tian Medical, LLC, and Zogenix. Dr. Cady provided consulting services for Allergan, Astellas, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck & Co., Inc., and Ortho-McNeil Neurologics. |
ORCID | 0000-0003-4081-8395 |
OpenAccessLink | https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fhead.12458 |
PMID | 25338927 |
PQID | 1646536013 |
PQPubID | 24968 |
PageCount | 16 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4320756 proquest_miscellaneous_1652390894 proquest_journals_1646536013 pubmed_primary_25338927 wiley_primary_10_1111_head_12458_HEAD12458 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_3MNVMF8P_0 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | January 2015 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2015 text: January 2015 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Mt. Royal – name: Oxford, UK |
PublicationTitle | Headache |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc – name: BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
References | Cady RK, Schreiber CP, Farmer KU. Understanding the patient with migraine: The evolution from episodic headache to chronic neurological disease. Headache. 2004;44:426-435. Hazard E, Muakata J, Bigal ME, Rupnow MFT, Lipton RB. The burden of migraine in the United States: Current and emerging perspectives on disease management and economic analysis. Value Health. 2009;12:55-64. Maizels M, Geiger AM. Intranasal lidocaine for migraine: A randomized trial and open-label followup. Headache. 1999;39:543-551. Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Jensen R, et al. The global burden of headache: A documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia. 2007;27:193-210. Paemeleire K, Goodman AM. Results of a patient survey for an implantable neurostimulator to treat migraine headaches. J Headache Pain. 2012;13:239-241. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013;33:629-808. Blanda M, Rench T, Gerson LW, Weigand JV. Intranasal lidocaine for the treatment of migraine headache: A randomized, controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:337-342. Headache Classification Committee, Olesen J, Bousser MG, et al. New appendix criteria open for a broader concept of chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2006;26:742-746. Katsarava Z, Schneeweiss S, Kurth T, et al. Incidence and predictors for chronicity of headache in patients with episodic migraine. Neurology. 2004;62:788-790. Candido KD, Massey ST, Sauer R, Darabad RR, Knezevic NN. A novel revision to the classical transnasal topical sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of headache and facial pain. Pain Physician. 2013;16:E769-E778. Ansarinia M, Rezai A, Tepper SJ, et al. Electrical stimulation of sphenopalatine ganglion for acute treatment of cluster headaches. Headache. 2010;50:1164-1174. Piagkou M, Demesticha T, Troupis T, et al. The pterygopalatine ganglion and its role in various pain syndromes: From anatomy to clinical practice. Pain Pract. 2012;12:399-412. Schoenen J, Jensen RH, Lantéri-Minet M, et al. Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for cluster headache treatment. Pathway CH-1: A randomized, sham-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2013;33:816-830. Syed MI, Shaikh A. Radiology of Non-Spinal Pain Procedures: A Guide for the Interventionalist. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2011:5-6. Kudrow L, Kudrow DB, Sandweiss JH. Rapid and sustained relief of migraine attacks with intranasal lidocaine: Preliminary findings. Headache. 1995;35:79-82. Cady R, O'Carroll P, Dexter K, Freitag F, Shade C. SumaRT/Nap vs naproxen sodium in treatment and disease modification of migraine: A pilot study. Headache. 2013;54:67-79. Yang I, Oraee S. A novel approach to transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion injection. Pain Physician. 2006;9:131-134. Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, Ramadan N, International Headache Society Clinical Trials Subcommittee, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: Third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia. 2012;32:6-38. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(Suppl. 1):1-160. Lipton RB, Bigal ME. Ten lessons on the epidemiology of migraine. Headache. 2007;47(Suppl. 1):S2-S9. Narouze S, Kapural L, Casanova J, Mekhail N. Sphenopalatine ganglion radiofrequency ablation for the management of chronic cluster headache. Headache. 2009;49:571-577. Tepper SJ, Rezai A, Narouze S, Steiner C, Mohajer P, Ansarinia M. Acute treatment of intractable migraine with sphenopalatine ganglion electrical stimulation. Headache. 2009;49:983-989. 2009; 12 2004; 44 2004; 62 2013; 16 2013; 33 2011 2013; 54 1999; 39 1995; 35 2006; 9 2006; 26 2004; 24 2001; 8 2008 2012; 13 2012; 12 2009; 49 2012; 32 2007; 47 2010; 50 2007; 27 19486173 - Headache. 2009 Jul;49(7):983-9 23314784 - Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(10):816-30 11279969 - Headache. 1999 Sep;39(8):543-51 15007133 - Neurology. 2004 Mar 9;62(5):788-90 20438584 - Headache. 2010 Jul;50(7):1164-74 16703973 - Pain Physician. 2006 Apr;9(2):131-4 22384463 - Cephalalgia. 2012 Jan;32(1):6-38 14979299 - Cephalalgia. 2004;24 Suppl 1:9-160 18783451 - Headache. 2009 Apr;49(4):571-7 18671771 - Value Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):55-64 16686915 - Cephalalgia. 2006 Jun;26(6):742-6 17425705 - Headache. 2007 Apr;47 Suppl 1:S2-9 21956040 - Pain Pract. 2012 Jun;12(5):399-412 11282668 - Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Apr;8(4):337-42 17381554 - Cephalalgia. 2007 Mar;27(3):193-210 22395639 - J Headache Pain. 2012 Apr;13(3):239-41 7737865 - Headache. 1995 Feb;35(2):79-82 15147250 - Headache. 2004 May;44(5):426-35 24021029 - Headache. 2014 Jan;54(1):67-79 23771276 - Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808 24284858 - Pain Physician. 2013 Nov-Dec;16(6):E769-78 |
References_xml | – reference: Headache Classification Committee, Olesen J, Bousser MG, et al. New appendix criteria open for a broader concept of chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2006;26:742-746. – reference: Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Jensen R, et al. The global burden of headache: A documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia. 2007;27:193-210. – reference: Schoenen J, Jensen RH, Lantéri-Minet M, et al. Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for cluster headache treatment. Pathway CH-1: A randomized, sham-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2013;33:816-830. – reference: Yang I, Oraee S. A novel approach to transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion injection. Pain Physician. 2006;9:131-134. – reference: Hazard E, Muakata J, Bigal ME, Rupnow MFT, Lipton RB. The burden of migraine in the United States: Current and emerging perspectives on disease management and economic analysis. Value Health. 2009;12:55-64. – reference: Piagkou M, Demesticha T, Troupis T, et al. The pterygopalatine ganglion and its role in various pain syndromes: From anatomy to clinical practice. Pain Pract. 2012;12:399-412. – reference: Lipton RB, Bigal ME. Ten lessons on the epidemiology of migraine. Headache. 2007;47(Suppl. 1):S2-S9. – reference: Paemeleire K, Goodman AM. Results of a patient survey for an implantable neurostimulator to treat migraine headaches. J Headache Pain. 2012;13:239-241. – reference: Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition. Cephalalgia. 2004;24(Suppl. 1):1-160. – reference: Katsarava Z, Schneeweiss S, Kurth T, et al. Incidence and predictors for chronicity of headache in patients with episodic migraine. Neurology. 2004;62:788-790. – reference: Candido KD, Massey ST, Sauer R, Darabad RR, Knezevic NN. A novel revision to the classical transnasal topical sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of headache and facial pain. Pain Physician. 2013;16:E769-E778. – reference: Tepper SJ, Rezai A, Narouze S, Steiner C, Mohajer P, Ansarinia M. Acute treatment of intractable migraine with sphenopalatine ganglion electrical stimulation. Headache. 2009;49:983-989. – reference: Maizels M, Geiger AM. Intranasal lidocaine for migraine: A randomized trial and open-label followup. Headache. 1999;39:543-551. – reference: Kudrow L, Kudrow DB, Sandweiss JH. Rapid and sustained relief of migraine attacks with intranasal lidocaine: Preliminary findings. Headache. 1995;35:79-82. – reference: Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013;33:629-808. – reference: Narouze S, Kapural L, Casanova J, Mekhail N. Sphenopalatine ganglion radiofrequency ablation for the management of chronic cluster headache. Headache. 2009;49:571-577. – reference: Blanda M, Rench T, Gerson LW, Weigand JV. Intranasal lidocaine for the treatment of migraine headache: A randomized, controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:337-342. – reference: Ansarinia M, Rezai A, Tepper SJ, et al. Electrical stimulation of sphenopalatine ganglion for acute treatment of cluster headaches. Headache. 2010;50:1164-1174. – reference: Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, Ramadan N, International Headache Society Clinical Trials Subcommittee, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: Third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia. 2012;32:6-38. – reference: Cady R, O'Carroll P, Dexter K, Freitag F, Shade C. SumaRT/Nap vs naproxen sodium in treatment and disease modification of migraine: A pilot study. Headache. 2013;54:67-79. – reference: Cady RK, Schreiber CP, Farmer KU. Understanding the patient with migraine: The evolution from episodic headache to chronic neurological disease. Headache. 2004;44:426-435. – reference: Syed MI, Shaikh A. Radiology of Non-Spinal Pain Procedures: A Guide for the Interventionalist. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2011:5-6. – volume: 16 start-page: E769 year: 2013 end-page: E778 article-title: A novel revision to the classical transnasal topical sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of headache and facial pain publication-title: Pain Physician – volume: 44 start-page: 426 year: 2004 end-page: 435 article-title: Understanding the patient with migraine: The evolution from episodic headache to chronic neurological disease publication-title: Headache – volume: 62 start-page: 788 year: 2004 end-page: 790 article-title: Incidence and predictors for chronicity of headache in patients with episodic migraine publication-title: Neurology – volume: 12 start-page: 399 year: 2012 end-page: 412 article-title: The pterygopalatine ganglion and its role in various pain syndromes: From anatomy to clinical practice publication-title: Pain Pract – volume: 33 start-page: 629 year: 2013 end-page: 808 article-title: The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version) publication-title: Cephalalgia – volume: 24 start-page: 1 issue: Suppl. 1 year: 2004 end-page: 160 article-title: The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition publication-title: Cephalalgia – volume: 13 start-page: 239 year: 2012 end-page: 241 article-title: Results of a patient survey for an implantable neurostimulator to treat migraine headaches publication-title: J Headache Pain – volume: 47 start-page: S2 issue: Suppl. 1 year: 2007 end-page: S9 article-title: Ten lessons on the epidemiology of migraine publication-title: Headache – volume: 49 start-page: 983 year: 2009 end-page: 989 article-title: Acute treatment of intractable migraine with sphenopalatine ganglion electrical stimulation publication-title: Headache – volume: 35 start-page: 79 year: 1995 end-page: 82 article-title: Rapid and sustained relief of migraine attacks with intranasal lidocaine: Preliminary findings publication-title: Headache – volume: 50 start-page: 1164 year: 2010 end-page: 1174 article-title: Electrical stimulation of sphenopalatine ganglion for acute treatment of cluster headaches publication-title: Headache – volume: 39 start-page: 543 year: 1999 end-page: 551 article-title: Intranasal lidocaine for migraine: A randomized trial and open‐label followup publication-title: Headache – volume: 9 start-page: 131 year: 2006 end-page: 134 article-title: A novel approach to transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion injection publication-title: Pain Physician – volume: 54 start-page: 67 year: 2013 end-page: 79 article-title: SumaRT/Nap vs naproxen sodium in treatment and disease modification of migraine: A pilot study publication-title: Headache – volume: 27 start-page: 193 year: 2007 end-page: 210 article-title: The global burden of headache: A documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide publication-title: Cephalalgia – volume: 33 start-page: 816 year: 2013 end-page: 830 article-title: Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for cluster headache treatment. Pathway CH‐1: A randomized, sham‐controlled study publication-title: Cephalalgia – start-page: 5 year: 2011 end-page: 6 – volume: 12 start-page: 55 year: 2009 end-page: 64 article-title: The burden of migraine in the United States: Current and emerging perspectives on disease management and economic analysis publication-title: Value Health – volume: 8 start-page: 337 year: 2001 end-page: 342 article-title: Intranasal lidocaine for the treatment of migraine headache: A randomized, controlled trial publication-title: Acad Emerg Med – volume: 32 start-page: 6 year: 2012 end-page: 38 article-title: Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: Third edition. A guide for investigators publication-title: Cephalalgia – start-page: 315 year: 2008 end-page: 377 – volume: 49 start-page: 571 year: 2009 end-page: 577 article-title: Sphenopalatine ganglion radiofrequency ablation for the management of chronic cluster headache publication-title: Headache – volume: 26 start-page: 742 year: 2006 end-page: 746 article-title: New appendix criteria open for a broader concept of chronic migraine publication-title: Cephalalgia – reference: 24284858 - Pain Physician. 2013 Nov-Dec;16(6):E769-78 – reference: 22384463 - Cephalalgia. 2012 Jan;32(1):6-38 – reference: 16703973 - Pain Physician. 2006 Apr;9(2):131-4 – reference: 19486173 - Headache. 2009 Jul;49(7):983-9 – reference: 22395639 - J Headache Pain. 2012 Apr;13(3):239-41 – reference: 11282668 - Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Apr;8(4):337-42 – reference: 17381554 - Cephalalgia. 2007 Mar;27(3):193-210 – reference: 21956040 - Pain Pract. 2012 Jun;12(5):399-412 – reference: 15147250 - Headache. 2004 May;44(5):426-35 – reference: 23314784 - Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(10):816-30 – reference: 18671771 - Value Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):55-64 – reference: 17425705 - Headache. 2007 Apr;47 Suppl 1:S2-9 – reference: 7737865 - Headache. 1995 Feb;35(2):79-82 – reference: 24021029 - Headache. 2014 Jan;54(1):67-79 – reference: 23771276 - Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808 – reference: 15007133 - Neurology. 2004 Mar 9;62(5):788-90 – reference: 16686915 - Cephalalgia. 2006 Jun;26(6):742-6 – reference: 18783451 - Headache. 2009 Apr;49(4):571-7 – reference: 14979299 - Cephalalgia. 2004;24 Suppl 1:9-160 – reference: 20438584 - Headache. 2010 Jul;50(7):1164-74 – reference: 11279969 - Headache. 1999 Sep;39(8):543-51 |
SSID | ssj0004696 |
Score | 2.400586 |
Snippet | Objective
To determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360® are superior in reducing pain... To determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360(®) are superior in reducing pain associated... Objective To determine if repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine delivered through the Tx360 are superior in reducing pain... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed wiley istex |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 101 |
SubjectTerms | acute treatment Administration, Intranasal - methods Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Analysis of Variance Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage Bupivacaine - administration & dosage Chronic Disease chronic migraine Double-Blind Method Female Headaches Humans Male Middle Aged Migraine Migraine Disorders - therapy Pain Measurement Pilot Projects preventive treatment Research Submissions Severity of Illness Index sphenopalatine ganglion block Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block - methods Time Factors Tx360 Young Adult |
Title | A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Repetitive Transnasal Sphenopalatine Ganglion Blockade With Tx360® as Acute Treatment for Chronic Migraine |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-3MNVMF8P-0/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fhead.12458 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25338927 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1646536013 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1652390894 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4320756 |
Volume | 55 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket) issn: 0017-8748 databaseCode: DR2 dateStart: 19970101 customDbUrl: isFulltext: true eissn: 1526-4610 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0004696 providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LbtQwFLVKF4gNb2igVEZCLBAZxbGdh8RmWjodIWU0gpZ2gyI7duhoqgR1MlJhxSew5x_4CD6FL-FeJxOmwAZ2k4nzPtc-ts89JuSJAZiYKBR-mgjhC2aVn0Zl7DMtVKLDRBcuby2bROMj8epEnmyQF6tcmNYfoh9ww8hw9TUGuNKLtSDHNewH0DpJzPRlXLo52tfhWlKkW5yrrYZjkXTepCjj-XUoUFJ8mxd_45d_yiTX6atrf0Y3yLvVnbeyk_lg2ehB8ek3U8f_fbSb5HpHTOmwRdItsmGr2-Rq1k293yFfhxTItj6zPz5_2YVLmOd0ikPwuoY_9lrB-5k1FIWJH2ldUqD2mMEGtSl1DWKlFnD-N6gpg446SvAqSw8UphHXFd2FRnWujKXHs-aUHl7wKPj-jaoFHRbLBs_Q6eEpkGzaOfrSbPYeV7iwd8nRaP9wb-x3Kzv4M8ECqGHDUkeJ5UJFABSmUgNEj6tYS1smwhgmbMisBPqpWFBay3FkRkcG2A7wr6Dg98hmVVd2i1AmZMGFjmMdS8FKlSZaWMMVbKKPkfTIU_eF8w-te0euzucoZotlfjw5yHk2eZuNkmkeeGR7BYG8i-NFju5rEp6YcY887ndDBOK0iqpsvcQy0JnH6VPhkfstYvqLhcCmkzSMPRJfwlJfAN29L--pZqfO5VvwEOhc5JFnDir9EateG4IkdyDJx_vDl-7Xg38p_JBcA_Yn2_GkbbLZnC_tI2BYjd4hV0Ix3XHx9BOuHCW2 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3NbtQwELagSMAF8U-ggJEQB0RQHNuJc9yWbhdoViuxpb1Z9tqhq1YJ6u5K5cYjcOcdeAgehSdhxknDVnDhlsR2Imdm7M_jb8aEPHegJi5LRVwoIWLBvImLrMpjZoVRNlV2FuLWynE22hfvDuVhx83BWJg2P0TvcEPLCOM1Gjg6pNesHA-xfw3Tk1SXyRWRpQkqdSoma2GR4XiudiDOheqykyKR509bAKX4P8_-hTD_JkquA9gwAw1vkhsddKSDVta3yCVf3yZXy25z_A75PqAAh-2J__X12xb0z72iE3SS2wYebLeU9BPvKFIHv9CmogC-McYMxjsapqzaLOD9H5D1BUtpJMnVnu4aDPRtaroF096xcZ4ezJdHdHrGs-TnD2oWdDBbLfENHWOdAgymXc5dWs4_4RkU_i7ZH-5Mt0dxd_ZCPBcsgTEwrWymPBcmA1EyUziAYtzkVvpKCeeY8CnzEgCiYUnlPUffic0c4BFASMmM3yMbdVP7B4QyIWdc2Dy3uRSsMoWywjtu4BYzDcmIvAgS0J_b_BranB4j3SyX-mC8q3k5_lgO1UQnEdk8F5HuLG2hMT-ahB4zHpFnfTHYCG58mNo3K6wDy23c4BQRud9KtP9YCnhXFWkekfyCrPsKmH_7Ykk9Pwp5uAVPAXBlEXkZtKJvcb6uQiXTQcn0aGfwJlw9_J_KT8m10bTc03tvx-8fkeuA1WTr_dkkG8vTlX8MeGhpnwSt_w35Ogfv |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LbtQwFL0qRarY8H6kFDASYoHIKA_nJbGZPqbDI6MRtLQbFNmx046mSqpORiqs-AT2_AMfwafwJdzrZMIU2MBuMnHe59rH9rnHAE8UwkSFHreTmHObu1rYSVhEtiu5iKUXy9zkraWjcLjPXx0GhyvwYpEL0_hDdANuFBmmvqYAP1XFUpDTGvY9bJ2C-BJc5iF2r4gSvfWWsiLN6lxNPRzxuDUnJR3Pr2ORk9LrPP8bwfxTJ7nMX00DNLgGHxa33uhOpr15LXv5p99cHf_32a7D1ZaZsn4DpRuwosubsJa2c--34GufIduWJ_rH5y-beAn1nI1pDF5W-MdWo3g_0YqRMvEjqwqG3J5S2LA6ZaZFLMUMz_-ORGXYUycNXqnZrqA84qpkm9iqToXS7GBSH7O9cz90vn9jYsb6-bymM7SCeIYsm7WWviydHNESF_o27A929raGdru0gz3hroNVrFfIMNY-FyEixRWJQqbni0gGuoi5Ui7XnqsD5J_CdQqtfRqakaFCuoMEzMn9O7BaVqW-B8zlQe5zGUUyCrhbiCSWXCtf4CYZGQUWPDVfODtt7DsycTYlNVsUZAej3cxPR-_TQTzOHAs2FhDI2kCeZWS_FuATu74Fj7vdGII0ryJKXc2pDPbmaf6UW3C3QUx3MQ_pdJx4kQXRBSx1Bcje--KecnJsbL657yGfCy14ZqDSHbHothFIMgOSbLjT3za_1v-l8CNYG28PsjcvR6_vwxVkgkEztrQBq_XZXD9AtlXLhyaofgJqFieq |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Double-Blind%2C+Placebo-Controlled+Study+of+Repetitive+Transnasal+Sphenopalatine+Ganglion+Blockade+With+Tx360%C2%AE+as+Acute+Treatment+for+Chronic+Migraine&rft.jtitle=Headache&rft.au=Cady%2C+Roger&rft.au=Saper%2C+Joel&rft.au=Dexter%2C+Kent&rft.au=Manley%2C+Heather+R&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.pub=BlackWell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=0017-8748&rft.eissn=1526-4610&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=116&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fhead.12458&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F25338927&rft.externalDocID=PMC4320756 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0017-8748&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0017-8748&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0017-8748&client=summon |