Identifying global zoogeographical regions: lessons from Wallace
Aim When dividing the world into zoogeographical regions, Alfred Russel Wallace stipulated a set of criteria by which regions should be determined, foremost the use of generic rather than species distributions. Yet, recent updates of Wallace's scheme have not followed his reasoning, probably ex...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of biogeography Vol. 40; no. 12; pp. 2215 - 2225 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Oxford
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.12.2013
John Wiley & Sons Ltd Blackwell Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0305-0270 1365-2699 |
| DOI | 10.1111/jbi.12214 |
Cover
| Abstract | Aim When dividing the world into zoogeographical regions, Alfred Russel Wallace stipulated a set of criteria by which regions should be determined, foremost the use of generic rather than species distributions. Yet, recent updates of Wallace's scheme have not followed his reasoning, probably explaining in part the discrepancies found. Using a recently developed quantitative method, we evaluated the world's zoogeographical regions following his criteria as closely as possible. Location Global. Methods We subjected presence–absence data from range maps of birds, mammals and amphibians to an innovative clustering algorithm, affinity propagation. We used genera as our taxonomic rank, although species and familial ranks were also assessed, to evaluate how divergence from Wallace's criteria influences the results. We also accepted Wallace's argument that bats and migratory birds should be excluded (although he was contradictory about the birds) and devised a procedure to determine the optimal number of regions to eliminate subjectivity in delimiting the number of regions. Results Regions attained using genera (eight for mammals and birds and six for amphibians) strongly coincided with the regions proposed by Wallace. The regions for amphibians were nearly identical to Wallace's scheme, whereas we obtained two new 'regions' for mammals and two for birds that largely coincide with Wallace's subregions. As argued by Wallace, there are strong reasons not to consider these as being equivalent to the six main regions. Species distributions generated many small regions related to contemporary climate and vegetation patterns, whereas at the familial rank regions were very broad. The differences between our generic maps and Wallace's all involve areas which he identified as being uncertain in his regionalization. Main conclusions Despite more than 135 years of additional knowledge of distributions, the shuffling of generic concepts, and the development of computers and complex analytical techniques, Wallace's zoogeographical regions appear to be no less valid than they were when he proposed them. Recent studies re-evaluating Wallace's scheme should not be considered updates as such because they have not followed Wallace's reasoning, and all computer-based analyses, including this one, are subject to the vagaries of the particular methods used. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Aim
When dividing the world into zoogeographical regions, Alfred Russel Wallace stipulated a set of criteria by which regions should be determined, foremost the use of generic rather than species distributions. Yet, recent updates of Wallace's scheme have not followed his reasoning, probably explaining in part the discrepancies found. Using a recently developed quantitative method, we evaluated the world's zoogeographical regions following his criteria as closely as possible.
Location
Global.
Methods
We subjected presence–absence data from range maps of birds, mammals and amphibians to an innovative clustering algorithm, affinity propagation. We used genera as our taxonomic rank, although species and familial ranks were also assessed, to evaluate how divergence from Wallace's criteria influences the results. We also accepted Wallace's argument that bats and migratory birds should be excluded (although he was contradictory about the birds) and devised a procedure to determine the optimal number of regions to eliminate subjectivity in delimiting the number of regions.
Results
Regions attained using genera (eight for mammals and birds and six for amphibians) strongly coincided with the regions proposed by Wallace. The regions for amphibians were nearly identical to Wallace's scheme, whereas we obtained two new ‘regions’ for mammals and two for birds that largely coincide with Wallace's subregions. As argued by Wallace, there are strong reasons not to consider these as being equivalent to the six main regions. Species distributions generated many small regions related to contemporary climate and vegetation patterns, whereas at the familial rank regions were very broad. The differences between our generic maps and Wallace's all involve areas which he identified as being uncertain in his regionalization.
Main conclusions
Despite more than 135 years of additional knowledge of distributions, the shuffling of generic concepts, and the development of computers and complex analytical techniques, Wallace's zoogeographical regions appear to be no less valid than they were when he proposed them. Recent studies re‐evaluating Wallace's scheme should not be considered updates as such because they have not followed Wallace's reasoning, and all computer‐based analyses, including this one, are subject to the vagaries of the particular methods used. Aim When dividing the world into zoogeographical regions, Alfred Russel Wallace stipulated a set of criteria by which regions should be determined, foremost the use of generic rather than species distributions. Yet, recent updates of Wallace's scheme have not followed his reasoning, probably explaining in part the discrepancies found. Using a recently developed quantitative method, we evaluated the world's zoogeographical regions following his criteria as closely as possible. Location Global. Methods We subjected presence–absence data from range maps of birds, mammals and amphibians to an innovative clustering algorithm, affinity propagation. We used genera as our taxonomic rank, although species and familial ranks were also assessed, to evaluate how divergence from Wallace's criteria influences the results. We also accepted Wallace's argument that bats and migratory birds should be excluded (although he was contradictory about the birds) and devised a procedure to determine the optimal number of regions to eliminate subjectivity in delimiting the number of regions. Results Regions attained using genera (eight for mammals and birds and six for amphibians) strongly coincided with the regions proposed by Wallace. The regions for amphibians were nearly identical to Wallace's scheme, whereas we obtained two new 'regions' for mammals and two for birds that largely coincide with Wallace's subregions. As argued by Wallace, there are strong reasons not to consider these as being equivalent to the six main regions. Species distributions generated many small regions related to contemporary climate and vegetation patterns, whereas at the familial rank regions were very broad. The differences between our generic maps and Wallace's all involve areas which he identified as being uncertain in his regionalization. Main conclusions Despite more than 135 years of additional knowledge of distributions, the shuffling of generic concepts, and the development of computers and complex analytical techniques, Wallace's zoogeographical regions appear to be no less valid than they were when he proposed them. Recent studies re-evaluating Wallace's scheme should not be considered updates as such because they have not followed Wallace's reasoning, and all computer-based analyses, including this one, are subject to the vagaries of the particular methods used. When dividing the world into zoogeographical regions, Alfred Russel Wallace stipulated a set of criteria by which regions should be determined, foremost the use of generic rather than species distributions. Yet, recent updates of Wallace's scheme have not followed his reasoning, probably explaining in part the discrepancies found. Using a recently developed quantitative method, we evaluated the world's zoogeographical regions following his criteria as closely as possible. We subjected presence-absence data from range maps of birds, mammals and amphibians to an innovative clustering algorithm, affinity propagation. We used genera as our taxonomic rank, although species and familial ranks were also assessed, to evaluate how divergence from Wallace's criteria influences the results. We also accepted Wallace's argument that bats and migratory birds should be excluded (although he was contradictory about the birds) and devised a procedure to determine the optimal number of regions to eliminate subjectivity in delimiting the number of regions. Regions attained using genera (eight for mammals and birds and six for amphibians) strongly coincided with the regions proposed by Wallace. The regions for amphibians were nearly identical to Wallace's scheme, whereas we obtained two new 'regions' for mammals and two for birds that largely coincide with Wallace's subregions. As argued by Wallace, there are strong reasons not to consider these as being equivalent to the six main regions. Species distributions generated many small regions related to contemporary climate and vegetation patterns, whereas at the familial rank regions were very broad. The differences between our generic maps and Wallace's all involve areas which he identified as being uncertain in his regionalization. Despite more than 135 years of additional knowledge of distributions, the shuffling of generic concepts, and the development of computers and complex analytical techniques, Wallace's zoogeographical regions appear to be no less valid than they were when he proposed them. Recent studies re-evaluating Wallace's scheme should not be considered updates as such because they have not followed Wallace's reasoning, and all computer-based analyses, including this one, are subject to the vagaries of the particular methods used.Original Abstract: Global. Aim When dividing the world into zoogeographical regions, Alfred Russel Wallace stipulated a set of criteria by which regions should be determined, foremost the use of generic rather than species distributions. Yet, recent updates of Wallace's scheme have not followed his reasoning, probably explaining in part the discrepancies found. Using a recently developed quantitative method, we evaluated the world's zoogeographical regions following his criteria as closely as possible. Location Global. Methods We subjected presence-absence data from range maps of birds, mammals and amphibians to an innovative clustering algorithm, affinity propagation. We used genera as our taxonomic rank, although species and familial ranks were also assessed, to evaluate how divergence from Wallace's criteria influences the results. We also accepted Wallace's argument that bats and migratory birds should be excluded (although he was contradictory about the birds) and devised a procedure to determine the optimal number of regions to eliminate subjectivity in delimiting the number of regions. Results Regions attained using genera (eight for mammals and birds and six for amphibians) strongly coincided with the regions proposed by Wallace. The regions for amphibians were nearly identical to Wallace's scheme, whereas we obtained two new 'regions' for mammals and two for birds that largely coincide with Wallace's subregions. As argued by Wallace, there are strong reasons not to consider these as being equivalent to the six main regions. Species distributions generated many small regions related to contemporary climate and vegetation patterns, whereas at the familial rank regions were very broad. The differences between our generic maps and Wallace's all involve areas which he identified as being uncertain in his regionalization. Main conclusions Despite more than 135 years of additional knowledge of distributions, the shuffling of generic concepts, and the development of computers and complex analytical techniques, Wallace's zoogeographical regions appear to be no less valid than they were when he proposed them. Recent studies re-evaluating Wallace's scheme should not be considered updates as such because they have not followed Wallace's reasoning, and all computer-based analyses, including this one, are subject to the vagaries of the particular methods used. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
| Author | Hawkins, Bradford A. Rodríguez, Miguel Á. Rueda, Marta |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Marta surname: Rueda fullname: Rueda, Marta email: Correspondence: Marta Rueda, Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA., mruedaga@uci.edu organization: Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of California, CA, Irvine, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Miguel Á. surname: Rodríguez fullname: Rodríguez, Miguel Á. organization: Forest Ecology & Restoration Group, Department of Life Sciences, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain – sequence: 3 givenname: Bradford A. surname: Hawkins fullname: Hawkins, Bradford A. organization: Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of California, CA, Irvine, USA |
| BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27960709$$DView record in Pascal Francis |
| BookMark | eNpdkE9PGzEQxa0KpIa0Bz5ApZWqSr0s-M_aa3NqGxEaFMoFxNHy7s5unW7WwU5UwqdnQhBI-OKx3m_G894RORjCAIQcM3rC8JwuKn_COGfFBzJiQsmcK2MOyIgKKnPKS_qRHKW0oJQaKYoR-TFrYFj7duuHLuv6ULk-ewyhg9BFt_rra3xH6HwY0lnWQ0pYZG0My-zO9b2r4RM5bF2f4PPLPSa30_Obye98fn0xm_yc515oVuSsdlprw0AUVBSg60bypuIaKlcWDS6qGgWGMWOaWpfStIa1qNMavwDDKzEm3_dzVzHcbyCt7dKnGnCHAcImWVYoLXTBlUL06zt0ETZxwO2QkugbSYPUtxfKJXTZRjfUPtlV9EsXt5aXRtGS7rjTPfff97B91Rm1u8AtBm6fA7eXv2bPBXZ82Xcs0jrEt4k750Zy1PO97tMaHl51F_9ZVYpS2rs_F3Yq55MrMZ1aKZ4Ai3KOIg |
| CODEN | JBIODN |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2015 INIST-CNRS Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. – notice: 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
| DBID | BSCLL IQODW 7SN 7SS 8FD C1K FR3 P64 RC3 F1W H95 L.G |
| DOI | 10.1111/jbi.12214 |
| DatabaseName | Istex Pascal-Francis Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional |
| DatabaseTitle | Entomology Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database Ecology Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts |
| DatabaseTitleList | Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Entomology Abstracts |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Geography Biology Ecology |
| EISSN | 1365-2699 |
| Editor | Patten, Michael |
| Editor_xml | – sequence: 4 givenname: Michael surname: Patten fullname: Patten, Michael |
| EndPage | 2225 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 3130894901 27960709 JBI12214 24034952 ark_67375_WNG_F5LCM3FF_5 |
| Genre | article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness funderid: CGL2010‐22119 – fundername: Spanish Ministry of Education and Science funderid: BVA‐2010‐0596 |
| GroupedDBID | -~X .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OC 29J 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHBH AAHKG AAHQN AAISJ AAKGQ AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABBHK ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABLJU ABPLY ABPPZ ABPVW ABSQW ABTLG ABXSQ ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCZN ACGFS ACHIC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACSTJ ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADULT ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUPB AEUYR AEYWJ AFAZZ AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGUYK AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHXOZ AI. AIDQK AIDYY AILXY AITYG AIURR AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ANHSF AQVQM ASPBG ATUGU AUFTA AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 CAG CBGCD COF CS3 CUYZI D-E D-F DCZOG DEVKO DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM DU5 EBS ECGQY EJD F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE G-S G.N GODZA GTFYD H.T H.X HF~ HGD HGLYW HQ2 HTVGU HVGLF HZI HZ~ H~9 IHE IPSME IX1 J0M JAAYA JBMMH JBS JEB JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLS JLXEF JPM JST K48 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG P2P P2W P2X P4D Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K ROL RX1 SA0 SUPJJ TN5 UB1 VH1 VOH VQP W8V W99 WBKPD WIH WIK WMRSR WOHZO WQJ WSUWO WXSBR XG1 YQT ZZTAW ~02 ~IA ~KM ~WT 1OB AAHHS ACCFJ ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AFPWT AIWBW AJBDE DOOOF EQZMY ESX JSODD SAMSI WRC IQODW 7SN 7SS 8FD C1K FR3 P64 RC3 F1W H95 L.G |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-i3814-1ca88891e34034e8cd52db28eba74d3656d6e91199dc8759f91fdb20cacee92b3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
| ISSN | 0305-0270 |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 05:40:53 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:15:36 EDT 2025 Wed Apr 02 07:15:05 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 17:10:49 EST 2025 Sun Sep 28 12:59:34 EDT 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:18:36 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 12 |
| Keywords | bioregionalization Propagation Amphibia Biogeography birds Vertebrata Alfred Russel Wallace Mammalia mammals Affinity Affinity propagation clustering Aves biogeographical regions amphibians |
| Language | English |
| License | CC BY 4.0 |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-i3814-1ca88891e34034e8cd52db28eba74d3656d6e91199dc8759f91fdb20cacee92b3 |
| Notes | ark:/67375/WNG-F5LCM3FF-5 Spanish Ministry of Education and Science - No. BVA-2010-0596 istex:31050B0DE6AA5C03C9ACA77E265D5F753145642D ArticleID:JBI12214 Appendix S1 Familial rank regions. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness - No. CGL2010-22119 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jbi.12214 |
| PQID | 1459536839 |
| PQPubID | 1086398 |
| PageCount | 11 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1468384266 proquest_journals_1459536839 pascalfrancis_primary_27960709 wiley_primary_10_1111_jbi_12214_JBI12214 jstor_primary_24034952 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_F5LCM3FF_5 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | December 2013 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-12-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2013 text: December 2013 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Oxford |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of biogeography |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J. Biogeogr |
| PublicationYear | 2013 |
| Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd John Wiley & Sons Ltd Blackwell Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: John Wiley & Sons Ltd – name: Blackwell – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| References | Parenti, L.R. & Ebach, M.C. (2013a) Evidence and hypothesis in biogeography. Journal of Biogeography, 40, 813-820. Procheş, Ş. & Ramdhani, S. (2012) The world's zoogeographical regions confirmed by cross-taxon analyses. BioScience, 62, 260-270. Smith, C.H. (1983) A system of world mammal faunal regions. I. Logical and statistical derivation of the regions. Journal of Biogeography, 10, 455-466. Whittaker, R.J., Araújo, M.B., Jepson, P., Ladle, R.J., Watson, J.E.M. & Willis, K.J. (2005) Conservation Biogeography: assessment and prospect. Diversity and Distributions, 11, 3-23. Kreft, H. & Jetz, W. (2013) Comment on "An update of Wallace's zoogeographic regions of the world". Science, 341, 343. Holt, B.G., Lessard, J.-P., Borregaard, M.K., Fritz, S.A., Araújo, M.B., Dimitrov, D., Fabre, P.-H., Graham, C.H., Graves, G.R., Jønsson, K.A., Nogués-Bravo, D., Wang, Z., Whittaker, R.J., Fjeldså, J. & Rahbek, C. (2013a) An update of Wallace's zoogeographic regions of the world. Science, 339, 74-78. Cox, C.B. (2010) Underpinning global biogeographical schemes with quantitative data. Journal of Biogeography, 37, 2027-2028. Esselstyn, J.A., Oliveros, C.H. & Moyle, R.G. (2010) Integrating phylogenetic and taxonomic evidence illuminates complex biogeographic patterns along Huxley's modification of Wallace's Line. Journal of Biogeography, 37, 2054-2066. Heikinheimo, J., Fortelius, M., Eronen, J. & Mannila, E. (2007) Biogeography of European land mammals shows environmentally distinct and spatially coherent clusters. Journal of Biogeography, 34, 1053-1064. Morrone, J.J. (2002) Biogeographical regions under track and cladistic scrutiny. Journal of Biogeography, 29, 149-152. Zhang, E. & Chen, Y. (1997) Fish fauna in Northeastern Jiangxi Province with a discussion on the zoogeographical division of East China. Acta Hydobiologica Sinica, 21, 260-266. de Bruyn, M., Stelbrink, B., Page, T.J., Phillips, M.J., Lohman, D.J., Albrecht, C., Hall, R., von Rintelen, K., Ng, P.K.L., Shih, H.-T., Carvalho, G.R. & von Rintelen, T. (2013) Time and space in biogeography: response to Parenti & Ebach (2013). Journal of Biogeography, doi:10.1111/jbi.12166. Sclater, P.L. (1858) On the general geographical distribution of the members of the class Aves. Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society: Zoology, 2, 130-145. Zhang, R. (1979) Physical geography of China: zoogeography. Science Press, Beijing. Wallace, A.R. (1894) What are zoological regions? Nature, 49, 610-613. Wang, K., Zhang, J., Li, D., Zhang, X. & Guo, T. (2007) Adaptive affinity propagation clustering. Acta Automatica Sinica, 33, 1242-1246. Foley, J.A., Coe, M.T., Scheffer, M. & Wang, G. (2003) Regime shifts in the Sahara and Sahel: interactions between ecological and climatic systems in Northern Africa. Ecosystems, 6, 524-539. Holt, B.G., Lessard, J.-P., Borregaard, M.K., Fritz, S.A., Araújo, M.B., Dimitrov, D., Fabre, P.-H., Graham, C.H., Graves, G.R., Jønsson, K.A., Nogués-Bravo, D., Wang, Z., Whittaker, R.J., Fjeldså, J. & Rahbek, C. (2013b) Response to comment on "An update of Wallace's zoogeographic regions of the world". Science, 341, 343. Frey, B.J. & Dueck, D. (2007) Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science, 315, 972-976. de Vivo, M. & Carmignotto, A.P. (2004) Holocene vegetation change and the mammal faunas of South America and Africa. Journal of Biogeography, 31, 943-957. Parenti, L.R. & Ebach, M.C. (2013b) The explanatory power of biogeographical patterns: a reply to de Bruyn et al. Journal of Biogeography, doi:10.1111/jbi.12205. Rueda, M., Rodríguez, M.Á. & Hawkins, B.A. (2010) Towards a biogeographic regionalization of the European biota. Journal of Biogeography, 37, 2067-2076. Gagné, S. & Proulx, R. (2009) Accurate delineation of biogeographical regions depends on the use of an appropriate distance measure. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 561-567. Dyke, A.S., Moore, A. & Robertson, L. (2003) Deglaciation of North America. Geological Survey of Canada Open File 1574. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa. Schmidt, K.P. (1954) Faunal realms, regions, and provinces. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 29, 322-331. Rao, C.R. (1995) A review of canonical coordinates and an alternative to correspondences analysis using Hellinger distance. Qüestiió, 19, 23-63. Mayr, E. (1944) Wallace's Line in the light of recent zoogeographic studies. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 19, 1-4. Sparks, J.S. & Smith, W.L. (2004) Phylogeny and biogeography of the Malagasy and Australasian rainbowfishes (Teleostei: Melanotaenioidei): Gondwanan vicariance and evolution in freshwater. Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution, 33, 719-734. Morales-Castilla, I., Olalla-Tárraga, M.Á., Purvis, A., Hawkins, B.A. & Rodríguez, M.Á. (2012) The imprint of Cenozoic migrations and evolutionary history on the biogeographic gradient of body size in New World mammals. The American Naturalist, 180, 246-256. Kreft, H. & Jetz, W. (2010) A framework for delineating biogeographical regions based on species distributions. Journal of Biogeography, 37, 2029-2053. Voelker, G. & Outlaw, R.K. (2008) Establishing a perimeter position: speciation around the Indian Ocean Basin. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 1779-1788. Cardille, J.A. & Lambois, M. (2009) From the redwood forest to the Gulf Stream waters: human signature nearly ubiquitous in representative US landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8, 130-134. Bodenhofer, U., Kothmeier, A. & Hochreiter, S. (2011) APCluster: an R package for affinity propagation clustering. Bioinformatics, 27, 2463-2464. Cox, C.B. (2001) The biogeographic regions considered. Journal of Biogeography, 28, 511-523. Wallace, A.R. (1876) The geographical distribution of animals, Vols 1 & 2. Harper & Brothers, New York. Rousseeuw, P.J. (1987) Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53-65. Zhang, J.-T., Liu, C.-Y. & Wu, H.-Y. (1989) Studies of the boundary line between Palaearctic and Oriental Regions in central China in relation to the zoogeography of Siphonaptera. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica, 4, 020. Simpson, G.G. (1977) Too many lines: the limits of the Oriental and Australian zoogeographic regions. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 121, 107-120. Frey, B.J. & Dueck, D. (2008) Response to comment on "Clustering by passing messages between data points". Science, 319, 726. Legendre, P. & Gallagher, E.D. (2001) Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia, 129, 271-280. Vane-Wright, R.I. (1991) Transcending the Wallace line: do the western edges of the Australian region and the Australian plate coincide? Australian Systematic Botany, 4, 183-197. Wallace, A.R. (1880) Island life. Harper & Brothers, New York, NY. Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 1991; 4 1989; 4 2010; 37 1944; 19 1880 1997; 21 2010 2012; 180 1998 1983; 10 1876 2013b 2001; 28 2003 2013; 341 1995; 19 1954; 29 2001; 129 2007; 33 2007; 34 1979 1977; 121 2004; 33 2009; 36 2013a; 40 2004; 31 2013b; 341 1987; 20 2002; 29 1858; 2 2007; 315 2013a; 339 2003; 6 2008; 319 2009; 8 2008; 21 2013 2011; 27 2005; 11 1894; 49 2012; 62 |
| References_xml | – reference: Cox, C.B. (2010) Underpinning global biogeographical schemes with quantitative data. Journal of Biogeography, 37, 2027-2028. – reference: Bodenhofer, U., Kothmeier, A. & Hochreiter, S. (2011) APCluster: an R package for affinity propagation clustering. Bioinformatics, 27, 2463-2464. – reference: Rao, C.R. (1995) A review of canonical coordinates and an alternative to correspondences analysis using Hellinger distance. Qüestiió, 19, 23-63. – reference: Wallace, A.R. (1880) Island life. Harper & Brothers, New York, NY. – reference: Esselstyn, J.A., Oliveros, C.H. & Moyle, R.G. (2010) Integrating phylogenetic and taxonomic evidence illuminates complex biogeographic patterns along Huxley's modification of Wallace's Line. Journal of Biogeography, 37, 2054-2066. – reference: Parenti, L.R. & Ebach, M.C. (2013a) Evidence and hypothesis in biogeography. Journal of Biogeography, 40, 813-820. – reference: Voelker, G. & Outlaw, R.K. (2008) Establishing a perimeter position: speciation around the Indian Ocean Basin. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 1779-1788. – reference: Foley, J.A., Coe, M.T., Scheffer, M. & Wang, G. (2003) Regime shifts in the Sahara and Sahel: interactions between ecological and climatic systems in Northern Africa. Ecosystems, 6, 524-539. – reference: Vane-Wright, R.I. (1991) Transcending the Wallace line: do the western edges of the Australian region and the Australian plate coincide? Australian Systematic Botany, 4, 183-197. – reference: Kreft, H. & Jetz, W. (2013) Comment on "An update of Wallace's zoogeographic regions of the world". Science, 341, 343. – reference: Wallace, A.R. (1894) What are zoological regions? Nature, 49, 610-613. – reference: Sclater, P.L. (1858) On the general geographical distribution of the members of the class Aves. Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society: Zoology, 2, 130-145. – reference: Parenti, L.R. & Ebach, M.C. (2013b) The explanatory power of biogeographical patterns: a reply to de Bruyn et al. Journal of Biogeography, doi:10.1111/jbi.12205. – reference: Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam. – reference: Holt, B.G., Lessard, J.-P., Borregaard, M.K., Fritz, S.A., Araújo, M.B., Dimitrov, D., Fabre, P.-H., Graham, C.H., Graves, G.R., Jønsson, K.A., Nogués-Bravo, D., Wang, Z., Whittaker, R.J., Fjeldså, J. & Rahbek, C. (2013a) An update of Wallace's zoogeographic regions of the world. Science, 339, 74-78. – reference: Rousseeuw, P.J. (1987) Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53-65. – reference: Wallace, A.R. (1876) The geographical distribution of animals, Vols 1 & 2. Harper & Brothers, New York. – reference: Simpson, G.G. (1977) Too many lines: the limits of the Oriental and Australian zoogeographic regions. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 121, 107-120. – reference: de Vivo, M. & Carmignotto, A.P. (2004) Holocene vegetation change and the mammal faunas of South America and Africa. Journal of Biogeography, 31, 943-957. – reference: Frey, B.J. & Dueck, D. (2007) Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science, 315, 972-976. – reference: Cardille, J.A. & Lambois, M. (2009) From the redwood forest to the Gulf Stream waters: human signature nearly ubiquitous in representative US landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8, 130-134. – reference: Morales-Castilla, I., Olalla-Tárraga, M.Á., Purvis, A., Hawkins, B.A. & Rodríguez, M.Á. (2012) The imprint of Cenozoic migrations and evolutionary history on the biogeographic gradient of body size in New World mammals. The American Naturalist, 180, 246-256. – reference: Morrone, J.J. (2002) Biogeographical regions under track and cladistic scrutiny. Journal of Biogeography, 29, 149-152. – reference: Whittaker, R.J., Araújo, M.B., Jepson, P., Ladle, R.J., Watson, J.E.M. & Willis, K.J. (2005) Conservation Biogeography: assessment and prospect. Diversity and Distributions, 11, 3-23. – reference: Legendre, P. & Gallagher, E.D. (2001) Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia, 129, 271-280. – reference: de Bruyn, M., Stelbrink, B., Page, T.J., Phillips, M.J., Lohman, D.J., Albrecht, C., Hall, R., von Rintelen, K., Ng, P.K.L., Shih, H.-T., Carvalho, G.R. & von Rintelen, T. (2013) Time and space in biogeography: response to Parenti & Ebach (2013). Journal of Biogeography, doi:10.1111/jbi.12166. – reference: Sparks, J.S. & Smith, W.L. (2004) Phylogeny and biogeography of the Malagasy and Australasian rainbowfishes (Teleostei: Melanotaenioidei): Gondwanan vicariance and evolution in freshwater. Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution, 33, 719-734. – reference: Frey, B.J. & Dueck, D. (2008) Response to comment on "Clustering by passing messages between data points". Science, 319, 726. – reference: Cox, C.B. (2001) The biogeographic regions considered. Journal of Biogeography, 28, 511-523. – reference: Zhang, R. (1979) Physical geography of China: zoogeography. Science Press, Beijing. – reference: Wang, K., Zhang, J., Li, D., Zhang, X. & Guo, T. (2007) Adaptive affinity propagation clustering. Acta Automatica Sinica, 33, 1242-1246. – reference: Gagné, S. & Proulx, R. (2009) Accurate delineation of biogeographical regions depends on the use of an appropriate distance measure. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 561-567. – reference: Schmidt, K.P. (1954) Faunal realms, regions, and provinces. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 29, 322-331. – reference: Smith, C.H. (1983) A system of world mammal faunal regions. I. Logical and statistical derivation of the regions. Journal of Biogeography, 10, 455-466. – reference: Holt, B.G., Lessard, J.-P., Borregaard, M.K., Fritz, S.A., Araújo, M.B., Dimitrov, D., Fabre, P.-H., Graham, C.H., Graves, G.R., Jønsson, K.A., Nogués-Bravo, D., Wang, Z., Whittaker, R.J., Fjeldså, J. & Rahbek, C. (2013b) Response to comment on "An update of Wallace's zoogeographic regions of the world". Science, 341, 343. – reference: Kreft, H. & Jetz, W. (2010) A framework for delineating biogeographical regions based on species distributions. Journal of Biogeography, 37, 2029-2053. – reference: Zhang, J.-T., Liu, C.-Y. & Wu, H.-Y. (1989) Studies of the boundary line between Palaearctic and Oriental Regions in central China in relation to the zoogeography of Siphonaptera. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica, 4, 020. – reference: Rueda, M., Rodríguez, M.Á. & Hawkins, B.A. (2010) Towards a biogeographic regionalization of the European biota. Journal of Biogeography, 37, 2067-2076. – reference: Zhang, E. & Chen, Y. (1997) Fish fauna in Northeastern Jiangxi Province with a discussion on the zoogeographical division of East China. Acta Hydobiologica Sinica, 21, 260-266. – reference: Mayr, E. (1944) Wallace's Line in the light of recent zoogeographic studies. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 19, 1-4. – reference: Procheş, Ş. & Ramdhani, S. (2012) The world's zoogeographical regions confirmed by cross-taxon analyses. BioScience, 62, 260-270. – reference: Dyke, A.S., Moore, A. & Robertson, L. (2003) Deglaciation of North America. Geological Survey of Canada Open File 1574. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa. – reference: Heikinheimo, J., Fortelius, M., Eronen, J. & Mannila, E. (2007) Biogeography of European land mammals shows environmentally distinct and spatially coherent clusters. Journal of Biogeography, 34, 1053-1064. – volume: 10 start-page: 455 year: 1983 end-page: 466 article-title: A system of world mammal faunal regions. I. Logical and statistical derivation of the regions publication-title: Journal of Biogeography – volume: 33 start-page: 719 year: 2004 end-page: 734 article-title: Phylogeny and biogeography of the Malagasy and Australasian rainbowfishes (Teleostei: Melanotaenioidei): Gondwanan vicariance and evolution in freshwater publication-title: Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution – volume: 37 start-page: 2029 year: 2010 end-page: 2053 article-title: A framework for delineating biogeographical regions based on species distributions publication-title: Journal of Biogeography – year: 2013b article-title: The explanatory power of biogeographical patterns: a reply to de Bruyn publication-title: Journal of Biogeography – volume: 4 start-page: 183 year: 1991 end-page: 197 article-title: Transcending the Wallace line: do the western edges of the Australian region and the Australian plate coincide? publication-title: Australian Systematic Botany – volume: 33 start-page: 1242 year: 2007 end-page: 1246 article-title: Adaptive affinity propagation clustering publication-title: Acta Automatica Sinica – volume: 11 start-page: 3 year: 2005 end-page: 23 article-title: Conservation Biogeography: assessment and prospect publication-title: Diversity and Distributions – year: 2003 – year: 1876 – year: 2013 article-title: Time and space in biogeography: response to Parenti & Ebach (2013) publication-title: Journal of Biogeography – volume: 121 start-page: 107 year: 1977 end-page: 120 article-title: Too many lines: the limits of the Oriental and Australian zoogeographic regions publication-title: Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society – volume: 8 start-page: 130 year: 2009 end-page: 134 article-title: From the redwood forest to the Gulf Stream waters: human signature nearly ubiquitous in representative US landscapes publication-title: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment – volume: 29 start-page: 149 year: 2002 end-page: 152 article-title: Biogeographical regions under track and cladistic scrutiny publication-title: Journal of Biogeography – volume: 20 start-page: 53 year: 1987 end-page: 65 article-title: Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis publication-title: Computational and Applied Mathematics – volume: 21 start-page: 1779 year: 2008 end-page: 1788 article-title: Establishing a perimeter position: speciation around the Indian Ocean Basin publication-title: Journal of Evolutionary Biology – volume: 4 start-page: 020 year: 1989 article-title: Studies of the boundary line between Palaearctic and Oriental Regions in central China in relation to the zoogeography of Siphonaptera publication-title: Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica – volume: 27 start-page: 2463 year: 2011 end-page: 2464 article-title: APCluster: an R package for affinity propagation clustering publication-title: Bioinformatics – volume: 6 start-page: 524 year: 2003 end-page: 539 article-title: Regime shifts in the Sahara and Sahel: interactions between ecological and climatic systems in Northern Africa publication-title: Ecosystems – year: 1979 – volume: 40 start-page: 813 year: 2013a end-page: 820 article-title: Evidence and hypothesis in biogeography publication-title: Journal of Biogeography – volume: 31 start-page: 943 year: 2004 end-page: 957 article-title: Holocene vegetation change and the mammal faunas of South America and Africa publication-title: Journal of Biogeography – volume: 19 start-page: 1 year: 1944 end-page: 4 article-title: Wallace's Line in the light of recent zoogeographic studies publication-title: The Quarterly Review of Biology – year: 1998 – volume: 29 start-page: 322 year: 1954 end-page: 331 article-title: Faunal realms, regions, and provinces publication-title: The Quarterly Review of Biology – volume: 36 start-page: 561 year: 2009 end-page: 567 article-title: Accurate delineation of biogeographical regions depends on the use of an appropriate distance measure publication-title: Journal of Biogeography – volume: 341 start-page: 343 year: 2013 article-title: Comment on “An update of Wallace's zoogeographic regions of the world” publication-title: Science – start-page: 303 year: 2010 end-page: 318 – volume: 21 start-page: 260 year: 1997 end-page: 266 article-title: Fish fauna in Northeastern Jiangxi Province with a discussion on the zoogeographical division of East China publication-title: Acta Hydobiologica Sinica – volume: 37 start-page: 2027 year: 2010 end-page: 2028 article-title: Underpinning global biogeographical schemes with quantitative data publication-title: Journal of Biogeography – volume: 2 start-page: 130 year: 1858 end-page: 145 article-title: On the general geographical distribution of the members of the class Aves publication-title: Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society: Zoology – volume: 180 start-page: 246 year: 2012 end-page: 256 article-title: The imprint of Cenozoic migrations and evolutionary history on the biogeographic gradient of body size in New World mammals publication-title: The American Naturalist – volume: 49 start-page: 610 year: 1894 end-page: 613 article-title: What are zoological regions? publication-title: Nature – volume: 129 start-page: 271 year: 2001 end-page: 280 article-title: Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data publication-title: Oecologia – volume: 19 start-page: 23 year: 1995 end-page: 63 article-title: A review of canonical coordinates and an alternative to correspondences analysis using Hellinger distance publication-title: Qüestiió – volume: 28 start-page: 511 year: 2001 end-page: 523 article-title: The biogeographic regions considered publication-title: Journal of Biogeography – volume: 37 start-page: 2054 year: 2010 end-page: 2066 article-title: Integrating phylogenetic and taxonomic evidence illuminates complex biogeographic patterns along Huxley's modification of Wallace's Line publication-title: Journal of Biogeography – volume: 315 start-page: 972 year: 2007 end-page: 976 article-title: Clustering by passing messages between data points publication-title: Science – volume: 339 start-page: 74 year: 2013a end-page: 78 article-title: An update of Wallace's zoogeographic regions of the world publication-title: Science – volume: 319 start-page: 726 year: 2008 article-title: Response to comment on “Clustering by passing messages between data points” publication-title: Science – volume: 341 start-page: 343 year: 2013b article-title: Response to comment on “An update of Wallace's zoogeographic regions of the world” publication-title: Science – volume: 37 start-page: 2067 year: 2010 end-page: 2076 article-title: Towards a biogeographic regionalization of the European biota publication-title: Journal of Biogeography – volume: 34 start-page: 1053 year: 2007 end-page: 1064 article-title: Biogeography of European land mammals shows environmentally distinct and spatially coherent clusters publication-title: Journal of Biogeography – year: 1880 – volume: 62 start-page: 260 year: 2012 end-page: 270 article-title: The world's zoogeographical regions confirmed by cross‐taxon analyses publication-title: BioScience |
| SSID | ssj0009534 |
| Score | 2.4015355 |
| Snippet | Aim When dividing the world into zoogeographical regions, Alfred Russel Wallace stipulated a set of criteria by which regions should be determined, foremost... Aim When dividing the world into zoogeographical regions, Alfred Russel Wallace stipulated a set of criteria by which regions should be determined, foremost... When dividing the world into zoogeographical regions, Alfred Russel Wallace stipulated a set of criteria by which regions should be determined, foremost the... |
| SourceID | proquest pascalfrancis wiley jstor istex |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 2215 |
| SubjectTerms | Affinity propagation clustering Alfred Russel Wallace Amphibia. Reptilia Amphibians Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Aves biogeographical regions Biogeography Biological and medical sciences Biological taxonomies bioregionalization Birds Ecoregions Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genera General aspects Geographic regions Mammalia Mammals Migratory birds SPECIAL PAPER Species Synecology Tropical regions Vegetation patterns Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution |
| Title | Identifying global zoogeographical regions: lessons from Wallace |
| URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-F5LCM3FF-5/fulltext.pdf https://www.jstor.org/stable/24034952 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjbi.12214 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1459536839 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1468384266 |
| Volume | 40 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3dT9RAEJ8QEqMvKiqxgKQkxvjSS_er7cqLilQkwoORyINJ091u4YK5I9xdIvz1zOy25fCJ-DbJTpt2Z2dnZnfmNwBvU2ZY2-Yu0SoViSyyJjFoKZLcMqfQ5hgrqd756Dg7OJGHp-p0BXb7WpiADzEcuJFm-P2aFLw2s2UlN-MR49w3sWYiI9z8Lz_4EuCuCNBRlJzG87RDFfJZPP2T6JDSXP7tcxEpMbKe4dy0oanFPa9z2Xf1xqd8Br_7zw45JxejxdyM7M0_iI7_-V_P4WnnlMafwipagxU3eQGPQpvKa6T2bUc97nqmn1-_hI-hxtfXScUBVyS-mU7POg4SfkxtH3BZf4j_4IaKREzVLHF3eP8KTsr9n3sHSdePIRmjXZcJszXGy5o5IVMhXWEbxRvDC2fqXDYCPcMmc7h5at1YDIN0q1mL46nFVzrNjViH1cl04l5D3KRWN3nRZrXlsuVCM4NxlSy4tVwZkUbwzkumugyYG1V9dUEpaLmqfh1_rUr1fe9IlGWlIlj3ohsYCV8Qgz4ewfY9Wd4x5Bi05amOYKsXbtXp7QwDIUX32eg1RrAzDKPG0TVKPXHTBfHgeEGeTQTvvSSHdw8RlRlXXobV4edvnth4OOsmPOHUc8PnzGzB6vxq4d6g5zM3236J3wKQ3PvX |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB5VRahceFdNKSVICHHJKvFjEyMOQNWwLbt7QK3oBVmx48CqaLdqdyXaX8-MnYQtJ8RtJE-ixOPxfGPPA-BVmpmsaXKXKJnyRBTDOjFoKZLcZk6izTFWUL7zZDocnYrjM3m2Ae-6XJhQH6I_cCPN8Ps1KTgdSK9ruZkNMsaoi_Udfz9HkOgLWyu5y0PxKApPY3na1hXycTzdowhJaTZ_ddGIFBpZXeHsNKGtxS3cuY5evfkpH8C37sND1Mn5YLU0A3vzV03H__2zh3C_xaXxh7CQHsGGmz-Gu6FT5TVSh7alttq26T-un8D7kObrU6XiUFokvlksvrccJP-YOj_gyn4b_8Q9FYmYElri9vz-KZyWhycHo6RtyZDM0LSLJLMVuswqc1ykXLjC1pLVhhXOVLmoOYLDeuhw_1SqtugJqUZlDY6nFl_pFDN8Gzbni7nbgbhOrarzohlWlomGcZUZdK1Ewaxl0vA0gtdeNPoilN3Q1eU5RaHlUn-dftKlHB9MeFlqGcG2l13PSCUG0e9jEezfEuYfhhz9tjxVEex10tWt6l6hLyTpShuBYwQv-2FUOrpJqeZusSIeHC8I3ETwxouyf3fvVJmZ9jLUxx-PPLH776wvYGt0Mhnr8dH08zO4x6gFhw-h2YPN5eXKPUcgtDT7fr3_BlZMAAQ |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB5VRTwuvCsCpQQJIS5ZJbbzMFyA0tCWdoUQFT1UsuJH2lXRbtXuSrS_nhk7CVtOiNtInkSJx-P5xp4HwKs001nbli6RecoTURU20WgpktJkLkebo42gfOf9cbF9IHYP88MVeNfnwoT6EMOBG2mG369Jwc9su6zkejLKGKMm1jdEgWaSENE3tlRxl4faURSdxsq0Kyvkw3j6RxGR0mT-6oMRKTKyucDJaUNXi2uwcxm8eutT34Oj_rtD0MnpaDHXI3P1V0nH__yx-3C3Q6Xxh7CMHsCKmz6Em6FP5SVSW6ajbndN008uH8H7kOTrE6XiUFgkvprNjjsOkn5MfR9wXb-Nf-KOikRM6Sxxd3r_GA7qre-b20nXkCGZoGEXSWYadJhl5rhIuXCVsTmzmlVON6WwHKGhLRzunlJag36QbGXW4nhq8JVOMs3XYHU6m7onENvUSFtWbdEYJlrGZabRsRIVM4blmqcRvPaSUWeh6IZqzk8pBq3M1Y_xZ1Xne5v7vK5VHsGaF93ASAUG0etjEWxck-UfhhK9tjKVEaz3wlWd4l6gJ5TThTbCxgheDsOocnSP0kzdbEE8OF4RtIngjZfk8O7BpdIT5WWodj_ueOLpv7O-gFtfP9Vqb2f85RncYdR_w8fPrMPq_HzhniMKmusNv9p_A1YP_qQ |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying+global+zoogeographical+regions%3A+lessons+from+Wallace&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+biogeography&rft.au=RUEDA%2C+Marta&rft.au=RODRIGUEZ%2C+Miguel+A&rft.au=HAWKINS%2C+Bradford+A&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.pub=Blackwell&rft.issn=0305-0270&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2215&rft.epage=2225&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fjbi.12214&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=27960709 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0305-0270&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0305-0270&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0305-0270&client=summon |