A Comparative Study of Food Intake Detection Using Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Machine

In Machine Learning applications, the selection of the classification algorithm depends on the problem at hand. This paper provides a comparison of the performance of the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for food intake detection. A combination of time domain (TD)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in2013 12th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications Vol. 1; p. 153
Main Authors Farooq, Muhammad, Fontana, Juan M., Boateng, Akua F., Mccrory, Megan A., Sazonov, Edward
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 01.12.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
DOI10.1109/ICMLA.2013.33

Cover

More Information
Summary:In Machine Learning applications, the selection of the classification algorithm depends on the problem at hand. This paper provides a comparison of the performance of the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for food intake detection. A combination of time domain (TD) and frequency domain (FD) features, extracted from signals captured using a jaw motion sensor, were used to train both types of classifiers. Data were collected from 12 subjects in free-living for a period of 24-hrs under unrestricted conditions. ANN with a different number of hidden layer neurons and SVMs with different kernels were trained using a leave one out cross validation scheme. ANN achieved an average accuracy of 86.86 ± 6.5 % whereas SVM (with linear kernel) achieved an average classification accuracy of 81.93 ± 9.22 %. Data collected from an independent subject in a separate study were used to evaluate the performance of these classifiers in-terms of the number of meals detected per day resulting in an accuracy of 72.72% for ANN and 63.63% for SVM. The results suggest that ANN may perform better than SVM for this specific problem.
DOI:10.1109/ICMLA.2013.33