Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and c-reactive protein <2 mg/l : An analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial

The aim of this research was to compare relative efficacy of different statin regimens in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and C-reactive protein (CRP) reduction. While secondary prevention guidelines for statin therapy suggest lowering LDL-C levels <70 mg/d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 45; no. 10; pp. 1644 - 1648
Main Authors RIDKER, Paul M, MORROW, David A, ROSE, Lynda M, RIFAI, Nader, CANNON, Christopher P, BRAUNWALD, Eugene
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Science 17.05.2005
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.080

Cover

Abstract The aim of this research was to compare relative efficacy of different statin regimens in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and C-reactive protein (CRP) reduction. While secondary prevention guidelines for statin therapy suggest lowering LDL-C levels <70 mg/dl, we have recently shown that clinical outcomes are improved when CRP levels are also lowered <2 mg/l. We addressed the relative efficacy of pravastatin 40 mg and atorvastatin 80 mg daily to reduce LDL-C and CRP among 3,745 acute coronary syndrome patients. A total of 1,018 participants (27.1%) achieved the dual goals of LDL-C <70 mg/dl and CRP <2 mg/l. After adjustment for age, gender, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and HDL-C, these individuals had a 28% lower risk of recurrent myocardial infarction or vascular death (relative risk = 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 0.99). Of those who achieved dual goals, 80.6% received atorvastatin 80 mg, while 19.4% received pravastatin 40 mg (p < 0.001). Only 11% allocated pravastatin and 44% allocated atorvastatin achieved the goals of LDL-C <70 mg/dl and CRP <2 mg/l, and only 5.8% allocated pravastatin 40 mg and 26.1% allocated atorvastatin 80 mg reached the even lower goals of LDL-C <70 mg/dl and CRP <1 mg/l. The correlation coefficient for CRP measured at 30 days and at end of study was 0.61 (p < 0.001), a value almost identical to that for LDL-C over the same follow-up period (r = 0.62, p < 0.001). While atorvastatin 80 mg was superior to pravastatin 40 mg in terms of achieving the dual goals of aggressive LDL-C and CRP reduction, neither agent brought the majority of patients below thresholds needed to maximize patient benefit.
AbstractList The aim of this research was to compare relative efficacy of different statin regimens in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and C-reactive protein (CRP) reduction. While secondary prevention guidelines for statin therapy suggest lowering LDL-C levels <70 mg/dl, we have recently shown that clinical outcomes are improved when CRP levels are also lowered <2 mg/l. We addressed the relative efficacy of pravastatin 40 mg and atorvastatin 80 mg daily to reduce LDL-C and CRP among 3,745 acute coronary syndrome patients. A total of 1,018 participants (27.1%) achieved the dual goals of LDL-C <70 mg/dl and CRP <2 mg/l. After adjustment for age, gender, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and HDL-C, these individuals had a 28% lower risk of recurrent myocardial infarction or vascular death (relative risk = 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 0.99). Of those who achieved dual goals, 80.6% received atorvastatin 80 mg, while 19.4% received pravastatin 40 mg (p < 0.001). Only 11% allocated pravastatin and 44% allocated atorvastatin achieved the goals of LDL-C <70 mg/dl and CRP <2 mg/l, and only 5.8% allocated pravastatin 40 mg and 26.1% allocated atorvastatin 80 mg reached the even lower goals of LDL-C <70 mg/dl and CRP <1 mg/l. The correlation coefficient for CRP measured at 30 days and at end of study was 0.61 (p < 0.001), a value almost identical to that for LDL-C over the same follow-up period (r = 0.62, p < 0.001). While atorvastatin 80 mg was superior to pravastatin 40 mg in terms of achieving the dual goals of aggressive LDL-C and CRP reduction, neither agent brought the majority of patients below thresholds needed to maximize patient benefit.
The aim of this research was to compare relative efficacy of different statin regimens in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and C-reactive protein (CRP) reduction.OBJECTIVESThe aim of this research was to compare relative efficacy of different statin regimens in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and C-reactive protein (CRP) reduction.While secondary prevention guidelines for statin therapy suggest lowering LDL-C levels <70 mg/dl, we have recently shown that clinical outcomes are improved when CRP levels are also lowered <2 mg/l.BACKGROUNDWhile secondary prevention guidelines for statin therapy suggest lowering LDL-C levels <70 mg/dl, we have recently shown that clinical outcomes are improved when CRP levels are also lowered <2 mg/l.We addressed the relative efficacy of pravastatin 40 mg and atorvastatin 80 mg daily to reduce LDL-C and CRP among 3,745 acute coronary syndrome patients.METHODSWe addressed the relative efficacy of pravastatin 40 mg and atorvastatin 80 mg daily to reduce LDL-C and CRP among 3,745 acute coronary syndrome patients.A total of 1,018 participants (27.1%) achieved the dual goals of LDL-C <70 mg/dl and CRP <2 mg/l. After adjustment for age, gender, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and HDL-C, these individuals had a 28% lower risk of recurrent myocardial infarction or vascular death (relative risk = 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 0.99). Of those who achieved dual goals, 80.6% received atorvastatin 80 mg, while 19.4% received pravastatin 40 mg (p < 0.001). Only 11% allocated pravastatin and 44% allocated atorvastatin achieved the goals of LDL-C <70 mg/dl and CRP <2 mg/l, and only 5.8% allocated pravastatin 40 mg and 26.1% allocated atorvastatin 80 mg reached the even lower goals of LDL-C <70 mg/dl and CRP <1 mg/l. The correlation coefficient for CRP measured at 30 days and at end of study was 0.61 (p < 0.001), a value almost identical to that for LDL-C over the same follow-up period (r = 0.62, p < 0.001).RESULTSA total of 1,018 participants (27.1%) achieved the dual goals of LDL-C <70 mg/dl and CRP <2 mg/l. After adjustment for age, gender, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and HDL-C, these individuals had a 28% lower risk of recurrent myocardial infarction or vascular death (relative risk = 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 0.99). Of those who achieved dual goals, 80.6% received atorvastatin 80 mg, while 19.4% received pravastatin 40 mg (p < 0.001). Only 11% allocated pravastatin and 44% allocated atorvastatin achieved the goals of LDL-C <70 mg/dl and CRP <2 mg/l, and only 5.8% allocated pravastatin 40 mg and 26.1% allocated atorvastatin 80 mg reached the even lower goals of LDL-C <70 mg/dl and CRP <1 mg/l. The correlation coefficient for CRP measured at 30 days and at end of study was 0.61 (p < 0.001), a value almost identical to that for LDL-C over the same follow-up period (r = 0.62, p < 0.001).While atorvastatin 80 mg was superior to pravastatin 40 mg in terms of achieving the dual goals of aggressive LDL-C and CRP reduction, neither agent brought the majority of patients below thresholds needed to maximize patient benefit.CONCLUSIONSWhile atorvastatin 80 mg was superior to pravastatin 40 mg in terms of achieving the dual goals of aggressive LDL-C and CRP reduction, neither agent brought the majority of patients below thresholds needed to maximize patient benefit.
Objectives The aim of this research was to compare relative efficacy of different statin regimens in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and C-reactive protein (CRP) reduction. Background While secondary prevention guidelines for statin therapy suggest lowering LDL-C levels <70 mg/dl, we have recently shown that clinical outcomes are improved when CRP levels are also lowered <2 mg/l. Methods We addressed the relative efficacy of pravastatin 40 mg and atorvastatin 80 mg daily to reduce LDL-C and CRP among 3,745 acute coronary syndrome patients. Results A total of 1,018 participants (27.1%) achieved the dual goals of LDL-C <70 mg/dl and CRP <2 mg/l. After adjustment for age, gender, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and HDL-C, these individuals had a 28% lower risk of recurrent myocardial infarction or vascular death (relative risk = 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 0.99). Of those who achieved dual goals, 80.6% received atorvastatin 80 mg, while 19.4% received pravastatin 40 mg (p < 0.001). Only 11% allocated pravastatin and 44% allocated atorvastatin achieved the goals of LDL-C <70 mg/dl and CRP <2 mg/l, and only 5.8% allocated pravastatin 40 mg and 26.1% allocated atorvastatin 80 mg reached the even lower goals of LDL-C <70 mg/dl and CRP <1 mg/l. The correlation coefficient for CRP measured at 30 days and at end of study was 0.61 (p < 0.001), a value almost identical to that for LDL-C over the same follow-up period (r = 0.62, p < 0.001). Conclusions While atorvastatin 80 mg was superior to pravastatin 40 mg in terms of achieving the dual goals of aggressive LDL-C and CRP reduction, neither agent brought the majority of patients below thresholds needed to maximize patient benefit.
Author CANNON, Christopher P
MORROW, David A
BRAUNWALD, Eugene
ROSE, Lynda M
RIFAI, Nader
RIDKER, Paul M
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Paul M
  surname: RIDKER
  fullname: RIDKER, Paul M
  organization: Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
– sequence: 2
  givenname: David A
  surname: MORROW
  fullname: MORROW, David A
  organization: Donald W. Reynolds Center for Cardiovascular Research, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Lynda M
  surname: ROSE
  fullname: ROSE, Lynda M
  organization: Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Nader
  surname: RIFAI
  fullname: RIFAI, Nader
  organization: Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Christopher P
  surname: CANNON
  fullname: CANNON, Christopher P
  organization: Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Eugene
  surname: BRAUNWALD
  fullname: BRAUNWALD, Eugene
  organization: Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16847309$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15893181$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpdkdtuEzEQhi1URNPAC3CBLCG4261nvT4s6k1VFYhUVFQFbldTrzdx5KyDvQnKg_I-OCEFiSuPZj7__xwuyNkQBkvIa2AlMJCXq3KFxpQVY6JkVck0e0YmIIQuuGjUGZkwxUUBrFHn5CKlFWNMamhekHMQuuGgYUJ-PViPo9tZavveGTR7GnqKY4g7TGOuDFQzul5QHDq6ifg3Wx-zOUCzdHbnhgUdl5Z2W_R0EdCng44PP4vODsmNe-rdJmxiGG3-Y5bB2zTaGDy9Ugely84fLUwRLZpjQ0_wVXWoe_qBXme3Af0-uaP6we_rw_3322I2p_PZl1lRVXSMDv1L8rzPLdhXp3dKvn28nd98Lu7uP81uru-KZQV6LHRdd0xykdekoAbFeM8fhVZghRLAZIdgezQceslrgBqNUlXeZ6OQCSkZn5L3f3Rzrz-2eaJ27ZKx3uNgwza1UulKq3yGKXn7H7gK25hnSS0IJkHWIHWm3pyo7ePadu0mujXGfft0rgy8OwGYDPo-4mBc-sdJXSvOGv4b03akXg
CODEN JACCDI
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2005 INIST-CNRS
Copyright Elsevier Limited May 17, 2005
Copyright_xml – notice: 2005 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright Elsevier Limited May 17, 2005
DBID IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7T5
7TK
H94
K9.
NAPCQ
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.080
DatabaseName Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Immunology Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Immunology Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1558-3597
EndPage 1648
ExternalDocumentID 3242672511
15893181
16847309
Genre Comparative Study
Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
18M
1B1
1CY
1P~
1~.
1~5
29L
2WC
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6PF
7-5
71M
8P~
AABNK
AABVL
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKUH
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABOCM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIUM
ACJTP
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEFWE
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AEXQZ
AFCTW
AFETI
AFFNX
AFPUW
AFRAH
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGYEJ
AHMBA
AIGII
AITUG
AJRQY
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BAWUL
BLXMC
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EFKBS
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FNPLU
G-Q
GBLVA
GX1
H13
HVGLF
HX~
HZ~
IHE
IQODW
IXB
J1W
J5H
K-O
KQ8
L7B
MO0
N4W
N9A
O-L
O9-
OA.
OAUVE
OK1
OL~
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PQQKQ
PROAC
Q38
QTD
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SEW
SSZ
TR2
UNMZH
UV1
W8F
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X7M
XPP
YYM
YYP
YZZ
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
0SF
3V.
6I.
7RV
AACTN
AAFTH
AAYOK
ABVKL
AJOXV
AMFUW
BENPR
BPHCQ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NCXOZ
NPM
T5K
7T5
7TK
H94
K9.
NAPCQ
7X8
EFLBG
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-h218t-844d06357357141703f3b5871e575106da1efac31f634114ac77210997a056603
ISSN 0735-1097
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 07:42:51 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 26 03:25:30 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:39:18 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:10:50 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 10
Keywords Lipoprotein LDL
Efficiency
Analysis
Atorvastatin
Circulatory system
Cardiology
Pravastatin
C reactive protein
Phlebology
Cholesterol
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-h218t-844d06357357141703f3b5871e575106da1efac31f634114ac77210997a056603
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMID 15893181
PQID 1506164168
PQPubID 2031078
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_67828707
proquest_journals_1506164168
pubmed_primary_15893181
pascalfrancis_primary_16847309
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2005-05-17
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2005-05-17
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2005
  text: 2005-05-17
  day: 17
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace New York, NY
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York, NY
– name: United States
– name: New York
PublicationTitle Journal of the American College of Cardiology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Am Coll Cardiol
PublicationYear 2005
Publisher Elsevier Science
Elsevier Limited
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Science
– name: Elsevier Limited
SSID ssj0006819
Score 2.305466
Snippet The aim of this research was to compare relative efficacy of different statin regimens in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol...
Objectives The aim of this research was to compare relative efficacy of different statin regimens in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1644
SubjectTerms Administration, Oral
Aged
Anticholesteremic Agents - administration & dosage
Atorvastatin Calcium
Biological and medical sciences
C-Reactive Protein - metabolism
Cardiology
Cardiology. Vascular system
Cholesterol
Cholesterol, LDL - blood
Cohort Studies
Coronary Restenosis - blood
Coronary Restenosis - drug therapy
Coronary Restenosis - mortality
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Drug therapy
Female
Fluoroquinolones - administration & dosage
Follow-Up Studies
Heart attacks
Heptanoic Acids - administration & dosage
Humans
Hypercholesterolemia - blood
Hypercholesterolemia - drug therapy
Hypercholesterolemia - mortality
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction - blood
Myocardial Infarction - drug therapy
Myocardial Infarction - mortality
Pravastatin - administration & dosage
Pyrroles - administration & dosage
Secondary Prevention
Statins
Statistics as Topic
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
Title Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and c-reactive protein <2 mg/l : An analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15893181
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1506164168
https://www.proquest.com/docview/67828707
Volume 45
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9NAEF6FIiEuiHcDpewBTpGDH2uvK_VSpS0VSoNUJVJu1tpet6lSuyIPBAf-Dz8SiZndtb2BFgFSZFlrZyx7Po9nZ7-ZIeQN55kXZnzPKXxeOIwFuROnoXTCKODY5oG5qSLIjqKTCfswDaedzg-LtbRapv3s6415Jf-jVRgDvWKW7D9othEKA7AP-oUtaBi2f6VjzWRbS-yPDA87U6vlBzCLXgtMFJqVvdjtXZ2bjADRjDI1qnpFXMzkus6YOsRUkveVKag8rD47h0hvBzd9OLuuVEUHzBHEjrpYXqGa994GA46y4BZyXXNg4JxJoWwo5iCoP8BJvj5nfosrbKW3lHYoY6DIsnbc_2yWGxoIUhrbUO5pVdeSVCT9NkJbd44cfilz0bNqdhe6D_cImdwboY8QV-11pqeOx9U5Ob_ngvEA66tq5m9fGtMexk4QmjFj-3UpyxrjrmXJYRrJbvzE6GjHZf9SZJmJyfl9V7ej2qznPfqYHE-Gw2R8NB1vHtX-A3pHHKd4d8hdn4PrB-a4_61lKEWx6kvT3IzJ-dL0xF8vj6ResYD3utANWW6fMSnPafyQPDB6pgcav49IR5aPyb1TQ-p4Qr7XMKY1jGlVUBvGNHbp1TkFfFELxpSpUdhpYEwBSRRhTBWMUY4FY2rBmFowpvscJb3L5-oSLYSpgTDd9_H4_CmZHB-NByeO6SDiXIDrunRixnIXKy7Cz2MefN2KIA1j7klcbnSjXHiyEFngFRF4cx4TGUw2ca2YC5gYRG7wjGyVVSm3Cc0D8OXCAsS5BRORK1Lw7XMO3q-q5-R1ye7G80-udbWYBA0efEb3umSnVkhibMgiwfqegDQ4p0teN4fBwuOynShltVok4E4iG4F3yXOtxlZ0CLMNcNFf_Fn0S3K_fXt2yNby00q-Ald6me4qwP0EIaHFwg
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relative+Efficacy+of+Atorvastatin+80+mg+and+Pravastatin+40+mg+in+Achieving+the+Dual+Goals+of+Low-Density+Lipoprotein+Cholesterol+%3C70+mg%2Fdl+and+C-Reactive+Protein+%3C2+mg%2Fl&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+American+College+of+Cardiology&rft.au=Ridker%2C+Paul+M&rft.au=Morrow%2C+David+A&rft.au=Rose%2C+Lynda+M&rft.au=Rifai%2C+Nader&rft.date=2005-05-17&rft.pub=Elsevier+Limited&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1644&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jacc.2005.02.080&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT&rft.externalDocID=3242672511
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0735-1097&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0735-1097&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0735-1097&client=summon