A randomized, double-blind comparison of two topical anesthetic formulations prior to electrodesiccation of dermatosis papulosa nigra
Liposomal lidocaine 4% (L.M.X.4 cream, Ferndale Laboratories Inc., Ferndale, MI, USA) has been proposed as a more rapidly acting topical anesthetic than the eutectic mixture of lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% (EMLA cream, AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE, USA) for venipuncture and laser procedures....
Saved in:
| Published in | Dermatologic surgery Vol. 32; no. 1; p. 1 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
01.01.2006
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1076-0512 |
| DOI | 10.1111/1524-4725.2006.32000 |
Cover
| Abstract | Liposomal lidocaine 4% (L.M.X.4 cream, Ferndale Laboratories Inc., Ferndale, MI, USA) has been proposed as a more rapidly acting topical anesthetic than the eutectic mixture of lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% (EMLA cream, AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE, USA) for venipuncture and laser procedures. However, their anesthetic efficacy has not been previously compared for electrosurgical destruction of superficial skin lesions.
To test the hypothesis that L.M.X.4 and EMLA differ in anesthetic efficacy when applied under occlusion for 30 minutes prior to electrodesiccation of papules of dermatosis papulosa nigra.
Forty adults were randomly assigned to treatment with either agent for 30 minutes under Tegaderm. The study drug was administered for an additional 30 minutes if the electrodesiccation of the first few papules was too painful.
One subject treated with EMLA versus none treated with L.M.X.4 experienced complete anesthesia after a single 30-minute application. Nineteen of 20 (95%) subjects treated with EMLA versus 18 of 20 (90%) subjects treated with L.M.X.4 required only a single application (p = .49). Pain scores after the initial 30-minute application (scale: 0 = none to 10 = very severe) were EMLA 3.3 +/- 2.2 (mean +/- SD) versus L.M.X. 4 2.9 +/- 2.0 (p = .46).
EMLA and L.M.X.4 provide comparable levels of anesthesia after a single 30-minute application under occlusion prior to electrodesiccation of superficial skin lesions. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Liposomal lidocaine 4% (L.M.X.4 cream, Ferndale Laboratories Inc., Ferndale, MI, USA) has been proposed as a more rapidly acting topical anesthetic than the eutectic mixture of lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% (EMLA cream, AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE, USA) for venipuncture and laser procedures. However, their anesthetic efficacy has not been previously compared for electrosurgical destruction of superficial skin lesions.
To test the hypothesis that L.M.X.4 and EMLA differ in anesthetic efficacy when applied under occlusion for 30 minutes prior to electrodesiccation of papules of dermatosis papulosa nigra.
Forty adults were randomly assigned to treatment with either agent for 30 minutes under Tegaderm. The study drug was administered for an additional 30 minutes if the electrodesiccation of the first few papules was too painful.
One subject treated with EMLA versus none treated with L.M.X.4 experienced complete anesthesia after a single 30-minute application. Nineteen of 20 (95%) subjects treated with EMLA versus 18 of 20 (90%) subjects treated with L.M.X.4 required only a single application (p = .49). Pain scores after the initial 30-minute application (scale: 0 = none to 10 = very severe) were EMLA 3.3 +/- 2.2 (mean +/- SD) versus L.M.X. 4 2.9 +/- 2.0 (p = .46).
EMLA and L.M.X.4 provide comparable levels of anesthesia after a single 30-minute application under occlusion prior to electrodesiccation of superficial skin lesions. Liposomal lidocaine 4% (L.M.X.4 cream, Ferndale Laboratories Inc., Ferndale, MI, USA) has been proposed as a more rapidly acting topical anesthetic than the eutectic mixture of lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% (EMLA cream, AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE, USA) for venipuncture and laser procedures. However, their anesthetic efficacy has not been previously compared for electrosurgical destruction of superficial skin lesions.BACKGROUNDLiposomal lidocaine 4% (L.M.X.4 cream, Ferndale Laboratories Inc., Ferndale, MI, USA) has been proposed as a more rapidly acting topical anesthetic than the eutectic mixture of lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% (EMLA cream, AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE, USA) for venipuncture and laser procedures. However, their anesthetic efficacy has not been previously compared for electrosurgical destruction of superficial skin lesions.To test the hypothesis that L.M.X.4 and EMLA differ in anesthetic efficacy when applied under occlusion for 30 minutes prior to electrodesiccation of papules of dermatosis papulosa nigra.OBJECTIVETo test the hypothesis that L.M.X.4 and EMLA differ in anesthetic efficacy when applied under occlusion for 30 minutes prior to electrodesiccation of papules of dermatosis papulosa nigra.Forty adults were randomly assigned to treatment with either agent for 30 minutes under Tegaderm. The study drug was administered for an additional 30 minutes if the electrodesiccation of the first few papules was too painful.METHODSForty adults were randomly assigned to treatment with either agent for 30 minutes under Tegaderm. The study drug was administered for an additional 30 minutes if the electrodesiccation of the first few papules was too painful.One subject treated with EMLA versus none treated with L.M.X.4 experienced complete anesthesia after a single 30-minute application. Nineteen of 20 (95%) subjects treated with EMLA versus 18 of 20 (90%) subjects treated with L.M.X.4 required only a single application (p = .49). Pain scores after the initial 30-minute application (scale: 0 = none to 10 = very severe) were EMLA 3.3 +/- 2.2 (mean +/- SD) versus L.M.X. 4 2.9 +/- 2.0 (p = .46).RESULTSOne subject treated with EMLA versus none treated with L.M.X.4 experienced complete anesthesia after a single 30-minute application. Nineteen of 20 (95%) subjects treated with EMLA versus 18 of 20 (90%) subjects treated with L.M.X.4 required only a single application (p = .49). Pain scores after the initial 30-minute application (scale: 0 = none to 10 = very severe) were EMLA 3.3 +/- 2.2 (mean +/- SD) versus L.M.X. 4 2.9 +/- 2.0 (p = .46).EMLA and L.M.X.4 provide comparable levels of anesthesia after a single 30-minute application under occlusion prior to electrodesiccation of superficial skin lesions.CONCLUSIONEMLA and L.M.X.4 provide comparable levels of anesthesia after a single 30-minute application under occlusion prior to electrodesiccation of superficial skin lesions. |
| Author | Coppola, Carol A Carter, Eric L Barsanti, Franco A |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Eric L surname: Carter fullname: Carter, Eric L organization: Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10032, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Carol A surname: Coppola fullname: Coppola, Carol A – sequence: 3 givenname: Franco A surname: Barsanti fullname: Barsanti, Franco A |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16393591$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNo1kD1PwzAQhj0U0VL4Bwh5YiLFH7HdjFXFl1SJpXvk2Jdi5MTBToRg539joNxwN9yjV3reMzTrQw8IXVKyonluqWBlUSomVowQueJ5kxlaUKJkQQRlc3SW0ishlFWcnKI5lbzioqIL9LXBUfc2dO4T7A22YWo8FI13vcUmdIOOLoUehxaP7wGPYXBGe6x7SOMLjM7gNsRu8np0oU94iC7ETGHwYMYYLCRnzO_zJ8JC7PQYksukHiYfksa9O0R9jk5a7RNcHO8S7e_v9tvHYvf88LTd7IqDqmhhhBSlJapS3DS0lKTSrRBMsLVac6U5aFsCo9woqgmTQqzBNiJ3A3ZtWwF8ia7_YocY3qasUHcuGfA--4Qp1VJJIgSRGbw6glPTga2zV6fjR_3fG_8G83Byyw |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1111/1524-4725.2006.32000 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| ExternalDocumentID | 16393591 |
| Genre | Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article Comparative Study |
| GroupedDBID | --- --K .3N .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1B1 1OC 29F 31~ 36B 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5RE 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8L- 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAAAV AAHHS AAHPQ AAIQE AAJCS AAONW AARTV AASCR AAUEB AAZKR ABASU ABBUW ABCQN ABDIG ABEML ABJNI ABOCM ABVCZ ABXVJ ABZAD ACCFJ ACDDN ACEWG ACGFS ACILI ACSCC ACWDW ACWRI ACXJB ACXNZ ACXQS ADGGA ADHPY ADNKB ADZOD AEBDS AEETU AEEZP AENEX AEQDE AFBPY AFDTB AFEXH AFFNX AFSOK AFZJQ AHQNM AHVBC AINUH AIWBW AJAOE AJBDE AJCLO AJIOK AJNWD AJNYG AJZMW AKCTQ ALKUP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AOHHW AZBYB BAFTC BQLVK BY8 C45 CAG CGR COF CS3 CUY CVF D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DIWNM DR2 DU5 DUNZO EBS ECM EEVPB EIF EJD EX3 F00 F01 F04 FCALG FEDTE G-S G.N GNXGY GODZA GQDEL H.X HF~ HLJTE HOLLA HVGLF HZ~ IHE IKREB IX1 J0M K48 L-C LC2 LC3 LH4 LP6 LP7 LW6 M41 MK4 N04 N05 N9A NF~ NPM NQ- O9- ODMTH OHYEH OIG OLW OPUJH OUVQU OVD OVDNE OVOZU OXXIT P0- P2P P2X P2Z P4B P4D Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIG RLZ ROL RPZ RX1 SUPJJ TEORI TSPGW UB1 UDS W8V W99 WOW WQJ WRC WXI WYUIH XG1 YFH ZGI ZXP ZZMQN ~IA ~WT 7X8 AAMMB ABPXF ACDOF ADKSD AEFGJ AFNMH AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-g791-c5654d07973cb14609af5525287837a3ead4e213c71a026558edb5152ed8df5e3 |
| ISSN | 1076-0512 |
| IngestDate | Mon Sep 08 15:44:52 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:34:27 EST 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-g791-c5654d07973cb14609af5525287837a3ead4e213c71a026558edb5152ed8df5e3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| PMID | 16393591 |
| PQID | 67605506 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_67605506 pubmed_primary_16393591 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2006-Jan 20060101 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2006-01-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2006 text: 2006-Jan |
| PublicationDecade | 2000 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Dermatologic surgery |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Dermatol Surg |
| PublicationYear | 2006 |
| SSID | ssj0012930 |
| Score | 1.7563926 |
| Snippet | Liposomal lidocaine 4% (L.M.X.4 cream, Ferndale Laboratories Inc., Ferndale, MI, USA) has been proposed as a more rapidly acting topical anesthetic than the... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | 1 |
| SubjectTerms | Administration, Cutaneous Adult Anesthesia, Local Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage Desiccation Double-Blind Method Electrosurgery Female Humans Hyperpigmentation - surgery Lidocaine - administration & dosage Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination Liposomes Male Middle Aged Prilocaine - administration & dosage Prospective Studies |
| Title | A randomized, double-blind comparison of two topical anesthetic formulations prior to electrodesiccation of dermatosis papulosa nigra |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16393591 https://www.proquest.com/docview/67605506 |
| Volume | 32 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket) issn: 1076-0512 databaseCode: DR2 dateStart: 19970101 customDbUrl: isFulltext: true dateEnd: 20141231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0012930 providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Ja9wwFBbTFEovoXvSVYfeXBUvkjU-DklDKKSHMoXcBlmS04FkZDw2obn3f_dp8VI6KWkvZpCEZsbv473vSW9B6L0EzOa8zIitVEKo5ooUlBYkrsA-gQOdU3d7fvYlP_1GP5-z89nsxyRqqWvLj_JmZ17J_0gVxkCuNkv2HyQ7bAoD8BnkC0-QMDzvJONFBJZGmav1jT-yVKYrLzUpgTqqEF0eOgxG7TVwTFOH2gBgCr7b7EWXu9j14XB1s7YxhyYKvXGUBhHKgVMqq8RbYyuY1KLuLs1WRJv1RSOmBPfYL3IaNdpOcq7dPUcT2oBY7RsNx85Hpq7Bwx7iT6bnq80WRL_uKbY0YW7XOYVXrTGHMZb8pnvHs80BY16RJn9R70A5KKE8Zf4uKbPZRtPlIKT6yokcyKbNPE5GYzeEIPZT99D9FAyC7fpx_HWoPGZZkC9kEX50yLq0QWC7vt7Wng0b3u6qOMqyfIT2g6-BFx44j9FMb56gB2chmuIp-rnAI34-4Cl68IgebCoM6MEBPXhED56iBzv0wCr8J3rsFiN6cI8e7NDzDC1PPi2PTkloy0EueJEQCS4AVTEveCZLsLNxISrGUgau9zzjIgPVRHWaZJInAhx8xuZalcCaU63mqmI6e472NmajDxCuElZxIeNECUl1JQvJbE-0gmvws1MpDtG7_lWuQOvZqyz4j6bbrnIObjiL80P0wr_hVe2Ls6x6Mby8deYVejji8zXaa5tOvwFm2ZZvHQZ-ARp_eeM |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+randomized%2C+double-blind+comparison+of+two+topical+anesthetic+formulations+prior+to+electrodesiccation+of+dermatosis+papulosa+nigra&rft.jtitle=Dermatologic+surgery&rft.au=Carter%2C+Eric+L&rft.au=Coppola%2C+Carol+A&rft.au=Barsanti%2C+Franco+A&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.issn=1076-0512&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2F1524-4725.2006.32000&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F16393591&rft.externalDocID=16393591 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1076-0512&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1076-0512&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1076-0512&client=summon |