A randomized, double-blind comparison of two topical anesthetic formulations prior to electrodesiccation of dermatosis papulosa nigra

Liposomal lidocaine 4% (L.M.X.4 cream, Ferndale Laboratories Inc., Ferndale, MI, USA) has been proposed as a more rapidly acting topical anesthetic than the eutectic mixture of lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% (EMLA cream, AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE, USA) for venipuncture and laser procedures....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDermatologic surgery Vol. 32; no. 1; p. 1
Main Authors Carter, Eric L, Coppola, Carol A, Barsanti, Franco A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.01.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1076-0512
DOI10.1111/1524-4725.2006.32000

Cover

Abstract Liposomal lidocaine 4% (L.M.X.4 cream, Ferndale Laboratories Inc., Ferndale, MI, USA) has been proposed as a more rapidly acting topical anesthetic than the eutectic mixture of lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% (EMLA cream, AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE, USA) for venipuncture and laser procedures. However, their anesthetic efficacy has not been previously compared for electrosurgical destruction of superficial skin lesions. To test the hypothesis that L.M.X.4 and EMLA differ in anesthetic efficacy when applied under occlusion for 30 minutes prior to electrodesiccation of papules of dermatosis papulosa nigra. Forty adults were randomly assigned to treatment with either agent for 30 minutes under Tegaderm. The study drug was administered for an additional 30 minutes if the electrodesiccation of the first few papules was too painful. One subject treated with EMLA versus none treated with L.M.X.4 experienced complete anesthesia after a single 30-minute application. Nineteen of 20 (95%) subjects treated with EMLA versus 18 of 20 (90%) subjects treated with L.M.X.4 required only a single application (p = .49). Pain scores after the initial 30-minute application (scale: 0 = none to 10 = very severe) were EMLA 3.3 +/- 2.2 (mean +/- SD) versus L.M.X. 4 2.9 +/- 2.0 (p = .46). EMLA and L.M.X.4 provide comparable levels of anesthesia after a single 30-minute application under occlusion prior to electrodesiccation of superficial skin lesions.
AbstractList Liposomal lidocaine 4% (L.M.X.4 cream, Ferndale Laboratories Inc., Ferndale, MI, USA) has been proposed as a more rapidly acting topical anesthetic than the eutectic mixture of lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% (EMLA cream, AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE, USA) for venipuncture and laser procedures. However, their anesthetic efficacy has not been previously compared for electrosurgical destruction of superficial skin lesions. To test the hypothesis that L.M.X.4 and EMLA differ in anesthetic efficacy when applied under occlusion for 30 minutes prior to electrodesiccation of papules of dermatosis papulosa nigra. Forty adults were randomly assigned to treatment with either agent for 30 minutes under Tegaderm. The study drug was administered for an additional 30 minutes if the electrodesiccation of the first few papules was too painful. One subject treated with EMLA versus none treated with L.M.X.4 experienced complete anesthesia after a single 30-minute application. Nineteen of 20 (95%) subjects treated with EMLA versus 18 of 20 (90%) subjects treated with L.M.X.4 required only a single application (p = .49). Pain scores after the initial 30-minute application (scale: 0 = none to 10 = very severe) were EMLA 3.3 +/- 2.2 (mean +/- SD) versus L.M.X. 4 2.9 +/- 2.0 (p = .46). EMLA and L.M.X.4 provide comparable levels of anesthesia after a single 30-minute application under occlusion prior to electrodesiccation of superficial skin lesions.
Liposomal lidocaine 4% (L.M.X.4 cream, Ferndale Laboratories Inc., Ferndale, MI, USA) has been proposed as a more rapidly acting topical anesthetic than the eutectic mixture of lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% (EMLA cream, AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE, USA) for venipuncture and laser procedures. However, their anesthetic efficacy has not been previously compared for electrosurgical destruction of superficial skin lesions.BACKGROUNDLiposomal lidocaine 4% (L.M.X.4 cream, Ferndale Laboratories Inc., Ferndale, MI, USA) has been proposed as a more rapidly acting topical anesthetic than the eutectic mixture of lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% (EMLA cream, AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE, USA) for venipuncture and laser procedures. However, their anesthetic efficacy has not been previously compared for electrosurgical destruction of superficial skin lesions.To test the hypothesis that L.M.X.4 and EMLA differ in anesthetic efficacy when applied under occlusion for 30 minutes prior to electrodesiccation of papules of dermatosis papulosa nigra.OBJECTIVETo test the hypothesis that L.M.X.4 and EMLA differ in anesthetic efficacy when applied under occlusion for 30 minutes prior to electrodesiccation of papules of dermatosis papulosa nigra.Forty adults were randomly assigned to treatment with either agent for 30 minutes under Tegaderm. The study drug was administered for an additional 30 minutes if the electrodesiccation of the first few papules was too painful.METHODSForty adults were randomly assigned to treatment with either agent for 30 minutes under Tegaderm. The study drug was administered for an additional 30 minutes if the electrodesiccation of the first few papules was too painful.One subject treated with EMLA versus none treated with L.M.X.4 experienced complete anesthesia after a single 30-minute application. Nineteen of 20 (95%) subjects treated with EMLA versus 18 of 20 (90%) subjects treated with L.M.X.4 required only a single application (p = .49). Pain scores after the initial 30-minute application (scale: 0 = none to 10 = very severe) were EMLA 3.3 +/- 2.2 (mean +/- SD) versus L.M.X. 4 2.9 +/- 2.0 (p = .46).RESULTSOne subject treated with EMLA versus none treated with L.M.X.4 experienced complete anesthesia after a single 30-minute application. Nineteen of 20 (95%) subjects treated with EMLA versus 18 of 20 (90%) subjects treated with L.M.X.4 required only a single application (p = .49). Pain scores after the initial 30-minute application (scale: 0 = none to 10 = very severe) were EMLA 3.3 +/- 2.2 (mean +/- SD) versus L.M.X. 4 2.9 +/- 2.0 (p = .46).EMLA and L.M.X.4 provide comparable levels of anesthesia after a single 30-minute application under occlusion prior to electrodesiccation of superficial skin lesions.CONCLUSIONEMLA and L.M.X.4 provide comparable levels of anesthesia after a single 30-minute application under occlusion prior to electrodesiccation of superficial skin lesions.
Author Coppola, Carol A
Carter, Eric L
Barsanti, Franco A
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Eric L
  surname: Carter
  fullname: Carter, Eric L
  organization: Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10032, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Carol A
  surname: Coppola
  fullname: Coppola, Carol A
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Franco A
  surname: Barsanti
  fullname: Barsanti, Franco A
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16393591$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo1kD1PwzAQhj0U0VL4Bwh5YiLFH7HdjFXFl1SJpXvk2Jdi5MTBToRg539joNxwN9yjV3reMzTrQw8IXVKyonluqWBlUSomVowQueJ5kxlaUKJkQQRlc3SW0ishlFWcnKI5lbzioqIL9LXBUfc2dO4T7A22YWo8FI13vcUmdIOOLoUehxaP7wGPYXBGe6x7SOMLjM7gNsRu8np0oU94iC7ETGHwYMYYLCRnzO_zJ8JC7PQYksukHiYfksa9O0R9jk5a7RNcHO8S7e_v9tvHYvf88LTd7IqDqmhhhBSlJapS3DS0lKTSrRBMsLVac6U5aFsCo9woqgmTQqzBNiJ3A3ZtWwF8ia7_YocY3qasUHcuGfA--4Qp1VJJIgSRGbw6glPTga2zV6fjR_3fG_8G83Byyw
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1111/1524-4725.2006.32000
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
ExternalDocumentID 16393591
Genre Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1B1
1OC
29F
31~
36B
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8L-
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAAAV
AAHHS
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAJCS
AAONW
AARTV
AASCR
AAUEB
AAZKR
ABASU
ABBUW
ABCQN
ABDIG
ABEML
ABJNI
ABOCM
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ABZAD
ACCFJ
ACDDN
ACEWG
ACGFS
ACILI
ACSCC
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ACXQS
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADNKB
ADZOD
AEBDS
AEETU
AEEZP
AENEX
AEQDE
AFBPY
AFDTB
AFEXH
AFFNX
AFSOK
AFZJQ
AHQNM
AHVBC
AINUH
AIWBW
AJAOE
AJBDE
AJCLO
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJNYG
AJZMW
AKCTQ
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AZBYB
BAFTC
BQLVK
BY8
C45
CAG
CGR
COF
CS3
CUY
CVF
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DIWNM
DR2
DU5
DUNZO
EBS
ECM
EEVPB
EIF
EJD
EX3
F00
F01
F04
FCALG
FEDTE
G-S
G.N
GNXGY
GODZA
GQDEL
H.X
HF~
HLJTE
HOLLA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
IKREB
IX1
J0M
K48
L-C
LC2
LC3
LH4
LP6
LP7
LW6
M41
MK4
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NPM
NQ-
O9-
ODMTH
OHYEH
OIG
OLW
OPUJH
OUVQU
OVD
OVDNE
OVOZU
OXXIT
P0-
P2P
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIG
RLZ
ROL
RPZ
RX1
SUPJJ
TEORI
TSPGW
UB1
UDS
W8V
W99
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WXI
WYUIH
XG1
YFH
ZGI
ZXP
ZZMQN
~IA
~WT
7X8
AAMMB
ABPXF
ACDOF
ADKSD
AEFGJ
AFNMH
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-g791-c5654d07973cb14609af5525287837a3ead4e213c71a026558edb5152ed8df5e3
ISSN 1076-0512
IngestDate Mon Sep 08 15:44:52 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:34:27 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-g791-c5654d07973cb14609af5525287837a3ead4e213c71a026558edb5152ed8df5e3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMID 16393591
PQID 67605506
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_67605506
pubmed_primary_16393591
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2006-Jan
20060101
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2006-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2006
  text: 2006-Jan
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Dermatologic surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate Dermatol Surg
PublicationYear 2006
SSID ssj0012930
Score 1.7563926
Snippet Liposomal lidocaine 4% (L.M.X.4 cream, Ferndale Laboratories Inc., Ferndale, MI, USA) has been proposed as a more rapidly acting topical anesthetic than the...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1
SubjectTerms Administration, Cutaneous
Adult
Anesthesia, Local
Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage
Desiccation
Double-Blind Method
Electrosurgery
Female
Humans
Hyperpigmentation - surgery
Lidocaine - administration & dosage
Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination
Liposomes
Male
Middle Aged
Prilocaine - administration & dosage
Prospective Studies
Title A randomized, double-blind comparison of two topical anesthetic formulations prior to electrodesiccation of dermatosis papulosa nigra
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16393591
https://www.proquest.com/docview/67605506
Volume 32
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket)
  issn: 1076-0512
  databaseCode: DR2
  dateStart: 19970101
  customDbUrl:
  isFulltext: true
  dateEnd: 20141231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0012930
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Ja9wwFBbTFEovoXvSVYfeXBUvkjU-DklDKKSHMoXcBlmS04FkZDw2obn3f_dp8VI6KWkvZpCEZsbv473vSW9B6L0EzOa8zIitVEKo5ooUlBYkrsA-gQOdU3d7fvYlP_1GP5-z89nsxyRqqWvLj_JmZ17J_0gVxkCuNkv2HyQ7bAoD8BnkC0-QMDzvJONFBJZGmav1jT-yVKYrLzUpgTqqEF0eOgxG7TVwTFOH2gBgCr7b7EWXu9j14XB1s7YxhyYKvXGUBhHKgVMqq8RbYyuY1KLuLs1WRJv1RSOmBPfYL3IaNdpOcq7dPUcT2oBY7RsNx85Hpq7Bwx7iT6bnq80WRL_uKbY0YW7XOYVXrTGHMZb8pnvHs80BY16RJn9R70A5KKE8Zf4uKbPZRtPlIKT6yokcyKbNPE5GYzeEIPZT99D9FAyC7fpx_HWoPGZZkC9kEX50yLq0QWC7vt7Wng0b3u6qOMqyfIT2g6-BFx44j9FMb56gB2chmuIp-rnAI34-4Cl68IgebCoM6MEBPXhED56iBzv0wCr8J3rsFiN6cI8e7NDzDC1PPi2PTkloy0EueJEQCS4AVTEveCZLsLNxISrGUgau9zzjIgPVRHWaZJInAhx8xuZalcCaU63mqmI6e472NmajDxCuElZxIeNECUl1JQvJbE-0gmvws1MpDtG7_lWuQOvZqyz4j6bbrnIObjiL80P0wr_hVe2Ls6x6Mby8deYVejji8zXaa5tOvwFm2ZZvHQZ-ARp_eeM
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+randomized%2C+double-blind+comparison+of+two+topical+anesthetic+formulations+prior+to+electrodesiccation+of+dermatosis+papulosa+nigra&rft.jtitle=Dermatologic+surgery&rft.au=Carter%2C+Eric+L&rft.au=Coppola%2C+Carol+A&rft.au=Barsanti%2C+Franco+A&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.issn=1076-0512&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2F1524-4725.2006.32000&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F16393591&rft.externalDocID=16393591
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1076-0512&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1076-0512&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1076-0512&client=summon